We examine access to effective teachers for low-income students in 26 geographically dispersed school districts over a 5-year period. We measure teacher effectiveness using a value-added model that accounts for measurement error in prior test scores and peer effects. Differences between the average value added of teachers of high- and low-income students are 0.005 standard deviations in English/language arts and 0.004 standard deviations in math. Differences between teachers of Black, Hispanic, and White students are also small. Rearranging teachers to obtain perfect equity would do little to narrow the sizable student achievement gap between low- and high-income students. We also show that a higher proportion of novice teachers in high-poverty schools contributes negligibly to differences in access to effective teachers.
AbdulkadirogluA.AngristJ. D.DynarskiS. M.KaneT. J.PathakP. (2011). Accountability and flexibility in public schools: Evidence from Boston’s charters and pilots. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(2), 699–748.
2.
AngristJ. A.HullP. D.PathakP. A.WaltersC. R. (2017). Leveraging lotteries for school value-added: Testing and estimation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(2), 871–919.
3.
ArellanoM. (1987). Computing robust standard errors for within-groups estimators. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 49(4), 431–434.
4.
Bacher-HicksA.KaneT.StaigerD. (2014, October). Validating teacher effect estimates using changes in teacher assignments in Los Angeles [NBER working paper]. National Bureau of Economic Research.
5.
BoydD.LankfordH.LoebS.RockoffJ.WyckoffJ. (2008, June). The narrowing gap in New York City teacher qualifications and its implications for student achievement in high poverty schools (NBER Working Paper No. 14021). National Bureau of Economic Research.
6.
BuonaccorsiJ. P. (2010). Measurement error: Models, methods, and applications. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
7.
CarlinB. P.LouisT. A. (2000). Bayes and empirical Bayes methods for data analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
8.
ChabrierJ.CohodesS.OreopoulosP. (2016). What can we learn from charter school lotteries?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3), 57–84.
9.
ChettyR.FriedmanJ.RockoffJ. (2014a). Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2633–2679.
10.
ChettyR.FriedmanJ.RockoffJ. (2014b). Measuring the impacts of teachers I: Evaluating bias in teacher value-added estimates. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2593–2632.
11.
ChettyR.HendrenN.KlineP.SaezE. (2014). Where is the land of opportunity? The geography of intergenerational mobility in the United States. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(4), 1553–1623.
12.
ClarkM.IsenbergE. (2020). Do teacher for America corps members still improve student achievement? Evidence from a randomized controlled trial of teach for America’s scale-up effort. Education Finance and Policy, 15(4), 736–760.
13.
ClotfelterC.LaddH.VigdorJ.WheelerJ. (2007). High poverty schools and the distribution of teachers and principals. North Carolina Law Review, 85, 1345–1379.
14.
ColemanJ.CampbellE.HobsonC.McPartlandJ.MoodA.WeinfeldF.YorkR. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education.
15.
ConstantineJ.PlayerD.SilvaT.HallgrenK.GriderM.DekeJ. (2009, February). An evaluation of teachers trained through different routes to certification: Final report (NCEE 2009-4043). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
16.
DobbieW.FryerR. G.Jr. (2011). Are high-quality schools enough to increase achievement among the poor? Evidence from the Harlem Children’s Zone. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(3), 158–187.
17.
DuncanG.MagnusonK. (2011). The nature and impact of early achievement skills, attention skills, and behavior problems. In DuncanG.MurnaneR. (Eds.), Whither opportunity: Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 47–69). Russell Sage Foundation.
18.
GlazermanS.MaxJ. (2011). Do low-income students have equal access to the highest-performing teachers? [NCEE Evaluation Brief]. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
19.
GleasonP. M. (2019). Searching for policies and practices that make charter schools successful: What can the research tell us?. In BerendsM. R.WaddingtonR. J.SchoenigJ. (Eds.), School choice at the crossroads (pp. 186–204). Routledge.
20.
GleasonP. M.TuttleC. C.GillB.Nichols-BarrerI.TehB.-R. (2014). Do KIPP schools boost student achievement?Education Finance and Policy, 9(1), 36–58.
21.
GoldhaberD.LaveryL.TheobaldR. (2015). Uneven playing field? Assessing the teacher quality gap between advantaged and disadvantaged students. Educational Researcher, 44(5), 293–307.
22.
GoldhaberD.QuinceV.TheobaldR. (2016a, December). Has it always been this way? Tracing the evolution of teacher quality gaps in U.S. public schools (CALDER Working Paper No. 171). National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.
23.
GoldhaberD.QuinceV.TheobaldR. (2016b, December). Reconciling different estimates of teacher quality based on value added (CALDER Brief 14). National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.
24.
HanselmanP. (2018). Do school learning opportunities compound or compensate for background inequalities? Evidence from the case of assignment to effective teachers. Sociology of Education, 91(2), 132–158.
25.
HanushekE.RivkinS. (2006). Teacher quality. In HanushekE.WelchF. (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 1, pp. 1051–1078). North-Holland.
26.
HarrisD.SassT. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 798–812.
27.
HerrmannM.WalshE.IsenbergE. (2016). Shrinkage of value-added estimates and characteristics of students with hard-to-predict achievement levels. Statistics and Public Policy, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/2330443X.2016.1182878
28.
HockH.IsenbergE. (2017). Methods for accounting for co-teaching in value-added models. Statistics and Public Policy, 4(1), 1–11.
29.
IsenbergE.MaxJ.GleasonP.JohnsonM. (2020). The relationship between teacher career transitions and access to effective teachers [Unpublished manuscript].
30.
IsenbergE.MaxJ.GleasonP.JohnsonM.DeutschJ.HansenM. (2016, October). Do low-income students have equal access to effective teachers? Evidence from 26 districts (NCEE 2017-4007). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
31.
IsenbergE.TehB.-R.WalshE. (2015). Elementary school data issues for value-added models: Implications for research. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 8(1), 120–129.
32.
KaneT.RockoffJ.StaigerD. (2008). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. Economics of Education Review, 27(6), 615–631.
33.
KoedelC.BettsJ. (2011). Does student sorting invalidate value-added models of teacher effectiveness? An extended analysis of the Rothstein critique. Education Finance and Policy, 6(1), 18–42.
34.
KoedelC.MihalyK.RockoffJ. E. (2015). Value-added modeling: A review. Economics of Education Review, 47(C), 180–195.
35.
KraftM. A.BlazarD.HoganD. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588.
36.
LiangK.-Y.ZegerS. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73(1), 13–22.
37.
MansfieldR. (2015). Teacher quality and student inequality. Journal of Labor Economics, 33(3), 751–788.
38.
MorrisC. N. (1983). Parametric empirical Bayes inference: Theory and applications. Journal of American Statistical Association, 78(381), 47–55.
39.
NickowA.OreopoulosP.QuanV. (2020, July). The impressive effects of tutoring on PreK-12 learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the experimental evidence (NBER Working Paper No. 27476). National Bureau of Economic Research.
40.
ReardonS. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between rich and poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In DuncanG.MurnaneR. (Eds.), Whither opportunity: Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 91–115). Russell Sage Foundation.
41.
RothsteinJ. (2015, October). Revisiting the impacts of teachers. University of California, Berkeley.
42.
SassT.HannawayJ.XuZ.FiglioD.FengL. (2012). Value added of teachers in high-poverty schools and lower poverty schools. Journal of Urban Economics, 72, 104–122.
43.
SchultzL. M. (2014). Inequitable dispersion: Mapping the distribution of highly qualified teachers in St. Louis metropolitan elementary schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(90), 1–20.
44.
SteeleJ. L.BairdM.EngbergJ.HunterG. P. (2014, March). Trends in the distribution of teacher effectiveness in the intensive partnerships for effective teaching. RAND Corporation.
45.
SteeleJ. L.PepperM. J.SpringerM. G.LockwoodJ. R. (2015). The distribution and mobility of effective teachers: Evidence from a large, urban school district. Economics of Education Review, 48(5), 86–101.
46.
ThompsonP.GuarinoC. (2017). An evaluation of teacher value-added estimation with peer effects [Working paper]. Oregon State University.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). Education Longitudinal Study of 2002 (ELS: 2002), base year and third follow-up, table 104.91. Institute of Education Sciences, Digest of Education Statistics.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
