Enhancing Transit’s Competitiveness: A Survey Methodology

Abstract

Attracting customers to the bus and subway is an often-discussed goal for transit agencies. Current research methodologies such as travel demand, stated preference, and discrete choice models and opinion research are sometimes poorly suited to determining which types of service improvements, facility designs, or fare policy initiatives will be most effective in attracting potential customers. Drawing on elements of established methods, an approach is developed for use by New York City Transit focusing on travelers’ actual experience of the subway, bus, automobile, taxi, and car service and their reasons for mode choice. Survey questions were developed from focus group findings that New Yorkers actively choose between competing modes on the basis of six major factors, from how long the trip will take to availability of parking. Travelers choose the mode that presents the least difficulty for a particular type of trip. Survey results show that the areas of subway service improvement with the greatest potential ridership payoff are reducing how long it takes to make a trip, increasing the availability or ease of use of transit, and making traveling on the subway a more comfortable and relaxing experience. Two external factors—parking availability and taxi fares—are also found to significantly affect subway ridership.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bowman

J. L.

, and Ben-Akiva

. Activity-Based Travel Forecasting. In Summary, Recommendations, and Compendium of Papers, Activity-Based Travel Forecasting Conference, June 2–5, New Orleans, La., Report DOT-T-97-17, Feb. 1997.

Sun

, Wilmot

C. G.

, and Kasturi

. Household Travel, Household Characteristics, and Land Use: An Empirical Study from the 1994 Portland Travel Survey. In Transportation Research Record 1617, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 10–17.

Lawton

T. K.

Activity and Time Use Data for Activity-Based Forecasting. In Summary, Recommendations, and Compendium of Papers, Activity-Based Travel Forecasting Conference, June 2–5, New Orleans, La., Report DOT-T-97-17, Feb. 1997.

Ruiter

E. R.

, and Ben-Akiva

M. E.

. Disaggregate Travel Demand Models for the San Francisco Bay Area: System Structure, Component Models, and Application Procedures. In Transportation Research Record 673, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1978, pp. 121–128.

Johnson

M. A.

Attribute Importance in Multiattribute Transportation Decisions. In Transportation Research Record 673, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1978, pp. 15–21.

Elmore-Yalch

Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 37: Integrating Market Research into Transit Management. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998.

Elmore-Yalch

Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 36: Using Market Segmentation To Increase Transit Ridership. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998.

Dunning

Mode Choice Study. Dunning & Company, New York City, Oct. 1997.

Lieberman Research East. 1998 CityWide Survey. Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Sept. 1998.

10.

Charles River Associates Incorporated. Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 27: Building Transit Ridership. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997.