Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In practice, teacher turnover appears to have negative effects on school quality as measured by student performance. However, some simulations suggest that turnover can instead have large positive effects under a policy regime in which low-performing teachers can be accurately identified and replaced with more effective teachers. This study examines this question by evaluating the effects of teacher turnover on student achievement under IMPACT, the unique performance-assessment and incentive system in the District of Columbia Public Schools (DCPS). Employing a quasi-experimental design based on data from the first years of IMPACT, we find that, on average, DCPS replaced teachers who left with teachers who increased student achievement by 0.08 standard deviation (SD) in math. When we isolate the effects of lower-performing teachers who were induced to leave DCPS for poor performance, we find that student achievement improves by larger and statistically significant amounts (i.e., 0.14 SD in reading and 0.21 SD in math). In contrast, the effect of exits by teachers not sanctioned under IMPACT is typically negative but not statistically significant.

Keywords

teacher quality teacher turnover teacher evaluation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aaronson

Barrow

Sander

(2007). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago Public High Schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 25, 95–135. doi:10.1086/508733

Boyd

Lankford

Loeb

Rockoff

Wyckoff

(2008). The narrowing gap in New York City teacher qualifications and its implications for student achievement in high-poverty schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27, 793–818.

Bryk

Schneider

(2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage.

Chetty

Friedman

J. N.

Rockoff

J. E.

(2014). Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. American Economic Review, 104, 2633–2679. doi:10.1257/aer.104.9.2633

Clotfelter

C. T.

Glennie

Ladd

H. F.

Vigdor

J. L.

(2008). Would higher salaries keep teachers in high-poverty schools? Evidence from a policy intervention in North Carolina. Journal of Public Economics, 92(5–6), 1352–1370. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.07.003

Donaldson

M. L.

Papay

J. P.

(2015). Teacher evaluation for accountability and development. In Ladd

Geortz

(Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy (2nd ed., pp. 174–193). New York, NY: Routledge.

Dee

T. S.

Wyckoff

(2015). Incentives, selection, and teacher performance: Evidence from IMPACT. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34, 267–297. doi:10.1002/pam.21818

Glazerman

Seifullah

(2012). An evaluation of the Chicago Teacher Advancement Program (Chicago TAP) after four years. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.

Goldhaber

Lavery

Theobald

(2015). Uneven playing field? Assessing the teacher quality gap between advantaged and disadvantaged students. Educational Researcher, 44, 293–307.

10.

Guin

(2004). Chronic teacher turnover in urban elementary schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(42). doi:10.14507/epaa.v12n42.2004

11.

Hanushek

E. A.

(2009). Teacher deselection. In Goldhaber

Hannaway

(Eds.), Creating a new teaching profession (pp. 165–180). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.

12.

Hill

C. J.

Bloom

H. S.

Black

A. R.

Lipsey

M. W.

(2008). Empirical benchmarks for interpreting effect sizes in research. Child Development Perspectives, 2, 172–177. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00061.x

13.

Isenberg

Max

Gleason

Potamites

Santillano

Hock

Hansen

(2013, November). Access to effective teaching for disadvantaged students (No. NCEE 2014-4001). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20144001/pdf/20144001.pdf

14.

Jackson

C. K.

(2012, December). Non-cognitive ability, test scores, and teacher quality: Evidence from 9th grade teachers in North Carolina (Working Paper No. 18624). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w18624

15.

Johnson

S. M.

Kraft

M. A.

Papay

J. P.

(2012). How context matters in high-need schools: The effects of teachers’ working conditions on their professional satisfaction and their students’ achievement. Teachers College Record, 114, 100306.

16.

Loeb

Miller

L. C.

Wyckoff

(2015). Performance screens for school improvement: The case of tenure reform in New York City. Educational Researcher, 44, 199–212.

17.

National Council on Teacher Quality. (2012). State of the states 2012: Teacher effectiveness policies–Area 3: Identifying effective teachers. Washington, DC: Author.

18.

Office of the State Superintendent of Education. (2012, February 8). 2011/12 annual enrollment audit overview. Author. Retrieved from http://osse.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/osse/publication/attachments/Annual%20Enrollment%20Overview%202011%20to%202012.pdf

19.

Office of the State Superintendent of Education. (2013a). DC CAS math and reading scale scores. Retrieved from http://osse.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/osse/publication/attachments/scale_lines3.pdf

20.

Office of the State Superintendent of Education. (2013b). OSSE presentation 2013 DC CAS results (statewide). Retrieved from http://osse.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/osse/publication/attachments/OSSE%20Presentation%202013%20DC%20CAS%20Results%20%28Statewide%29-2.pdf

21.

Papay

Bacher-Hicks

Page

Marinell

(2015). The challenge of teacher retention in urban schools: Evidence of variation from a cross-site analysis. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2607776

22.

Rivkin

S. G.

Hanushek

E. A.

Kain

J. F.

(2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73, 417–458. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x

23.

Rockoff

J. E.

(2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. The American Economic Review, 94, 247–252.

24.

Rockoff

J. E.

Jacob

B. A.

Kane

T. J.

Staiger

D. O.

(2011). Can you recognize an effective teacher when you recruit one? Education Finance and Policy, 6, 43–74.

25.

Rockoff

J. E.

Speroni

(2010). Subjective and objective evaluations of teacher effectiveness. The American Economic Review, 100, 261–266.

26.

Ronfeldt

Loeb

Wyckoff

(2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 4–36. doi:10.3102/0002831212463813

27.

Rothstein

(2015). Teacher quality policy when supply matters. American Economic Review, 105, 100–130. doi:10.1257/aer.20121242

28.

Sass

T. R.

Hannaway

Figlio

D. N.

Feng

(2012). Value added of teachers in high-poverty schools and lower poverty schools. Journal of Urban Economics, 72, 104–122. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2012.04.004

29.

Staiger

D. O.

Rockoff

J. E.

(2010). Searching for effective teachers with imperfect information. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 97–118. doi:10.1257/jep.24.3.97

30.

Thomsen

(2014). Teacher performance plays growing role in employment decisions. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.

31.

The New Teacher Project. (2012). The irreplaceables: Understanding the real retention crisis in America’s urban schools. Brooklyn, NY: Author.

32.

Whitehurst

Chingos

Lindquist

(2014). Evaluating teachers with classroom observations: Lessons learned in four districts. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.15 MB

Teacher Turnover,Teacher Quality,and Student Achievement in DCPS

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material