Abstract
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
.
Beals
TC
Junko
JT
Amendola
A
Nickisch
F
Saltzman
CL
: Minimally invasive distraction technique for prone posterior ankle and subtalar arthroscopy . Foot Ankle Int.
31 :316 –319 , 2010 . http://dx.doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2010.0316
2.
.
Dowdy
PA
Watson
BV
Amendola
A
Brown
JD
: Noninvasive ankle distraction: relationship between force, magnitude of distraction, and nerve conduction abnormalities . Arthroscopy.
12 :64 –69 , 1996 .
3.
.
Ferkel
RD
Scranton
PE
Jr.
: Arthroscopy of the ankle and foot . J Bone Joint Surg Am.
75 :1233 –1242 , 1993 .
4.
.
Lijoi
F
Lughi
M
Baccarani
G
: Posterior arthroscopic approach to the ankle: an anatomic study . Arthroscopy.
19 :62 –67 , 2003 . http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/jars.2003.50003
5.
.
Lohrer
H
Arentz
S
: Posterior approach for arthroscopic treatment of posterolateral impingement of the ankle in a top-level field hockey player . Arthroscopy.
20 :e15 –21 . 2004 . http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2004.01.038
6.
.
Sitler
DF
Amendola
A
Bailey
CS
Thain
LM
Spouge
A
: Posterior ankle arthroscopy . J Bone Joint Surg Am.
84 :763 –769 , 2002 .
7.
.
Paterson
RS
Brown
JN
: The posteromedial impingement lesion of the ankle . A series of six cases. Am J Sports Med.
29 :550 –557 , 2001 .
8.
.
van Dijk
CN
Scholten
PE
Krips
R
: A 2-portal endoscopic approach for diagnosis and treatment of posterior ankle pathology . Arthroscopy.
16 :871 –876 , 2000 . http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/jars.2000.19430
9.
.
van Dijk
CN
Verhagen
RA
Tol
HJ
: Technical note: Resterilizable noninvasive ankle distraction device . Arthroscopy.
17 :E12 , 2001 . http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/jars.2001.19453