AlarantaHLempinenV MHaavistoEPohjolainenTHurriH. Subjective benefits of energy storing prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int1994; 18: 92–97
2.
BarticusE KColvinJ MArbogastR E. Development of a novel lower limb prosthesis using low cost composite materials. J Reinforced Plastics Composites1994; 13: 301–313
3.
BreakeyJ. Gait of unilateral below-knee amputees. Orthot Prosthet1976; 30(3): 17–24
4.
ChildressDBillockJThompsonR. A search for better limbs: prosthetic research at Northwestern University. Bull Prosthet Res1974; 10(22): 200–212
5.
CrennaPFrigoC. A motor programme for the initiation of forward-oriented movements in humans. J Physiol (Land)1991; 437: 635–653
6.
ColwellD F. Six month clinical review of the Genesis Foot and Ankle System. Proceedings, 20th Annual Meeting and Symposium. AAOP. 1994. AAPA, Nashville, TN, 7
7.
EdelsteinJ. Prosthetic and orthotic gait. Gait in rehabilitationVedited, SmidtG L. Churchill Livingstone, New York1990; 281–300
8.
ErikssonEBrAnemarkP I. Osseointegration from the perspective of the plastic surgeon. Plast Reconstr Surg1994; 93: 626–637
9.
FreudensteinFSandorG. Synthesis of path-generating mechanisms by means of programmed digital computer. ASME J Eng Ind1959; B 81: 2
10.
GnterACzbrnieckiJ MDeCrootD M. Biomechanical analysis of the influence of prosthetic feet on below-knee amputee walking. Am J Phys Med Rehabil1991; 70: 142–148
11.
GohJ CHSolomonidisS ESpenceW DPaulJ P. Biomechanical evaluation of SACH and uniaxial feet. Prosthet Orthot Int1984; 8: 147–154
12.
HartenbergR SDenavrrJ. Kinematic synthesis of linkages. McGraw-Hill, New York1964
13.
HittenbergerD C. The Seattle foot. Orthot Prosthet1986; 40(3): 17–23
14.
KristinssonÖssur. Prosthetic Foot. U.S. Patent. 5,139,525, 1992
15.
LehmannJ FPriceRBoswell-BessetteSDralleAQueatadK. Comprehensive analysis of dynamic elastic response feet: Seattle Ankle/Lite foot versus SACH foot. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1993; 74: 853–861
16.
McConvtlleJ TChurchillT DKalepsIClauserC ECuzziJ. Anthropometric relationships of body and body segment moments of intertia. Report AFAMRL-TR-80-119 — Yellow Springs. Anthropoly Research Project Inc., OH1980
17.
PerryJ. Gait Analysis: normal and pathological function. Slack, Thorofare, NJ1992
18.
PhillipsVan L. Modular Composite Prosthetic Foot and Leg. U.S. Patent 4, 822, 363, 1989
19.
PitkinM R. Problem of the Mobility of the Human Foot. Mechanica Tverdogo Tela. Izvestia Academy of Sciences of the USSR., Moscow1975; 10 (6): 40–45, (in Russian). Published in English in: Mechanics of Solids — New York: Allerton Press Inc. Vol. 10(6) 31-36.
20.
PitkinM R. Artificial Foot and Ankle. U.S. Patent 5, 376, 139, 1994a
21.
PmanM R. Normalizing skin/socket interface and range of motion in knee in trans-tibial amputee gait with the rolling joint prosthetic foot and ankle. Proceedings, 20th Annual Meeting and Symposium. 1994b. AAOP, Nashville, TN, 5–6
22.
PttkinM R. Mechanical outcomes of a rolling joint prosthetic foot and its performance in dorsiflexion phase of the trans-tibial amputee gait. J Prosthet Orthot1995; 7: 114–123
23.
RadojffeC WFoortJ. The pattellar-tendon-bearing below-knee prosthesis. University of California, Biomechanics Laboratory, Berkeley, CA1961
24.
RadcuffeC W. The biomechanics of below-knee prostheses in normal, level, bipedal walking. Artificial Limbs1962; 6(2): 16–24
25.
ReberLPerryJPinkM. Muscular control of the ankle in running. Am J Sports Med1993; 21: 805–810
26.
SandersJ EDalyC HBurgessE M. Clinical measurement of normal and shear stresses on a trans-tibial stump: characteristics of wave-form shapes during walking. Prosthet Orthot Int1993; 17: 38–48
27.
DeCM SaundersJ BInmanV TEberhartH D. The major determinants in normal and pathological gait. J Bone Joint Surgery1953; 35A: 543–558
28.
ScottS HWinterD A. Talocrural and talocalcaneal joint kinematics and kinetics during the stance phase of walking. J Biomech1991; 24: 743–752
29.
TorburnLPerryJAyyappaEShanfeldS L. Below-knee amputee gait with dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet: a pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev1990; 27(4): 369–384
30.
VannahW MChildressD S. Modelling the mechanics of narrowly contained soft tissues: the effect of specification of Poisson's ratio. J Rehabil Res Dev1993; 30(2): 205–209
31.
WagnerJSienkoSSupanTBarthD. Motion analysis of SACH vs. Flex-Foot in moderately active below-knee amputees. Clin Prosthet Orthot1987; 11: 55–62
32.
WinterD A. Biomechanics of Human Movement. J Wiley, New York1979
33.
WirtaR WMasonRCalvoKGolbransonF L. Effect of gait using various prosthetic ankle-foot devices. J Rehabil Res Dev1991; 28: 13–14
34.
WrightD GRennelsD C. A Study of the elastic properties of plantar fascia. J Bone Joint Surg1964; 46A: 482–492
35.
ZunigaE NLeavtttL ACalvertJ CCanzonerJPetersonC K. Gait patterns in above-knee amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1972; 53: 373–382