Abstract
This rejoinder is a response to the three Ballou critiques. It argues that Ballou offered some interesting and creative ideas to check the quality of the data set, but gave no conclusive evidence to demonstrate that the findings are invalid. Further analyses of the data set are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.