Patients in a general hospital psychiatric unit completed Visual Analogue Mood Scales before and after group psychotherapy sessions, and at corresponding times on days without group meetings. Changes in the dispersion of scores between “before” and “after” measurements differed between days with group psychotherapy and days without. Cohesiveness attributable to the group process is suggested as likely explanation for this difference. Factors influencing measurements are investigated and discussed.
References
1.
AitkenR. C. B. (1969). Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine62: 989.
2.
FolsteinM. F.LuriaR. (1973). The reliability, validity, and clinical application of the Visual Analogue Mood Scale. Psychological Medicine3: 479.
3.
HayesM. H.PattersonD. G. (1921). Experimental development of the graphic rating method. Psychological Bulletin18: 98.
4.
LuriaR. E. (1975). The validity and reliability of the Visual Analogue Mood Scale. Journal of Psychiatric Research12: 51.
5.
YalomI. D.PetersH. S.SheldonM. Z.RandK. H. (1967). Prediction of success in group therapy. Archives of General Psychiatry17: 159.
6.
YalomI. D.RandK. (1966). Compatibility and cohesiveness in therapy groups. Archives of General Psychiatry13: 267.
7.
ZeallyA. K.AitkenR. C. B. (1969). Measurement of mood. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine62: 993.
