Implications of Dynamic Systems for Future Methodology in Developmental and Learning Science

Abstract

Children develop and learn within dynamic contexts, yet the simplifying assumptions of common statistical methods often relegate such complexity to unexplained error. This chapter discusses ideas from the dynamic systems literature, which focuses on the interplay within and between components of complex systems, such as individuals and their multitiered contexts. This chapter presents three scenarios highlighting knowledge from the dynamic systems literature. These scenarios have implications requiring reconsidering common approaches to explaining the variance associated with change, the conceptualization of effect sizes, and the use of between-person data and analyses to make within-person inferences. The final section provides resources for moving beyond dynamic metaphors and principles, so theories can be translated into testable hypotheses.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asparouhov

Hamaker

E. L.

Muthén

(2018). Dynamic structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(3), 359–388.

Bergeman

C. S.

Deboeck

P. R.

(2014). Trait stress resistance and dynamic stress dissipation on health and well-being: The reservoir model. Research in Human Development, 11(2), 108–125.

Boker

S. M.

Deboeck

P. R.

Edler

Keel

P. K.

(2009). Generalized local linear approximation of derivatives from time series. In Chow

Ferrer

Hsieh

(Eds.), Statistical methods for modeling human dynamics: An interdisciplinary dialogue. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203864746

Boker

S. M.

Laurenceau

J.-P.

(2006). Dynamical systems modeling: An application to the regulation of intimacy and disclosure in marriage. Models for Intensive Longitudinal Data, 63, 195–218.

Boker

S. M.

Leibenluft

Deboeck

P. R.

Virk

Postolache

T. T.

(2008). Mood oscillations and coupling between mood and weather in patients with rapid cycling bipolar disorder. International Journal of Child Health and Human Development, 1(2), 181–202.

Boker

S. M.

Neale

Rausch

(2004). Latent differential equation modeling with multivariate multi-occasion indicators. In van Montfort

Oud

Satorra

(Eds.), Recent developments on structural equation models. Mathematical modelling: Theory and applications (Vol. 19, pp. 151–174). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1958-6_9

Boker

S. M.

Nesselroade

(2002). A method for modeling the intrinsic dynamics of intraindividual variability: Recovering the parameters of simulated oscillators in multi-wave panel data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37(1), 127–160.

Box

G. E.

Jenkins

G. M.

Reinsel

G. C.

Ljung

G. M.

(2015). Time series analysis: forecasting and control. John Wiley & Sons.

Brandtstädter

(1998). Action perspectives on human development. In Damon

Lerner

R. M.

(Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 807–863). John Wiley & Sons Inc.

10.

Bronfenbrenner

Morris

P. A.

(2006). The bioecological model of human development. In Lerner

R. M.

Damon

(Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 793–828). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

11.

Butner

J. E.

(2017). Quantitative reasoning under a dynamical social science. https://systems.psych.utah.edu/quantitative-butner.html

12.

Butner

J. E.

Berg

C. A.

Baucom

B. R.

Wiebe

D. J.

(2014). Modeling coordination in multiple simultaneous latent change scores. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49(6), 554–570.

13.

Cantor

Lerner

R. M.

Pittman

Chase

P. A.

Gomperts

(2021). Whole-child development, learning, and thriving: A dynamic systems approach. Cambridge University Press.

14.

Curran

P. J.

Bauer

D. J.

(2011). The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 583–619.

15.

Curran

P. J.

Wirth

R. J.

Nesselroade

J. R.

Rogosa

Thum

Y. M.

Tuerlinckx

von Eye

(2004). Commentaries. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2(4), 219–247.

16.

Deboeck

P. R.

(2010). Estimating dynamical systems, derivative estimation hints from Sir Ronald A. Fisher. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 43(4), 725–745.

17.

Deboeck

P. R.

(2020). Empirical Bayes derivative estimates. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 55(3), 382–404.

18.

Deboeck

P. R.

Bergeman

C. S.

(2013). The reservoir model: A differential equation model of psychological capacity. Psychological Methods, 18(2), 237–256.

19.

Deboeck

P. R.

Nicholson

J. S.

Bergeman

C. S.

Preacher

K. J.

(2013). From modeling long-term growth to short-term fluctuations: Differential equation modeling is the language of change. In Millsap

R. E.

van der Ark

L. A.

Bolt

D. M.

Woods

C. M.

(Eds.), New developments in quantitative psychology (pp. 427–447). Springer.

20.

Deboeck

P. R.

Nicholson

J. S.

Kouros

Little

T. D.

Garber

(2015). Integrating developmental theory and methodology: Using derivatives to articulate change theories, models, and inferences. Applied Developmental Science, 19(4), 217–231.

21.

Deboeck

P. R.

Preacher

K. J.

(2015). No need to be discrete: A method for continuous time mediation analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 61–75.

22.

Deboeck

P. R.

Preacher

K. J.

Cole

D. A.

(2018). Mediation modeling: Differing perspectives on time alter mediation inferences. In van Montfort

Oud

Voelkle

(Eds.), Continuous time modeling in the behavioral and related sciences (pp. 179–203). Springer.

23.

Gollob

H. F.

Reichardt

C. S.

(1987). Taking account of time lags in causal models. Child Development, 58, 80–92.

24.

Gollob

H. F.

Reichardt

C. S.

(1991). Interpreting and estimating indirect effects assuming time lags really matter. In Collins

L. M.

Horn

J. L.

(Eds.), Best methods for the analysis of change: Recent advances, unanswered questions, future directions (pp. 243–259). American Psychological Association.

25.

Hamaker

E. L.

Kuiper

R. M.

Grasman

R. P.

(2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889

26.

Kaplan

Glass

(1997). Understanding nonlinear dynamics. Springer Science & Business Media.

27.

Maxwell

S. E.

Boker

S. M.

(2007). Multilevel models of dynamical systems. In Boker

S. M.

Wenger

M. J.

(Eds.), Data analytic techniques for dynamical systems (pp. 161–187). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

28.

May

R. M.

(1976). Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature, 261(5560), 459–467.

29.

May

R. M.

(1987). Chaos and the dynamics of biological populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 413(1844), 27–44.

30.

McArdle

J. J.

(2009). Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 577–605.

31.

McArdle

J. J.

Nesselroade

J. R.

(2014). Longitudinal data analysis using structural equation models. American Psychological Association.

32.

Molenaar

P. C.

(2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2(4), 201–218.

33.

Molenaar

P. C.

(2008). On the implications of the classical ergodic theorems: Analysis of developmental processes has to focus on intra-individual variation. Developmental Psychobiology: The Journal of the International Society for Developmental Psychobiology, 50(1), 60–69.

34.

Montpetit

M. A.

Bergeman

C. S.

Deboeck

P. R.

Tiberio

S. S.

Boker

S. M.

(2010). Resilience–as–process: Negative affect, stress, and coupled dynamical systems. Psychology and Aging, 25(3), 631–640.

35.

Nesselroade

J. R.

(1991). Interindividual differences in intraindividual change. In Collins

L. M.

Horn

J. L.

(Eds.), Best methods for the analysis of change: Recent advances, unanswered questions, future directions (pp. 92–105). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10099-006

36.

Nesselroade

J. R.

Ram

(2004). Studying intraindividual variability: What we have learned that will help us understand lives in context. Research in Human Development, 1(1–2), 9–29.

37.

Newsom

J. T.

(2015). Longitudinal structural equation modeling: A comprehensive introduction. Routledge.

38.

Oravecz

Tuerlinckx

Vandekerckhove

(2016). Bayesian data analysis with the bivariate hierarchical Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(1), 106–119.

39.

Oud

J. H.

Jansen

R. A.

(2000). Continuous time state space modeling of panel data by means of sem. Psychometrika, 65, 199–215.

40.

Reichardt

C. S.

(2011). Commentary: Are three waves of data sufficient for assessing mediation? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 842–851.

41.

Rose

(2016). The end of average: How we succeed in a world that values sameness. HarperCollins Publishers.

42.

Strogatz

S. H.

(2018). Nonlinear dynamics and chaos: With applications to physics, biology, chemistry, and engineering. CRC press.

43.

Voelkle

M. C.

Oud

J. H.

Davidov

Schmidt

(2012). An SEM approach to continuous time modeling of panel data: Relating authoritarianism and anomia. Psychological Methods, 17(2), 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027543

44.

Whitaker

M. M.

Deboeck

P. R.

Bergeman

C. S.

(under review). Summing the ups and downs of life: The Bayesian reservoir model of psychological regulation.