Objective: We sought to identify the psychosocial characteristics of high earthquake exposure subjects that were associated with the development of post-disaster morbidity and with recovery.
Method: Data reported are from 515 participants in a longitudinal study of the psychosocial effects of the 1989 Newcastle (Australia) earthquake. Subjects were allocated to three subgroups (low morbidity; recovered; and persistent morbidity) on the basis of their Impact of Event Scale scores across the four phases of the study. Differences between these subgroups were examined on a broad range of variables.
Results: Several background, dispositional, coping style and exposure-related factors characterised those who developed psychological morbidity, only a small subset of which differentiated between those who recovered and those with persistent morbidity.
Conclusions: Post-earthquake morbidity persists longer in those who are older, have a history of emotional problems, have higher neuroticism, use more neurotic defenses, and report higher levels of post-disaster life events.
GreenBLLindyJDPost-traumatic stress disorder in victims of disasters. Psychiatric Clinics of North America1994; 17:301–309.
2.
GibbsMSFactors in the victim that mediate between disaster and psychopathology: a review. Journal of Traumatic Stress1989; 2:489–514.
3.
JonesJCBarlowDHThe etiology of posttraumatic stress disorder. Clinical Psychology Review1990; 10:299–328.
4.
McFarlaneACThe aetiology of post-traumatic morbidity: predisposing, precipitating and perpetuating factors. British Journal of Psychiatry1989; 154:221–228.
5.
CarrVJLewinTJWebsterRAHazellPLKenardyJACarterGLPsychosocial sequelae of the 1989 Newcastle earthquake: I. Community disaster experiences and psychological morbidity 6 months post-disaster. Psychological Medicine1995; 25:539–555.
6.
CarrVJLewinTJWebsterRAKenardyJAHazellPLCarterGLPsychosocial sequelae of the 1989 Newcastle earthquake: II. Exposure and morbidity profiles during the first 2 years post-disaster. Psychological Medicine1997; 27:167–178.
7.
CarrVJLewinTJKenardyJAPsychosocial sequelae of the 1989 Newcastle earthquake: III. Role of vulnerability factors in post-disaster morbidity. Psychological Medicine1997; 27:179–190.
8.
HorowitzMWilnerNAlvarezW.The Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine1979; 41:209–218.
9.
GoldbergDPThe detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. London: Oxford University Press, 1972.
10.
GoldbergDPGaterRSartoriusNThe validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychological Medicine1997; 27:191–197.
11.
BillingsAGMoosRHThe role of coping responses and social resources in attenuating the stress of life events. Journal of Behavioral Medicine1981; 4:139–157.
12.
Duncan-JonesP.Short stable measures of extroversion and neuroticism for the Australian general population. Canberra: Social Psychiatry Research Unit, Australian National University, 1983.
13.
NunnKPLewinTJWaltonJMCarrVJThe construction and characteristics of an instrument to measure personal hopefulness. Psychological Medicine1996; 26:531–545.
14.
AndrewsGSinghMBondM.The Defense Style Questionnaire. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease1993; 181:246–256.
15.
McFarlaneACThe aetiology of post-traumatic stress disorders following a natural disaster. British Journal of Psychiatry1988; 152:116–121.
16.
American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 3rd ed., revised. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1987.
17.
WebsterRAPosttraumatic stress reactions following an earthquake: epidemiology, diagnostic interviews and information processing. PhD thesis, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, 1997.
18.
DixonWJBrownMBEngelmanLHillMAJennrichRI, eds. BMDP statistical software manual. Vol. 1 and 2. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1988.
19.
GreggWMedleyIFowler-DixonRPsychological consequences of the Kegworth air disaster. British Journal of Psychiatry1995; 167:812–817.
20.
DugganCGunnJ.Medium-term course of disaster victims: a naturalistic follow-up. British Journal of Psychiatry1995; 167:228–232.
21.
TicehurstSWebsterRACarrVJLewinTJThe psychosocial impact of an earthquake on the elderly. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry1996; 11:943–951.
22.
Duncan-JonesPFergussonDMOrmelJHorwoodLJA model of stability and change in minor psychiatric symptoms: results from three longitudinal studies. Psychological Medicine1990; 18(Suppl.):1–28.
23.
DavidsonJRTBookSWColketJTAssessment of a new self-rating scale for post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychological Medicine1997; 27:153–160.
24.
American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed.Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1994.
25.
DavidsonJSmithRKudlerH.Validity and reliability of the DSM-III criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder: experience with a structured interview. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease1989; 177:336–341.
26.
PetersLAndrewsGCottierLBChatterjiSJancaASmeetsRMWThe Composite International Diagnostic Interview post-traumatic stress disorder module: preliminary data. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research1996; 6:167–174.
27.
CarrVJLewinTJWebsterRAKenardyJAA synthesis of the findings from the Quake Impact Study: a two-year investigation of the psychosocial sequelae of the 1989 Newcastle earthquake. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology1997; 32:123–136.
28.
EhlersASteilR.Maintenance of intrusive memories in posttraumatic stress disorder: a cognitive approach. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy1995; 23:217–249.
