Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2007-4
A Specific Bone Marrow Edema around the Foot and Ankle Following Trauma and Immobilization Therapy: Pattern Description and Potential Clinical Relevance
Background: We describe a characteristic pattern of bone marrow edema about the foot and ankle seen by MRI in patients who have undergone recent immobilization therapy and investigate potential etiologies as well as possible clinical significance. Methods: Three reviewers retrospectively evaluated 52 ankle MRI examinations in 18 patients with abnormal signals compatible with bone marrow edema who had been treated with various types and durations of immobilization of the lower limb after traumatic injury. Bone marrow edema patterns were characterized by distribution, extent, location, and interval evolution or resolution on subsequent followup MRI examination. These MRI findings were then correlated with clinical history, symptomatology and treatment regimens. Results: All patients had a characteristic pattern of bone marrow edema about the foot and ankle predominating in subchondral, subcortical, and subenthesial locations. The occurrence of this edema pattern was most often noted on MRI within the first 12 weeks after completion of immobilization therapy or resumption of partial or full weight-bearing and did not correlate well with new symptomatology or pain. In patients with protracted imaging followup, the bone marrow edema ultimately resolved and was not associated with reported setbacks in recovery course or unexpected delays in restoration of function. All MRI examinations performed more than 18 weeks after the immobilization period showed resolution or stabilization of bone marrow signal, with no continued evolution. No patient had a clinical picture suspicious for reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Conclusions: A distinctive pattern of bone marrow edema on MRI of the foot and ankle can be seen on MRI after a variety of weightbearing and nonweightbearing immobilization therapies. This pattern has a consistent appearance on MRI and does not seem to be related to clinical symptomatology. At present, no substantial conclusions can be made regarding the etiology of this phenomenon. However, these bone marrow signal alterations should not mandate further imaging or a change in therapy on the basis of MRI findings alone.
BluemkeDAZerhouniEA: MRI of avascular necrosis of bone.Top. Magn. Reson. Imaging8:231–246, 1996.
2.
BloemJL: Transient osteoporosis of the hip: MR imaging.Radiology167:753–755, 1988.
3.
De SmetAAFisherDRBurnsteinMI: Value of MR imaging in staging osteochondral lesions of the talus (osteochondritis dissecans): results in 14 patients.AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.154:555–558, 1990.
4.
FavusM (ed.): Primer on the Metabolic Bone Diseases and Disorders of Mineral Metabolism, Fourth edition, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2000.
5.
HayesCWConwayWFDanielWW: MR imaging of bone marrow edema pattern: transient osteoporosis, transient bone marrow edema syndrome, or osteonecrosis.Radiographics13:1001–1012, 1993.
6.
HofmannSKramerJVakil-AdliAAignerNBreitenseherM: Painful bone marrow edema of the knee: differential diagnosis and therapeutic concepts.Orthop. Clin. North Am.35:321–333, 2004.
7.
JuddDBKimDHHrutkayJM: Transient osteoporosis of the talus.Foot Ankle Int.21:134–137, 2000.
8.
LiXJJeeWSChowSY: Adaptation of cancellous bone to aging and immobilization in the rat: a single photon absorptiometry and histomorphometry study.Anat. Rec.32:459–476, 2002.
MoosikasuwanJBMillerTTMathKSchultzE: Shifting bone marrow edema of the knee.Skeletal Radiol.33:380–385, 2004.
11.
MorrisonWBSchweitzerMEBatteWG: Osteomyelitis of the foot: relative importance of primary and secondary MR imaging signs.Radiology207:625–632, 1998.
12.
RadkeSVispo-SearaJWaltherMEttlVEulertJ: Transient bone marrow edema of the foot.Int. Orthop.25:263–267, 2001.
13.
RobinsonDKossashviliYSandbankJHalperinNAlkD: Transient bone oedema of the tibia mimicking a tumorous process.Acta. Orthop. Belg.68:157–162, 2002.
14.
SchweitzerMEMandelSSchwartzmanRJKnoblerRLTahmoushAJ: Reflex sympathetic dystrophy revisited: MR imaging findings before and after infusion of contrast material.Radiology195:211–214, 1995.
15.
SchweitzerMEWhiteLM: Does altered biomechanics cause marrow edema?.Radiology198:851–853, 1996.
16.
SchweitzerMEKarasickD: MRI of the ankle and hindfoot.Semin. Ultrasound CT MR.15:410–422, 1994.
17.
SchweitzerMEHaimsAHMorrisonWB: MR imaging of ankle marrow.Foot Ankle Clin.5:63–82, 2000.
18.
ThordarsonDBTriffonMJTerkMR: Magnetic resonance imaging to detect avascular necrosis after open reduction and internal fixation of talar neck fractures.Foot Ankle Int.17:742–747, 1996.
19.
Van LoonJJBervoetsDJBurgerEH: Decreased mineralization and increased calcium release in isolated fetal mouse long bones under near weightlessness.Anat. Rec.227:12–24, 1990.
20.
YaoLLeeJK: Occult intraosseous fracture: detection with MR imaging.Radiology167:749–751, 1988.
21.
YaoLJohnsonCGentiliA: Stress injuries of bone: Analysis of MR imaging staging criteria.Acad. Radiol.5:34–40, 1998.
22.
WhiteLMPowellTITomlinsonGBoyntonE: Increased subcortical patellar signal intensity at T2-weighted MR imaging: a subacute finding after knee injury.Radiology236:952–957, 2005.
23.
WolffJ: Über die Theorie des Knochenschwundes durch vermehrten Druck and der Knochenanbildung durch Druckentlastung.Archiv fur klinische Chirurgie (1891).
