AOFAS Position Statement Regarding the Future of the AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems

Button G Pinney S : A meta-analysis of outcome rating scales in foot and ankle surgery: is there a valid, reliable, and responsive system? Foot Ankle Int. 25(8):521–525, 2004.

Dhawan V Spratt KF Pinzur MS Reliability of the AOFAS Diabetic Foot Questionnaire in Charcot Arthropathy: Stability, Internal Consistency, and Measurable Difference Foot Ankle Int. 26:717–731, 2005.

Elgafy H Ebraheim NA Tile M Stephen D Kase J Fractures of the talus: experience of two level 1 trauma centers Foot Ankle Int. 21:1023–1029, 2000.

Guyton GP Theoretical limitations of the AOFAS scoring systems: an analysis using Monte Carlo modeling Foot Ankle Int. 22:779–787, 2001.

Harris WH Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation J Bone Joint Surg Am. 51:737–755, 1969.

Herron ML : A review of outcome measures for the ankle and hindfoot. Foot and Ankle Surgery. 12(3):161–167, 2006.

Kitaoka HB Alexander IJ Adelaar RS : Clinical Rating Systems for the Ankle-Hindfoot, Midfoot, Hallux, and Lesser Toes. Foot Ankle Int. 15(7):349–353, 1994.

Larson CB Rating scale for hip disabilities Clin Orthop. 31:85–93, 1963.

Malviya A Makwana N Laing P Correlation of the AOFAS scores with a generic health QUALY score in foot and ankle surgery Foot Ankle Int. 28:494–498, 2007.

Martin DP Engelberg R Agel J Development of a musculoskeletal extremity health status instrument: the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment instrument J Orthop Res. 14:173–181, 1996.

Martin RL Irrgang JJ Lalonde KA Conti S : Current Concepts Review: Foot and Ankle Outcome Instruments. Foot Ankle Int. 27(5):383–390, 2006.

Naal FD Impellizzeri FM Rippstein PF : Which Are the Most Frequently Used Outcome Instruments in Studies on Total Ankle Arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 468:815–826, 2010.

Pena F Agel J Coetzee JC Comparison of the MFA to the AOFAS outcome tool in a population undergoing total ankle replacement Foot Ankle Int. 28:788–793, 2007.

Pynsent PB Fairbank JCT Carr AJ : editors. Outcome measures in orthopaedics and orthopaedic trauma. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.

Radford PJ : General outcomes measures, In Pynsent P Fairebank J Carr A (eds). Outcome Measures in Orthopaedics. London: Butterworth-Heinmann, 59–80, 1993.

Sammarco GJ Chang L Outcome of surgical treatment of tarsal tunnel syndrome Foot Ankle Int. 24:125–131, 2003.

SooHoo NF Shuler M Fleming LL Evaluation of the validity of the AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems by correlation to the SF-36 Foot Ankle Int. 24:50–55, 2003.

Terwee CB Bot SD de Boer MR Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires J Clin Epidemiol. 60:34–42, 2007.

Ware JE Jr Sherbourne CD The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Conceptual framework and item selection Med Care. 30:473–483, 1992.