We present the 2-year experimental mixed-methods findings of a two-generation English as a second language (ESL) program. This program combines a high-dosage, child-oriented curriculum for parents with Head Start for children in addition to family-based supportive services. At baseline and after 2 years, 189 Latinx and Zomi immigrant parents completed surveys while children completed skill assessments. A subset of 67 parents participated in focus groups regarding their experiences. Treatment parents reported significantly higher English writing skills and self-esteem and significantly lower language brokering and material hardship. There were no significant differences in children’s outcomes. Possible explanatory mechanisms across multiple contexts were identified in the qualitative data. Evidence is promising that a Two-Generation ESL Program improves some outcomes for parents.
Ballard & Tighe, Publishers. (2010). Examiner’s manual. In Pre-IPT oral english (4th ed.). Ballard & Tighe, Publishers, Educational IDEAS, Inc.
2.
BronfenbrennerU.MorrisP. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In DamonW. (Series Ed.) & LernerR. M. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 793–828). Wiley.
3.
Brooks-GunnJ.DuncanG. J. (1997). The effects of poverty on children. The Future of Children, 7(2), 55–71.
BurielR.PerezW.De MentT. L.ChavezD. V.MoranV. R. (1998). The relationship of language brokering to academic performance, biculturalism, and self-efficacy among Latino adolescents. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 20, 283–297.
6.
BuschJ.YoshikawaH. (2022). Refugee policies and parenting in the United States and Germany. In MorrisA.MendezJ. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of parenting: Interdisciplinary research and application (pp. 514–535). Cambridge University Press.
7.
CabreraN. J.AlonsoA.ChenY. (2021). Parenting contributions to Latinx children’s development in the early years. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 696(1), 158–178.
8.
CarlockR. H. (2016). La unión hace la fuerza: Community organizing in adult education for immigrants. Harvard Educational Review, 86(1), 98–122.
9.
CarpentieriJ. (2012). Family learning: A review of the research literature. National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy, Institute of Education, University of London.
10.
CassidyJ.GarciaR.Tejeda-DelgadoC.GarrettS. D.Martinez-GarciaC.HinojosaR. V. (2004). A learner-centered family literacy project for Latino parents and caregivers. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 47(6), 478–488.
11.
Chase-LansdaleL.Brooks-GunnJ. (2014). Two-generation programs in the twenty-first century. The Future of Children, 24, 13–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/foc.2014.0003
12.
Chase-LansdaleP. L.D’AngeloA. V.PalaciosN. (2007). A multidisciplinary perspective on the development of young children in immigrant families. In LansfordJ. E.Dirby-DeckardK.BornsteinM. H. (Eds.), Immigrant families in contemporary society (pp. 137–156). The Guildford Press.
13.
CondelliL.WrigleyH. S.YoonK. S. (2008). “What works” for adult literacy students of English as a Second Language. In RederS.BynnerJ. (Eds.), Tracking adult literacy and numeracy skills: Findings from longitudinal research (pp. 132–159). Routledge.
14.
CongerR. D.CongerK. J.MartinM. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status, family processes, and individual development. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 685–704.
Davis-KeanP. E.TigheL. A.WatersN. E. (2021). The role of parent educational attainment in parenting and children’s development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(2), 186–192.
17.
De Los ReyesA.AugensteinT. M.AldaoA. (2017). Assessment issues in child and adolescent psychotherapy. In WeiszJ. R.KazdinA. E. (Eds.), Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents (3rd ed., pp. 537–554). Guilford Publications.
18.
DeterdingN. M.WatersM. C. (2021). Flexible coding of in-depth interviews: A twenty-first-century approach. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(2), 708–739.
19.
EyringJ. L. (2014). Adult ESL education in the US. The CATESOL Journal, 26, 120–149.
20.
FrickP. J. (1991). The Alabama Parenting Questionnaire [Unpublished rating scale]. University of Alabama.
21.
García CollC.CrnicK.LambertyG.WasikB. H.JenkinsR.GarciaH. V.McAdooH. P. (1996). An integrative model for the study of developmental competencies in minority children. Child Development, 67(5), 1891–1914.
22.
GoodM. E.MasewiczS.VogelL. (2010). Latino English language learners: Bridging achievement and cultural gaps between schools and families. Journal of Latinos and Education, 9(4), 321–339.
23.
GormleyW. T.PhillipsD.GayerT. (2008). Preschool programs can boost school readiness. Science, 320, 1723–1724.
KesslerR. C.AndrewsG.ColpeL. J.HiripiE.MroczekD. K.NormandS. L.WaltersE. E.ZaslavskyA. M. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32(6), 959–976.
26.
MartinezC. R.JrMcClureH. H.EddyJ. M. (2009). Language brokering contexts and behavioral and emotional adjustment among Latino parents and adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 29(1), 71–98.
27.
MatherN.WoodcockR. W. (2001). Examiner’s manual. In Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement. Riverside.
28.
McCabeA.Tamis-LeMondaC. S.BornsteinM. H.Brockmeyer CatesC.GolinkoffR.Wishard GuerraA.Hirsh-PasekK.HoffE.KuchirkoY.MelziG.MendelsohnA.PáezM.SongL. (2013). Multilingual children beyond myths and toward best practices. Social Policy Report, 27(4), 1–37. Society for Research in Child Development.
MooreK. A.CaalS.RojasA.LawnerE. K. (2014). Child trends’ evaluation of the Abriendo Puertas/Opening Doors Program: Executive summary and discussion brief. Child Trends Hispanic Institute. https://ap-od.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/apexec.pdf
PekrunR. (2020). Commentary: Self-report is indispensable to assess students’ learning. Frontline Learning Research, 8(3), 185–193.
36.
PhillipsD.GormleyW.AndersonS. (2016). The effects of Tulsa’s CAP Head Start program on middle-school academic outcomes and progress. Developmental Psychology, 52(8), 1247–1261.
37.
PidanoA. E.AllenA. R. (2015). The Incredible Years series: A review of the independent research base. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 1898–1916.
38.
RogersL. O.NiwaE. Y.ChungK.YipT.ChaeD. (2021). M (ai) cro: Centering the macrosystem in human development. Human Development, 65(5–6), 270–292.
39.
RosenbergM. (1989). Society and the adolescent self-image. Wesleyan University Press.
40.
SabolT.ChorE.Eckrich SommerT.TigheL.Chase-LansdaleL.MorrisA. S.Brooks-GunnJ.YoshikawaH.KingC. (2024). Does adding parent education and workforce training to Head Start promote or interfere with children’s development? [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University.
41.
SabolT. J.SommerT. E.Chase-LansdaleP. L.Brooks-GunnJ. (2021). Intergenerational economic mobility for low-income parents and their children: A dual developmental science framework. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 265–292. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-051001
42.
SchwartzS. J.UngerJ. B.ZamboangaB. L.SzapocznikJ. (2010). Rethinking the concept of acculturation: Implications for theory and research. American Psychologist, 65(4), 237.
43.
SommerT. E.GomezC. J.YoshikawaH.SabolT.ChorE.SanchezA.Chase-LansdaleP. L.Brooks-GunnJ. (2018). Head Start, two-generation ESL services, and parent engagement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 52, 63–73.
44.
SommerT. E.TigheL. A.SabolT. J.ChorE.Chase-LansdaleP. L.YoshikawaH.Brooks-GunnJ.MorrisA. S.KingC. T. (2023). The effects of a two-generation English as a second language (ESL) intervention on immigrant parents and children in Head Start. Applied Developmental Science, 28(3), 1–20.
45.
SpurlingS.SeymourS.ChismanF. P. (2008). Pathways and outcomes: Tracking ESL student performance. Council for the Advancement of Adult Literacy. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED506600.pdf
46.
St. PierreR. G.RicciutiA. E.RimdziusT. A. (2005). Effects of a family literacy program on low-literate children and their parents: Findings from an evaluation of the Even Start family literacy program. Developmental Psychology, 41(6), 953–970.
Umaña-TaylorA. (2003). Language brokering as a stressor for immigrant children and their families. In ColemanM.GanongL. (Eds.), Points and counterpoints: Controversial relationship and family issues in the 21st century (pp. 157–159). Roxbury.
Vélez-AgostoN. M.Soto-CrespoJ. G.Vizcarrondo-OppenheimerM.Vega-MolinaS.García CollC. (2017). Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory revision: Moving culture from the macro into the micro. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5), 900–910.
51.
WatermanR. (2009). Communication is more than language: Adult ESL classes foster parent–school collaboration. Bilingual Research Journal: The Journal of the National Association for Bilingual Education, 31(1–2), 227–250.
52.
WatersM. C.PineauM. G. (Eds.) (2015). The Integration of immigrants into American society. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The National Academies Press.
53.
WechslerD. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised. Psychological Corporation.
54.
WeisskirchR. S. (2005). The relationship of language brokering to ethnic identity for Latino early adolescents. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 27, 286–299.
55.
YoshikawaH.GodfreyE. B.RiveraA. C. (2008). Access to institutional resources as a measure of social exclusion: Relations with family process and cognitive development in the context of immigration. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 121, 73–96.
