Driver Preview Distances at Night Based on Driver Eye Scanning Recordings as a Function of Pavement Marking Retroreflectivities

Abstract

Pavement marking visibility models and tightly controlled pavement marking field experiments indicate that increased pavement marking retroreflectivity does in fact result in longer pavement marking visibility distances. The authors suggest that drivers should be provided with a pavement marking visibility distance long enough to allow for a preview time of 3.65 s at a given vehicle speed. This minimum required preview distance can be translated into a minimum required pavement marking retroreflectance. Questions were raised that perhaps drivers may not take advantage of brighter pavement markings (increased retroreflectance)—that is, drivers may not be looking as far ahead as possible from a pavement marking visibility point of view. This study was conducted to test whether drivers increase their longitudinal eye fixation distance when pavement marking retroreflectance is increased. Eye scanning data from six subjects were used to establish longitudinal eye fixation distributions on straight and level roads under low-beam illumination at night. In general, drivers appear to adjust their visual information acquisition behavior (longitudinal eye fixation distances and eye fixation preview times) when driving on roads with bright and highly visible pavement markings. Within the range of pavement marking retroreflectances investigated, it appears that, at least for half the drivers tested, brighter markings are indeed better and provide longer preview distances, which is desirable from an information acquisition, information processing, and safety point of view.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Schnell

, and Zwahlen

H. T.

. The Development of CARVE (Computer Aided Road-Marking Visibility Evaluator) a PC-Based Pavement-Marking Visibility Evaluation Software Package. Presented at Symposium on Night Visibility and Driver Behavior, Transportation Research Board, National Research Board, National Research Council, and University of Iowa Center for Computer-Aided Design, Iowa City, Iowa, April 28–30, 1996.

Zwahlen

H. T.

, and Schnell

. Modeling the Visibility of Pavement Markings at Night Using the Contrast Based Computer Model CARVE. Proc., 1996 International Road Federation Asia-Pacific Regional Meeting. Vol. II, The Role of Transportation in Economic Development Asian Highway Investment, 1996, pp. 221–230.

Blackwell

H. R.

Contrast Thresholds of the Human Eye. Journal of the Optical Society of America, Vol. 36, No. 11, 1946.

Visual Aspects of Road Markings. CIE Joint Technical Report 73, CIE/PIARC, Vienna, 1988.

Zwahlen

H. T.

Conspicuity of Suprathreshold Reflective Targets in a Driver’s Peripheral Visual Field at Night. In Transportation Research Record 1213, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1989, pp. 35–46.

Zwahlen

H. T.

, and Schnell

. Driver Eye Scanning Behavior When Reading Symbolic Warning Signs. Presented at 6th International Conference on Vision in Vehicles, University of Derby, U.K., Sept. 13–16, 1995.

Schmidt-Clausen

H. J.

, and Rosenhahn

E. O.

. Criteria for the Visibility of Road Markings, Final Report. Institute for Lighting Technology, Technical University, Darmstadt, 1996.

Hoffman

E. R.

, and Mc Lean

J. R.

. The Effects of Restricted Preview on Driver Steering Control and Performance. Human Factors, Vol. 15, No. 4, 1973, pp. 421–430.

Zwahlen

H. T.

, and Schnell

. The Visibility of Road Markings as a Function of Age and Retro-Reflectivity Under Low-Beam and High-Beam Illumination at Night. Presented at 77th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 11–15, 1998, paper 98-0285.

10.

Zwahlen

H. T.

, and Schnell

. Visibility of New Centerline and Edge Line Pavement Markings. Presented at 76th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 12–16, 1997, paper 97-1166.

11.

Zwahlen

H. T.

, and Schnell

. Visibility of Yellow Center Line Pavement Markings as a Function of Line Configuration and Line Width. Proc., 40th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1996, pp. 919–922.

12.

Zwahlen

H. T.

, and Schnell

. Visibility of New Dashed Yellow and White Center Stripes as a Function of Material Retroreflectivity. In Transportation Research Record 1553, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 73–80.

13.

Zwahlen

H. T.

, Hagiwara

, and Schnell

. Visibility of New Yellow Center Stripes as a Function of Obliteration. In Transportation Research Record 1495, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 77–86.

14.

Zwahlen

H. T.

, Schnell

, and Hagiwara

. Effects of Lateral Separation Between Double Center-Stripe Pavement Markings on Visibility Under Nighttime Driving Conditions. In Transportation Research Record 1495, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 87–98.

15.

Zwahlen

H. T.

, and Schnell

. Visibility of New Pavement Markings at Night Under Low-Beam Illumination. In Transportation Research Record 1495, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 117–127.

16.

Zwahlen

H. T.

, and Schnell

. Driver Eye Scanning Behavior at Night as a Function of Pavement Marking Configuration. Presented at 76th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 12–16, 1997, paper 97-1422.

17.

Connolly

P. L.

Visual Considerations of Man, the Vehicle, and the Highway. SAE Transactions, Vol. 75, 1967.

18.

Zwahlen

H. T.

Driver Eye Scanning Behavior in Rain and During an Unexpected Windshield Wiper Failure. Zeitschrift für Verkehrssicherheit, Heft 4, Verlag TÜV Rheinland, 1980.