Abstract
The study develops a typology of educational monitoring systems with a view toward its utility for educational policymakers. The three major types are compliance monitoring, diagnostic monitoring, and performance monitoring. Three case studies are presented from New Jersey, Minnesota, and California that typify each approach to monitoring. The concluding section discusses the policy trade-offs that accompany reliance by states on each approach to educational accountability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.