Performance Evaluation of Backcalculation Algorithms Through Three-Dimensional Finite-Element Modeling of Pavement Structures

Abstract

Currently, the only means of assessing the performance of a backcalculation algorithm is to compare its results with the values obtained through laboratory measurements of core samples. Discrepancies are attributed to the inability of replicating in laboratory tests the same consolidation and stress conditions encountered in the field. In this paper, an explicit three-dimensional (3D) finite-element model (FEM) is used to back-calculate the layer moduli of rigid, flexible, and composite pavement structures. The modeling approach accounts for the dynamic nature of the falling weight deflectometer (FWD) load, friction at pavement-layer interfaces, and the 3D geometrical characteristics of the pavement structure. The FWD-measured and FEM-generated deflection basins are matched by adjusting the values of layer moduli used in the FEM. The backcalculated moduli using 3D FEM are compared with the results obtained from three backcalculation programs: MODCOMP, MODULUS, and EVERCALC. The results indicate that the three programs have an excellent capability of predicting the FEM-generated subgrade modulus values for flexible, composite, and rigid pavements provided that a correction factor is used. A correction factor for backcalculated subgrade modulus is estimated for each program and pavement type. The mechanistically evaluated correction factors were found to be in close agreement with the experience-based values recommended for flexible and rigid pavements in the American Association of State Highway Officials pavement design guide.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Davies

T. G.

, and Mamlouk

M. S.

. Theoretical Response of Multilayer Pavement Systems to Dynamic Nondestructive Testing. In Transportation Research Record 1022, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985, pp. 1–7.

Mamlouk

M. S.

, and Davis

T. G.

. Elasto-Dynamic Analysis of Pavement Deflections. Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 110, No. 6, 1994, pp. 536–550.

Sebaaly

B. E.

Dynamic Models for Pavement Analysis. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Civil Engineering, Arizona State University, 1987.

Uzan

Dynamic Linear Backcalculation of Pavement Material Parameters. Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 120, No. 1, 1994, pp. 109–126.

Nishizawa

, Himeno

, Maruyama

, and Saika

. Comparison of Static and Dynamic FEM Analysis in Connection with Backcalculation of Pavement Layer Moduli Based on FWD Deflection Data. Proc., 4th International Conference, Bearing Capacity of Minnesota, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, NRC Canada, and FAA, Minneapolis, Minn., 1994, pp. 215–227.

Mallela

, and George

K. P.

. Three-Dimensional Dynamic Response Model for Rigid Pavements. In Transportation Research Record 1448, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 92–99.

Shoukry

S. N.

, Martinelli

D. R.

, and Selezneva

O. I.

. Dynamic Performance of Composite Pavements Under Impact. In Transportation Research Record 1570, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 163–171.

Uddin

, Zhang

, and Fernandez

. Finite Element Simulation of Pavement Discontinuities and Dynamic Load Response. In Transportation Research Record 1448, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 100–106.

Nazarian

, and Boddapati

K. M.

. Pavement-Falling Weight Deflec-tometer Interaction Using Dynamic Finite-Element Analysis. In Transportation Research Record 1482, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 33–43.

10.

PCS/Law Engineering. Layer Moduli Backcalculation Procedure: Software Selection. SHRP-P-651. Strategic Highway Research Program, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993.

11.

Deusen

D. V.

Selection of Flexible Backcalculation Software for the Minnesota Road Research Project. Report MN/PR-96/29. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, 1996.

12.

Rix

G. J.

, Stokoe

K. H.

, and Roset

J. M.

. Experimental Study of Factors Affecting the Spectral-Analysis-of-Surface-Wave Method. Report 1123-5, Project 2/3-18-87/9-1123. Center of Transportation Research, University of Texas at Austin, Feb. 1991.

13.

Kennedy

J. C.

, and Everhart

R. D.

. Dynamic Compliant Boundary. Final Report. Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, McLean, Va., 1995.

14.

Kennedy

, and Everhart

R. D.

. Comparison of Predicted Pavement Structural Response with Field Measured Data. Final Report. Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, McLean, Va., 1996.

15.

Hallquist

J. O.

LS-DYNA3D Theoretical Manual. LSTC Report 1018, Rev. 2. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, July 1993.

16.

Seaman

, Simons

J. W.

, and Shockey

D. A.

. Unified Airport Pavement Design Procedure. Proc., Unified Airport Pavement Design and Analysis Concepts Workshops. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, July 1992, pp. 446–537.

17.

Brill

D. R.

, Hayhoe

G. F.

, and Lee

. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Modeling of Rigid Pavement Structures. Proc., Aircraft/Pavement Technology: In the Midst of Change, ASCE Airfield Pavement Conference, 1997, pp. 151–165.

18.

Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. Chapter 3: Guides for Field Data Collection. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. III-90–III-117.