Abstract
Objective: The aim of the paper is to devise an ethical argument to support the contention that post-termination patient–therapist sexual contact (PTSC) is always unethical.
Method: Arguments both defending and condemning post-termination PTSC are reviewed and their strengths and weaknesses explored.
Results: Analysis of these arguments reveals a strong case for the universal condemnation of post-termination PTSC.
Conclusions: Ethical codes, including that of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, should be amended to explicitly prohibit post-termination PTSC.
