Vouchers in the Bayou: The Effects of the Louisiana Scholarship Program on Student Achievement After 2 Years

Abstract

The Louisiana Scholarship Program (LSP) offers publicly funded vouchers to students in low-performing schools with family income no greater than 250% of the poverty line, allowing them to enroll in participating private schools. Initially established in 2008 as a pilot program in New Orleans, the LSP was expanded statewide in 2012. This article examines the experimental effects of using an LSP scholarship to enroll in one’s first-choice private school on student achievement in the first 2 years following the program’s expansion. Our results indicate that the use of an LSP scholarship has negatively affected both English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics achievement. We observe less negative effect estimates in the second year of the program, with the impacts on ELA only on the margin of statistical significance.

Keywords

school vouchers school choice student achievement randomized control trial

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdulkadiroglu

Angrist

J. D.

Dynarski

S. M.

Kane

T. J.

Pathak

P. A.

(2011). Accountability and flexibility in public schools: Evidence from Boston’s charters and pilots. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 699–748.

Abdulkadiroglu

Pathak

P. A.

Roth

A. E.

(2005). The New York City high school match. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 95, 364–367.

Abdulkadiroglu

Pathak

P. A.

Walters

C. R.

(2015, December). School vouchers and student achievement: First-year evidence from the Louisiana Scholarship Program (NBER Working Paper No. 21839). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Angrist

J. D.

Pischke

J. S.

(2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Barnard

Frangakis

C. E.

Hill

J. L.

Rubin

D. B.

(2003). Principal stratification approach to broken randomized experiments: A case study of school choice vouchers in New York City. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98, 299–323.

Barrow

Rouse

C. E.

(2008). Economic Perspectives. School vouchers: Recent findings and unanswered questions. Chicago, IL: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.

Bitler

M. P.

Domina

Penner

E. K.

Hoynes

H. W.

(2013, July). Distributional effects of a school voucher program: Evidence from New York City (NBER Working Paper No. 19271). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Bloom

H. S.

Unterman

(2014). Can small high schools of choice improve educational prospects for disadvantaged students? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33, 290–319.

Chingos

M. M.

Peterson

P. E.

(2015). Experimentally estimated impacts of school vouchers on college enrollment and degree attainment. Journal of Public Economics, 122, 1–12.

10.

Cowen

J. M.

(2008). School choice as a latent variable: Estimating the “complier average causal effect” of vouchers in Charlotte. Policy Studies Journal, 36, 301–315.

11.

Cowen

J. M.

Fleming

D. J.

Witte

J. F.

Wolf

P. J.

(2012). Going public: Who leaves a large, longstanding, and widely available urban voucher program? American Educational Research Journal, 49, 231–256.

12.

Cowen

J. M.

Fleming

D. J.

Witte

J. F.

Wolf

P. J.

Kisida

(2013). School vouchers and student attainment: Evidence from a state-mandated study of Milwaukee’s Parental Choice Program. Policy Studies Journal, 41(1), 147–168.

13.

Deming

D. J.

Hastings

J. S.

Kane

T. J.

Staiger

D. O.

(2014). School choice, school quality, and postsecondary attainment. American Economic Review, 104, 991–1013.

14.

Doolittle

Connors

(2001). Designing education voucher experiments: Recommendations for researchers, funders, and users. In Levin

H. M.

(Ed.), Privatizing education: Can the marketplace deliver choice, efficiency, equity, and social cohesion? Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

15.

Figlio

(2011, August). Evaluation of the Florida Tax Credit Scholarship Program participation, compliance and test scores in 2009-10 (Report to the Florida State Department of Education). Retrieved from https://www.floridaschoolchoice.org/pdf/FTC_Research_2009-10_report.pdf

16.

Figlio

Karbownik

(2016, July). Evaluation of Ohio’s EdChoice Scholarship Program: Selection, competition, and performance effects. Columbus, OH: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.

17.

Friedman

(1955). The role of government in education. In Solo

R. A.

(Ed.), Economics and the public interest (pp. 123–144). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

18.

Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice. (2015). School choice: Louisiana. Retrieved from http://www.edchoice.org/school-choice/state/louisiana/

19.

Gerber

A. S.

Green

D. P.

(2012). Field experiments: Design, analysis, and interpretation. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.

20.

Greene

J. P.

(2001). Vouchers in Charlotte. Education Matters, 1, 55–60.

21.

Greene

J. P.

Peterson

P. E.

(1999). Effectiveness of school choice: The Milwaukee experiment. Education and Urban Society, 31, 191–213.

22.

Howell

W. G.

Peterson

P. E.

(with Wolf

P. J.

Campbell

D. E.

). (2006). The education gap: Vouchers and urban schools (Rev. ed.). Washington, DC: Brookings Press.

23.

Jin

Barnard

Rubin

D. B.

(2010). A modified general location model for noncompliance with missing data: Revisiting the New York City School Choice Scholarship Program using principal stratification. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35, 154–173.

24.

Kisida

Wolf

P. J.

(2015). Customer satisfaction and educational outcomes: Experimental impacts of the market-based delivery of public education. International Public Management Journal, 18, 265–285.

25.

Kisida

Wolf

P. J.

Rhinesmith

(2015). Views from private schools: Attitudes about school choice programs in three states. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.

26.

Krueger

A. B.

Zhu

(2004). Another look at the New York City school voucher experiment. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 658–698.

27.

Lee

D. S.

(2009). Training, wages, and sample selection: Estimating sharp bounds on treatment effects. Review of Economic Studies, 76, 1071–1102.

28.

Mayer

D. P.

Peterson

P. E.

Myers

D. E.

Tuttle

C. C.

Howell

W. G.

(2002). School choice in New York City after three years: An evaluation of the school choice scholarships program (MPR Reference No. 8404-045). Cambridge, MA: Mathematica Policy Research.

29.

Mill

J. S.

(1962). Utilitarianism, on liberty, essay on Bentham ( Warnock

, Ed.). New York, NY: Meridian. (Original work published 1869)

30.

Mills

J. N.

(2015). The effectiveness of cash transfers as a policy instrument in K-16 education (Doctoral dissertation). University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.

31.

Mills

J. N.

Sude

Wolf

P. J.

(2015, November 12–14). An evaluation of cognitive and non-cognitive skills in the Louisiana Scholarship Program. Thirty-Seventh Annual Fall Research Meetings of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Miami, FL.

32.

Moe

T. M.

(2005). Power and political institutions. Perspectives on Politics, 2, 214–233.

33.

Murnane

R. J.

(2005). The role of markets in American K-12 education. The limits of market organization ( Nelson

R. R.

, Ed.). New York, NY: Russell Sage.

34.

Murray

M. P.

(2006). Avoiding invalid instruments and coping with weak instruments. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(4), 111–132.

35.

Paine

(1791). The rights of man: Answer to Mr. Burke’s attack on the French Revolution. London, England: J.S. Jordan.

36.

Peterson

P. E.

Howell

W. G.

(2004). Efficiency, bias, and classification schemes: A response to Alan B. Krueger and Pei Zhu. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 699–717.

37.

Rouse

C. E.

(1998). Private school vouchers and student achievement: An evaluation of the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 553–602.

38.

Somers

Zhu

Wong

(2011, October). Tests to measure student achievement in a multi-state randomized experiment: An empirical assessment based on four recent evaluations (NCEE 2012-4015). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

39.

Staiger

D. O.

Stock

J. H.

(1997). Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica, 65, 557–586.

40.

Waddington

R. J.

Berends

(2015, November). Vouchers in the crossroads: Heterogeneous impacts on student achievement and attendance across private schools in Indiana. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Miami, FL.

41.

What Works Clearinghouse. (2014). Procedure and standards handbook, version 3.0. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.

42.

Witte

J. F.

(2000). The market approach to education: An analysis of America’s first voucher program. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

43.

Witte

J. F.

Wolf

P. J.

Cowen

J. M.

Carlson

Fleming

D. F.

(2014). High stakes choice: Achievement and accountability in the nation’s oldest urban voucher program. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36, 437–456.

44.

Wolf

P. J.

(2008). School voucher programs: What the research says about parental school choice. Brigham Young University Law Review, 2008, 415–446.

45.

Wolf

P. J.

Gutmann

Puma

Kisida

Rizzo

Eissa

N. O.

(2009, March). Evaluation of the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program: Impacts after three years (NCEE 2009-4050, U.S. Department of Education, Institute for Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20094050/

46.

Wolf

P. J.

Kisida

Gutmann

Puma

Eissa

N. O.

Rizzo

(2013). School vouchers and student outcomes: Experimental evidence from Washington, DC. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32, 246–270.