Life without the AOFAS Score: A Critical Problem in a Time of Scarcity

1. Ashcroft R : What is clinical effectiveness? Stud Hist Phil Biol & Biomed Sci, 33:219–233, 2002.

2. Beauchamp TL Childress JF : Principles of biomedical ethics, 6th edn. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.

3. Coulter A Ham C : The global challenge of health care rationing. Buckingham; Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press; 2000.

4. Culyer AJ : Equity of what in healthcare? Why the traditional answers don't help policy—and what to do in the future. Healthcare Papers. 8 Spec No:12-26, 2007.

5. Daniels N : Justice, health, and healthcare. The American journal of bioethics : AJOB 1(2): 2–16, 2001.

6. Daniels N Sabin JE : Setting limits fairly can we learn to share medical resources? In. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press; 2002: xi, 191 p.

7. Farrugia P Goldstein C Petrisor BA : Measuring foot and ankle injury outcomes: common scales and checklists. Injury. 42(3): 276–280, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.051

8. Guyton GP : Theoretical limitations of the AOFAS scoring systems: an analysis using Monte Carlo modeling. Foot Ankle Int. 22(10): 779–787, 2001.

9. Holm S : The second phase of priority setting. Goodbye to the simple solutions: the second phase of priority setting in health care. BMJ. 317(7164):1000–1002, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7164.1000

10. Mayich J Cox JL Buth KJ Legare JF : Unequal access to interventional cardiac care in Nova Scotia in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Can J Cardio 22(4): 331–335, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0828-282X(06)70918-7

11. Norris F : A Bleak Outlook for Long-Term Growth. In: New York Times. New York, NY, USA; 2012: B3.

12. Peacock S Ruta D Mitton C Donaldson C Bate A Murtagh M : Using economics to set pragmatic and ethical priorities. BMJ. 332(7539):482–485, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7539.482

13. Pear R : Panel Says U.S. Should Weigh Cost in Deciding 'Essential Health Benefits'. In: New York Times. New York, NY, USA; 2011: A14.

14. Pinsker E Daniels TR : AOFAS position statement regarding the future of the AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems. Foot Ankle Int. 32(9): 841–2, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2011.0841

15. Rawls J : A theory of justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1971.

16. Siegel JE Weinstein MC Russell LB Gold MR : Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA. 276(16): 1339–1341, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.276.16.1339

17. SooHoo NF Shuler M Fleming LL : Evaluation of the validity of the AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems by correlation to the SF-36. Foot Ankle Int. 24(1): 50–55, 2003.

18. Weinstein MC Siegel JE Gold MR Kamlet MS Russell LB : Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA. 276(15): 1253–1258, 1996.