In any organization there is a limit on the amount of resources that can be used for risk reduction. By examining strategies for reducing the risk of fatalities on the East Japan Railway (JR East), a framework in which risk-reduction resources can be used well is described. Basic principles of risk assessment are introduced. Various analyses and models to study collisions, earthquake effects, level-crossing accidents, and operating policies regarding natural hazards are presented. The concept of a global risk assessment of JR East is included. The question of perceived versus objective risk is discussed in the context of safety-related investment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarnettA.Not by Chance Alone: The Passenger Safety Record of East Japan Railway. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1997.
2.
BohnenblustH., OdoniA., and SussmanJ.. Perspectives on a Safety Management Plan. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1995.
3.
NasserT.-O., and OdoniA.. A Framework To Monitor the Safety Performance of Transportation Systems. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1996.
4.
SiZ., and SussmanJ.. Reducing Earthquake Risk on the East Japan Railway Through Investment in Safety. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1996.
5.
AnandaraoS., and MartlandC.. Risk Assessment of Level-Crossing Safety in the JR East System. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1996.
6.
PapadimitriouA., and VenezianoD.. Seismic Safety of the Tohoku Shinkansen: Assessment and Enhancement. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1995.
7.
Rimm-KaufmanA. P.Risk Mitigation Models for a Japanese Railroad. Ph.D. thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1996.
8.
IshiharaY., and SheridanT.. Prediction of Human Error in Rail Car Maintenance. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1996.
9.
HoriuchiM., and FukuyamaH.. The Global Risk Assessment in JR East. JR East, Tokyo, 1997.
10.
StarrC.Social Benefits vs. Technological Risk, Science, Vol. 165, 1969, pp. 1232–1238.
11.
LitaiD., LanningD. D., and RasmussenN. C.. The Public Perception of Risk. Proc., Meeting of Society of Risk Analysis, Washington, D.C., 1981.
12.
CrossF. B.Facts and Values in Risk Assessment, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 59, 1998, pp. 27–40.
13.
Waiting for the Big One. The Economist, CONEG, Washington, D.C., Dec.1991, pp. 101–103.
