Foot Orthoses in Lower Limb Overuse Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

1. Alderson P Green S Higgins JPT : Cochrane reviewer's handbook 4.2. Updated December 2003. In: The cochrane library, Issue 1. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, LTD, 2004.

2. Altman DG Schulz KF Moher D : The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann. Intern. Med. 134:663–694, 2001.

3. American College of Foot and Ankle Orthopedics and Medicine: Prescription custom foot orthoses practice guidelines, www.acfaom.org, 2004.

4. Australian Podiatry Council: Clinical guidelines for orthotic therapy provided by podiatrists, www.apodc.com.au, 1998.

5. Bennett PJ : A randomized clinical assessment of foot pronation and its relationship to patellofemoral syndrome. Aust. Podiatrist 22:6–9, 1988.

6. Bisset L Paungmali A Vicenzino B Beller E : A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on physical interventions for lateral epicondylalgia. Br. J. Sports Med. 39:411–422, 2005.

7. Brukner P Khan K (eds.): Clinical sports medicine, 2nd Edition, Sydney, McGraw-Hill, 2002.

8. Cohen J (ed.): Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, Edition 2. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J., 1988.

9. Dahle LK Mueller M Delitto A Diamond JE : Visual assessment of foot type and relationship of foot type to lower extremity injury. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 14:70–74, 1991.

10. Dimou ES Brantingham JW Wood T : A randomized, controlled trial (with blinded observer) of chiropractic manipulation and Achilles stretching vs. orthotics for the treatment of plantar fasciitis. J. Amer. Chiropr. Assoc. 41:32–42, 2004.

11. Eng JJ Pierrynowski MR : Evaluation of soft foot orthotics in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Phys. Ther. 73:62–68, 1993.

12.EQ-5D. http://gs1.q4matics.com/EuroqolPublishWeb/, 2006.

13. Esterman A Pilotto L : Foot shape and its effect on functioning in Royal Australian Air Force recruits. Part 2: Pilot, randomized, controlled trial of orthotics in recruits with flat feet. Mil. Med. 170:629–633, 2005.

14. Finestone A Giladi M Elad H : Prevention of stress fractures using custom biomechanical shoe orthoses. Clin. Orthop. 360:182–190, 1999.

15. Finestone A Novack V Farfel A : A prospective study of the effect of foot orthoses composition and fabrication on comfort and the incidence of overuse injuries. Foot Ankle Int. 25:462–466, 2004.

16. Garrett WE Speer KP Kirkendall DT (ed.): Principles and practice of orthopaedic sports medicine, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2000.

17. Herbert RD : How to estimate treatment effects from reports of clinical trials. I: Continuous outcomes. Aust. J. Physiother. 46:229–235, 2000.

18. James SL Bates BT Osternig LR : Injuries to runners. Am. J. Sports Med. 6:40–50, 1978.

19. Kaufman KR Brodine SK Shaffer RA Johnson CW Cullison TR : The effect of foot structure and range of motion on musculoskeletal overuse injuries. Am. J. Sports Med. 27:585–593, 1999.

20. Kelly A Winson I : Use of ready-made insoles in the treatment of lesser metatarsalgia: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Foot Ankle Int. 19:217–220, 1998.

21. Kilmartin TE Wallace WA : Effect of pronation and supination orthosis on Morton's neuroma and lower extremity function. Foot Ankle Int. 15:256–262, 1994.

22. Kriss S : Injectable steroids in the management of heel pain. A prospective randomised trial. Br. J. Pod. 6:40–42, 2003.

23. Landorf KB : Effectiveness of foot orthoses in the treatment of plantar fasciitis. University of Western Sydney, Sydney, Australia, 2004.

24. Larsen K Weidich F Leboeuf-Yde C : Can custom-made biomechanic shoe orthoses prevent problems in the back and lower extremities? A randomized, controlled intervention trial of 146 military conscripts. J. Manipulative Physiol. Ther. 25:326–331, 2002.

25. Lynch DM Goforth WP Martin JE : Conservative treatment of plantar fasciitis. A prospective study. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 88:375–380, 1998.

26. Martin JE Hosch JC Goforth WP : Mechanical treatment of plantar fasciitis. A prospective study. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 91:55–62, 2001.

27. Matheson GO Clement DB McKenzie DC : Stress fractures in athletes. A study of 320 cases. Am. J. Sports Med. 15:46–58, 1987.

28. McPoil TG Hunt GC : Evaluation and management of foot and ankle disorders: present problems and future directions. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 21:381–388, 1995.

29. Milgrom C Giladi M Kashtan H : A prospective study of the effect of a shock-absorbing orthotic device on the incidence of stress fractures in military recruits. Foot Ankle. 6:101–104, 1985.

30. Moher D Pham B Jones A : Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?. Lancet. 352:609–613, 1998.

31. Moher D Schulz KF Altman DG : The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann. Intern. Med. 134:657–662, 2001.

32. Mundermann A Stefanyshyn DJ Nigg BM : Relationship between footwear comfort of shoe inserts and anthropometric and sensory factors. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 33:1939–1945, 2001.

33. Nigg BM Nurse MA Stefanyshyn DJ : Shoe inserts and orthotics for sport and physical activities. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 31:S421–428, 1999.

34. Norris CM (ed.): Sports injuries: diagnosis and management, Butterworth Heinemann, Edinburgh, 2004.

35. Pfeffer G Bacchetti P Deland J : Comparison of custom and prefabricated orthoses in the initial treatment of proximal plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int. 20:214–221, 1999.

36. Physiotherapy Evidence Database. www.pedro.fhs.usyd.edu.au, 2004.

37. Postema K Burm PE Zande ME Limbeek J : Primary metatarsalgia: the influence of a custom moulded insole and a rockerbar on plantar pressure. Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 22:35–44, 1998.

38. Review Manager (RevMan): www.cc-ims.net/Revman.

39. Rome K Gray J Stewart F : Evaluating the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of foot orthoses in the treatment of plantar heel pain: a feasibility study. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 94:229–238, 2004.

40. Russell BE : Comparison of the plantar fasciitis splint versus the night resting splint in the treatment of plantar fasciitis, Women's University, Houston, Texas, 1999.

41. Sackett DL Straus SE Richardson WS Rosenberg W Haynes RB (eds.): Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM, Churchill Livingstone, New York, 2000.

42. Saggini R Giamberardino MA Gatteschi L Vecchiet L : Myofascial pain syndrome of the peroneus longus: biomechanical approach. Clin. J. Pain. 12:30–37, 1996.

43. Schuster RO : Podiatry and the foot of the athlete. J. Am. Podiatry Assoc. 62:465–468, 1972.

44. Simkin A Leichter I Giladi M Stein M Milgrom C : Combined effect of foot arch structure and an orthotic device on stress fractures. Foot Ankle. 10:25–29, 1989.

45. Smidt N Assendelft WJ Arola H : Effectiveness of physiotherapy for lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review. Ann. Med. 35:51–62, 2003.

46. Subotnick SI : Orthotic foot control and the overuse syndrome. Phys. Sports Med. 3:75–79, 1975.

47. Taunton JE Ryan MB Clement DB McKenzie DC Lloyd-Smith DR : Plantar fasciitis: a retrospective analysis of 267 cases. Phys. Ther. Sport 3:57–65, 2002.

48. Turlik MA Donatelli TJ Veremis MG : A comparison of shoe inserts in relieving mechanical heel pain. Foot 9:84–87, 1999.

49. Verhagen AP de Vet HC de Bie RA : The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 51:1235–1241, 1998.

50. Wiener-Ogilvie S Jones RB : A randomised trial of exercise therapy and foot orthoses as treatment for knee pain in primary care. Br. J. Pod. 7:43–49, 2004.