Qualitative neuropathologic evaluations are appropriate for initial screening of compounds for neurotoxicity. In the future, advances in tissue preparation and computer technology will make quantitative evaluation of some nervous tissue structures more routine. These evaluations will be used as part of tier II studies to determine dose-responses or no-effect levels. Quantitative methods can enable small but significant differences to be detected, and the data can be subjected to statistical analysis.
References
1.
1. World Health Organization. (1986). Principles and Methods for the Assessment of Neurotoxicity Associated with Exposure to Chemicals.Environmental Health Criteria 60, Geneva: World Health Organization.
2.
2. Diemer, N.H. (1982). Quantitative morphological studies of neuropathological changes. Part I. Crc Crit. Rev. Toxicol.10215–263.
3.
3. Spencer, P.S., and Bischoff, M.C. (1982). Contemporary neuropathology methods in toxicology, in Nervous System Toxicology. Target Organ Toxicology Series.New York: Raven Press, pp. 259–275.
4.
4. Haug, H. (1980). The significance of quantitative stereologic experimental procedures in pathology. Pathol. Res. Pract.166, 144–164.
5.
5. Dayan, A.D. (1979). A morphologist's approach to detection and study of neurotoxicity. Pharm. Ther.5, 571–577.
6.
6. Haug, H. (1986). History of neuromorphometry. J. Neurosci. Methods18, 1–17.
7.
7. Collan, Y., Oja, E., and Whimster, W.F. (1983). Mathematical background to stereology and morphometry for diagnostic pathologists, in Collan, Y., et al. (eds.). Stereology and Morphometry in Pathology.Kuopio, Finland: Kuopio University Press.
8.
8. Elias, H., and Hyde, D.M. (1983). A Guide to Practical Stereology.New York: Karger.
9.
9. De La Iglesia, F.A., and Mc Guire, E.J. (1981). Quantitative stereology: Toxicologic pathology applications. Toxicol. Pathol.9, 21–28.
10.
10. Dyck, P.J. (1975). Pathologic alterations of the peripheral nervous system of man, in Peripheral Neuropathy.Philadelphia: Saunders.
11.
11. Haug, H. (1970). Quantitative data in neuroanatomy, in Schade, J.P., and Smith, J. (eds.). Computer and Brains, Progress in Brain Research.Amsterdam: Elsevier, Vol. 3, pp. 113–127.
12.
12. Elias, H., Henning, A., and Schwartz, D.E. (1971). Stereology: Applications to biomedical research. Physiol. Rev.51, 158–200.
13.
13. Weibel, E.R. (1979). Stereological Methods, Vol. I. Practical Methods for Biological Morphometry.New York: Academic Press.
14.
14. Miller A.K.H., Alston, R.L., and Corsellis, F.A.N. (1981). The practical application of imageanalysing systems to neuropathology: Principles and possible scope.Smith, T. and Cavanagh, J.B. (eds.). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
15.
15. Marchevsky, A.M., Gill, J., and Jeanty, H. (1987). Computerized interactive morphometry in pathology: Current instrumentation and methods. Human Pathol.18, 320–331.
16.
16. Visscher, G.E., and Stifano, T.M. (1981). Practical applications of morphometric analysis in toxicology. Toxicol. Pathol.9, 30–35.
17.
17. Dunhill, M.S. (1985). Some statistical aspects of sampling in morphometry. Anal. Quant. Cytol. Histol.7, 250–255.
18.
18. White, F.H. (1983). Applications of stereology in pathology: A brief guide. Acta Stereol.2, 25–36.
19.
19. Donovan, A. (1967). The nerve fiber composition of the cat optic nerve. Anatomy101, 1–11.
20.
20. Friede, R.L. (1986). Computer editing of morphometric data on nerve fibers. An improved computer program. Acta Neuropathol.72, 74–81.
21.
21. Reid, I.M. (1980). Morphometric methods in veterinary pathology: A review. Vet. Pathol.17, 522–543.
23. Shay, J. (1975). Economy of effort in electron microscope morphometry. Am. J. Pathol.81, 503–511.
24.
24. Gundersen, H.J.G., and Osterby, R. (1980). Optimizing sampling efficiency of stereological studies in biology “or” do more less well. J. Microsc.121, 65–73.
25.
25. Origuchi, Y. (1981). Quantitative histological study in the sural nerves of children. Brain Dev.3, 395–402.
26.
26. Usson, Y., and D'Aubigny, G.D. (1985). Multimodal frequency distribution analysis of peripheral nerves. Anal. Quant. Cytol. Histol.7, 294–298.
27.
27. Mc Millan, I. (submitted).
28.
28. Federal Register. (September 27, 1985). 50, 188, 798–6400, 39433–39461.
29.
29. Baak, J.P.A., and Oort, J. (1983). A Manual of Morphometry in Diagnostic Pathology.Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer-Verlag.
30.
30. Krigman, M.R. (1982). Neuropathology of heavy metal intoxication, in Nervous System Toxicology. Target Organ Toxicology Series.New York: Raven Press, pp. 277–283.
