Some individual Australian psychiatrists have held influential positions in the administration of health care, academic institutions and medical research. It is timely to assess whether individual or group action best meets psychiatry's professional and service needs. Through an exploration of aspects of professionalism, power, leadership, change in the nature and control of health care, and psychiatry's political roles, a case is made for corporate action aimed at psychiatry establishing leadership roles in Australian health care.
References
1.
Apa (1985), American Psychiatric News, 21 June 1985.
2.
FentonW. S.LeafP. J.MoranN. L.TischlerG. L. (1984), Trends in psychiatric practice, 1965–1980, American Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 346–51.
3.
KnesperD. J.CarlsonB. W. (1981), An analysis of the movement to private psychiatric practice, Archives of General Psychiatry, 38, 943–9.
4.
KolbL. C. (1974), Discussion of ‘Psychiatry's drift away from medicine’ by R. A. Schwartz, American Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 133–4.
5.
LaddJ. (1981), Physicians and society: Tribulations of power and responsibility, in SpickerS. F.HealeyJ. M.EngelhardtH. T. (eds), The Law-Medicine Relation: A Philosophical Exploration, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Holland.
6.
LiptonG. L. (1983), Politics of mental health: circles or spirals, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 17, 50–6.
7.
MaddisonD. (1975), Take me to your leader: The psychiatrist in the health care system, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 9, 133–9.
8.
ParkerG. (1985), Medical experimentation: a behavioural science perspective, The Medical Journal of Australia, 142, 681–4.
9.
ShoreM. F. (1979), Public psychiatry: The public view, Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 30, 768–71.