Universal Pavement Distress Evaluator Based on Fuzzy Sets

Abstract

Setting priorities for pavement maintenance and rehabilitation depends on the availability of a universal scale for assessing the condition of every element in the network. The condition of a pavement section has traditionally been assessed by several condition indexes. The present serviceability index (PSI) is one common evaluator used to describe the functional condition with respect to ride quality. Pavement condition index is another index commonly used to describe the extent of distress on a pavement section. During the decision-making process, both classes of indexes are needed to evaluate the overall status of a pavement section in comparison to other sections in the network. Traditionally, regression techniques were used for the development of functions that relate condition indexes to the information recorded in the pavement management database. This approach produces mathematical functions that are limited to a particular database. The functions so developed may also suffer from inaccuracies due to errors in data collection and recording. There is a need for a more generalized approach for the evaluation of pavement conditions to enable efficient management of large transportation networks. The development of a universal measure capable of formally assessing the condition of a pavement section within the universe of pavement conditions is described. This is accomplished by the fusion of a set of fuzzy membership functions that describe different parameters in the database with the perception of each parameter’s significance. The model output is the fuzzy distress index (FDI), which combines the extent of structural distress with traditional performance parameters such as roughness to describe the overall status of the pavement section. The behavior of FDI over time is examined for a random sample of pavement sections and is compared with trends in the corresponding PSI values (PSI was used only because it was readily available in the database). The results indicate that the flexible, universal FDI is a consistent and accurate measure of the overall pavement condition. The set of generated membership functions describing the different extents of every distress type can be easily standardized over the 50 states, allowing the model to be implemented on any pavement at any location. Also, the parameter weights used in the assessment may be easily adjusted (increased or decreased) to reflect changes in maintenance policies or budget availability at the local, state, or national decision-making level. Moreover, the concept allows for the omission of any number of parameters that might not be available in a particular pavement management database.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Special Report 61E: The AASHO Road Test, Report 5, Pavement Research. HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1962.

Shahin

M. Y.

, Stock

, and Beckberger

. Comparing Pavement Performance and Its Effect on Maintenance and Rehabilitation Cost. Proc. 3rd International Conference on Managing Pavements, Washington, D.C., 1994.

Shahin

M. Y.

, Nunez

M. N.

, Broten

M. R.

, Carpenter

S. H.

, and Sameh

. New Techniques for Modeling Pavement Deterioration. In Transportation Research Record 1123, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 40–46.

Lukanen

E. O.

, and Han

. Performance History and Prediction Modeling for Minnesota Pavements. Proc., International Conference on Managing Pavements, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 63–73.

Fwa

T. F.

, and Sinha

K. C.

. Routine Maintenance and Pavement Performance. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 112, No. 4, July 1986, pp. 329–344.

George

K. P.

, Rajagopal

A. S.

, and Lim

L. K.

. Models for Predicting Pavement Deterioration. In Transportation Research Record 1215, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1989, pp. 1–7.

Ritchie

S. G.

, Kaseko

, and Bavarian

. Development of an Intelligent System for Automated Pavement Evaluation. In Transportation Research Record 1311, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 112–119.

Fwa

T. F.

, and Chen

W. T.

. Priority Rating of Highway Maintenance Needs by Neural Networks. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 119, No. 3, May/June 1993, pp. 419–432.

Attoh-Okine

N. O.

Analysis of Learning Rate and Momentum Term in Back Propagation Neural Network Algorithm Trained to Predict Pavement Performance. Presented at 74th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1995.

10.

Randolph

D. A.

The Application of Neural Network Technology to Highway Maintenance Management. Presented at 75th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1996.

11.

Carnahan

J. V.

, Davis

W. J.

, Shahin

M. Y.

, Keane

P. L.

, and Wu

M. I.

. Optimal Maintenance Decisions for Pavement Management. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 113, No. 5, Sept. 1987, pp. 554–572.

12.

Butt

A. A.

, Shahin

M. Y.

, Feighan

K. J.

, and Carpenter

S. H.

. Pavement Performance Prediction Model Using the Markov Process. In Transportation Research Record 1123, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1987, pp. 12–19.

13.

Butt

A. A.

, Shahin

M. Y.

, Carpenter

S. H.

, and Carnahan

J. V.

. Application of Markov Process to Pavement Management Systems at Network Level. Proc. 3rd International Conference on Managing Pavements, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 159–172.

14.

Wang

K. C. P.

, Zaniewski

, and Way

. Probabilistic Behavior of Pavements. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 120, No. 3, May/June 1994.

15.

Zadeh

L. A

. Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, Vol. 8, 1965, pp. 338–353.

16.

Ross

T. J

. Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, 1995.

17.

Elton

D. J.

, and Jung

C. H.

. Asphalt Pavement Evaluation Using Fuzzy Sets. In Transportation Research Record 1196, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 1–6.

18.

Jung

C. H.

, and Amirkhanian

S. N.

. Unified Pavement Distress Index for Managing Flexible Pavements. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 118, No. 5, Sept./Oct. 1992, pp. 686–699.

19.

Huihua

, and Henry

J. J.

. The Use of Fuzzy-Sets Mathematics for Analysis of Pavement Skid Resistance. In Surface Characteristics of Roadways: International Research and Technologies, ASTM STP 1031 ( Meyer

W. E.

and Reichert

, eds.), American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1990, pp. 39–49.

20.

Sun-Lijun and Yao-Zukang. The Use of Fuzzy Sets Mathematics in Performance Evaluation and Maintenance and Reconstruction Strategy Selection of Asphalt Pavements. Tongji Daxue Xueb, Vol. 18, 1990, No. 2, pp. 167–176.

21.

Andonyadis

, Altschaeffl

A. G.

, and Chameau

J. L.

. The Use of Fuzzy Sets Mathematics to Assist Pavement Evaluation and Management. Final Report FHWA/IN/JHRP-85/14. Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind., July 1985.

22.

Zhang

, Singh

, and Hudson

W. R.

. Comprehensive Ranking Index for Flexible Pavement Using Fuzzy Sets Model. In Transportation Research Record 1397, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 96–102.

23.

Tee

, Bowman

M. D.

, and Sinha

K. C.

. The Development of Optimal Strategies for Maintenance, Rehabilitation and Replacement of Highway Bridges, Vol. 2. A System for Bridge Structural Condition Assessment. Final Report FWHA/IN/JHRP-89/9. Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind., 1989.

24.

Distress Identification Manual for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Project. Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993.

25.

Rideability History of the Nevada Department of Transportation. State of Nevada Department of Transportation Materials Division Pavement Analysis Section, Jan. 1995.