We used self-report surveys to gather information on a broad set of non-cognitive skills from 1,368 eighth graders. At the student level, scales measuring conscientiousness, self-control, grit, and growth mindset are positively correlated with attendance, behavior, and test-score gains between fourth grade and eighth grade. Conscientiousness, self-control, and grit are unrelated to test-score gains at the school level, however, and students attending over-subscribed charter schools score lower on these scales than do students attending district schools. Exploiting admissions lotteries, we find positive impacts of charter school attendance on achievement and attendance but negative impacts on these non-cognitive skills. We provide suggestive evidence that these paradoxical results are driven by reference bias or the tendency for survey responses to be influenced by social context.
AbdulkadirogluA.AngristJ. D.DynarskiS. M.KaneT. J.PathakP. A. (2011). Accountability and flexibility in public schools: Evidence from Boston’s charters and pilots. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 699–748.
2.
AlmlundM.DuckworthA. L.HeckmanJ. J.KautzT. D. (2011). Personality psychology and economics. In HanushekE. A.MachinS.WoessmannL. (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 4, pp. 1–181). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
3.
AngristJ. D.CohodesS. R.DynarskiS. M.PathakP. A. (2013). Stand and deliver: Effects of Boston’s charter schools on college preparation, entry and choice (NBER Working Paper No. 19275). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
4.
AngristJ. D.PathakP. A.WaltersC. R. (2013). Explaining charter school effectiveness. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(4), 1–27.
5.
BanduraA. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (2nd ed., pp. 154–196). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
6.
BaronJ. (1982). Personality and intelligence. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 308–351). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BlackwellL. S.TrzesniewskiK. H.DweckC. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263.
8.
BorghansL.DuckworthA. L.HeckmanJ. J.ter WeelB. (2008). The economics and psychology of personality traits. Journal of Human Resources, 43, 972–1059.
9.
CunhaF.HeckmanJ. J. (2008). Formulating, identifying and estimating the technology of cognitive and noncognitive skill formation. Journal of Human Resources, 43, 738–782.
10.
DeeT. S.WestM. R. (2011). The non-cognitive returns to class size. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33, 23–46.
11.
DobbieW.FryerR. G.Jr. (2013). The medium-term impacts of high-achieving charter schools on non-test score outcomes (NBER Working Paper No. 19581). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
12.
DuckworthA. L.CarlsonS. M. (2013). Self-regulation and school success. In SokolB. W.GrouzetF. M. E.MullerU. (Eds.), Self-regulation and autonomy: Social and developmental dimensions of human conduct (pp. 208–230). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
13.
DuckworthA. L.PetersonC.MatthewsM. D.KellyD. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1087–1101.
14.
DuckworthA. L.QuinnP. D. (2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (Grit-S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 166–174.
15.
DuckworthA. L.SeligmanM. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16, 939–944.
16.
DuckworthA. L.TsukayamaE.MayH. (2010). Establishing causality using hierarchical linear modeling: An illustration predicting achievement from self-control. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 1, 311–317.
17.
DurlakJ. A.DymnickiA. B.TaylorR.WeissbergR. P.SchellingerK. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82, 405–432.
18.
DweckC. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.
19.
EvansG. W.RosenbaumJ. (2008). Self-regulation and the income-achievement gap. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 504–514.
20.
FarringtonC.RoderickM.AllensworthE.NagaokaJ.KeyesT. S.JohnsonD.BeechumN. O. (2012). Teaching adolescents to become learners: The role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research.
21.
FinnA. S.KraftM. A.WestM. R.LeonardJ. A.BishC. E.MartinR. E.. . . GabrieliJ. D. E. (2014). Cognitive skills, student achievement tests, and schools. Psychological Science, 25, 736–744.
22.
HeckmanJ. J.KautzT. (2013). Fostering and measuring skills: Interventions that improve character and cognition. In HeckmanJ. J.HumphriesJ. E.KautzT. (Eds.), The myth of achievement tests: The GED and the role of character in American life (pp. 341–430). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23.
HeineS. J.BuchtelE. E.NorenzayanA. (2008). What do cross-national comparisons of personality traits tell us? The case of conscientiousness. Psychological Science, 19, 309–313.
24.
HittC.TrivittJ. (2013). Don’t know? Or don’t care? Predicting educational attainment using survey response rates and coding speed tests as measures of conscientiousness (EDRE Working Paper 2013-05). Fayetteville: University of Arkansas.
25.
JacksonJ. J.WoodD.BoggT.WaltonK. E.HarmsP. D.RobertsB. W. (2010). What do conscientious people do? Development and validation of the Behavioral Indicators of Conscientiousness (BIC). Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 501–511.
26.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
27.
KingG.MurrayC. J. L.SalomonJ. A.TandonA. (2004). Enhancing the validity and cross-cultural comparability of measurement in survey research. American Political Science Review, 98, 191–205.
28.
KyllonenP. C.BertlingJ. P. (2013). Innovative questionnaire assessment methods to increase cross-country comparability. In RutkowskiL.von DavierM.RutkowskiD. (Eds.), Handbook of international large-scale assessment: Background, technical Issues, and methods of data analysis (pp. 277-285). London, England: Chapman & Hall.
29.
LakeR.BowenM.DemerittA.McCulloughM.HaimsonJ.GillB. (2012). Learning from charter school management organizations: Strategies for student behavior and teacher coaching. Washington, DC: Center on Reinventing Public Education and Mathematica Policy Research.
30.
MessickS. (1979). Potential uses of noncognitive measurement in education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 281–292.
31.
MischelW.ShodaY. (1999). Integrating dispositions and processing dynamics within a unified theory of personality: The cognitive-affective personality system. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2, 197-218.
32.
MoffittT. E.ArseneaultL.BelskyD.DicksonN.HancoxR. J.HarringtonH.. . . CaspiA. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 2693–2698.
33.
National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills for the 21st century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
34.
NaumannL. P.JohnO. P. (2013). Toward a domain-specific approach to cultural differences: The influence of cultural values and reference-group standards on self-reported personality. Unpublished manuscript.
35.
PaulhusD. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In RobinsonJ. P.ShaverP. R.WrightsmanL. S. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17–59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
36.
PengK.NisbettR. E.WongN. Y. C. (1997). Validity problems comparing values across cultures and possible solutions. Psychological Methods, 2, 329–344.
37.
PoropatA. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 322–338.
38.
SchmittD. P.McRaeR. R.Benet-MartinezV. (2007). The geographic distribution of big five personality traits: Patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 173–212.
39.
SeiderS. (2012). Character compass: How powerful school culture can point students toward success. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
40.
SpearmanC. (1904). “General intelligence,” objectively determined and measured. The American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–292.
41.
SteinbergL. (2007). Risk taking in adolescence: New perspectives from brain and behavioral science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 55–59.
42.
TangneyJ. P.BaumeisterR. F.BooneA. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–322.
43.
ToughP. (2012). How children succeed: Grit, curiosity, and the hidden power of character. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
TuttleC. C.GillB.GleasonP.KnechtelV.Nichols-BarrerI.ReschA. (2013). KIPP middle schools: Impacts on achievement and other outcomes. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
46.
Van de GaerE.GrisayA.SchulzW.GebhardtE. (2012). The reference group effect: An explanation of the paradoxical relationship between academic achievement and self-confidence across countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 1205–1228.
47.
YeagerD. S.PauneskuD.WaltonG. W.DweckC. (2013, May). How can we instill productive mindsets at scale? A review of the evidence and an initial R&D agenda. White paper prepared for the White House Meeting on Excellence in Education: The Importance of Academic Mindsets, Washington, DC.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
