This chapter is grounded in a closer examination of the multiple origins of our theories of learning. Two questions guide our inquiry. First, in what ways has the science of learning and development originated in the lifeways of our ancestors? And second, what are some Global South Side origins of our theories of learning? First, we use two river stories to highlight growing restorative sociocultural and socioaxiological currents in the field. We then offer five origin theories: (a) spiritwork; (b) land is, therefore we are; (c) storying relations; (d) formal and organic intellectuals; and (e) settings grow from settings. We describe each one and potential ways forward for those interested in designing collective thriving grounded in our age-old theories of life.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsD. W. (1995). Education for extinction: American Indians and the boarding school experience, 1875-1928 (3rd ed). University Press of Kansas.
2.
AlatasS. F. (2006). Alternative discourses in Asian social science: Responses to Eurocentrism. Sage.
3.
AllenC. (2012). Trans-Indigenous: Methodologies for global Native literary studies. University of Minnesota Press.
4.
AppaduraiA. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. University of Minnesota Press.
5.
ArchibaldJ. Q. Q. X. (2008). Indigenous storywork: Educating the heart, mind, body, and spirit. University of British Columbia Press.
ArmstrongJ. (2018). A single strand: The Nsyilxcin speaking people’s Tmixw knowledge as a model for sustaining a life-force place. In NelsonM. K.ShillingD. (Eds.), Traditional ecological knowledge: Learning from Indigenous practices for environmental sustainability (pp. 95–108). Cambridge University Press.
8.
AustenR. (2010). The medium of “tradition”: Amadou Hampâté Bâ’s confrontations with languages, literacy, and colonialism. Islamic Africa, 1(2), 217–228.
9.
BangM. (2015). Culture, learning, and development and the natural world: The influences of situative perspectives. Educational Psychologist, 50(3), 220–233.
10.
BangM. (2017). Towards an ethic of decolonial trans-ontologies in sociocultural theories of learning and development. In EsmondeI.BookerA. N. (Eds.), Power and privilege in the learning sciences: Critical and sociocultural theories of learning (pp. 115–138). Routledge.
11.
BangM. (2020). Learning on the move toward just, sustainable, and culturally thriving futures. Cognition and Instruction, 28(3), 434–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1777999
12.
BangM.CurleyL.KesselA.MarinA.SuzokovichE. S.IIIStrackG. (2014). Muskrat theories, tobacco in the streets, and living Chicago as Indigenous land. Environmental Education Research, 20(1), 37–55.
13.
BangM.FaberL.GurneauJ.MarinA.SotoC. (2015). Community based design research: Learning across generations and strategic transformations of institutional relations toward axiological innovations. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(1), 28–41.
14.
BangM.MarinA.WemigwaseS.NayakP.NxumaloF. (2022). Undoing human supremacy and white supremacy to transform relationships: An interview with Megan Bang and Ananda Marin. Curriculum Inquiry, 52(2), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2022.2052635
15.
BangM.MedinD. L. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94(6), 1008–1026.
16.
BangM.MedinD. L.AtranS. (2007). Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(35), 13868–13874.
17.
BangM.VossoughiS. (2016). Participatory design research and educational justice: Studying learning and relations within social change making. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 173–193.
18.
BangM.WarrenB.RoseberyA. S.MedinD. (2012). Desettling expectations in science education. Human Development, 55, 302–318.
19.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
20.
BettelheimB. (2010). The uses of enchantment: The meaning and importance of fairy tales. Vintage.
BorrowsJ. (2019). Law’s Indigenous ethics. University of Toronto Press.
23.
BoykinA. W. (1977). Experimental psychology from a Black perspective: Issues and examples. Journal of Black Psychology, 3(2), 29–49.
24.
BoykinA. W. (1986). The triple quandary and the schooling of Afro-American children. In NeisserU. (Ed.), The school achievement of minority children (pp. 57–92). Erlbaum.
25.
BrayboyB. J. M. (2005). Toward a tribal critical race theory in education. The Urban Review, 37(5), 425–446.
26.
BrennerL. (2010). A living library: Amadou Hampaté Bâ and the oral transmission of Islamic religious knowledge. Islamic Africa, 1(2), 167–215.
27.
BrownA. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.
28.
browna. m. (2017). Emergent strategy: Shaping change, changing worlds. AK Press.
29.
BrownK.ColeM. (2001). A utopian methodology as a tool for cultural and critical psychologies: Toward a positive critical theory. In PackerM. J.TappanM. B. (Eds.), Cultural and critical perspectives on human development (pp. 41–66). State University of New York Press.
30.
BurkhartB. (2019). Indigenizing philosophy through the land: A trickster methodology for decolonizing environmental ethics and Indigenous futures. MSU Press.
BurkhartB. Y. (2010). The physics of spirit: The Indigenous continuity of science and religion. In HaagJ. W.PetersonG. R.SpezioM. L. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to religion and science (pp. 34–42). Routledge. https://www.academia.edu/26053164/The_Physics_of_Spirit
33.
BynumE. (2021). Our African unconscious: The Black origins of mysticism and psychology. Inner Traditions.
CantorP.OsherD.BergJ.SteyerL.RoseT. (2019). Malleability, plasticity, and individuality: How children learn and develop in context. Applied Developmental Science, 23(4), 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2017.1398649
ChomskyN. (2005). Rules and representations. Columbia University Press.
38.
ColeM. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. The Belknap Press.
39.
ColeM. (2008). Cultural and cognitive development in phylogenetic, historical, and ontological perspective. In DamonW.LernerR. M. (Eds.), Child and adolescent development: An advanced course (pp. 593–646). John Wiley & Sons.
40.
ColeM. (1978/2022). Ethnographic psychology of cognition—So far. In SpindlerG. D. (Ed.), The making of psychological anthropology (pp. 614–631). University of California Press. (Original work published 1978)
41.
ColeM.GriffinP. (1983). A socio-historical approach to re-mediation. Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 5(4), 69–74.
42.
ConnellR. (2014). Using southern theory: Decolonizing social thought in theory, research and application. Planning Theory, 13(2), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095213499216
CoulthardG. S. (2014). Red skin, white masks: Rejecting the colonial politics of recognition. University of Minnesota Press.
45.
CrossW. E. (1995). The psychology of nigrescence. In PonterottoJ.CasasJ.SuzukiL.AlexanderC. (Eds.), Handbook of counseling (pp. 93–122). Sage.
46.
CurnowJ.VeaT. (2020). Emotional configurations of politicization in social justice movements. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(9/10), 729–747. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-01-2020-0017
47.
Darling-HammondL.FlookL.Cook-HarveyC.BarronB.OsherD. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
48.
DavisN. R.VossoughiS.SmithJ. F. (2020). Learning from below: A micro-ethnographic account of children’s self-determination as sociopolitical and intellectual action. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 24, Article 100373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100373
49.
DeloriaV. (Ed.). (1979). A brief history of the federal responsibility to the American Indian (No. 79). Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, [Education Division], Office of Education.
50.
DeloriaV.Jr. (2003). God is red: A native view of religion (3rd ed.). The Putnam Publishing Group.
51.
DeloriaV.Jr. (2012). The metaphysics of modern existence. Fulcrum Publishing.
52.
DeloriaV.Jr.WildcatD. R. (2001). Power and place: Indian education in America. Fulcrum Publishing.
53.
DiazV. M. (2019). Ocean in the plains: The politics and analytics of transIndigenous resurgence in Chuukese voyaging of Dakota lands, waters, and skies in Miní Sóta Makhóčhe. Pacific Studies, 42(1/1), 1–43.
54.
DillardC. B. (2011). Learning to remember the things we’ve learned to forget: Endarkened feminisms and the sacred nature of research. In DenzinN. K.GiardinaM. D. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and global crises (pp. 226–243). Left Coast Press.
Elliott-GrovesE. (2020). A culturally grounded biopsychosocial assessment utilizing Indigenous ways of knowing with the Cowichan Tribes. In Rethinking social work practice with multicultural communities (pp. 115–133). Routledge.
57.
Elliott-GrovesE.Meixi. (2022). Why and how communities Learn by Observing and Pitching In: Indigenous axiologies and ethical commitments in LOPI (Cómo y por qué las comunidades Aprenden por medio de Observar y Acomedirse axiologías indígenas y compromisos éticos en el modelo LOPI). Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 45(3), 567–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2022.2062916
58.
EngeströmY.SanninoA. (2021). From mediated action to hetrogenous coalitions: Four generations of activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 28(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2020.1806328
59.
EricksonF. (2009). Musicality in talk and listening: A key element in classroom discourse as an environment for learning. In MallochS.TrevarthenC. (Eds.), Communicative musicality: Exploring the basis of human companionship (pp. 449–463). Oxford University Press.
60.
EscobarA. (2018). Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371816
61.
EsmondeI.BookerA. N. (Eds.). (2016). Power and privilege in the learning sciences: Critical and sociocultural theories of learning. Routledge.
62.
EspinozaM. L. (2008). Humanization and social dreaming: A case study of changing social relations in a summer migrant educational program (Publication No. 3302577) [Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
63.
EspinozaM. L.VossoughiS.RoseM.PozaL. E. (2020). Matters of participation: Notes on the study of dignity and learning. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 27(4), 325–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2020.1779304
64.
FanonF. (1967). Peau noire, masques blancs [Black skin, white masks] (MarkmannC., Trans.). Editions de Seuil. (Original work published 1952)
65.
FishmanB. J.PenuelW. R.AllenA.-R.ChengB. H.SabelliN. (2013). Design-based implementation research: An emerging model for transforming the relationship of research and practice. In FishmanB. J.PenuelW. R. (Eds.), The yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education: Vol. 112: Design-based implementation research (pp. 136–156). Teachers College.
GalvizY. C. F.RibeiroR. V.SouzaG. M. (2020). Yes, plants do have memory. Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology, 32(3), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40626-020-00181-y
68.
GivensJ. R. (2021). Fugitive pedagogy: Carter G. Woodson and the art of Black teaching. Harvard University Press.
69.
GoemanM. (2008). (Re)Mapping Indigenous presence on the land in Native women’s literature. American Quarterly, 60(2), 295–302.
70.
GoemanM. (2015). Land as life: Unsettling the logics of containment. In TevesS. N.SmithA.RahejaM. H. (Eds.), Native studies keywords (pp. 71–89). University of Arizona Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt183gxzb.9
71.
GravemeijerK.CobbP. (2006). Design research from a learning design perspective. In van den AkkerJ.GravemeijerK.McKeeneyS.NieveenN. (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 29–63). Routledge.
GutiérrezK. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.43.2.3
74.
GutiérrezK. D. (2018). Social design–based experiments: A proleptic approach to literacy. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 67(1), 86–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336918787823
75.
GutiérrezK. D.Baquedano-LopezP.TejedaC. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6(4), 286–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039909524733
76.
GutiérrezK. D.BeckerB. L. C.EspinozaM. L.CortesK. L.CortezA.LizárragaJ. R.RiveroE.VillegasK.YinP. (2019). Youth as historical actors in the production of possible futures. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 26(4), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2019.1652327
77.
GutiérrezK. D.JurowA. S. (2016). Social design experiments: Toward equity by design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 565–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1204548
78.
GutiérrezK. D.JurowA. S.VakilS. (2020). Social design-based experiments: A utopian methodology for understanding new possibilities for learning. In NasirN. S.LeeC. D.PeaR.de RoystonM. McKinney (Eds.), Handbook of the cultural foundations of learning (pp. 330–347). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774977-23
79.
GutiérrezK. D.RogoffB. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25.
80.
Hampaté BâA. (1981). The living tradition. In Ki-ZerboJ. (Ed.), General history of Africa I: Methodology and African prehistory (pp. 166–205). University of California Press.
81.
Hampaté BâA. (2008). A spirit of tolerance: The inspiring life of Tierno Bokar (GaetaniR., Ed.; CasewitF., Trans.). World Wisdom, Inc. (Original work published 1980)
82.
Hampaté BâA.KestelootL. (1968). Un Épopée peule: ‘Silimaka’ [A Fulani epic: ‘Silimaka’]. L’homme, 8(2), 5–36.
83.
HarjoL. (2019). Spiral to the stars: Mvskoke tools of futurity. The University of Arizona Press.
84.
Henne-OchoaR.Elliott-GrovesE.MeekB. A.RogoffB. (2020). Pathways forward for Indigenous language reclamation: Engaging Indigenous epistemology and learning by observing and pitching in to family and community endeavors. The Modern Language Journal, 104(2), 481–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12652
85.
HenrichJ.HeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–135.
86.
HermesM. R.EngmanM. M.MeixiMcKenzieJ. (2022). Relationality and Ojibwemowin in forest walks: Learning from multimodal interaction about land and language. Cognition and Instruction, 41(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2022.2059482
87.
hooksb. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
88.
HouldenS.VeletsianosG. (2023). Impossible dreaming: On speculative education fiction and hopeful learning futures. Postdigital Science and Education, 5, 605–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00348-7
89.
HountondjiP. J. (2002). The struggle for meaning: Reflections on philosophy, culture, and democracy in Africa (Conteh-MorganJ., Trans.). Ohio University Press.
90.
HutchinsE. (1996). Cognition in the wild. MIT Press.
91.
JosephG. G. (2011). The crest of the peacock: Non-European roots of mathematics (3rd ed.). Princeton University Press.
92.
JurowS. A.SheaM. (2015). Learning in equity-oriented scale-making projects. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(2), 286–307.
KimmererR. W. (2014). Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge and the teachings of plants. Milkweed Editions.
95.
KwanchewanB.PrasitL. (2009). Modern education systems and impact on ethnic minorities. In Baron-GuttyA.ChupraditS. (Eds.), Education, economy and identity: Ten years of educational reform in Thailand (pp. 37–53). IRASEC - Research Institute on Contemporary Southeast Asia.
96.
LaPenseeE. A. (2017). Transformations and remembrances in the digital game we sing for healing. Transmotion, 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.22024/UniKent/03/tm.243
97.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
98.
LeeC. D. (2001). Is October Brown Chinese? A cultural modeling activity system for underachieving students. American Educational Research Journal, 38(1), 97–141.
99.
LeeC. D. (2017). Understanding the ecologies of human learning and the challenge for education science. In BudwigN.TurielE.ZelazoP. D. (Eds.), New perspectives on human development (pp. 123–144). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316282755.009
100.
LeeC. D.MeltzoffA. N.KuhlP. K. (2020). The braid of human learning and development: Neuro-physiological processes and participation in cultural practices. In NasirN. S.LeeC. D.PeaR.McKinney de RoystonM. (Eds.), Handbook of the cultural foundations of learning (pp. 24–43). Routledge.
101.
LeeU.-S. A.DeLiemaD.GomezK. (2022). Equity conjectures: A methodological tool for centering social change in learning and design. Cognition and Instruction, 40(1), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2021.2010211
102.
LeesA.Tropp LamanT.CalderónD. (2021). “Why didn’t I know this?”: Land education as an antidote to settler colonialism in early childhood teacher education. Theory Into Practice, 60(3), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2021.1911482
103.
LeontyevA. N. (2019). The development of mind: Selected works of Aleksi Nikolaevich Leontyev. Marxists Internet Archive Publications.
104.
LiberaliF. C. (2008). Formação crítica de educadores: questões fundamentais [Critical education of educators: Fundamental questions]. Cabral Editora e Livraria Universitária.
105.
LizárragaJ. R.CortezA. (2020). Cyborg Jotería pedagogies: Latinx drag queens leveraging communication ecologies in the age of the digital and social displacement. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal, 14(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.24974/amae.14.2.358
106.
LuriaA. R. (1982). Language and cognition (WertschJ. V., Ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
107.
MadhubutiH. (1991). Black men, obsolete, single, dangerous?: The Afrikan American family in transition. Third World Press.
108.
MangenaF. (2012). Towards a hunhu/ubuntu dialogical moral theory. Phronimon, 13(2), 1–17.
MarinA.BangM. (2018). “Look it, this is how you know:” Family forest walks as a context for knowledge-building about the natural world. Cognition and Instruction, 36(2), 89–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2018.1429443
112.
MarinA. M. (2020). Ambulatory sequences: Ecologies of learning by attending and observing on the move. Cognition and Instruction, 38(3), 281–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1767104
113.
MarinA.TaylorK. H.ShapiroB. R.HallR. (2020). Why learning on the move: Intersecting research pathways for mobility, learning and teaching. Cognition and Instruction, 38(3), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1769100
114.
MarkerM. (2006). After the Makah whale hunt: Indigenous knowledge and limits to multicultural discourse. Urban Education, 41(5), 482–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085906291923
115.
MasseyD. (2005). For space. Sage.
116.
McDaid BarryN.BangM.BruceF.Barajas-LópezF. (2023). “Then the Nettle People won’t be lonely”: Recognizing the personhood of plants in an Indigenous STEAM summer program. Cognition and Instruction, 41(4), 381–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2023.2220852
117.
McGregorD. (2009). Honouring our relations: An Anishnaabe perspective on environmental justice. In AgyemanJ.ColeP.Haluza-DeRayR.O’RileyP. (Eds.), Speaking for ourselves: Environmental justice in Canada (pp. 27–41). University of British Columbia Press.
118.
McKinney de RoystonM.NasirN. S. (2017). Racialized learning ecologies: Understanding race as a key feature of learning and developmental processes in schools. In TurielE.BudwigN.ZelazoP. D. (Eds.), New perspectives on human development (pp. 258–286). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316282755.015
119.
McKinney de RoystonM.Sengupta-IrvingT. (2019). Another step forward: Engaging the political in learning. Cognition and Instruction, 37(3), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1624552
120.
McWilliamsJ.PenuelW. R. (2016). Queer theory in the learning sciences. In EsmondeI.BookerA. N. (Eds.), Power and privilege in the learning sciences (pp. 93–114). Routledge.
121.
MedinD.ColeM. (1975). Comparative psychology and human cognition. In EstesW. K. (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (Volume 1): Introduction to concepts and issues (pp. 111–150). Erlbaum Associates.
122.
MedinD.ojalehtob.MarinA.BangM. (2014). Culture and epistemologies: Putting culture back into the ecosystem. In GelfandM. J.ChiuC.-Y.HongY.-Y. (Eds.), Advances in culture and psychology (pp. 177–217). Oxford University Press.
Meixi. (2022). Towards gentle futures: Co-developing axiological commitments and alliances among humans and the greater living world at school. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 29(4), 316–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2022.2142242
125.
MeixiKongkaewS.TheechumpaP.PinwannaA.LingA. (2022). Making relatives: The poetics and politics of a trans-Indigenous teacher collective. Comparative Education Review, 66(3), 442–464. https://doi.org/10.1086/720405
126.
MeixiMoreno-DulceyF.AlcaláL.KeyserU.Elliott-GrovesE. (2022). When learning is life giving: Redesigning schools with Indigenous systems of relationality. AERA Open, 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211062587
127.
MeyerM. A. (2001). Our own liberation: Reflections on Hawaiian epistemology. The Contemporary Pacific, 13(1), 124–148.
128.
MeyerM. A. (2013). Holographic epistemology: Native common sense. China Media Research, 9(2), 94–101.
129.
MignoloW. D. (2007). Delinking: The rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality and the grammar of de-coloniality. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 449–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162647
MillionD. (2014). There is a river in me: Theory from life. In SimpsonA.SmithA. (Eds.), Theorizing Native studies (pp. 31–42). Duke University Press.
132.
MirraN.GarciaA. (2020). “I hesitate but I do have hope”: Youth speculative civic literacies for troubled times. Harvard Educational Review, 90(2), 295–321. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-90.2.295
MukurazitaE. (2024, March10–14). African Indigenous Learning Theory: Turning the gaze upside down [Poster presentation]. Comparative and International Education Society Conference Annual Meeting, Miami, FL, United States.
135.
NasirN. S. (2011). Racialized identities: Race and achievement among African American youth. Stanford University Press.
136.
NasirN. S.HandV. M. (2006). Exploring sociocultural perspectives on race, culture, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 449–475.
137.
NasirN. S.LeeC. D.PeaR.McKinney de RoystonM. (2020). Handbook of the cultural foundations of learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774977
138.
NasirN. S.RoseberyA. S.WarrenB.LeeC. D. (2006). Learning as a cultural process: Achieving equity through diversity. In SawyerR. K. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of learning sciences (pp. 489–504). Cambridge University Press.
139.
NxumaloF.CedilloS. (2017). Decolonizing place in early childhood studies: Thinking with Indigenous onto-epistemologies and Black feminist geographies. Global Studies of Childhood, 7(2), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610617703831
140.
NzingaK. (2023a). Cultural resonances: Between the natural frequencies of hip-hop & the sociopolitical development of youth artivists in Palestine. Mind, Culture, and Activity, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2023.2238704
141.
NzingaK. (2023b). Why errybody sayin ‘no new friends’?: The proverbs of rap and why young people recite them. Cognition & Instruction. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2023.2240460
142.
NzingaK. L. K.MedinD. L. (2018). The moral priorities of rap listeners. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 18(3–4), 312–342. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12340033
OsherD.CantorP.BergJ.SteyerL.RoseT. (2020). Drivers of human development: How relationships and context shape learning and development1. Applied Developmental Science, 24(1), 6–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2017.1398650
PenuelW. R. (2019). Infrastructuring as a practice of design-based research for supporting and studying equitable implementation and sustainability of innovations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(4–5), 659–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1552151
147.
PenuelW. R. (2020). Promoting equitable and just learning across settings: Organizational forms for educational change. In PenuelW. R. (Ed.), Handbook of the cultural foundations of learning (pp. 348–364). Routledge.
148.
PhamJ. H. (2022). Teacher leadership for love, solidarity, and justice: The invisibilized and contested practices of teacher leaders of color. Journal of Teacher Education, 73(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871211051990
149.
PhilipT. M.GuptaA. (2020). Emerging perspectives on the co-construction of power and learning in the learning sciences, mathematics education, and science education. In PivovarovaM.PowersJ. M.FischmanG. E. (Eds.), Review of research in education, (Vol. 44, pp. 195–217). Sage. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903309
150.
PhilipT. M.PhamJ. H.ScottM.CortezA. (2022). Intentionally addressing nested systems of power in schooling through teacher solidarity co-design. Cognition and Instruction, 40(1), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2021.2010208
151.
PhilipT. M.SenguptaP. (2020). Theories of learning as theories of society: A contrapuntal approach to expanding disciplinary authenticity in computing. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 30(2), 330–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2020.1828089
152.
The Politics of Learning Writing Collective. (2017). The learning sciences in a new era of U.S. nationalism. Cognition and Instruction, 35(2), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2017.1282486
153.
PotvinA. S.BoardmanA. G.StamatisK. (2021). Consequential change: Teachers scale project-based learning in English language arts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 107, Article 103469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103469
154.
QuijanoA. (2000). Coloniality of power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views From South, 1(3), 533–580.
155.
RiedyR. T. T. (2022). Dignity-affirming care in collaborative research spaces (Publication No. 29391324. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado Boulder]. ProQuest.
156.
RobinsonD. (2020). Hungry listening: Resonant theory for Indigenous sound studies. University of Minnesota Press.
157.
RockJ.GouldR. (2018, June6–8). Indigenous riverscapes and mounds: The feminine relationship of earth, sky, and water [Paper presentation]. Hawaii University International Conferences: Science, Technology, and Engineering, Arts, Mathematics and Education, Honolulu, HI, United States.
158.
RogoffB. (2003). The cultural nature of human development (Reprint). Oxford University Press.
159.
RogoffB.AlcaláL.CoppensA. D.LópezA.RuvalcabaO.SilvaK. G. (Eds.). (2014). Learning by observing and pitching in to family and community endeavors. Human Development, 57(2–3).
160.
SaidE. (1994). Representations of the intellectual: The 1993 Reith Lectures. Vintage Books.
SandovalC. D. M. (2019). Uprooting systems of colonization: Naming learning ecologies as Eurocentric. In SandovalC. D. M. (Ed.), Ancestral knowledge meets computer science education: Environmental change in community (pp. 1–22). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47520-6_1
163.
SantosB. de S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Routledge.
164.
SaxeG. B. (1999). Cognition, development, and cultural practices. In TurielE. (Ed.), Development and cultural change: Reciprocal processes (pp. 19–35). Jossey-Bass.
165.
SaxeG. B. (2002). Children’s developing mathematics in collective practices: A framework for analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(2–3), 275–300.
166.
SaxeG. B.EsmondeI. (2005). Studying cognition in flux: A historical treatment of fu in the shifting structure of Oksapmin mathematics. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(3–4), 171–225.
167.
SaxeG. B.GearhartM.ShaughnessyM.EarnestD.CremerS.SitabkhanY.PlatasL.YoungA. (2009). A methodological framework and empirical techniques for studying the travel of ideas in classroom communities. In SchwartzB.DreyfusT.HershkowitzR. (Eds.), Transformation of knowledge in classroom interaction (pp. 203–222). Routledge
168.
ScribnerS. (1984). Literacy in three metaphors. American Journal of Education, 93(1), 6–24.
169.
ScribnerS.ColeM. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Harvard University.
170.
SchusterR.GermainR. R.BennettJ. R.ReoN. J.ArceseP. (2019). Vertebrate biodiversity on Indigenous-managed lands in Australia, Brazil, and Canada equals that in protected areas. Environmental Science & Policy, 101, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.07.002
171.
SerpellR. (1976). Culture’s influence on behaviour. Methuen.
172.
ShahN.LeonardoZ. (2016). Learning discourses of race and mathematics in classroom interaction: A poststructural perspective. In EsmondeI.BookerA. N. (Eds.), Power and privilege in the learning sciences: Critical and sociocultural theories of learning (pp. 50–69). Routledge.
173.
SilovaI. (2021). Facing the Anthropocene: Comparative education as sympoiesis. Comparative Education Review, 65(4), 587–616. https://doi.org/10.1086/716664
SimardS. (2021). Finding the mother tree: Discovering the wisdom of the forest. Knopf.
176.
SimpsonL. B. (2014). Land as pedagogy: Nishnaabeg intelligence and rebellious transformation. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 3(3), 1–25.
177.
SimpsonL. B. (2017). As we have always done: Indigenous freedom through radical resistance (3rd ed.). University of Minnesota Press.
178.
SoméS. (2000). The spirit of intimacy: Ancient African teachings in the ways of relationships. Sobonfu William Morrow Paperbacks.
179.
SpencerM. B.DupreeD.HartmannT. (1997). A phenomenological variant of ecological systems theory (PVEST): A self-organization perspective in context. Development and Psychopathology, 9(4), 817–833.
180.
Standing BearL. (2006). Land of the spotted eagle (New ed.). Bison Books. (Original work published 1978)
181.
StyresS. D. (2017). Pathways for remembering and recognizing Indigenous thought in education: Philosophies of iethi’nihstenha ohwentsia’kekha (land). University of Toronto Press.
TachineA.NicolazzoZ. (Eds.). (2022). Weaving an otherwise: In-relations methodological practice. Routledge.
184.
TakayamaK.SriprakashA.ConnellR. (2017). Toward a postcolonial comparative and international education. Comparative Education Review, 61(S1), S1–S24. https://doi.org/10.1086/690455
185.
TaylorK. H. (2018). The role of public education in place-remaking: From a retrospective walk through my hometown to a call to action. Cognition and Instruction, 36(3), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2018.1460844
186.
TaylorK. H. (2020). Resuscitating (and refusing) Cartesian representations of daily life: When mobile and grid epistemologies of the city meet. Cognition and Instruction, 38(3), 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1766463
187.
TaylorK. H.HallR. (2013). Counter-mapping the neighborhood on bicycles: Mobilizing youth to reimagine the city. Tech Know Learn, 18, 65–93.
188.
ThongchaiW. (1994). Siam mapped: A history of the geo-body of a nation. University of Hawaii Press.
189.
TomaselloM. (1999). The human adaptation for culture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, 509–529.
190.
TzouC.MeixiSuárezE.BellP.LaBonteD.StarksE.BangM. (2019). Storywork in STEM-Art: Making, materiality and robotics within everyday acts of Indigenous presence and resurgence. Cognition and Instruction, 37(3), 306–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1624547
191.
UttamchandaniS. (2021). Educational intimacy: Learning, prefiguration, and relationships in an LGBTQ+ youth group’s advocacy efforts. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 30(1), 52–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2020.1821202
192.
VakilS.RoystonM. M. deNasirN. S.KirshnerB. (2016). Rethinking race and power in design-based research: Reflections from the field. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1169817
193.
ValenzuelaA.EpsteinE. M. B. (2023). Struggles for/with/through ethnic studies in Texas: Third spaces as anchors for collective action. Teachers College Record, 125(5), 12–24.
194.
VizenorG. (2008). Survivance: Narratives of Native presence. University of Nebraska Press.
195.
VossoughiS. (2014). Social analytic artifacts made concrete: A study of learning and political education. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 21(4), 353–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2014.951899
196.
VossoughiS. (2018, November). Sister-spaces: Participatory design research as a tool for studying learning as collective, historical and prefigurative activity. In MeléndezJ. W.RadinskyJ. (Co-Chairs), Community-based design partnerships: Examples from a new generation of CHAT/DBR [Symposium]. International Society of the Learning Sciences Conference, London, England.
197.
VossoughiS.DavisN. R.JacksonA.EchevarriaR.MuñozA.EscudéM. (2021). Beyond the binary of adult versus child centered learning: Pedagogies of joint activity in the context of making. Cognition and Instruction, 39(3), 211–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1860052
198.
VossoughiS.JacksonA.ChenS.RoldanW.EscudéM. (2020). Embodied pathways and ethical trails: Studying learning in and through relational histories. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(2), 183–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1693380
199.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
200.
wa Thiong’oN. (1992). Decolonising the mind: The politics of language in African literature. East African Publishers.
201.
WhyteK. (2017). On concepts of collective continuance in Indigenous studies: Brief reflections concerning responsibility, fluidity and justice. Littcrit: An Indian Response to Literature, 43(2), 86–97.
202.
WhyteK.CaldwellC.SchaeferM. (2018). Indigenous lessons about sustainability are not just for “all humanity.” In SzeJ. (Ed.), Sustainability: approaches to environmental justice and social power (pp. 49–179). NYU Press.
203.
WildcatD. R. (2001). The question of self-determination. In DeloriaV.Jr.WildcatD. R. (Eds.), Power and place: Indian education in America (pp. 135–150). Fulcrum Publishing.
204.
WohllebenP.FlanneryT.SimardS. (2016). The hidden life of trees: What they feel, how they communicate—Discoveries from a secret world (BillinghurstJ., Trans.). Greystone Books.
ZavalaM. (2016). Design, participation, and social change: What design in grassroots spaces can teach learning scientists. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1169818
