The energy storing (ES) prosthesis has been used in the Prosthetic Foundation's workshop since 1987. Subjective responses from 168 amputees (141 trans-tibial and 27 trans-femoral) fitted with the ES prosthesis were analysed. Ratings were generally favourable in comparison with those for conventional prostheses. The most pronounced advantages of the new prosthesis as shown by the ratings were in walking uphill or swift walking. The younger amputees had more benefit than the older ones. High body weight decreased the benefit of the ES prosthesis. The ES prosthesis does not seem to provide any major advantage for the less active amputee whose movements are mainly indoors.
References
1.
AlarantaHKlnnunenAKarkkainenMPohjolainenTHeliovaaraM. Practical benefits of Flex-Foot in below-knee amputees. J Prosthet Orthot1991; 3: 179–181
2.
GonzalezE GCorcoranP JReyesR L. Energy expenditure in below-knee amputees: correlation with stump length. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1974; 55: 111–119
3.
JainA S. Amputation and lower limb prosthetics. Curr Opin Orthop1992; 3: 819–823
4.
JamesU. Oxygen uptake and heart rate during prosthetic walking in healthy male unilateral above-knee amputees. Scand J Rehabil Med1973; 5: 71–80
5.
MichaelJ. Energy storing feet: a clinical comparison. Clin Prosthet Orthot1987; 11: 154–168
6.
NielsenD HShurrD GGoldenJ CMeierK. Comparison of energy cost and gait efficiency during ambulation in below-knee amputees using different prosthetic feet: a preliminary report. J Prosthet Orthot1988; 1: 24–31
7.
PagliaruloM AWatersRHislopH J. Energy cost of walking of below-knee amputees having no vascular disease. Phys Ther1979; 59: 538–542
8.
SchuchC M. Dynamic alignment options for the Flex-Foot. J Prosthet Orthot1988; 1: 37–40
9.
WagnerJSienkoSSupanTBarthD. Motion analysis of SACH vs. Hex-Foot in moderately active below-knee amputees. Clin Prosthet Orthot1987; 11: 55–62
10.
WingD CHittenbergerD A. Energy-storing prosthetic feet. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1989; 70: 330–335
11.
WirtaR WMasonRCalvoKGolbransonF L. Effect of gait using various prosthetic ankle-foot devices. J Rehabil Res Dev1991; 28: 13–24
