Objective: The original study aimed to determine the best cut-off scores to screen for postnatal depression on translated versions of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for Vietnamese and Arabic women. This research was conducted using the depression module of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) to determine caseness. This paper reports on the suitability of this diagnostic interview as a criterion measure of depression in these women with a non-English speaking background.
Method: Vietnamese and Arabic women in south-west Sydney completed the EPDS and a General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-30) antenatally. At 6–8 weeks postpartum they completed an EPDS, the GHQ-30 and a Faces Scale, and were interviewed using the depression module of the DIS. Members of a small convenience sample of women were asked about the cultural appropriateness of each of the instruments.
Results: Vietnamese women admitted to few depressive symptoms on the DIS, whereas they appeared more open to reporting these on the EPDS and the GHQ-30. Arabic women responded more openly to the questionnaires and the interview, although they too were reluctant to report specific symptoms on the DIS.
Conclusion: The usefulness of the DIS in determining rates of major depression in the Vietnamese and Arabic community in Australia is questionable. Further studies designed specifically to investigate this are needed.
BrislinRW.The wording and translation of research instruments. In: LonnerWJBerryJW, eds. Field methods in cross-cultural research. Beverley Hills: Sage, 1986:137–164.
2.
El-RufaieOAbsoodG.Validity study of the hospital anxiety and depression scale among a group of Saudi patients. British Journal of Psychiatry1987; 151:687–688.
3.
MollicaRFWyshakGde MarneffeDKhounFLavelleJ.Indochinese versions of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist 25: a screening instrument for the psychiatric care of refugees. American Journal of Psychiatry1987; 144:497–500.
4.
RobinsLNHelzerJECroughanJRatcliffKS.National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule: its history, characteristics and validity. Archives of General Psychiatry1981; 38:381–389.
5.
WingJKBirleyJLTCooperSEGrahamPIsaacsA.Reliability of a procedure for measuring and classifying psychiatric state. British Journal of Psychiatry1967; 113:499–575.
6.
FebboSBurvillPW.Validation of an Italian translation of the 30-item General Health Questionnaire for use in Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry1995; 29:266–269.
7.
ChengTWilliamsP.The design and development of a screening questionnaire (CHQ) for use in community studies of mental disorders in Taiwan. Psychological Medicine1986; 16:415–422.
8.
KinzieJDMansonSMVinhDTTolanNTAnhBPhoTN.Development and validation of a Vietnamese-language depression rating scale. American Journal of Psychiatry1982; 139:1276–1281.
9.
KnauperBWittchenH-U.Diagnosing major depression in the elderly: evidence for response bias in standardized diagnostic interviews?Journal of Psychiatric Research1994; 28:147–164.
10.
ParkerG.Are the lifetime prevalence estimates in the ECA study accurate?Psychological Medicine1987; 17:275–282.
11.
RobinsLNWingJWittchenHUThe Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Archives of General Psychiatry1988; 45:1069–1077.
12.
KarnoMBurnamMAEscobarJIHoughRLEatonWW.Development of the Spanish-language version of the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Archives of General Psychiatry1983; 40:1183–1188.
13.
BurnamMAKarnoMHoughRLEscobarJIForsytheAB.The Spanish Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Reliability and comparison with clinical diagnoses. Archives of General Psychiatry1983; 40:1189–1196.
14.
BravoMCaninoGJRubio-StipecMWoodbury-FarinaM.A cross-cultural adaptation of a psychiatric epidemiologic instrument: the Diagnostic Interview Schedule's adaptation in Puerto Rico. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry1991; 15:1–18.
15.
SemlergWittchen HUJoschkeKTest-retest reliability of a standardized psychiatric interview (DIS/CIDI). European Archives of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences1987; 236:214–222.
16.
HwuHGYehEKChangLY.Chinese Diagnostic Interview Schedule: I. Agreement with psychiatrist's diagnosis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica1986; 73:225–233.
17.
HwuHGYehEKChangLYYehYL.Chinese Diagnostic Interview Schedule: II. A validity study on estimation of lifetime prevalence. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica1986; 73:348–357.
LopezSNunezJA.Cultural factors considered in selected diagnostic criteria and interview schedules. Journal of Abnormal Psychology1987; 3:270–272.
20.
DegotardiV.Vietnamese asylum-seekers in Hong Kong: cultural attitudes to mental illness and health-seeking behaviour. Australasian Journal of Psychiatry1995; 3:93–94.
21.
LienO.Attitudes of the Vietnamese community towards mental illness. Australasian Psychiatry1993; 1:110–112.
22.
TakeuchiDTKuoH-SKimKLeafPJ.Psychiatric symptom dimensions among Asian Americans and Native Hawaiians: an analysis of the symptom checklist. Journal of Community Psychology1989; 17:319–329.
23.
SenBde MariJesus J.Psychiatric research instruments in the transcultural setting: experiences in India and Brazil. Social Science and Medicine1986; 23:277–281.
24.
CoxJHoldenJSagovskyR.Detection of postnatal depression: development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. British Journal of Psychiatry1987; 150:782–786.
25.
GoldbergDP.The manual of the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor: National Foundation for Educational Research, Nelson, 1978.
26.
BrislinRWLonnerWJThorndikeRM.Cross-cultural research methods. New York: John Wiley, 1973.