A prominent concern is that college students are harming their long-term economic prospects by making student loan decisions without full information about the implications of their choices. We designed an experiment to examine students’ responses to a debt letter, an increasingly popular strategy to provide easily accessible information about student loans. The debt letters are modeled after requirements in recent state laws that attempt to encourage students to make informed borrowing decisions. Our results suggest that information alone is not sufficient to systematically change students’ borrowing choices. The debt letter led to no change in the amount that students borrow or the likelihood that they will borrow. We supplement results from the experiment with semistructured interviews to examine why the intervention did not change behavior.
AkersB.ChingosM. M. (2014). Are college students borrowing blindly?Washington, DC: Brown Center on Education Policy, Brookings Institution.
2.
AndruskaE.HogarthJ.FletcherC.ForbesG.WohlgemuthD. (2014). Do you know what you owe? Students’ understanding of their student loans. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 44, 125–148.
3.
AveryC. (2010, September). The effects of college counseling on high-achieving, low-income students (Working Paper No. 16359). The National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w16359
4.
AveryC.TurnerS. (2012). Student loans: Do college students borrow too much—or not enough?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26, 165–192.
5.
BarrA.BirdK.CastlemanB. (2016, January). Prompting active choice among high-risk borrowers: Evidence from a student loan counseling experiment (Working Paper No. 41). EdPolicyWorks. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/uae0dK
6.
BaumS.MaJ.PenderM.BellD. (2015). Trends in student aid 2015. New York, NY: College Board.
7.
BergmanP.DenningJ.ManoliD. (2016, August). Is information enough? Evidence from a tax credit information experiment with 1,000,000 students (Working paper). Retrieved from www.columbia.edu/~psb2101/TaxMailing8-26-16.pdf
8.
BettingerE.LongB. T.OreopoulosP.SanbonmatsuL. (2012). The role of simplification and information in college decisions: Results from the H&R Block FAFSA experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127, 1205–1242.
9.
BleemerZ.ZafarB. (2015). Intended college attendance: Evidence from an experiment on college returns and costs (Staff Report no. 739). New York: Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
10.
BooijA. S.LeuvenE.OosterbeekH. (2012). The role of information in the take-up of student loans. Economics of Education Review, 31, 33–44.
CadenaB. C.KeysB. J. (2013). Can self-control explain avoiding free money? Evidence from interest-free student loans. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95, 1117–1129.
13.
CarrellS. E.SacerdoteB. (2013, May). Why do college going interventions work? (Working Paper No. 19031). The National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from www.nber.org/papers/w19031
14.
CastlemanB.GoodmanJ. (forthcoming). Intensive college counseling and the enrollment and persistence of low income students. Education Finance and Policy.
15.
CastlemanB. L.PageL. C. (2015a). Freshman year financial aid nudges: An experiment to increase FAFSA renewal and college persistence. Journal of Human Resources, 51, 389–415.
16.
CastlemanB. L.PageL. C. (2015b). Summer nudging: Can personalized text messages and peer mentor outreach increase college going among low-income high school graduates?Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 115, 144–160.
17.
CialdiniR. (2008). Influence: Science and practice (5th Ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
18.
DaroliaR.RitterD. (2015, September). Do student loan borrowers opportunistically default? Evidence from bankruptcy reform (Working Paper No. 15-17R). Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2592600
19.
DynarskiS. M.Scott-ClaytonJ. E. (2006). The cost of complexity in federal student aid: Lessons from optimal tax theory and behavioral economics. National Tax Journal, 59, 219–356.
20.
DynarskiS. M.Scott-ClaytonJ. E. (2013). Financial aid policy: Lessons from research. Future of Children, 23, 67–91.
21.
ElliottW.LewisM. (2014). The student loan problem in America: It is not enough to say students will eventually recover. Lawrence, KS: Assets & Education Initiative.
22.
EllwoodD.KaneT. (2000). Who is getting a college education: Family background and the growing gaps in enrollment. In DanzingerS.WaldfogelJ. (Eds.), Securing the future: Investing in children from birth to college (pp. 283–324). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
23.
Federal Reserve Bank of New York. (2017). Quarterly report on household debt and credit: February 2016. New York, NY: Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Retrieved from https://www.newyorkfed.org/microeconomics/hhdc.html
24.
FernandezC. (2015). From passive to proactive: Understanding and improving the borrower experience with online student loan exit counseling. Round Rock, TX: TG Research and Analytical Services.
25.
FernandezC. (2016). Effective counseling, empowered borrowers: An evidence-based policy agenda for informed student loan borrowing and repayment. Round Rock, TX: TG Research and Analytical Services.
26.
FieldE. (2009). Educational debt burden and career choice: Evidence from a financial aid experiment at NYU Law School. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1, 1–21.
27.
FrederickS.LoewensteinG.O’DonoghueT. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 351–401.
28.
GoldinC.KatzL. (2008). The race between education and technology. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
29.
HoxbyC. M.TurnerS. (2013, June). Informing students about their college options: A proposal for broadening the expanding college opportunities project (Discussion Paper 2013-03). Washington, DC: The Hamilton Project.
30.
KarlanD.McConnellM.MullainathanS.ZinmanJ. (2010, July). Getting to the top of mind: How reminders increase saving (Working Paper No. 16205). The National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from www.nber.org/papers/w16205
31.
KennedyJ. (2015). Indiana University student loan debt initiatives (Testimony before the US Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions). Retrieved from https://www.help.senate.gov/download/kennedy-testimony
32.
Kübler-RossE. (1969). On death and dying: What the dying have to teach doctors, nurses, clergy, and their own families. New York, NY: Scribner.
LochnerL. J.Monge-NaranjoA. (2011). The nature of credit constraints and human capital. American Economic Review, 101, 2487–2529.
35.
LooneyA.YannelisC. (2015). A crisis in student loans? How changes in the characteristics of borrowers and in the institutions they attended contributed to rising loan defaults (Brookings Papers on Economic Activity Conference Draft). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
36.
LusardiA.MitchellO. (2014). The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), 5–44.
37.
MarxB.TurnerL. (2015, January). Borrowing trouble? Student loans, the cost of borrowing, and implications for the effectiveness of need-based grant aid (Working Paper No. 20850). The National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from www.nber.org/papers/w20850.pdf
38.
MarxB.TurnerL. (2017). Student loan nudges: Experimental evidence on borrowing and educational attainment. Unpublished manuscript.
39.
MerriamS. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
40.
OreopoulosP.SalvanesK. G. (2011). Priceless: The nonpecuniary benefits of schooling. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25, 159–184.
41.
RothsteinJ.RouseC. E. (2011). Constrained after college: Student loans and early career occupational choices. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 149–163.
42.
StangoV.ZinmanJ. (2014). Limited and varying consumer attention: Evidence from shocks to the salience of bank overdraft fees. Review of Financial Studies, 27, 990–1030.
43.
StoddardC.UrbanC.SchmeiserM. (2017). Can targeted information affect academic performance and borrowing behavior for college students? Evidence from administrative data. Economics of Education Review, 56, 95–109.
44.
TierneyW. G.VenegasK. M. (2009). Finding money on the table: Information, financial aid, and access to college. Journal of Higher Education, 80, 363–388.
