The call for many higher education institutions to atone for their histories of enslavement is rapidly growing. Prior reparations research, however, has primarily focused on reparations at the federal level. Utilizing QuantCrit with the afterlife of slavery and racialized organizations theory, a discrete-time hazard model, was developed to predict whether a higher education institution established prior to the Civil War engaged in university reparations based on time and organizational factors. Results show that Carnegie Classification (doctoral university), endowment, percent of Black faculty, membership in the Universities Studying Slavery (USS) consortium, and time all predicted the odds of a pre-Civil War higher education institution engaging in their first reparation.
AllisonP. D. (1982). Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories. Sociological Methodology, 13, 61–98.
2.
AmboT.Rocha BeardallT. (2023). Performance or progress? The physical and rhetorical removal of Indigenous peoples in settler land acknowledgements at land-grab universities. American Educational Research Journal, 60(1), 103–140.
3.
American Council on Education. (2024). Understanding college and university endowments. American Council on Education.
BakerD. J. (2019). Pathways to racial equity in higher education: Modeling the antecedents of state affirmative action bans. American Educational Research Journal, 56(5), 1861–1895. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219833918
6.
BakerR.KlasikD.ReardonS. F. (2018). Race and stratification in college enrollment over time. AERA Open, 4(1), 1–28.
7.
BergerJ. B.MilemJ. F. (2000). Organizational behavior in higher education and student outcomes. In SmartJ. C.TierneyW. G. (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 15, pp. 268–338). Agathon. https://link.springer.com/book/9780875861272
8.
BouhlilaD. S.SellaoutiF. (2013). Multiple imputation using chained equations for missing data in TIMSS: A case study. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 1(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-0739-1-4
9.
BrophyA. L. (2006). Reparations: Pro and con. Oxford University Press.
BrunoT. (2023). Ecological memory in the biophysical afterlife of slavery. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 113(7), 1543–1553.
12.
BurkeC. (1982). American collegiate populations: A test of the traditional view. New York University Press.
13.
CabreraN. L. (2018). Where is the racial theory in critical race theory? A constructive criticism of the crits. Review of Higher Education, 42, 209–233.
14.
CarbadoD. W.RoithmayrD. (2014). Critical race theory meets social science. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 10(1), 149–167.
15.
CastilloW.BabbN. (2024). Transforming the future of quantitative educational research: A systematic review of enacting QuantCrit. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 27(1), 1–21.
16.
CastilloW.GillbornD. (2023). How to “QuantCrit:” Practices and questions for education data researchers and users (EdWorkingPaper 22-546). Annenberg Institute at Brown University. https://doi.org/10.26300/v5kh-dd65
17.
ClarkeM.FineG. A. (2010). “A” for apology: Slavery and the discourse of remonstrance in two American Universities. History & Memory, 22(1), 81–112.
18.
ColeE. (2020). The campus color line: College presidents and the struggle for Black freedom. Princeton University Press.
DachéA.GaribayJ. C.SunJ.PickenpackA.Moore-LewisD. A.ChurchillA. (2023, April). “1839 was built on my B(l)ack”: Racial justice activism and the university reparations movement. Research paper presented at the American Education Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.
22.
DavisD. A. (2019). Trump, race, and reproduction in the afterlife of slavery. Cultural Anthropology, 34(1), 26–33.
DillonS. (2012). Possessed by death: The neoliberal-carceral state, black feminism, and the afterlife of slavery. Radical History Review, 112(112), 113–125.
25.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
FlackM. M.TateK. (2004, September2). Public opinion on reparations for American slavery: Racial justice long overdue or affirmative action redux?Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
30.
FosterJ. M.FowlesJ. (2018). Ethnic heterogeneity, group affinity, and state higher education spending. Research in Higher Education, 59, 1–28.
GarcesL. M. (2020). The false notion of “race-neutrality”: How legal battles in higher education undermine racial equity. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 52(2), 51–55.
33.
GarciaN. M.LópezN.VélezV. N. (2018). QuantCrit: Rectifying quantitative methods through critical race theory. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 21, 149–157.
34.
GaribayJ. C.DachéA.Moore-LewisD. A.SunJ. (2024). A reparations framework for Black enslavement in higher education. Research paper to be presented at the Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Meeting, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
35.
GaribayJ. C.MathisC. (2021). Does a university’s enslavement history play a role in Black student-white faculty interactions? A structural equation model. Education Sciences, 11(12), 809–819.
36.
GaribayJ. C.MathisC. L.WestC. P. L. (2022). Black student views on higher education reparations at a university with an enslavement history. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 25(5), 607–628.
37.
GaribayJ. C.WestC. P.MathisC. (2020). “It affects me in ways that I don’t even realize”: Black student responses to a university’s historical involvement in slavery. Journal of College Student Development, 61(6), 697–716.
38.
GillbornD.WarmingtonP.DemackS. (2018). QuantCrit: Education, policy, “Bid Data” and principles for a critical race theory of statistics. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 21, 158–179.
39.
HackneyJ. R.Jr. (2004). Ideological conflict, African American reparations, tort causation and the case for social welfare transformation. Boston University Law Review, 84, 1193–1207.
40.
HaenschA.-C.BartlettJ.WeißB. (2022). Multiple imputation of partially observed covariates in discrete-time survival analysis. Sociological Methods & Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241221140147
41.
HarperS. R. (2012). Race without racism: How higher education researchers minimize racist institutional norms. The Review of Higher Education, 36(1), 9–29.
42.
HarrisL. M. (2020). Higher education’s reckoning with slavery: Two decades of activism and scholarship have led to critical self-examination. Academe, 106, 31–36.
43.
HarrisL. M.CampbellJ. T.BrophyA. L. (Eds.). (2019). Slavery and the University: Histories and legacies. University of Georgia Press.
44.
HartmanS. (2007). Lose your mother: A journey along the Atlantic slave route. Farrar, Staus, and Giroux.
45.
Harvard University’s Presidential Committee on Harvard & the Legacy of Slavery. (2022). Harvard and the legacy of slavery. Harvard University.
JargowskyP. A. (2005). Omitted variable bias. In Kempf-LeonardK. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of social measurement: 919–924. Academic Press.
48.
JayakumarU. M.HowardT. C.AllenW. R.HanJ. C. (2009). Racial privilege in the professoriate: An exploration of campus climate, retention, and satisfaction. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(5), 538–563.
49.
KelleyR. D. G. (2002). Freedom dreams: The Black radical imagination. Beacon Press.
50.
KingdonJ. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Little, Brown.
51.
Ladson-BillingsG.TateW. F. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97(1), 47–68.
LitwackL. F. (1961). North of slavery: The negro in the free states. The University of Chicago Press.
54.
LópezN.ErwinC.BinderM.ChavezM. J. (2018). Making the invisible visible: Advancing quantitative methods in higher education using critical race theory and intersectionality. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 21(2), 180–207.
55.
McInnisM. D.NelsonL. P. (Eds.) (2019). Educated in tyranny: Slavery at Thomas Jefferson’s university. University of Virginia Press.
MustaffaJ. B. (2017). Mapping violence, naming life: A history of anti-Black oppression in the higher education system. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30, 711–727.
60.
NienhusserH. K. (2015). Undocumented immigrants and higher education policy: The policymaking environment of New York state:The Review of Higher Education, 38(2), 271–303.
61.
PattonL. D. (2016). Disrupting postsecondary prose: Toward a critical race theory of higher education. Urban Education, 51(3), 315–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085915602542
62.
PosseltJ. R.JaquetteO.BielbyR.BastedoM. N. (2012). Access without equity: Longitudinal analyses of institutional stratification by race and ethnicity, 1972–2004. American Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1074–1111.
63.
PusserB. (2004). Burning down the house: Politics, governance, and affirmative action at the University of California. SUNY University Press.
64.
RayV. (2019). A theory of racialized organizations. American Sociological Review, 84(1), 26–53.
65.
RayV. (2023). Racialized organizations and the interest divergence dilemma. Sociological Forum, 38(4), 1375–1381.
66.
Red Shirt-ShawM. (2020). Beyond the land acknowledgement: College ‘‘LAND BACK’’ or free tuition for Native students (Policy and Practice Brief). Hack the Gates. https://hackthegates.org
67.
RockmanS. (2012). The future of civil war era studies: Slavery and capitalism. Journal of the Civil War Era, 2(1), 1–16.
68.
RodriguezA.DeaneK. C.DavisC. H. F. (2022). Towards a framework of racialized policymaking in higher education. In PernaL. W. (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 37, pp. 519–599). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76660-3_2
69.
RojasF. (2006). Social movement tactics, organizational change and the spread of African-American Studies. Social Forces, 84(4), 2147–2166.
70.
RubinD. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for survey nonresponse. Wiley.
ScottW. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
75.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (1993). It’s about time: Using discrete-time survival analysis to study duration and the timing of events. Journal of Educational Statistics, 18(2), 155–195.
76.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
77.
SolorzanoD.CejaM.YossoT. (2000). Critical race theory, racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate: The experiences of African American College students. The Journal of Negro Education, 69(1/2), 60–73.
78.
StanleyC. A. (2006). Coloring the academic landscape: Faculty of color breaking the silence in predominantly white colleges and universities. American Educational Research Journal, 43(4), 701–736.
StulbergL. M.ChenA. S. (2014). The origins of race-conscious affirmative action in undergraduate admissions: A comparative analysis of institutional change in higher education. Sociology of Education, 87(1), 36–52.
81.
TachineA. R.CabreraN. L. (2021). “I’ll be right behind you”: Native American families, land debt, and college affordability. AERA Open, 7. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211025522
82.
TaylorB. J. (2022). Wrecked: Deinstitutionalization and partial defenses in state higher education policy. Rutgers University Press.
83.
TaylorB. J.CantwellB.WattsK.WoodO. (2020). Partisanship, white racial resentment, and state support for higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 91(6), 858–887.
84.
TewksburyD. G. (1932). The Founding of American Colleges and Universities before the civil war. Martino Fine Books.
85.
TichavakundaA. A. (2022). University memorials and symbols of white supremacy: Black students’ counternarratives. The Journal of Higher Education, 93(5), 677–701.
University of Virginia President’s Commission on Slavery and the University [PCSU]. (2018). President’s commission on slavery and the university. https://slavery.virginia.edu/
89.
van BuurenS. (2007). Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 16(3), 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280206074463
90.
VerdunV. (1993). If the shoe fits, wear it: An analysis of reparations to African Americans. Tulane Law Review, 67(3), 597–668.
WeinbaumA. E. (2013). The afterlife of slavery and the problem of reproductive freedom. Social Text, 31(2), 49–68.
94.
WestR. M. (2016). Academic bondage: A look at the history of slavery on university campuses in America and how these schools are addressing their past [Thesis]. University of Georgia.
WhiteI. R.RoystonP.WoodA. M. (2011). Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Statistics in Medicine, 30(4), 377–399. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4067
