SanazaroPJMeasuring clinical performance of individual internists in office and hospital practice. Medical Care. 1985;23:1097–1111
2.
BurvillPW. A survey of the distribution of psychiatrists in Australia and New Zealand in 1987. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry1988;22:436–447
3.
OlfsonMPincusHADialTH. Professional practice patterns of US psychiatrists. American Journal of Psychiatry1994,151:89–95
4.
GrolR. Peer review in primary care. Quality Assurance in Health Care. 1990;2:119–126
5.
GuebalyEl N. Peer Review: empirical data bases and practical implications. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 1988;33:645–649
6.
McAuleyRGFive-year results of the peer assessment program of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. Canadian Medical Association Journal1990;143:1193–1199
7.
SmallwoodR. Recertification: what is happening now in Australia, New Zealand and elsewhere?Fellowship Affairs1991;10:6–7
8.
RethansJJStumansFDropRvan der VleutenC. Assessment of the performance of general practitioners by the use of standardized (simulated) patients. British Journal of General Practice1991;41:97–99
9.
AgiusRM. Peer review audit in occupational medicine. Journal of the Society of Occupational Medicine1990;40:87–88
10.
BeckmanHBFrankelRM. The effect of physician behaviour on the collection of data. Annals of Internal Medicine1984;101:692–696
11.
BrookRH. Quality of care assessment: a comparison of five methods of peer review. US Department of Health Education and Welfare DHEW Publication No HRA-74-3100,1973
12.
HornSDPozenMW. An interpretation of implicit judgements in chart review. Journal of Community Health. 1977;2:251–258
13.
GoldmanRL. The reliability of peer assessments of quality of care. Journal of the American Medical Association1992;267:958–960
14.
Peer Assessment Program (interim report), College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, Toronto, 1984,11–14