Objective and Method: This review examines the scope of forensic psychiatry with particular emphasis on its ethical and social implications. Some comparisons are made between the development of the subspecialty in Australasia and similar developments in the United Kingdom and North America, and the reasons for differences.
Results: There has been inadequate debate in Australasia about some of the ethical issues relating to the practice of forensic psychiatry. Furthermore, Australian forensic psychiatry in particular has been slow to develop comprehensive and integrated services compared to other jurisdictions, and remains predominantly an assessment-based activity with primacy of the expert witness.
Conclusions: Australasian psychiatry faces significant problems with respect to maldistribution of services. Governments are becoming more radical in their attempts to address this maldistribution and this has ethical implications for the profession itself and the practice of forensic psychiatry. Greater emphasis on the development of integrated and community-based forensic services, with leadership being provided by the profession itself, may deflect some of the present criticism, thereby allowing the subspecialty to more fully mature and develop with the approach of the new millennium.
GunnJ.Forensic psychiatry as a subspeciality. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry1982; 5:65–79.
2.
OrmrodR.The scope of forensic psychiatry. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry1990; 1:1–4.
3.
BluglassR.The scope of forensic psychiatry. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry1990; 1:5–9.
4.
American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.Ethics guidelines for the practice of forensic psychiatry. Bloomfield, CT: American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 1987.
5.
StoneAAThe ethics of forensic psychiatry: a view from the ivory tower. In: Stone AA. Law, psychiatry and morality. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1984.
6.
AppelbaumPSThe parable of the forensic psychiatrist: ethics and the problem of doing harm. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry1990; 13:249–259.
7.
FreckeltonI.The trial of the expert: a study of expert evidence and forensic experts. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1987.
8.
BluglassR.Valedictory address. Free use of unexpired time; my criminal career. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health1996; Suppl. 3:95–106.
9.
OliverADThe sex offender: lessons from the California experience. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry1982; 5:403–411.
10.
Community Protection Act 1994 (New South Wales)..
11.
Guardian Weekly. 9 March 1997.
12.
PenroseL.Mental disease and crime: outline of a comparative study of European statistics. British Journal of Medical Psychology1939; 18:1–15.
13.
HerrmanHMcGorryPMillsJSinghB.Hidden severe psychiatric morbidity in sentenced prisoners: an Australian study. American Journal of Psychiatry1991; 148:236–239.
14.
GlaserWLasterK.Are the mentally ill being criminalised? Admission of prisoners to psychiatric hospital before and after the 1986 Mental Health Act (Vic). Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology1990; 23:230–240.
15.
JosephLAPotterM.Diversion from custody II: effect on hospital and prison resources. British Journal of Psychiatry1993; 162:303–334.
16.
Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists.Ethical guidelines. Melbourne: Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, 1992.
17.
PargiterRBlochS.The ethics committee of a psychiatric college: its procedures and themes. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry1997; 31:76–82.
18.
McKay B and associates. Proposals for change (final report). Optimum supply and effective use of psychiatrists. Sydney: National Mental Health Strategy, 1996.
19.
LiveraniMRThe new doctors. The Australian Magazine 29–30 March 1997:51–55.
