From Individual to Collective Logics of Thriving: Redesigning K–12 Learning Ecosystems to Support Equitable Civic Futures

Abstract

The concept of “thriving” in educational policy refers to a loosely defined mix of academic, socioemotional, and civic outcomes associated with youth well-being. In this chapter, we analyze three focus areas in K–12 education—social emotional learning, 21st-century skills, and digital citizenship—and conclude that they are currently built on an individualistic neoliberal paradigm of learning and success. We argue that this paradigm is incommensurate with the personal, social, and civic flourishing necessary to sustain equitable multiracial democratic futures and offer instead an alternative collective logic of thriving. Our critical metasynthesis of the emergent field of social-design-based experimentation offers design principles educators can use to reorganize collective learning environments to support expansive youth thriving in schools and society.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

*Alhadad

S. J.

Vasco

Williams

J. C.

Dizon

Kapnias

R. L.

Khan

S. B.

Payne

Simpson

B. C.

Warren

C. D.

(2021). Learning, unlearning, and relearning together: Unmasking power in a students as partners program using collaborative ethnography. Student Success, 12(2), 38–50.

Baines

A. M.

DeBarger

De Vivo

Warner

Santos

Brinkman

Udall

Zuckerbrod

Felsen

Urban

(2021). Key principles for project-based learning. Lucas Education Research.

Barnes

T. N.

(2019). Changing the landscape of social emotional learning in urban schools: What are we currently focusing on and where do we go from here? Urban Review, 51, 599–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-019-00534-1

Betebenner

Wenning

(2021). Understanding pandemic learning loss and learning recovery: The role of student growth and statewide testing. National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment.

Bronfenbrenner

(2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Sage Publications.

Cardona

[@SecCardona] (2022, December 16). Every student should have access to an education that aligns with industry demands and evolves to meet the demands of tomorrow’s global workforce [Tweet]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/SecCardona/status/1603831119962570771

CNN. (2013, August 28). Angelou: ‘No one of us can be free until everybody is free’ [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxkTd6BFL1o

Code.org. (2014). Anybody can learn—The hour of code is here! President Barack Obama wrote his first line of code. https://blog.code.org/post/104684466538/hourofcode2014

Cohen

(2006). Social, emotional, ethical, and academic education: Creating a climate for learning, participation in democracy, and well-being. Harvard Educational Review, 76(2), 201–237.

10.

Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (n.d.). Our history. https://casel.org/about-us/our-history/

11.

Comer

J. P.

(2004). Leave no child behind: Preparing today’s youth for tomorrow’s world. Yale University Press.

12.

Common Sense Education. (n.d.). Everything you need to teach digital citizenship. https://www.commonsense.org/education/digital-citizenship

13.

Davis

Dent

Meiners

Richie

(2022). Abolition. Feminism. Now. Haymarket Books.

14.

de los Ríos

C. V.

Martinez

D. C.

Musser

A. D.

Canady

Camangian

Quijada

P. D

. (2019). Upending colonial practices: Toward repairing harm in English education. Theory Into Practice, 58(4), 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1626615

15.

Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.

16.

Dewey

(1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. Macmillan.

17.

*DiGiacomo

Gutiérrez

(2017). Seven chilis: Making visible the complexities in leveraging cultural repertories of practice in a designed teaching and learning environment. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 12(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2017.1283992

18.

Dixon

Anderson

(2018). Where are we? Critical race theory in education 20 years later. Peabody Journal of Education, 93(1), 121–131.

19.

*Ehret

Čiklovan

(2020). How speculative designs produce new potentials for education research in digital culture. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 41(5), 708–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2020.1774713

20.

Eklund

Kilpatrick

K. D.

Kilgus

S. P.

Haider

(2018). A systematic review of state-level social–emotional learning standards: Implications for practice and research. School Psychology Review, 47(3), 316–326.

21.

Engeström

(2008). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge University Press.

22.

Escobar

(2020). Pluriversal politics: The real and the possible. Duke University Press.

23.

*Fowler-Amato

Warrington

(2017). Teachers as designers: Social design experiments as vehicles for developing antideficit English education. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 66(1), 358–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336917719054

24.

Freire

(1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Seabury Press.

25.

Garcia

McGrew

Mirra

Tynes

Kahne

(2021). Rethinking digital citizenship: Learning about media, literacy, and race in turbulent times. In Lee

White

Dong

(Eds.), Civic reasoning and discourse (pp. 319–352). National Academy of Education.

26.

Garcia

Mirra

(2023). Other suns: Designing for racial equity through speculative education. Journal of Learning Sciences, 32(1), 1–20.

27.

Garcia

Mirra

Morrell

Martinez

Scorza

(2015). The council of youth research: Critical literacy and civic agency in the digital age. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 31(2), 151–167.

28.

Gilmore

R. W.

(2022). Abolition geography: Essays toward liberation. Verso Books.

29.

Goleman

(1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bantam.

30.

Grossman

P. L.

Herrmann

Schneider Kavanagh

Pupik Dean

C. G.

(2021). Core practices for project-based learning: A guide for teachers and leaders. Harvard Educational Press.

31.

Gutiérrez

K. D.

(2016). Designing resilient ecologies: Social design experiments and a new social imagination. Educational Researcher, 45(3), 187–196.

32.

Gutiérrez

K. D.

(2018). Social design–based experiments: A proleptic approach to literacy. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 67(1), 86–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336918787823

33.

Gutiérrez

K. D.

Jurow

S. A.

Vakil

(2020). Social design-based experiments: A utopian methodology for understanding new possibilities for learning. In Nasir

N. A.

Lee

Pea

McKinney de Royston

(Eds.), Handbook of the cultural foundations of learning (pp. 330–347). Routledge.

34.

Gutiérrez

K. D.

Vossoughi

(2010). Lifting off the ground to return anew: Mediated praxis, transformative learning, and social design experiments. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 100–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347877

35.

Hess

(2022, September 26). After COVID-19, schools are spending big on social and emotional learning. Is that a problem? Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/frederickhess/2022/09/26/after-covid-19-schools-are-spending-big-on-social-and-emotional-learning-is-that-a-problem/?sh=4340acad6472

36.

Hobbs

Jenson

(2009). The past, present, and future of media literacy education. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.23860/jmle-1-1-1

37.

Hoffman

(2009). Reflecting on social emotional learning: A critical perspective on trends in the United States. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 533–556.

38.

Ito

Gutiérrez

Livingstone

Penuel

Rhodes

Salen

Schor

Sefton-Green

Watkins

S. C.

(2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.

39.

Jagers

R. J.

Rivas-Drake

Williams

(2019). Transformative social and emotional learning (SEL): Toward SEL in service of educational equity and excellence. Educational Psychologist, 54(3), 162–184.

40.

Jenkins

(with Clinton

Purushotma

Robison

A. J.

Weigel

). (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. MacArthur Foundation.

41.

Johns Hopkins University. (2023). Failure to thrive. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/failure-to-thrive

42.

Jones

Brush

Ramirez

Mao

Marenus

Wettje

Finney

Raisch

Podoloff

Kahn

Barnes

Stickle

Brion-Meisels

McIntyre

Cuartas

Bailey

(2021). Navigating SEL from the inside out. The Easel Lab at the Harvard Graduate School of Education.

43.

Kaba

(2021). We do this ’til we free us: Abolitionist organizing and transforming justice. Haymarket Books.

44.

Kahne

Middaugh

(2008). Democracy for some: The civic opportunity gap in high school (Circle Working Paper No. 59). Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement.

45.

*Kalir

J. H.

Garcia

(2019). Civic writing on digital walls. Journal of Literacy Research, 51(4), 420–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X19877208

46.

Kelley

R. D. G.

(2003). Freedom dreams: The Black radical imagination. Beacon Press.

47.

Kuhfeld

Soland

Lewis

Morton

(2022, March 3). The pandemic has had devastating impacts on learning. What will it take to help students catch up? Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/brown-center-chalkboard/2022/03/03/the-pandemic-has-had-devastating-impacts-on-learning-what-will-it-take-to-help-students-catch-up/

48.

Lachal

Revah-Levy

Orri

Moro

M. R.

(2017). Metasynthesis: An original method to synthesize qualitative literature in psychiatry. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 8, Article 269. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00269

49.

Ladson-Billings

(2021). I’m here for the hard re-set: Post pandemic pedagogy to preserve our culture. Equity & Excellence in Education, 54(1), 68–78.

50.

Lee

Meltzoff

Kuhl

(2020). The braid of human learning and development: Neuro-physiological processes and participation in cultural practices. In Nasir

N. A.

Lee

Pea

McKinney de Royston

(Eds.), Handbook of the cultural foundations of learning (pp. 24–43). Routledge.

51.

*Lizárraga

J. R.

(2023). Cyborg sociopolitical reconfigurations: Designing for speculative fabulation in learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 32(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2022.2154159

52.

*Lott

Perez

Yeh

T. L.

(2021). Cross-racial agency: Exploring a new form of collaborative practice to support men of color in higher education. Teachers College Record, 123(2), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812112300207

53.

Magnussen

I. L.

Alteren

Bondas

(2021). “Human flourishing with dignity”: A meta-ethnography of the meaning of gardens for elderly in nursing homes and residential care settings. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/23333936211035743

54.

Middaugh

(2019). More than just facts: Promoting civic media literacy in the era of outrage. Peabody Journal of Education, 94(1), 17–31.

55.

Mirra

Garcia

(2017). Civic participation reimagined: Youth interrogation and innovation in the multimodal public sphere. In Souto-Manning

Winn

M. T.

(Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 41, pp. 136–158). Sage.

56.

Mirra

Garcia

(2021). In search of the meaning and purpose of 21st-century literacy learning: A critical review of research and practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(3), 463–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.313

57.

*Mirra

Garcia

(2022). Guns, schools, and democracy: Adolescents imagining social futures through speculative civic literacies. American Educational Research Journal, 59(2), 345–380. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312221074400

58.

Nasir

N. S.

Bang

Yoshikawa

(2021). Reimagining American education: Possible futures: What might we accomplish in 25 years? Phi Delta Kappan, 103(2), 54–57.

59.

Nasir

N. S.

Lee

C. D.

Pea

McKinney de Royston

(2021). Rethinking learning: What the interdisciplinary science tells us. Educational Researcher, 50(8), 557–565.

60.

National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform: A report to the Nation and the Secretary of Education, United States Department of Education. National Commission on Excellence in Education.

61.

National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. National Academies Press.

62.

New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–93. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u

63.

Osher

Pittman

Young

Smith

Moroney

Irby

(2020). Thriving, robust equity, and transformative learning & development: A more powerful conceptualization of the contributors to youth success. American Institutes for Research and Forum for Youth Investment.

64.

Packer

(2010). Educational research as a reflexive science of constitution. NSSE Yearbook, 109(1), 17–33.

65.

Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2016). Framework for 21st century learning.

66.

Patel

(2022, September 4). Focusing on ‘learning loss’ obscures how much we’ve truly lost in the pandemic. Truthout. https://truthout.org/articles/focusing-on-learning-loss-obscures-how-much-weve-truly-lost-in-the-pandemic/

67.

Price-Dennis

Touloukian

Moore

Harlan Eller

(2022). Pedagogies of possibility: Exploring culturally responsive education during COVID-19. JustLit Project, Teachers College, Columbia University.

68.

*Rajala

Cole

Esteban-Guitart

(2023). Utopian methodology: Researching educational interventions to promote equity over multiple timescales. Journal of Learning Sciences, 32(1), 110–136.

69.

Roy

(2020, April 3). The pandemic is a portal. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/10d8f5e8-74eb-11ea-95fe-fcd274e920ca

70.

*Schuetze

Claeys

Bustos Flores

Sezech

(2014). La Clase Mágica as a community based expansive learning approach to STEM education. International Journal for Research on Extended Education, 2, 27–45.

71.

*Schwartz

DiGiacomo

Gutiérrez

(2015). Designing ‘contexts for tinkerability’ with undergraduates and children within the El Pueblo Mágico social design experiment. International Journal for Research on Extended Education, 3, 94–113.

72.

Stearns

(2016). Responsive classroom?: A critique of a social emotional learning program. Critical Studies in Education, 57(3), 330–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2015.1076493

73.

*Storm

Jones

Beck

S. W.

(2022). Designing interpretive communities toward justice: Indexicality in classroom discourse. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 21(1), 2–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-06-2021-0073

74.

*Stornaiuolo

(2020). Authoring data stories in a media makerspace: Adolescents developing critical data literacies. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(1), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1689365

75.

*Stornaiuolo

Nichols

T. P.

(2018). Making publics: Mobilizing audiences in high school makerspaces. Teachers College Record, 120(8), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812000804

76.

*Tan

Calabrese Barton

Benavides

(2021). Supporting teacher visioning of justice-oriented engineering in the middle grades. Peabody Journal of Education, 96(4), 376–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2021.1965411

77.

*Taylor

K. H.

Hall

(2013). Counter-mapping the neighborhood on bicycles: Mobilizing youth to reimagine the city. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning, 18, 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-013-9201-5

78.

UNICEF. (2021). The climate crisis is a child rights crisis: Introducing the children’s climate risk index. https://data.unicef.org/resources/childrens-climate-risk-index-report/

79.

U.S. Department of Education. (2022). Elementary and secondary school emergency relief fund: Fiscal year 2021 annual performance report. https://api.covid-relief-data.ed.gov/collection/api/v1/public/docs/ESSER%20Fiscal%20Year%202021%20Annual%20Performance%20Report%20Summary.pdf

80.

*Vakil

(2020). “I’ve always been scared that someday I’m going to sell out”: Exploring the relationship between political identity and learning in computer science education. Cognition and Instruction, 38(2), 87–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1730374

81.

Walker

B. H.

Salt

(2006). Resilience thinking: Sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Island Press.

82.

Walker

(2020, April 15). Social-emotional learning should be priority during COVID-19 crisis. National Education Association News. https://www.nea.org/advocating-for-change/new-from-nea/social-emotional-learning-should-be-priority-during-covid-19

83.

Watts

Flanagan

(2007). Pushing the envelope on civic engagement: A developmental and liberation psychology perspective. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 779–792.