Research increasingly points to the importance of parental engagement in children’s education. Yet, little research has investigated whether prompting parents to be more involved in college processes improves student outcomes. We investigate experimentally whether providing both students and their parents with personalized outreach about tasks students need to complete to enroll in college leads to improved college enrollment outcomes relative to providing outreach to students only. We utilize text messaging to provide information and advising to students and parents. Across treatment arms, the text outreach increased on-time college enrollment by a statistically significant 3.1 percentage points. Texting both parents and students, however, did not increase the efficacy of the outreach. We situate this result in the broader parental engagement literature.
ArnoldK. D.ChewningA.CastlemanB. L.PageL. C. (2015). Advisor and student experiences of summer support for college-intending, low-income high school graduates. Journal of College Access, 1, 6–28. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jca/vol1/iss1/3/
2.
ArnoldK.FlemingS.DeAndaM.CastlemanB.WartmanK. L. (2009). The summer flood: The invisible gap among low-income students. Thought & Action, 25, 23–34.
3.
AuerbachS. (2006). “If the student is good, let him fly”: Moral support for college among Latino immigrant parents. Journal of Latinos and Education, 5, 275–292.
4.
AuerbachS. (2007). From moral supporters to struggling advocates reconceptualizing parent roles in education through the experience of working-class families of color. Urban Education, 42, 250–283.
5.
BaileyM.DynarskiS. (2011). Inequality in postsecondary education. In DuncanG. J.MurnaneR. J. (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 117–132). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
BergmanP. (2015, June). Parent-child information frictions and human capital investment: Evidence from a field experiment (CESifo Working Paper No. 5391). Munich, Germany: CESifo.
8.
BettingerE. P.LongB. T.OreopoulosP.SanbonmatsuL. (2012). The role of application assistance and information in college decisions: Results from the H&R block FAFSA experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127, 1205–1242. doi:10.1093/qje/qjs017
9.
BowenW. G.ChingosM. M.McPhersonM. S. (2009). Crossing the finish line: Completing college at America’s public universities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
CastlemanB. L.OwenL.PageL. C. (2015). Stay late or start early? Experimental evidence on the benefits of college matriculation support from high schools versus colleges. Economics of Education Review, 47, 168–179.
11.
CastlemanB. L.PageL. C. (2014a). Summer melt: Supporting low-income students in the transition from high school to college. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
12.
CastlemanB. L.PageL. C. (2014b). A trickle or a torrent? Understanding the extent of summer “melt” among college-intending high school graduates. Social Science Quarterly, 95, 202–220.
13.
CastlemanB. L.PageL. C. (2015). Summer nudging: Can personalized text messages and peer mentor outreach increase college going among low-income high school graduates?Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 115, 144–160.
14.
CastlemanB. L.PageL. C. (2016). Freshman year financial aid nudges: An experiment to increase FAFSA renewal and college persistence. Journal of Human Resources, 51, 389–415.
15.
CastlemanB. L.PageL. C.SchooleyK. (2014). The forgotten summer: Does the offer of college counseling after high school mitigate summer melt among college-intending, low-income high school graduates?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33, 320–344.
DynarskiS. M.HemeltS. W.HymanJ. M. (2015). The missing manual using national student clearinghouse data to track postsecondary outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(1, Suppl.), 53S–79S.
18.
DynarskiS. M.Scott-ClaytonJ. E. (2006). The cost of complexity in federal student aid: Lessons from optimal tax theory and behavioral economics. National Tax Journal, 59, 319–356.
19.
GoldinC.KatzL. F.KuziemkoI. (2006). The homecoming of American college women: The reversal of the college gender gap. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(4), 133.
20.
GrodskyE.JonesM. T. (2007). Real and imagined barriers to college entry: Perceptions of cost. Social Science Research, 36, 745–766.
21.
HanafinJ.LynchA. (2002). Peripheral voices: Parental involvement, social class, and educational disadvantage. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(1), 35–49.
22.
HansenB. B.BowersJ. (2008). Covariate balance in simple, stratified and clustered comparative studies. Statistical Science, 219–236.
23.
HorvatE. M.WeiningerE. B.LareauA. (2003). From social ties to social capital: Class differences in the relations between schools and parent networks. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 319–351.
24.
HoxbyC. M.AveryC. (2013). The missing “one-offs”: The hidden supply of high-achieving, low-income students. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2013(1), 1–65.
25.
HoxbyC. M.TurnerS. (2013). Expanding college opportunities for high-achieving, low income students (Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper, 12-014). Stanford, CA: Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
KingJ. E. (2004). Missed opportunities: Students who do not apply for financial aid. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
28.
KofoedM. S. (2016). To apply or not to apply: FAFSA completion and financial aid gaps. Research in Higher Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11162-016-9418-y
29.
KraftM. A.RogersT. (2015). The underutilized potential of teacher-to-parent communication: Evidence from a field experiment. Economics of Education Review, 47, 49–63.
30.
LareauA. (2011). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Oakland: University of California Press.
31.
McDonoughP. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. New York: State University of New York Press.
32.
MullainathanS.ShafirE. (2013). Scarcity: Why having too little means so much. New York, NY: Macmillan.
33.
MyersS. M.MyersC. B. (2015). Family structure and school-based parental involvement: A family resource perspective. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 36, 114–131.
34.
OvinkS. M.KalogridesD. (2015). No place like home? Familism and Latino/a–White differences in college pathways. Social Science Research, 52, 219–235.
35.
PageL. C.CastlemanB. L.MeyerK. (2016). Customized nudging to improve FAFSA completion and income verification. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2854345
36.
PageL. C.Scott-ClaytonJ. (2016). Improving college access in the United States: Barriers and policy responses. Economics of Education Review, 51, 4–22.
37.
PutnamR. D. (2015). Our kids: The American dream in crisis. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
38.
ReardonS. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In DuncanG. J.MurnaneR. J. (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 91–116). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
SayerL. C.BianchiS. M.RobinsonJ. P. (2004). Are parents investing less in children? Trends in mothers’ and fathers’ time with children. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1–43.
41.
Smythe-LeisticoK.PageL. C. (2016, December). Connect-text: Leveraging text-message communication to mitigate chronic absenteeism and improve parental engagement in the earliest years of schooling (University of Pittsburgh working paper). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.
42.
Stanton-SalazarR. D. (2001). Manufacturing hope and despair: The school and kin support networks of US-Mexican youth. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
43.
TurleyR. N. L. (2006). When parents want children to stay home for college. Research in Higher Education, 47, 823–846.
44.
YorkB. N.LoebS. (2014). One step at a time: The effects of an early literacy text messaging program for parents of preschoolers (No. w20659). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
