Creativity is a vital topic of various educational discourses, yet the support it receives within the school system is insufficient. This chapter focuses on four particular ways of making creativity more democratized, salient, and accessible in school settings. We start by exploring the educational benefits of egalitarian theoretical approaches to creativity. Then, we posit that democratization requires an equal focus on the cognitive aspects of creative potential and the motivational sphere of self-perception and self-regulation. Third, analyzing cognitive characteristics, we pay special attention to creative imagery: an understudied yet critical aspect of creative potential. By meta-analyzing available evidence from interventional studies, we show that there are multiple effective approaches to enhancing creative imagery, so—in a sense—supporting creative potential might be democratized as well by going beyond creativity training. Fourth, and finally, we discuss the possibilities of adapting so-called wise interventions for the educational psychology of creativity. We review available evidence of how to strengthen creative confidence and the perceived value of creativity among students, and how to make their creative self-regulation more effective.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbrahamA.WindmannS.DaumI.GüntürkünO. (2005). Conceptual expansion and creative imagery as a function of psychoticism. Consciousness and Cognition, 14(3), 520–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2004.12.003
2.
AndersonR. C.HaneyM. (2020). Reflection in the creative process of early adolescents: The mediating roles of creative metacognition, self-efficacy, and self-concept. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000324
3.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
BeghettoR. A.DilleyA. E. (2016). Creative aspirations or pipe dreams? Toward understanding creative mortification in children and adolescents. In BarbotB. (Ed.), New directions for child and adolescent development: Perspectives on creativity development (Vol. 151, pp. 85–95). Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
6.
BeghettoR. A.KarwowskiM. (2017). Toward untangling creative self-beliefs. In KarwowskiM.KaufmanJ. C. (Eds.). Creative self: Effects of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity (pp. 4–24). Academic Press.
7.
BeghettoR. A.KarwowskiM.Reiter-PalmonR. (2021). Intellectual risk taking: A moderating link between creative confidence and creative behavior?Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 15(4), 637–644. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000323
8.
BenedekM.BruckdorferR.JaukE. (2020). Motives for creativity: Exploring the what and why of everyday creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 610–625. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.396
9.
BenedekM.KarstendiekM.CehS. M.GrabnerR. H.KrammerG.LebudaI.SilviaP. J.CotterK. N.LiY.HuW.MartskvishviliK.KaufmanJ. C. (2021). Creativity myths: Prevalence and correlates of misconceptions on creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 182, Article 111068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111068
10.
BlackwellL. S.TrzesniewskiK. H.DweckC. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
11.
BurnetteJ. L.RussellM. V.HoytC. L.OrvidasK.WidmanL. (2018). An online growth mindset intervention in a sample of rural adolescent girls. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 428–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12192
12.
BustilloJ.GaraizarP. (2016). Using Scratch to foster creativity behind bars: Two positive experiences in jail. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.08.003
13.
CallanG. L.RubensteinL. D.RidgleyL. M.McCallJ. R. (2019). Measuring self-regulated learning during creative problem-solving with SRL microanalysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 15(1), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000238
14.
CanningE. A.HarackiewiczJ. M. (2015). Teach it, don’t preach it: The differential effects of directly-communicated and self-generated utility–value information. Motivation Science, 1(1), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000015
15.
Castillo-VergaraM.GalleguillosN. B.CuelloL. J.Alvarez-MarinA.Acuña-OpazoC. (2018). Does socioeconomic status influence student creativity?Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.005
16.
ChenP.ChangT.WuC. (2020). Effects of gamified classroom management on the divergent thinking and creative tendency of elementary students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, Article 100664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100664
17.
CheungM. W.-L. (2014). Modeling dependent effect sizes with three-level meta-analyses: A structural equation modeling approach. Psychological Methods, 19(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032968
18.
*ChiuF.-C. (2012). Fit between future thinking and future orientation on creative imagination. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(3), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.05.002
ConnerT. S.SilviaP. J. (2015). Creative days: A daily diary study of emotion, personality, and everyday creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000022
21.
CorazzaG. E. (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1195627
CropleyA. J. (1997). Fostering creativity in the classroom: General principals. In RuncoM. A. (Ed.), Creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 83–114). Cresskill.
24.
DaumillerM.DreselM. (2019). Supporting self-regulated learning with digital media using motivational regulation and metacognitive prompts. The Journal of Experimental Education, 87(1), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2018.1448744
25.
DestinM. (2017). An open path to the future: Perceived financial resources and school motivation. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 37(7), 1004–1031. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431616636480
26.
DevolderA.van BraakJ.TondeurJ. (2012). Supporting self-regulated learning in computer-based learning environments: Systematic review of effects of scaffolding in the domain of science education: Scaffolding self-regulated learning with CBLES. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(6), 557–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00476.x
27.
DörrenbächerL.PerelsF. (2016). More is more? Evaluation of interventions to foster self-regulated learning in college. International Journal of Educational Research, 78, 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.05.010
28.
DuvalS.TweedieR. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
29.
*DziedziewiczD. (2008). Wpływ bajki na rozwój wyobraźni twórczej w okresie przedszkolnym. Eksperymentalne badania stymulowania wyobraźni twórczej z wykorzystaniem bajek i ekspresji plastycznej [Influence of fairy tales on the development of creative imagination in the preschool period. Experimental research on stimulating creative imagination with the use of fairy tales and artistic expression]. In ŁaszczykJ.JabłonowskaM. (Eds), Uczeń zdolny wyzwaniem dla współczesnej edukacji [Gifted student as a challenge to contemporary education] (pp. 303–311). Wydawnictwo Akademii Pedagogiki Specjalnej.
30.
*DziedziewiczD.GajdaA.KarwowskiM. (2014). Developing children’s intercultural competence and creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.02.006
31.
DziedziewiczD.GajdaA.KarwowskiM. (2015). How to develop children’s creativity and intercultural sensitivity: A Creativity Compass program. In TanA. G.ParlethC. (Eds.), Creativity, culture, and development (pp. 133–143). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-636-2_9
32.
DziedziewiczD.KarwowskiM. (2015). Development of children’s creative visual imagination: A theoretical model and enhancement programmes. Education 3-13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 4(43), 382–393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2015.1020646
33.
*DziedziewiczD.OlędzkaD.KarwowskiM. (2013). Developing 4–6-year-old children’s creativity using the doodle book program. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.09.004
34.
FeistG. J.BarronF. X. (2003). Predicting creativity from early to late adulthood: Intellect, potential, and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(2), 62–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00536-6
35.
FinkeR. A. (1990). Creative imagery: Discoveries and inventions in visualization. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315807362
36.
FinkeR. A.WardT. B.SmithS. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. MIT Press.
37.
GaltonF. (1880). Statistics of mental imagery. Mind, 5, 301–318.
38.
*GaraigordobilM.PérezI. J. (2002). Efectos de la participación en el programa de arte Ikertze sobre la creatividad verbal y gráfica [Effects of participation in the Ikertze art program on verbal and graphical creativity]. Anales de psicología, 18(1), 95–110.
39.
GaraigordobilM.PérezI. J. (2004). Un estudio de las relaciones entre distintos ámbitos creativos [A study of the relationships between different creative realms]. Educación y Ciencia. Nueva Época, 15(29), 67–78.
40.
*GaraigordobilM.BerruecoL. (2011). Effects of a play program on creative thinking of preschool children. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14(2), 608–618. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_sjop.2011.v14.n2.9.
41.
GaspardH.DickeA.-L.FlungerB.BrissonB. M.HäfnerI.NagengastB.TrautweinU. (2015). Fostering adolescents’ value beliefs for mathematics with a relevance intervention in the classroom. Developmental Psychology, 51(9), 1226–1240. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000028
42.
GaspardH.ParrisiusC.PieschH.KleinhanslM.WilleE.NagengastB.TrautweinU.HullemanC. S. (2021). The potential of relevance interventions for scaling up: A cluster-randomized trial testing the effectiveness of a relevance intervention in math classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000663
43.
GerwigA.MiroshnikK.ForthmannB.BenedekM.KarwowskiM.HollingH. (2021). The relationship between intelligence and divergent thinking – a meta-analytic update. Journal of Intelligence, 9(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9020023.
44.
GlăveanuV. P. (Ed.). (2019). The creativity reader. Oxford University Press.
45.
GlăveanuV. P.KarwowskiM.JankowskaD. M.de Saint LaurentC. (2017). Creative imagination. In ZittounT.GlăveanuV. P. (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and culture (pp. 61–86). Oxford University Press.
46.
*GongX.ZhangX.TsangM. C. (2020). Creativity development in preschoolers: The effects of children’s museum visits and other education environment factors. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67, Article 100932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100932
*GundoganA.AriM.GonenM. (2013). The effect of drama on the creative imagination of children in different age groups. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28(2), 206–220.
49.
HarackiewiczJ. M.CanningE. A.TibbettsY.PriniskiS. J.HydeJ. S. (2016). Closing achievement gaps with a utility-value intervention: Disentangling race and social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), 745–765. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000075
50.
HeW. J.WongW. C. (2021). Gender differences in creative self-efficacy: Findings of mean and variability analyses. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, Article 100955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100955
HofmannW.SchmeichelB. J.BaddeleyA. D. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(3), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.01.006
53.
HorngR.-Y.WangC.-W.YenY.-C.LuC.-Y.LiC.-T. (2021). A behavioural measure of imagination based on conceptual combination theory. Creativity Research Journal, 33(4), 376–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2021.1943136
54.
*HsiehC.ChenT. (2019). Effect of Pokémon GO on the cognitive performance and emotional intelligence of primary school students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(7), 1849–1874. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119854006
55.
*HuW.WuB.JiaX.YiX.DuanC.MeyerW.KaufmanJ. C. (2013). Increasing students’ scientific creativity: The “Learn to Think” intervention program. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.20
56.
HullemanC. S.HarackiewiczJ. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326(5958), 1410–1412. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1177067
57.
HullemanC. S.KosovichJ. J.BarronK. E.DanielD. B. (2017). Making connections: Replicating and extending the utility value intervention in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(3), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000146
58.
IvcevicZ.NusbaumE. C. (2017). From having an idea to doing something with it: Self-regulation for creativity. In KarwowskiM.KaufmanJ. C. (Eds.), The creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity (pp. 343–365). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809790-8.00020-0
59.
*JabłonowskaM.StańczykA. (2008). Trening twórczości z komputerem – wstępne wyniki badań [Computer-aided creativity training: Preliminary research findings]. In. LimontW.CieślikowskaJ.DreszerJ. (Eds.), Zdolności. Talent. Twórczość [Abilities. Giftedness. Creativity] (Vol. 1, pp. 237–249). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
60.
*JampoleE. S.MathewsF. N.KonopakB. C. (1994). Academically gifted students use of imagery for creative writing. Journal of Creative Behavior, 28(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1994.tb00715.x
JansenR. S.van LeeuwenA.JanssenJ.ConijnR.KesterL. (2020). Supporting learners’ self-regulated learning in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, 146, 103771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103771
64.
KarwowskiM. (2011). It doesn’t hurt to ask. . .But sometimes it hurts to believe: Polish students’ creative self-efficacy and its predictors. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(2), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021427
65.
KarwowskiM.BeghettoR. A. (2019). Creative behavior as agentic action. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(4), 402–415. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000190
66.
KarwowskiM.CzerwonkaM.LebudaI.JankowskaD. M.GajdaA. (2020). Does thinking about Einstein make people entity theorists? Examining the malleability of creative mindsets. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 14(3), 361. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000226
67.
KarwowskiM.GralewskiJ.SzumskiG. (2015). Teachers’ effect on students’ creative self-concept is moderated by students’ gender. Learning and Individual Differences, 44, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.10.001
68.
KarwowskiM.HanM.-H.Beghetto (2019). Toward dynamizing the measurement of creative confidence beliefs. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13, 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000229
69.
KarwowskiM.JankowskaD. M. (2019). Sir Francis Galton and the statistics of mental imagery. In GlaveanuV. P. (Ed.), The creativity reader (pp. 87–109). Oxford University Press.
70.
KarwowskiM.JankowskaD. M.BrzeskiA.CzerwonkaM.GajdaA.LebudaI.BeghettoR. A. (2020). Delving into creativity and learning. Creativity Research Journal, 32(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1712165
71.
KarwowskiMKaufmanJ. C. (Eds.). (2017). The creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity. Academic Press.
72.
KarwowskiM.LebudaI.BeghettoR. A. (2019). Creative self-beliefs. In KaufmanJ. C.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 396–417). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.021
73.
*KarwowskiM.SoszyńskiM. (2008). How to develop creative imagination? Assumptions, aims and effectiveness of role play training in creativity (RPTC). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(2), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.07.001
74.
KaufmanJ. C.BeghettoR. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688
75.
KaufmanS. B.KaufmanJ. C. (2007). Ten years to expertise, many more to greatness: An investigation of modern writers. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 41(2), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01284.x
KimK. H. (2008). Meta-analyses of the relationship of creative achievement to both IQ and divergent thinking test scores. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 106–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01290.x
78.
KimK. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta-analysis. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(2–3), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-473
79.
KonstantopoulosS. (2011). Fixed effects and variance components estimation in three-level meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 2(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.35
80.
KosovichJ. J.HullemanC. S.PhelpsJ.LeeM. (2019). Improving algebra success with a utility-value intervention. Journal of Developmental Education, 42(2), 2–10.
81.
*Kyung-WonJ. (2000). An evaluation of gifted pre-schoolers in the creative thinking in South Korea. Gifted Educational International, 14(3), 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142940001400309
82.
LebudaI.ZielińskaA.KarwowskiM. (2021). On surface and core predictors of real-life creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, Article 100973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100973
83.
LiangQ.NiuW.ChengL.QinK. (2021). Creativity outside school: The influence of family background, perceived parenting, and after-school activity on creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.521
84.
LeBoutillierN.MarksD. F. (2003). Mental imagery and creativity: A meta-analytic review study. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603762842084
85.
*LimontW. (1996). Analiza wybranych mechanizmów wyobraźni twórczej [Analysis of select mechanisms of creative imagination]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
86.
LinK. (2014). Effects of science fiction films on junior high school students’ creative processes and products. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 14, 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.09.00
87.
Lin-SieglerX.AhnJ. N.ChenJ.FangF.-F. A.Luna-LuceroM. (2016). Even Einstein struggled: Effects of learning about great scientists’ struggles on high school students’ motivation to learn science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 314–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000092
88.
LohmanD. F. (2005). The role of nonverbal ability tests in identifying academically gifted students: An aptitude perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(2), 111–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620504900203
89.
*Lopez-MartinezO.Navaro-LozannoJ. (2010). Influencia de una metodología creativa en el aula de primaria [Influence of a creative methodology in elementary classroom]. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 3,(1), 89–102.
90.
LubinskiD. (2010). Spatial ability and STEM: A sleeping giant for talent identification and development. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(4), 344–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.022
MathisenG. E.BronnickK. S. (2009). Creative self-efficacy: An intervention study. International Journal of Educational Research, 48(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2009.02.009
93.
McAvinueL. P.RobertsonI. H. (2007). Measuring visual imagery ability: A review. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 26(3), 191–211. https://doi.org/10.2190/3515-8169-24J8-7157
94.
McDanielM. A.EinsteinG. O. (2020). Training learning strategies to promote self-regulation and transfer: The knowledge, belief, commitment, and planning framework. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(6), 1363–1381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620920723
95.
*McWilliamsR. N. (1984). A comparison of the effect of two child-centered models educational intervention on three selected creative abilities of pre-school children: Fluency, originality, and imagination. [Unpublished EdD dissertation]. The Catholic University of America.
96.
MiuA. S.YeagerD. S. (2015). Preventing symptoms of depression by teaching adolescents that people can change: Effects of a brief incremental theory of personality intervention at 9-month follow-up. Clinical Psychological Science, 3(5), 726–743. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702614548317
97.
*MorreM.RussS. W. (2008). Follow up of a pretend play intervention: Effects on play, creativity and emotional process in children. Creativity Research Journal, 20(4), 427–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802391892
98.
OysermanD.LewisN. A. (2017). Seeing the destination and the path: Using identity-based motivation to understand and reduce racial disparities in academic achievement. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 159–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12030
99.
PalmieroM.NoriR.AloisiV.FerraraM.PiccardiL. (2015). Domain-specificity of creativity: A study on the relationship between visual creativity and visual mental imagery. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01870
100.
PauneskuD.WaltonG. M.RomeroC.SmithE. N.YeagerD. S.DweckC. S. (2015). Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychological Science, 26(6), 784–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615571017
101.
*PavlikL. (1989). Structured imagination and the writing of creative stories. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Fordham University.
102.
PieschH.GaspardH.ParrisiusC.WilleE.NagengastB. (2020). How can a relevance intervention in math support students’ career choices?Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 71, Article 101185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101185
103.
PluckerJ. A. (1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance’s (1958 to present) longitudinal data. Creativity Research Journal, 12(2), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1202_3
104.
PluckerJ. A.BeghettoR. A.DowG. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1
105.
*PłóciennikE. (2010). Stymulowanie zdolności twórczych dziecka. Weryfikacja obrazków dynamicznych [Stimulating the creative abilities of child. Verification of dynamic pictures]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
106.
PoonJ. C. Y.AuA. C. Y.TongT. M. Y.LauS. (2014). The feasibility of enhancement of knowledge and self-confidence in creativity: A pilot study of a three-hour SCAMPER workshop on secondary students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 14, 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.06.006
107.
PretzJ. E.KaufmanJ. C. (2017). Do traditional admissions criteria reflect applicant creativity?The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(3), 240–251. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.120
108.
RediferJ. L.BaeC. L.ZhaoQ. (2021). Self-efficacy and performance feedback: Impacts on cognitive load during creative thinking. Learning and Instruction, 71, 101395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101395
109.
Reiter-PalmonR.ForthmannB.BarbotB. (2019). Scoring divergent thinking tests: A review and systematic framework. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000227
110.
RichardsonC.HenriksenD.MishraP., & The Deep-Play Research Group. (2017). The courage to be creative: An interview with Dr. Yong Zhao. TechTrends, 61, 515–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0221-1
RosenzweigE. Q.HullemanC. S.BarronK. E.KosovichJ. J.PriniskiS. J.WigfieldA. (2019). Promises and pitfalls of adapting utility value interventions for online math courses. The Journal of Experimental Education, 87(2), 332–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2018.1496059
113.
RosenzweigE. Q.WigfieldA.HullemanC. S. (2020). More useful or not so bad? Examining the effects of utility value and cost reduction interventions in college physics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(1), 166–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000370
114.
RuncoM. A. (2004). Everyone has creative potential. In SternbergR. J.GrigorenkoE. L.SingerJ. L. (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 21–30). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10692-002
RuncoM. A.MillarG.AcarS.CramondB. (2010). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking as predictors of personal and public achievement: A fifty-year follow-up. Creativity Research Journal, 22(4), 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.523393
118.
SawyerR. K. (2011). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. Oxford University Press.
119.
SchmitzB.PerelsF. (2011). Self-monitoring of self-regulation during math homework behaviour using standardized diaries. Metacognition and Learning, 6(3), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9076-6
120.
SchmitzB.WieseB. S. (2006). New perspectives for the evaluation of training sessions in self-regulated learning: Time-series analyses of diary data. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(1), 64–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.02.002
121.
ScottG.LeritzL. E.MumfordM. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410409534549
122.
ShepardR. N. (1984). Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. Psychological Review, 91, 417–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.91.4.417
123.
SimontonD. K. (1997). Foreign influence and national achievement: The impact of open milieus on Japanese civilization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.86
124.
SimontonD. K. (2009). Varieties of (scientific) creativity: A hierarchical model of domain-specific disposition, development, and achievement. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(5), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01152.x
125.
SimontonD. K. (2012). Taking the U.S. Patent Office criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion creativity definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24(2–3), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.676974
126.
*SmogorzewskaA. (2012). Storyline and associations pyramid as methods of creativity enhancement: Comparison of effectiveness in 5-year-old children. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2011.12.003
127.
SpoonR.RubensteinL. D.TerwillegarS. R. (2021). Team effectiveness in creative problem solving: Examining the role of students’ motivational beliefs and task analyses in team performance. Thinking Skills and Creativity, Article 100792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100792
StoegerH.SontagC.ZieglerA. (2014). Impact of a teacher-led intervention on preference for self-regulated learning, finding main ideas in expository texts, and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 799–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036035
Szen-ZiemiańskaJ.LebudaI.KarwowskiM. (2017). Mix and match: Opportunities, conditions, and limitations of cross-domain creativity. In KaufmanJ. C.GlăveanuV. P.BaerJ. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains (pp. 18–40). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316274385.003
133.
SzumskiG.SmogorzewskaJ.KarwowskiM. (2017). Academic achievement of students without special educational needs in inclusive classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 21, 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.02.004
134.
*ThibodeauR. B.GilpinA. T.BrownM. M.MeyerB. A. (2016). The effects of fantastical pretend-play on the development of executive functions: An intervention study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 145, 120–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.01.001
135.
TierneyP.FarmerS. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069429
136.
TorranceE. P. (1976). Creativity testing in education. Creative Child & Adult Quarterly, 1(3), 136–148.
137.
TownsendS. S. M.StephensN. M.SmalletsS.HamedaniM. G. (2019). Empowerment through difference: An online difference-education intervention closes the social class achievement gap. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(7), 1068–1083. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218804548
138.
TsaiK. C. (2014). A review of the effectiveness of creative training on adults learners. Journal of Social Science Studies, 1(1), 17–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jsss.v1i1.4329
139.
TsiriotakisI. K.GrünkeM.SpantidakisI.VassilakiE.StavrouN. A. M. (2020). The impact of an explicit writing intervention on EFL students’ short story writing. Frontiers in Education, 5, Article 565213. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.565213
140.
*UdwinO. (1983). Imaginative play training as an intervention method with institutionalised preschool children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 53(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1983.tb02533.x
141.
*Uszyńska-JarmocJ. (2007). Od twórczości potencjalnej do autokreacji w szkole [From potential creativity to self-creation at school]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersyteckie TransHumana.
142.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
143.
WaltonG. M.CohenG. L. (2011). A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science, 331(6023), 1447–1451. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1198364
144.
WaltonG. M.CrumA. (Eds.). (2021). Handbook of wise interventions: How social psychology can help people change. The Guilford Press.
145.
WaltonG. M.WilsonT. D. (2018). Wise interventions: Psychological remedies for social and personal problems. Psychological Review, 125(5), 617–655. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000115
146.
WaltonG. M.YeagerD. S. (2020). Seed and soil: Psychological affordances in contexts help to explain where wise interventions succeed or fail. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(3), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420904453
147.
WardT. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1994.1010
148.
WeibelD.MartarelliC. S.HäberliD.MastF. W. (2018). The Fantasy Questionnaire: A measure to assess creative and imaginative fantasy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(4), 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1331913
149.
WeinsteinC. E.AceeT. W.JungJ. (2011). Self-regulation and learning strategies. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2011(126), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.443
150.
WestS.HoffE.CarlssonI. (2017). Enhancing team creativity with playful improvisation theater: A controlled intervention field study. International Journal of Play, 6(3), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2017.1383000
151.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
152.
WilliamsC. L.HirschiQ.SublettK. V.HullemanC. S.WilsonT. D. (2020). A brief social belonging intervention improves academic outcomes for minoritized high school students. Motivation Science, 6(4), 423–437. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000175
153.
WinnerE. (1996). Gifted children (Vol. 1). Basic Books.
154.
WiśniewskaE. (2018). Efektywność treningu twórczości wśród uczniów na różnych etapach kształcenia [The effectiveness of creativity training at different educational stages] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The Maria Grzegorzewska University, Warsaw, Poland.
155.
YeagerD. S.HanselmanP.WaltonG. M.MurrayJ. S.CrosnoeR.MullerC.TiptonE.SchneiderB.HullemanC. S.HinojosaC. P.PauneskuD.RomeroC.FlintK.RobertsA.TrottJ.IachanR.BuontempoJ.YangS. M.CarvalhoC. M.. . . DweckC. S. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573(7774), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y
156.
YeagerD. S.JohnsonR.SpitzerB. J.TrzesniewskiK. H.PowersJ.DweckC. S. (2014). The far-reaching effects of believing people can change: Implicit theories of personality shape stress, health, and achievement during adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 867–884. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036335
157.
YeagerD. S.MiuA. S.PowersJ.DweckC. S. (2013). Implicit theories of personality and attributions of hostile intent: A meta-analysis, an experiment, and a longitudinal intervention. Child Development, 84(5), 1651–1667. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12062
158.
YeagerD. S.TrzesniewskiK. H.DweckC. S. (2013). An implicit theories of personality intervention reduces adolescent aggression in response to victimization and exclusion. Child Development, 84(3), 970–988. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12003
159.
YeagerD. S.WaltonG. M. (2011). Social-psychological interventions in education: They’re not magic. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 267–301. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311405999
160.
*ZachopoulouE.TrevlasE.KonstadinidouE. (2006). The design and implementation of a physical education program to promote children’s creativity in the early years. International Journal of Early Years Education, 4(3), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760600880043
ZielińskaA.KarwowskiM. (in press). Living with uncertainty in creative process: A self-regulatory perspective. In BeghettoR. A.JaegerG. J. (Eds.). Uncertainty: A catalyst for creativity, learning and development. Springer.
163.
ZielińskaA.LebudaI.IvcevicZ.KarwowskiM. (2022). How adolescents develop and implement their ideas? On self-regulation of creative action. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, 100998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.100998
164.
ZielińskaA.LebudaI.KarwowskiM. (in press). Simple, yet wise? Students’ creative engagement benefits from a daily intervention. Translational Issues in Psychological Sciences.
ZimmermanB. J. (2011). Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance. In ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. H. (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook series. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 49–64). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
