Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In this study, I exploit exogenous differences in institutional policies regarding the treatment of home equity in grant aid allocation to estimate a causal impact of institutional grant aid on college choice. Because institutional grant aid is typically not awarded randomly, the college-estimated home equity value serves as an instrumental variable from which the causal relationship between institutional grant aid and college choice is identified. An additional $1,000 in institutional grant aid awarded by the typical sampled college increases the probability that the typical accepted student will choose that college by 1.66 percentage points. I also find that choice elasticity varies by student socioeconomic status, with the lowest income students nearly three times more sensitive to institutional grant aid than high-income students.

Keywords

instrumental variables college choice financial aid

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aitken

N. D.

(1982). College student performance, satisfaction and retention: Specification and estimation of a structural model. The Journal of Higher Education, 53(1), 32–50.

Allison

(2005). Fixed effects regression methods for longitudinal data using SAS®. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.

Angrist

J. D.

Pischke

J. S.

(2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Avery

Glickman

Hoxby

C. M.

Metrick

(2005). A revealed preference ranking of U.S. colleges and universities (NBER Working Paper 10803). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w10803.pdf

Avery

Hoxby

C. M.

(2003). Do and should financial aid packages affect students’ college choices? (NBER Working Paper 9482). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w9482.pdf

Baum

Payea

(2011). Trends in student aid 2011. New York, NY: The College Board Advocacy & Policy Center.

Betts

J. R.

Fairlie

R. W.

(2001). Explaining ethnic, racial, and immigrant differences in private school attendance. Journal of Urban Economics, 50(1), 26–51.

Bound

Hershbein

Long

B. T.

(2009). Playing the admissions game: Student reactions to increasing college competition. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(4), 119–146.

Brint

(2010, January 10). Amid recession, some college admissions policies look at students’ wealth. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/08/AR2010010803584.html

10.

College Board. (2007). Meeting college costs, 2008 edition. New York, NY: Author.

11.

Dale

S. B.

Krueger

A. B.

(2002). Estimating the payoff to attending a more selective college: An application of selection on observables and unobservables. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1491–1527.

12.

DeNavas-Walt

Proctor

B. D.

Smith

J. C.

(2010). U.S. Census Bureau, current population reports, P60-238, income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

13.

Dynarski

S. M.

(2000). Hope for whom? Financial aid for the middle class and its impact on college attendance. National Tax Journal, 53(3), 629–661.

14.

Dynarski

S. M.

(2003). Does aid matter? Measuring the effect of student aid on college attendance and completion. The American Economic Review, 93(1), 279–288.

15.

Ehrenberg

R. G.

(2000). Tuition rising: Why college costs so much. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

16.

Eide

Brewer

D. J.

Ehrenberg

R. G.

(1998). Does it pay to attend an elite private college? Evidence on the effects of undergraduate college quality on graduate school attendance. Economics of Education Review, 17(4), 371–376.

17.

Entwisle

D. R.

Astone

N. M.

(1994). Some practical guidelines for measuring youth’s race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Child Development, 65(6), 1521–1540.

18.

Fitzsimmons

W. R.

McGrath

M. E.

Donahue

S. C.

(2009). Harvard College Office of Admissions and financial aid 2009 newsletter. Retrieved from http://admissions.college.harvard.edu/counselors/gc_newsletter_fall2009.pdf

19.

Geyer

C. J.

Thompson

E. A.

(1992). Constrained Monte Carlo maximum likelihood for dependent data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 54(3), 657–699.

20.

Griffith

A. L.

Rothstein

D. S.

(2009). Can’t get there from here: The decision to apply to a selective college. Economics of Education Review, 28(5), 620–628.

21.

Hill

C. B.

Winston

G. C.

(2010). Low-income students and highly selective private colleges: Geography, searching, and recruiting. Economics of Education Review, 29, 495–503.

22.

Horrace

W. C.

Oaxaca

R. L.

(2006). Results on the bias and inconsistency of ordinary least squares for the linear probability model. Economics Letters, 90(3), 321–327.

23.

Hoxby

C. M.

(2009). The changing selectivity of American colleges. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(4), 95–118.

24.

Hoxby

C. M.

Long

(1999). Explaining rising income and wage inequality among the college educated (NBER Working Paper 6873). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w6873.pdf

25.

Hurwitz

(2011). The impact of legacy status on undergraduate admissions at elite colleges and universities. Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 480–492.

26.

Ishida

Spilerman

(1997). Educational credentials and promotion chances in Japanese and American organizations. American Sociological Review, 62(6), 866–882.

27.

Kelley

(2010, December 9). Cornell to match financial aid offers of peer universities. Cornell University Chronicle Online. Retrieved from http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/Dec10/AidMatch.html

28.

Kim

(2010). Early decision and financial aid competition among need-blind colleges and universities. Journal of Public Economics, 94(5-6), 410–420.

29.

Lentz

B. F.

Laband

D. N.

(1989). Why so many children of doctors become doctors: Nepotism vs. human capital transfers. The Journal of Human Resources, 24(3), 396–413.

30.

Lewin

(2010, December 17). Unease grows about future of financing for Pell grants. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/18/education/18pell.html

31.

Linsenmeier

D. M.

Rosen

H. S.

Rouse

C. E.

(2006). Financial aid packages and college enrollment decisions: An econometric case study. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(1), 126–145.

32.

Long

B. T.

(2004). How have college decisions changed over time? An application of the conditional logistic choice model. Journal of Econometrics, 121(1-2), 271–296.

33.

Manski

Wise

(1983). College choice in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

34.

McDonough

P. M.

(1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

35.

Monks

(2009). The impact of merit-based financial aid on college enrollment: A field experiment. Economics of Education Review, 28(1), 99–106.

36.

Murnane

R. J.

Willett

J. B.

(2011). Method matters: Improving causal inference in educational and social science research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

37.

Nurnberg

Schapiro

Zimmerman

(2010). Students choosing colleges: Understanding the matriculation decision at a highly selective private institution? (NBER Working Paper 15772). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w15772.pdf

38.

Okun

M. A.

Levy

Karoly

Ruehlman

(2009). Dispositional happiness and college student GPA: Unpacking a null relation. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(4), 711–715.

39.

Perna

L. W.

(2006). Studying college access and choice: A proposed conceptual model. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 21, 99–157.

40.

Rimer

Finder

(2007, December 11). Harvard to aid students high in middle class. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/11/education/11harvard.html?pagewanted=print

41.

Roberts

(2011, September 15). UC officials take pay raises; warn of doubling tuition. NBC Bay Area News. Retrieved from http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/UC-Officials-Take-Pay-Raises-While-Warning-of-Doubling-Tuition–129901743.html

42.

Roman

(2008, January 15). Yale overhauls financial aid; Reform targets middle class. Yale Daily News. Retrieved from http://www.yaledailynews.com/news/2008/jan/15/yale-overhauls-financial-aid-reform-targets/

43.

Sacerdote

(2001). Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 681–704.

44.

Tedeschi

(2009, April 3). College tuition not on the house. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/05/realestate/05mort.html

45.

U.S. News and World Report Best Colleges 2010. (2009).

46.

U.S. News and World Report Best Colleges 2011. (2010).

47.

van der Klaauw

(2002). Estimating the effect of financial aid offers on college enrollment: A regression-discontinuity approach. International Economic Review, 43(4), 1249–1287.

48.

Winston

G. G.

(1999). Subsidies, hierarchy and peers: The awkward economics of higher education. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(1), 13–36.

49.

Wong

G. W.

(2005, December 12). Early decision action plan: Your child has been accepted to the college of their dreams—but are you sure you can afford it? CNNMoney.com . Retrieved http://money.cnn.com/2005/12/09/pf/college/early_decision/index.htm

50.

Zimmerman

(2003). Peer effects in academic outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(1), 9–23.

The Impact of Institutional Grant Aid on College Choice

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References