As school board meetings are integral sites of local education policymaking, scholars must consider how structural racism manifests in these spaces across various district contexts. We examine how racialized institutional logics undergird the interactions between majority-Black district leadership and a local Black community during school board meetings. Through an ethnographic case study of school board meetings over the 2019–2020 school year, we find that racialized pressures led predominantly Black school board members and district administrators to uphold policies and practices that limited two-way authentic interactions with their Black constituents. In conclusion, we argue that racial representation in educational politics may be important, but is not sufficient unless accompanied by changes to policies and practices that privilege Whiteness and reproduce racism.
AhmedS. (2012). On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Duke University Press.
2.
AlemánE.Jr. (2009). LatCrit educational leadership and advocacy: Struggling over whiteness as property in Texas school finance. Equity & Excellence in Education, 42(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680902744246
BartanenB.GrissomJ. A.JoshiE.MeredithM. (2018). Mapping inequalities in local political representation: Evidence from Ohio school boards. AERA Open, 4(4), 2332858418818074. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418818074
7.
BellD. (1980). Brown v. Board of Education and the interest-convergence dilemma. Harvard Law Review, 94(3), 518–533. https://doi.org/10.2307/1340546
8.
BellD. (1992). Racial realism. Connecticut Law Review, 24, 363–379.
9.
BenavidesA. D.MedinaF. (2014). Representation and Hispanic school boards in North Central Texas: Confirming a lack of representation. Journal of Public Management & Social Policy, 20(1), Article 4. https://digitalscholarship.tsu.edu/jpmsp/vol20/iss1/4
10.
BertrandM.SampsonC. (2022a). Challenging systemic racism in school board meetings through intertextual co-optation. Critical Studies in Education, 63, 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1778795
BogdanR. C.BiklenS. K. (2006). Qualitative research for education to theory and methods (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
14.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2015). Getting over the Obama hope hangover: The new racism in “post racial” America. In MurjiK.JohnS. (Eds.) Theories of race and ethnicity (pp. 57–73). Cambridge University Press.
15.
Bonilla-SilvaE.DietrichD. (2011). The sweet enchantment of color-blind racism in Obamerica. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 634(1), 190–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716210389702
16.
Bridwell-MitchellE. N.ShererD. G. (2017). Institutional complexity and policy implementation: How underlying logics drive teacher interpretations of reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(2), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716677567
BurasK. (2011). Race, charter schools, and conscious capitalism: On the spatial politics of whiteness as property (and the unconscionable assault on black New Orleans). Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 296–331. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.2.6l42343qqw360j03
19.
Bush-MecenasS.MarshJ. A. (2018). The DIVE approach: Using case-ordered meta-matrices and theory-based data displays to analyze multiple case study data. In LochmillerC. (Ed.), Complementary research methods for educational leadership and policy studies. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93539-3_3
20.
CapperC. A.YoungM. D. (2015). The equity audit as the core of leading increasingly diverse schools and districts. In GeorgeT.ScanlanM. (Eds.), Leadership for increasingly diverse schools (pp. 212–223). Routledge.
21.
CésaireA. (2000). Discourse on colonialism. Monthly Review Press.
22.
CollinsJ. (2021). Should school boards be in charge? The effects of exposure to participatory and deliberative school board meetings. Peabody Journal of Education, 96(3), 341–355.
23.
CooperB. (2016). Intersectionality. In DischL.HawkesworthM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of feminist theory (pp. 385–406). Oxford University Press.
24.
CooperC. W. (2009). Parent involvement, African American mothers, and the politics of educational care. Equity & Excellence in Education, 42(4), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680903228389
25.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989, 139–167.
26.
CrenshawK.GotandaN.PellerG.ThomasK. (Eds.). (1995). Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement. The New Press.
27.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
28.
DaramolaE. J.MarshJ. A.AllbrightT. N. (2022). Advancing or inhibiting equity: The role of racism in the implementation of a community engagement policy. Leadership and Policy in Schools. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2022.2066546
29.
DaviesB.BanselP. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(3), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390701281751
30.
DelgadoR.StefancicJ. (2017). Critical race theory: An introduction. New York University Press.
31.
DeSenaJ. N.AnsaloneG. (2009). Gentrification, schooling and social inequality. Educational Research Quarterly, 33(1), 60–74.
32.
DiAngeloR. (2018). White fragility: Why it’s so hard for white people to talk about racism. Beacon Press.
33.
DicksB. (2005). New technologies for social research. Qualitative research and hypermedia: Ethnography for the digital age. Sage.
34.
DiemS.FrankenbergE.ClearyC. (2015). Factors that influence school board policy making: The political context of student diversity in urban-suburban districts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(5), 712–752.
35.
DiemS.WeltonA. D. (2020). Anti-racist educational leadership and policy: Addressing racism in public education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15589367
36.
DixsonA. D.Rousseau AndersonC. (2018). Where are we? Critical race theory in education 20 years later. Peabody Journal of Education, 93(1), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2017.1403194
37.
DomínguezD.BeaulieuA.EstalellaA.GómezE.SchnettlerB.ReadR. (2007). Virtual ethnography. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(3), 3–7. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0703E19
DyrnessA. (2011). Mothers united: An immigrant struggle for socially just education. University of Minnesota Press.
40.
EichelL. (2016). Governing urban schools in the future: What’s facing Philadelphia and Pennsylvania. Pew Charitable Trusts.
41.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.
42.
Enoch-StevensT.DaramolaE. J.JabbarH.MarshJ. (2022). Accountability battle: A critical analysis of a charter renewal decision. Urban Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859221095005
43.
EricksonF. (2006). Definition and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales. In GreenJ.CamilliG.ElmoreP. (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 177–192). American Educational Research Association.
44.
EwingE. L. (2018). Ghosts in the schoolyard: Racism and school closings on Chicago’s south side. University of Chicago Press.
45.
FieldsD. A.KafaiY. B. (2009). A connective ethnography of peer knowledge sharing and diffusion in a tween virtual world. Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-008-9057-1
46.
FinniganK. S.LavnerM. (2012). A political analysis of community influence over school closure. The Urban Review, 44, 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-011-0179-9
47.
FowlerF. (2000). Policy studies for educational leaders: An introduction. Merrill.
48.
FragaL. R.ElisR. (2009). Interests and representation: Ethnic advocacy on California school boards. Teachers College Record, 111(3), 659–682.
49.
FrankenbergR. (1993). White women, race matters: The social construction of whiteness. University of Minnesota Press.
GainesK. K. (2012). Uplifting the race: Black leadership, politics, and culture in the twentieth century. University of North Carolina Press.
52.
GillbornD. (2005). Education policy as an act of white supremacy: Whiteness, critical race theory and education reform. Journal of Education Policy, 20(4), 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500132346
53.
GillbornD. (2013). Interest-divergence and the colour of cutbacks: Race, recession and the undeclared war on Black children. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(4), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2013.822616
54.
GirouxH. A. (2003). Public pedagogy and the politics of resistance: Notes on a critical theory of educational struggle. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-5812.00002
55.
GreenT. L. (2017). Community-based equity audits: A practical approach for educational leaders to support equitable community-school improvements. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(1), 3–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X16672513
56.
GroomsA. A.MahatmyaD.JohnsonE. T. (2021). The retention of educators of color amidst institutionalized racism. Educational Policy, 35(2), 180–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904820986765
57.
HallettT. (2010). The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. American Sociological Review, 75(1), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122409357044
58.
HarrisC. I. (1995). Whiteness as property. In CrenshawK. W.GotandaN.PellerG.ThomasK. (Eds.), Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement (pp. 276–291). The New Press.
59.
HineC. (2000). Virtual ethnography. Sage.
60.
HochschildJ. L. (2005). What school boards can and cannot (or will not) accomplish. In HowellW. (Ed.), Besieged: School boards and the future of education politics (pp. 324–338). Brookings Institution Press.
61.
HorsfordS. D. (2019). School integration in the new Jim Crow: Opportunity or oxymoron?Educational Policy, 33(1), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904818810526
62.
HorsfordS. D.ScottJ. T.AndersonG. L. (2019). The politics of education policy in an era of inequality: Possibilities for democratic schooling. Routledge.
63.
HowardT. C.ReynoldsR. (2008). Examining parent involvement in reversing the underachievement of African American students in middle-class schools. Educational Foundations, 22, 79–98.
64.
IshimaruA. M. (2014). Rewriting the rules of engagement: Elaborating a model of district-community collaboration. Harvard Educational Review, 84(2), 188–216. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.2.r2007u165m8207j5
65.
IshimaruA. M. (2019). Just schools: Building equitable collaborations with families and communities. Teachers College Press.
66.
Jacobs-HueyL. (2002). The natives are gazing and talking back: Reviewing the problematics of positionality, voice, and accountability among “native” anthropologists. American Anthropologist, 104(3), 791–804. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2002.104.3.791
67.
JamesJ. (2014). Transcending the talented tenth: Black leaders and American intellectuals. Routledge.
68.
JenkinsD. A. (2021). Unspoken grammar of place: Anti-blackness as a spatial imaginary in education. Journal of School Leadership, 31(1–2), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052684621992768
69.
JerolmackC.KhanS. (2014). Talk is cheap: Ethnography and the attitudinal fallacy. Sociological Methods & Research, 43(2), 178–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114523396
70.
JerolmackC.KhanS. (Eds.). (2018). Approaches to ethnography: Analysis and representation in participant observation. Oxford University Press.
KhalifaM. A. (2015). Can Blacks be racists? Black-on-Black principal abuse in an urban school setting. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 28(2), 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2014.916002
73.
KhalifaM. A.JenningsM. E.BriscoeF.OleszweskiA. M.AbdiN. (2014). Racism? Administrative and community perspectives in data-driven decision-making: Systemic perspectives versus technical-rational perspectives. Urban Education, 49(2), 147–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085913475635
74.
KirstM. W. (1994). A changing context means school board reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 75, 378.
75.
KoganV.LavertuS.PeskowitzZ. (2021). The democratic deficit in U.S. education governance. American Political Science Review, 115, 1082–1089. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000162
76.
KohliR.PizarroM.NevárezA. (2017). The “new racism” of K–12 schools: Centering critical research on racism. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 182–202. https://https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16686949
77.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035007003
78.
Ladson-BillingsG.TateW. F. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97(1), 47–68.
79.
LandD. (2002). Local school boards under review: Their role and effectiveness in relation to students’ academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 229–278. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072002229
80.
LareauA.HorvatE. M. (1999). Moments of social inclusion and exclusion race, class, and cultural capital in family-school relationships. Sociology of Education, 72, 37–53. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673185
81.
LewisA. E.DiamondJ. B. (2015). Despite the best intentions: How racial inequality thrives in good schools. Oxford University Press.
82.
LightfootD. (2004). “Some parents just don’t care”: Decoding the meanings of parental involvement in urban schools. Urban Education, 39(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085903259290
83.
LipmanP. (2013). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. Routledge.
84.
MarableM. (1983). How capitalism underdeveloped black America. Haymarket Books.
85.
MarableM. (1985). Black power in Chicago: An historical overview of class stratification and electoral politics in a black urban community. Review of Radical Political Economics, 17(3), 157–182.
86.
MarschallM. J. (2005). Minority incorporation and local school boards. In HowellW. (Ed.), Besieged: School boards and the future of education politics (pp. 173–198). Brooking Institution Press.
87.
MarshJ. A. (2007). Democratic dilemmas: Joint work, education politics, and community. State University of New York Press.
88.
MarshJ. A.AllbrightT. N.BulkleyK. E.KennedyK. E.DhaliwalT. K. (2020). Institutional logics in Los Angeles schools: Do multiple models disrupt the grammar of schooling?American Journal of Education, 126(4), 603–651. https://doi.org/10.1086/709516
89.
MarshJ. A.HallM. (2018). Challenges and choices: A multidistrict analysis of statewide mandated democratic engagement. American Educational Research Journal, 55(2), 243–286. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217734803
90.
MatsudaM. L. C.DelgadoR.CrenshawK. (Eds.). (1993). Words that wound: Critical race theory, assaultive speech, and the first amendment. Westview Press.
91.
McIntoshP. (1988). White privilege and male privilege: A personal account of coming to see correspondence through work in women’s studies. In AndersonM.Hill CollinsP. (Eds.), Race, class, and gender: An anthology (pp. 94–105). Wadsworth.
92.
MeierK. J.Gonzalez JuenkeE. E. (2005). Electoral structure and the quality of representation: The policy consequences of school board elections. In HowellW. G. (Ed.), Besieged: School boards and the future of education (pp. 199–227). Brookings Institution Press.
93.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldanaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage.
MintromM. (2009). Promoting local democracy in education: Challenges and prospects. Educational Policy, 23(2), 329–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904807310041
96.
MolinaA. L.Jr.MeierK. J. (2018). Demographic dreams, institutional realities: Election design and Latino representation in American education. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 6(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2016.1182931
97.
MooreJ. M. (2003). Booker T. Washington, W.E.B. Du Bois, and the struggle for racial uplift. Rowman & Littlefield.
98.
MorelD. (2018). Takeover: Race, education, and American democracy. Oxford University Press.
99.
MurthyD. (2011). Emergent digital ethnographic methods for social research. In Hesse-BiberS. (Ed.), Handbook of emergent technologies in social research (pp. 158–179). Oxford University Press.
PacheA. C.SantosF. (2012). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0405
102.
ParisD. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244
103.
ParkerK.HorowitzJ.ArditiT. (2020). Amid protests, majorities across racial and ethnic groups express support for the Black lives matter movement. Pew Research Center.
104.
PotterJ.HepburnA. (2010). A kind of governance: Rules, time and psychology in organizations. In LlewellynN.HindmarsahJ. (Eds.), Organization, interaction and practice: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 49–73). Cambridge University Press.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
109.
SampsonC. (2019). (Im)possibilities of Latinx school board members’ educational leadership toward equity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(2), 296–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1778795
110.
SampsonC.BertrandM. (2022). “This is civil disobedience. I’ll continue.”: The racialization of school board meeting rules. Journal of Education Policy, 37, 226–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1778795
111.
SampsonC.HorsfordS. D. (2017). Putting the public back in public education: Community advocacy and education leadership under the Every Student Succeeds Act. Journal of School Leadership, 27(5), 725–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1778795
SolórzanoD. G. (1997). Images and words that wound: Critical race theory, racial stereotyping, and teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 24, 5–19. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23478088
114.
SondelB.KretchmarK.Hadley DunnA. (2019). Who do these people want teaching their children?” White saviorism, colorblind racism, and anti-blackness in “no excuses” charter schools. Urban Education, 57, 1621–1650.
115.
SpenceL. K. (2015). Knocking the hustle: Against the neoliberal turn in black politics. Punctum Books.
116.
SquireD. (2015). Engaging race and power in higher education organizations through a critical race institutional logics perspective. Journal of Critical Scholarship on Higher Education and Student Affairs, 2(1), 82–89. https://ecommons.luc.edu/jcshesa/vol2/iss1/8
117.
TateW. F.IV. (1997). Chapter 4: Critical race theory and education: History, theory, and implications. Review of Research in Education, 22(1), 195–247. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X022001195
118.
TaylorE. D. (2017). The original black elite: Daniel Murray and the story of a forgotten era. HarperCollins.
119.
TaylorK. Y. (2016). From #BlackLivesMatter to Black liberation. Haymarket Books.
120.
ThorntonP. H.OcasioW. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843.
121.
ThorntonP. H.OcasioW.LounsburyM. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford University Press.
122.
Todd-BrelandE. (2015). Barbara Sizemore and the politics of black educational achievement and community control, 1963–1975. Journal of African American History, 100(4), 636–662.
123.
Todd-BrelandE. (2018). A political education: Black politics and education reform in Chicago since the 1960s. UNC Press Books.
124.
TrujilloT. M. (2013). The disproportionate erosion of local control: Urban school boards, high-stakes accountability, and democracy. Educational Policy, 27(2), 334–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904812465118
125.
TurnerE. O. (2020). Suddenly diverse: How school districts manage race and inequality. University of Chicago Press.
126.
UhlmanT. M. (1978). Black elite decision making: The case of trial judges. American Journal of Political Science, 22(4), 884–895. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110596
127.
WarrenA. N.WardN. A. (2018). “This is my new normal”: Teachers’ accounts of evaluation policy at local school board meetings. Journal of Education Policy, 33(6), 840–860. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1390164
128.
WatsonT. N.BogotchI. (2015). Reframing parent involvement: What should urban school leaders do differently?Leadership and Policy in Schools, 14(3), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2015.1024327
129.
WestC. (1993). Race matters. Beacon Press.
130.
YinR. K. (2014). Case study research: Designs and methods (5th ed.). Sage.
131.
YossoT. J. (2013). Critical race counterstories along the Chicana/Chicano educational pipeline. Routledge.
132.
ZamudioM.RussellC.RiosF.BridgemanJ. L. (2011). Critical race theory matters: Education and ideology. Routledge.
