A stratum of cemented sand can cause numerous geotechnical design problems. Extensive research has been conducted to determine both the properties of cemented sand and their effects on the engineering response of soil. A cone penetration test module was developed at the University of Florida to detect the presence and strength of these materials. After design and construction were complete, the prototype module was field tested in sand without cementation and again at a site with possible cementation. Development, calibration, and field testing of the module are discussed, as are preliminary recommendations for its potential use.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BachusR. C., CloughG. W., SitarN., Shafi-RadN., CrosbyJ., and KaboliP.Behavior of Weakly Cemented Soil Slopes Under Static and Seismic Loading Conditions. U.S. Geological Survey, Vol. II, No. 51, 1981.
2.
RadN. S.Effect of Cementation on Penetration Resistance of Sand. Final Report for Fugro International. Department of Civil Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, La., 1984.
3.
RadN. S., and TumayM. T.Effect of Cementation on the Cone Penetration Resistance of Sand: A Model Study. Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 9, No. 3, 1986, pp. 117–125.
4.
AkiliW., and NabilM. A. A.Cone Penetration Tests on Artificially Cemented Sand. Penetration Testing, ISOPT-1. Ed. de Ruiter. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1988, pp. 607–613.
5.
PuppalaA. J., AcarY. B., and SennesetK.Cone Penetration in Cemented Sands: Bearing Capacity Interpretation. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 119, No. 12, 1993, pp. 1, 990-2,001.
6.
PuppalaA. J., AcarY. B., and TumayM. T.Cone Penetration in Very Weakly Cemented Sand. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 121, No. 8, 1995, pp. 589–600.
7.
DornicS. D.Cemented Sands. High honors project presented to Department of Civil Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla., 1994.
8.
MorganR. A.Effect of Cementation on Cone Penetration Testing in Sands. Master’s report presented to Department of Civil Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla., 1994.
9.
HartD. C.Development of a Modified Friction-Cone Penetrometer for Measuring Strength Reductions in Cemented Sands. Master’s thesis. University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla., 1996.
10.
SaxenaS. K., and LastricoR. M.Static Properties of Lightly Cemented Sand. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 104, No. 12, 1978, pp. 1,449–1,464.
11.
JanbuN., and SennesetK.Effective Stress Interpretation of In-Situ Static Penetration Test. Proc., European Symposium on Penetration Testing, ESOPTI. Rotterdam, Vol. 1.2, pp. 479–488.
12.
DurgunogloH. T., and MitchellJ. K.Static Penetration Resistance of Soils: 1—Analysis. Proc., Conference on In Situ Measurement of Soil Properties, June 1-4, 1975, Raleigh, N.C., pp. 151–171.
13.
SchmertmannJ. H.Guidelines for Cone Penetration Testing and Design. FHWA-TS-78-209. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1978.
14.
RobertsonP. K., and CampanellaR. G.Interpretation of Cone Penetration Tests. Part I: Sand. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1983, pp. 718–733.
15.
CloughG. W., SitarN., BachusR. C., and RadN. S.Cemented Sands Under Static Loading. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 107, No. GT6, 1981, pp. 799–817.
16.
ArslanS.Cone Penetration in Cemented Deposits: A Field Study. Master’s thesis. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, La., 1993.
17.
DavidsonJ. L., and BloomquistD. G.A Modern Cone Penetration Testing Vehicle. Use of In Situ Tests in Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE GSP 6, pp. 502–513.
