Anticipatory Optimization of Traffic Control

Abstract

Traffic control and travelers’ behavior are two mutually influential processes with different objectives. Decisions made in traffic control influence travelers’ possibilities in choosing their preferred mode, route, and time of departure; and the choices made by travelers influence the optimization possibilities for traffic control. This research presents the results of simulation studies and a mathematical analysis of this bilevel optimization problem. Under certain conditions, multiple stable situations are possible, but some of these situations are sensitive to small disturbances by which the system moves away from the original equilibrium state. There appears to be a nonlinear relationship between system parameters and the character and location of the equilibrium situations. The details of the travel time model appear to have a large influence. If road authorities want to optimize traffic control, they have to anticipate the reaction of travelers. This makes the optimization process much more complicated. Iterative optimization, where traffic control is adjusted as soon as traffic conditions change, generally does not lead to a system optimum. Methods are therefore necessary that allow for the optimization of traffic control while taking into account that traffic flows will change as a result of traffic control.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allsop

R. E.

Some Possibilities for Using Traffic Control to Influence Trip Distribution and Route Choice. Proc., 6th International Symposium on Transport and Traffic Theory, Elsevier, New York, 1974.

Charlesworth

J. A.

The Calculation of Mutually Consistent Signal Settings and Traffic Assignments for a Signal-Controlled Network. Proc., 7th International Symposium on Transport and Traffic Theory, Kyoto, Japan, The Institute of Systems Science Research, 1977, pp. 545–569.

Chang

G.-L.

, and Mahmassani

H. S.

. The Dynamics of Commuting Decision Behavior in Urban Transport Networks. Gower Publishing Company, Aldershot, U.K., 1989.

Chen

H.-K.

Dynamic Travel Choice Models: A Variational Inequality Approach. Springer Verlag, New York, 1999.

Watling

D. P.

Modeling Responsive Signal Control and Route Choice. Proc., 7th World’s Conference on Transport Research ( Henster

D. A.

, King

, and Oum

, eds.), Pergmon, Vol. 2, 1997, pp. 123–138.

Pendyala

R. M.

, Kitamura

, and Pas

E. I.

. An Activity-Based Micro Simulation Analysis of Transportation Control Measures. Transport Policy, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1997, pp. 183–192.

Jou

R.-C.

, and Mahmassani

H. S.

. Comparability and Transferability of Commuter Behavior Characteristics Between Cities: Departure Time and Route-Switching Decisions. In Transportation Research Record 1556, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 119–130.

Mokhtarian

P. L.

, and Raney

E. A.

. Behavioral Response to Congestion: Identifying Patterns and Socio-economic Differences in Adaption. Transport Policy, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1997, pp. 147–160.

Poiesz

T. B. C.

De transformatie van een karikatuur; over de ontwikkeling van het consumentenbeeld in de psychologie van de reclame. Inaugurele rede Katholieke Universiteit Brabant, Tilburg, Netherlands, 1989.

10.

Fisk

C. S.

Game Theory and Transportation System Modeling. Transportation Research 18B, 1984, pp. 310–313.

11.

Taale

, and Middelham

. FLEXSYT-II: A Validated Microscopic Simulation Tool. Proc., 8th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS Symposium ( Papageorgiou

and Pouliezos

, eds.), Vol. 2, Transportation Systems, IFAC, 1997, pp. 923–928.

12.

Taale

, and Middelham

. Simulating Traffic and Traffic Control with FLEXSYT-II: Modeling and Simulation ( Snorek

et al., eds.). Society for Computer Simulation International, Istanbul, Turkey, 1995, pp. 335–339.

13.

Taale

, and Scheerder

. The Validation of a Microscopic Model for the Simulation of Traffic and Traffic Control. Presented at 5th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Seoul, South Korea, 1998.

14.

Webster

F. W.

Traffic Signal Settings. Road Research Technical Paper No. 39. Road Research Laboratory, 1958.

15.

Akcelic

Traffic Signals: Capacity and Timing Analysis. ARRB Research Report 123, Victoria, Australia, 1981.

16.

Bell

M. G. H.

, and Grosso

. The Path Flow Estimator as a Network Observer. Traffic Engineering and Control, Oct. 1998, pp. 540–549.

17.

Cascetta

, Gallo

, and Montella

. An Asymmetric SUE Model for the Combined Assignment-Control Problem. World Conference on Transport Research, congres stream C3, Antwerp, Belgium, 1998.