Promise programs are proliferating across the United States, with wide variation in their design. Using national data on 33 Promise programs affecting single, 2-year colleges, this study examines program effects on first-time, full-time college enrollments of students by race/ethnicity and gender classification. Results suggest Promise programs are associated with large percent increases in enrollments of Black and Hispanic students, especially students classified as females, at eligible colleges. Promise programs with merit requirements are associated with higher enrollment of White and Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander female students; those with income requirements are negatively associated with enrollment of most demographic groups. More generous Promise programs are associated with greater enrollment increases among demographic groups with historically higher levels of postsecondary attainment.
American Educational Research Association. (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Educational Researcher, 35, 33–40.
2.
AndersonD. M.Goldrick-RabS. (2018). Aid after enrollment: Impacts of a statewide grant program at public two-year colleges. Economics of Education Review, 67, 148–157.
3.
AngristJ. D.PischkeJ. S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.
4.
BartikT. J.HershbeinB. J.LachowskaM. (2017). The effects of the Kalamazoo Promise scholarship on college enrollment, persistence, and completion (Upjohn Institute Working Papers 15-229). W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
5.
BenitezM.Jr. (2010). Resituating culture center within a social justice framework: Is there room for examining whiteness? In PattonL. D. (Ed.), Culture centers in higher education: Perspective on identity; theory; and practice (pp. 119–134). Stylus Publishing.
6.
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 57, 289–300.
7.
BensimonE. M. (2017). Making American higher education just. American Educational Research Association Social Justice Award Lecture. https://app.box.com/v/2017AERAsj
8.
BerneR.StiefelL. (1984). The measurement of equity in school finance: Conceptual, methodological and empirical dimensions. Johns Hopkins University Press.
9.
BertrandM.DufloE.MullainathanS. (2004). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 249–275.
BlackwellM.IacusS.KingG.PorroG. (2010). cem: Coarsened exact matching in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(4), 524–546.
12.
BozickR.GonzalezG.EngbergJ. (2015). Using a merit-based scholarship program to increase rates of college enrollment in an urban school district: The case of the Pittsburgh Promise. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 45(2), Article 2.
CarnevaleA. P.JayasunderaT.CheahB. (2012). The college advantage: Weathering the economic storm. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.
CarruthersC. K.FoxW. F. (2016). Aid for all: College coaching, financial aid, and post-secondary persistence in Tennessee. Economics of Education Review, 51, 97–112.
17.
ChaseM. M.DowdA. C.PazichL. B.BensimonE. M. (2014). Transfer equity for “minoritized” students: A critical policy analysis of seven states. Educational Policy, 28(5), 669–717.
18.
ChenR. (2008). Financial aid and student dropout in higher education: A heterogeneous research approach. In PaulsenM. B. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 209–239). Springer.
CookT. D.ShadishW. R.WongV. C. (2008). Three conditions under which experiments and observational studies produce comparable causal estimates: New findings from within-study comparisons. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27(4), 724–750.
21.
CornwellC.MustardD. B.SridharD. J. (2006). The enrollment effects of merit-based financial aid: Evidence from Georgia’s HOPE Program. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(4), 761–786.
de ChaisemartinC.d’HaultfoeuilleX. (2019) Two-way fixed effects estimators with heterogeneous treatment effects (Tech. Rep.). National Bureau of Economic Research.
24.
DemingD. J.WaltersC. R. (2017) The impact of price caps and spending cuts on US postsecondary attainment (No. w23736). National Bureau of Economic Research.
25.
DenningJ. T. (2017). College on the cheap: Consequences of community college tuition reductions. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(2), 155–188.
26.
DettlingL. J.HsuJ. W.JacobsL.MooreK. B.ThompsonJ. (2017). Recent trends in wealth-holding by race and ethnicity: Evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US).
DiamondJ. B.RandolphA.SpillaneJ. P. (2004). Teachers’ expectations and sense of responsibility for student learning: The importance of race, class, and organizational habitus. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 35, 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.2004.35.1.75
29.
Dynarski. (2000). Hope for whom? Financial aid for the middle class and its impact on college attendance. National Tax Journal, 53(3), 629–662.
30.
DynarskiS. (2004). The new merit aid. In HoxbyC. M. (Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 63–100). University of Chicago Press.
31.
DynarskiS. (2008). Building the stock of college-educated labor (NBER Working Paper No. 11604). National Bureau of Economic Research.
32.
DynarskiS.WiederspanM. (2012). Student aid simplification: Looking back and looking ahead. National Tax Journal, 65(1), 211–234.
33.
FelixE. R.CastroM. F. (2018). Planning as strategy for improving Black and Latinx student equity: Lessons from nine California community colleges. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26(56), 1–34.
34.
FergusonR. F. (2003). Teachers’ perceptions and expectations and the Black-White test score gap. Urban Education, 38(4), 460–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085903038004006
FurquimF.CorralD.HillmanN. (2019). A primer for interpreting and designing difference-in-differences studies in higher education research. In PernaL. W. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research: Volume 35 (pp. 1–58). Springer.
37.
GándaraD.NessE. C. (2019). Ideological think tanks and the politics of college affordability in the states. The Journal of Higher Education, 90(5), 717–743.
38.
GándaraP. C.ContrerasF. (2009). The Latino education crisis: The consequences of failed social policies. Harvard University Press.
39.
GoldinC. D.KatzL. F. (2008). The race between education and technology. Harvard University Press.
40.
Goldrick-RabS.HarrisD. N.TrostelP. A. (2009). Why financial aid matters (or does not) for college success: Towards a new interdisciplinary perspective. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 24, pp. 1–45). Springer Science & Business Media B.V.
GonzalezG. C.BozickR.Tharp-TaylorS.PhillipsA. (2011). Fulfilling the Pittsburgh Promise: Early progress of Pittsburgh’s postsecondary scholarship program [Monograph]. RAND Corporation.
43.
Goodman-BaconA. (2018). Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing (No. w25018). National Bureau of Economic Research.
44.
GrodskyE.JonesM. (2004). Real and imagined barriers to college entry: Perceptions of cost. Department of Sociology, University College Dublin.
HellerD. E. (1997). Student price response in higher education: An update to Leslie and Brinkman. The Journal of Higher Education, 68(6), 624–659.
47.
HellerD. E. (2006). MCAS scores and the Adams Scholarships: A policy failure. The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
48.
HerbautE.GevenK. (2019). What works to reduce inequalities in higher education? A systematic review of the (quasi-) experimental literature on outreach and financial aid (No. 8802). http://www.worldbank.org/research
49.
HerdP.MoynihanD. P. (2019). Administrative burden: Policymaking by other means. Russell Sage Foundation.
50.
HillmanN.OriansE. (2013). Community colleges and labor market conditions: How does enrollment demand change relative to local unemployment rates?Research in Higher Education, 54, 765–780.
51.
HowardT. C. (2019). Why race and culture matter in schools: Closing the achievement gap in America’s classrooms. Teachers College Press.
IacusS. M.KingG.PorroG. (2012). Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1–24.
54.
IritiJ.BickelW.KaufmanJ. (2012). Realizing “the promise”: Scholar retention and persistence in post-secondary education. Pittsburgh Promise.
55.
JaquetteO.ParraE. E. (2014). Using IPEDS for panel analyses: Core concepts, data challenges, and empirical applications. In PaulsenM. B. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 467–533). Springer.
KaneT. J. (1994). College entry by Blacks since 1970: The role of college costs, family background, and the returns to education. Journal of Political Economy, 102(5), 878–911.
58.
KennedyP. E. (1981). Estimation with correctly interpreted dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations [the interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations]. American Economic Review, 71(4), 801–801.
59.
KimD.NuñezA. M. (2013). Diversity, situated social contexts, and college enrollment: Multilevel modeling to examine student, high school, and state influences. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 6(2), 84–101.
60.
LiA.GándaraD. (2020). The promise of “free” tuition and program design features: Impacts on first-time college enrollment. In PernaL.SmithE. J. (Eds.), Improving research-based knowledge of college promise programs (pp. 219–240). American Educational Research Association.
61.
LinsenmeierD. M.RosenH. S.RouseC. E. (2006). Financial aid packages and college enrollment decisions: An econometric case study. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(1), 126–145.
Miller-AdamsM. (2015). Promise nation: Transforming communities through place-based scholarships. W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. http://research.upjohn.org/up_press/235/
65.
Miller-AdamsM.HershbeinB.TimmeneyB. (2019). Promise programs database. W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Promise: Investing in Community. www.upjohn.org/promise/database
66.
MironG.JonesJ.Kelaher-YoungA. (2012). The Impact of the Kalamazoo Promise on student attitudes, goals, and aspirations. American Secondary Education, 40(2), 5–28.
NguyenB. M. D.NogueraP.AdkinsN.TeranishiR. T. (2019). Ethnic discipline gap: Unseen dimensions of racial disproportionality in school discipline. American Educational Research Journal, 56(5), 1973–2003.
NogueraP. (2008). Creating schools where race does not predict achievement. The Journal of Negro Education, 77(2), 90–103.
73.
NogueraP. A. (2009). The trouble with Black boys: . . . And other reflections on race, equity, and the future of public education. John Wiley.
74.
OakesJ. (2005). Keeping track. Yale University Press.
75.
PageL. C.IritiJ. E.LowryD. J.AnthonyA. M. (2019). The promise of place-based investment in postsecondary access and success: Investigating the impact of the Pittsburgh Promise. Education Finance and Policy, 14, 572–600.
76.
PageL. C.Scott-ClaytonJ. (2016). Improving college access in the United States: Barriers and policy responses. Economics of Education Review, 51, 4–22.
PernaL. W.LeighE. W. (2018). Understanding the promise: A typology of state and local college promise programs. Educational Researcher, 47(3), 155–180.
PluhtaE. A.PennyG. R. (2013). The effect of a community college promise scholarship on access and success. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 37(10), 723–734.
81.
PorterK. E. (2016). Statistical power in evaluations that investigate effects on multiple outcomes: A guide for researchers. www.mdrc.org
Rabe-HeskethS.SkrondalA. (2012). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata (3rd ed.). Stata Press.
85.
RadwinD.WineJ.SiegelP.BryanM.Hunt-WhiteT. (2013). National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS:12). U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2013/2013165.pdf
86.
RoderickM.CocaV.NagaokaJ. (2011). Potholes on the road to college: High school effects in shaping urban students’ participation in college application, four-year college enrollment, and college match. Sociology of Education, 84(3), 178–211.
87.
RubinD. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 688–701.
88.
St. ClairT.CookT. D. (2015). Difference-in-differences methods in public finance. National Tax Journal, 68(2), 319–338.
89.
SalinasC.Jr.LozanoA. (2017). Mapping and recontextualizing the evolution of the term Latinx: An environmental scanning in higher education. Journal of Latinos and Education, 18, 1–14.
90.
SkibaR. J.HornerR. H.ChungC.-G.RauschM. K.MayS. L.TobinT. (2011). Race is not neutral: A national investigation of African American and Latino disproportionality in school discipline. School Psychology Review, 40(1), 85–107.
91.
Stanton-SalazarR. D. (1997). A social capital framework for understanding the socialization of racial minority children and youths. Harvard Educational Review, 67(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.67.1.140676g74018u73k
92.
StewartD.-L. (2013). Racially minoritized students at US four-year institutions. The Journal of Negro Education, 82(2), 184–197.
93.
TeranishiR. T.NguyenT. K. (2012). Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders: The changing demography of the United States and implications for education policy. Harvard Journal of Asian American Policy Review, 22, 17–27.
94.
ThomasC. M.FeatherstoneW. E. (2005). Validation of Vincenty’s formulas for the geodesic using a new fourth-order extension of Kivioja’s formula. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 131(1), 20–26.
95.
TierneyW. G.VenegasK. M. (2006). Fictive kin and social capital: The role of peer groups in applying and paying for college. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(12), 1687–1702.
96.
ToutkoushianR. K.ShafiqM. N.TrivetteM. J. (2013). Accounting for risk of non-completion in private and social rates of return to higher education. Journal of Education Finance, 39(1), 73–95.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
100.
ZhangL.HuS.SensenigV. (2013). The effect of Florida’s Bright Futures program on college enrollment and degree production: An aggregated-level analysis. Research in Higher Education, 54(7), 746–764.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
