Place is an inescapable aspect of daily life and is intimately linked to our life experiences. An expanding body of research has investigated how place shapes the “geography of opportunity” as well as students’, families’, and stakeholders’ experiences in and around schools. While researchers have begun to investigate the spatial context of education, the notion of place remains somewhat underconceptualized in education research. This chapter draws on an interdisciplinary review of 60 empirical, education-related studies to understand how researchers have accounted for place, the theoretical and conceptual frames in which they ground their work, and their data collection methods. We find that researchers have used place inquiry and spatial methods to investigate diverse education-related phenomena, such as school choice and teaching and learning. Beyond using place to identify and describe inequalities, we argue that place inquiry and spatial methodologies can strengthen the potential of education research to disrupt systems of power and oppression by also advancing our knowledge of the nature of and potential solutions to educational injustice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgnewJ. (1987). Place and politics: The geographical meditation of state and society. Allen & Unwin.
2.
*AjiloreO. (2011). The impact of ethnic heterogeneity on education spending: a spatial econometric analysis of United States school districts. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 23(1), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-940X.2011.00178.x
3.
*AnnammaS.MorrisonD.JacksonD. (2014). Disproportionality fills in the gaps: Connections between achievement, discipline and special education in the school-to-prison pipeline. Berkeley Review of Education, 5(1), 53–87. https://doi.org/10.5070/B85110003
BangM.CurleyL.KesselA.MarinA.SuzukovichE. S.IIIStrackG. (2014). Muskrat theories, tobacco in the streets, and living Chicago as Indigenous land. Environmental Education Research, 20(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.865113
6.
BassoK. H. (1996). Wisdom sits in places: Landscape and language among the Western Apache. University of Minnesota Press.
7.
*BellC. A. (2007). Space and place: Urban parents’ geographical preferences for schools. The Urban Review, 39(4), 375–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-007-0059-5
8.
*BellC. A. (2009). Geography in parental choice. American Journal of Education, 115(4), 493–521. https://doi.org/10.1086/599779
9.
*BlaisdellB. (2017). Resisting redlining in the classroom: A collaborative approach to racial spaces analysis. In MorrisonD.AnnammaS. A.JacksonD. D. (Eds.), Critical race spatial analysis: Mapping to understand and address educational inequality (pp.109–125). Stylus.
10.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
11.
*BurasK. (2011). Race, charter schools, and conscious capitalism: On the spatial politics of whiteness as property (and the unconscionable assault on black New Orleans). Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 296–330. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.2.6l42343qqw360j03
12.
*BurasK. (2013). ‘We’re not going nowhere’: Race, urban space, and the struggle for King Elementary School in New Orleans. Critical Studies in Education, 54(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2013.741072
13.
*BurnettC. (2014). Investigating pupils’ interactions around digital texts: a spatial perspective on the “classroom-ness” of digital literacy practices in schools. Educational Review, 66(2), 192–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.768959
14.
BuxtonC. A. (2010). Social problem solving through science: An approach to critical, place-based, science teaching and learning. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(1), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680903408932
15.
CajeteG. (1994). Look to the mountain: An ecology of indigenous education. Kivaki Press.
16.
CajeteG. (1999). Reclaiming biophilia: Lessons from indigenous peoples. In SmithG.WilliamsD. (Eds.), Ecological education in action: On weaving education, environment, and culture (pp. 189–206). State University of New York Press.
17.
CalderonD. (2014). Speaking back to Manifest Destinies: A land education-based approach to critical curriculum inquiry. Environmental Education Research, 20(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.865114
18.
CaseyE. (1996). How to get from space to place in a fairly short stretch of time: Phenomenological prolegomena. In BassoK. H.FeldS. (Eds.), Sense of place (pp. 13–52). School of American Research Press.
19.
*CloutierM.ApparicioP.TouezJ. (2007). GIS-based spatial analysis of child pedestrian accidents near primary schools in Montreal, Canada. Applied GIS, 3(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4225/03/57E9B71457976
20.
*CorbettM.HelmerL. (2017). Contested geographies: Competing constructions of community and efficiency in small school debates. Geographical Research, 55(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12209
21.
CresswellT. (2004). Place: A short introduction. Blackwell.
22.
*DavisT.OakleyD. (2013). Linking charter school emergence to urban revitalization and gentrification: A socio-spatial analysis of three cities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 35(1), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12002
23.
*DayP.PearceJ. (2011). Obesity-promoting food environments and the spatial clustering of food outlets around schools. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 40(2), 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.018
DeloriaV.WildcatD. R. (2001). Power and place: Indian education in America. Fulcrum.
26.
*Del VecchioD.ToomeyN.TuckE. (2017). Placing photovoice: Participatory action research with undocumented migrant youth in the Hudson Valley. Critical Questions in Education, 8(4), 358–376. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1159312.pdf
27.
DentzauM. W. (2014). The value of place. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(1), 165–171.
28.
*DoughertyJ.HarrelsonJMaloneyL.MurphyD.SmithR.SnowM.ZannoniD. (2009). School choice in suburbia: Test scores, race, and housing markets. American Journal of Education, 115, 523–548. https://doi.org/10.1086/599780
29.
*ErbsteinN. (2015). Placing math reform: locating Latino English learners in math classrooms and communities. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 28(8), 906–931. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2014.974714
*FarmerS.PoulosC.BaberA. (2019). Challenging the market logic of school choice: A spatial analysis of charter school expansion in Chicago. Journal of Urban Affairs, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1555437
32.
*FataarA. (2007). Educational renovation in a South African “township on the move”: A social-spatial analysis. International Journal of Educational Development, 27, 599–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2006.10.019
33.
FeldS.BassoK. (Eds.). (1996). Senses of place. School of American Research Press.
34.
*FotheringhamA.CharltonM.BrunsdonC. (2001). Spatial variations in school performance: A local analysis using geographically weighted regression. Geographical & Environmental Modeling, 5(1), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/13615930120032617
35.
GallayE.Marckini-PolkL.SchroederB.FlanaganC. (2016). Place-based stewardship education: Nurturing aspirations to protect the rural commons. Peabody Journal of Education, 91, 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2016.1151736
36.
*GilespeC. (2010). How culture constructs our sense of neighborhood: Mental maps and children’s perceptions of place. Journal of Geography, 109, 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221340903459447
37.
*GoodR. M. (2017a). Histories that root us: Neighborhood, place, and the protest of school closures in Philadelphia. Urban Geography, 38(6), 861–8883. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1182286
38.
*GoodR. M. (2017b). Invoking landscapes of spatialized inequality: Race, class, and place in Philadelphia’s school closure debate. Journal of Urban Affairs, 39(3), 358–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2016.1245069
39.
*GrantC.ArcelloA.KonradA.SwensonM. (2014). Fighting for the “right to the city”: Examining spatial injustice in Chicago public school closings. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35(5), 670–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2014.919844
40.
*GreenT. L. (2015). Places of inequality, places of possibility: Mapping “opportunity in geography” across urban school-communities. The Urban Review, 47(4), 717–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-015-0331-z
41.
GreenwoodD. A. (2009). Place, survivance, and White remembrance: A decolonizing challenge to rural education in mobile modernity. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 24(10), 1–6.
42.
GreenwoodD. A. (2012). A critical theory of place-conscious education. In StevensonR. B.BrodyM.DillonJ.WalsA. E. J. (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 93–100). Routledge.
GruenewaldD. (2003b). Foundations of place: A multidisciplinary framework for place-conscious education. American Educational Research Journal. 40(3), 619–654. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040003619
45.
*GulsonK.ParkesR. (2009). In the shadows of the mission: Education policy, urban space, and the “colonial present” in Sydney. Race Ethnicity and Education, 12(2), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613320903178246
*HogrebeM.TateW. (2017). Exploring educational opportunity with geospatial patterns in high school Algebra 1 and Advanced Mathematics Courses. In MorrisonD.AnnammaS. A.JacksonD. D. (Eds.), Critical race spatial analysis: Mapping to understand and address educational inequality (pp. 126–146). Stylus.
54.
hooksb. (1990). Yearning: Race, gender, and cultural politics. South End Press
55.
HowleyA.HowleyM.CamperC.PerkoH. (2011). Place-based education at island community school. Journal of Environmental Education, 42(4), 216–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2011.556682
56.
*JaramilloM. (2012). The spatial geography of teacher labor markets: Evidence from a developing country. Economics of Education Review, 31, 984–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.07.005
57.
*JocsonK.Thorne-WallingtonE. (2013). Mapping literacy-rich environments: Geospatial perspectives on literacy and education. Teachers College Record, 115(6), 1–24.
58.
JohnsonJ. (2012). Place-based learning and knowing: Critical pedagogies grounded in Indigeneity. GeoJournal, 77(6), 829–836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-010-9379-1
59.
JohnsonO. D. (2012). Toward a theory of place: Social mobility, proximity, and proximal capital. In TateW. (Ed.), Research on schools, neighborhoods, and communities: Toward civic responsibility (pp. 29–46). American Educational Research Association.
60.
*JonesB. D.HarrisK.TateW. (2015). Ferguson and beyond: A descriptive epidemiological study using geospatial analysis. Journal of Negro Education, 84(3), 231–253. https://doi.org/10.7709/jnegroeducation.84.3.0231
61.
*JonesS.ThielJ.DavilaD.PittardE.WoglomJ.ZhouX.BrownT.SnowM. (2016). Childhood geographies and spatial justice: Making sense of place and space-making as political acts in education. American Educational Research Journal, 53(4), 1126–1158. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216655221
62.
KeithMPileS (Eds.). (1993). Place and the politics of identity. Routledge.
63.
KerskiJ. (2011). Sleepwalking into the future: The case for spatial analysis throughout education. In DonertK.Lindner-FallyM. (Eds.), Learning with geoinformation (pp. 2–11). Wichmann.
64.
*LaFleurJ. (2016). Locating Chicago’s charter schools: A socio-spatial analysis. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(33). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.1745
65.
LefebvreH. (1974). The production of space. Blackwell.
66.
LefebvreH. (1996). Writings on cities. Blackwell.
67.
LipmanP. (2002). Making the global city, making inequality: The political economy and cultural politics of Chicago school policy. American Educational Research Journal, 39(2), 379–419. http://doi.org/10.3102/00028312039002379
68.
LipmanP. (2013). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203821800
69.
LipsitzG. (2011). How racism takes place. Temple University Press.
70.
LubienskiC.DoughertyJ. (2009). Mapping educational opportunity: Spatial analysis and school choices. American Journal of Education, 115(4), 485–491.
71.
*LubienskiC.GulosinoC.WeitzelP. (2009). School choice and competitive incentives: Mapping the distribution of educational opportunities across local education markets. American Journal of Education, 115(4), 601–647. https://doi.org/10.1086/599778
72.
LubienskiC.LeeJ. (2017). Geo-spatial analyses in education research: The critical challenge and methodological possibilities. Geographical Research, 55(1), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12188
73.
*MakrisM. (2015). Separate, different, but not isolated: How youth in public housing relate to their gentrified community. In Public housing and school choice in a gentrified city: Youth experiences of uneven opportunity (pp. 170–189). Palgrave.
74.
MarcuseP. (2009). Spatial justice: derivative but causal of social injustice. Spatial Justice, 1(4), 1–6.
MasseyD. (1994). Space, place, and gender. University of Minnesota Press.
77.
MasseyD. (2005). For space. Sage.
78.
McKenzieM. (2008). The places of pedagogy: Or, what we can do with culture through intersubjective experiences. Environmental Education Research, 14(3), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802194208
79.
McKittrickK. (2006). Demonic grounds: Black women and the cartographies of struggle. University of Minnesota Press.
80.
*MisraK.GrimesP.RogersK. (2012). Does competition improve public school efficiency? A spatial analysis. Economics of Education Review, 31, 1177–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.08.001
81.
*MorojeleP.MuthukrishnaN. (2012). The journey to school: Space, geography, and experiences of rural children. Perspectives in Education, 30(1), 90–100.
82.
MorrisonDAnnammaS. AJacksonD. D (Eds.). (2017). Critical race spatial analysis: Mapping to understand and address educational inequity. Stylus.
83.
*MurrayR. K.SwattM. L. (2013). Disaggregating the relationship between schools and crime: A spatial analysis. Crime & Delinquency, 59(2), 163–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128709348438
84.
*O’DonoghueD. (2006). Situating space and place in the making of masculinities in schools. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 3(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2006.10411569
85.
*O’DonoghueD. (2007). ‘James always hangs out here’: making space for place in studying masculinities at school. Visual Studies, 22(1), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860601167218
86.
OrrD. W. (1992). Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world. State University of New York Press.
87.
OrrD. W. (2004). Earth in mind: On education, environment, and the human prospect (10th anniversary ed.). Island Press.
88.
OwensP. E.RochelleM. L.NelsonA. A.Montgomery-BlockK. (2011). Youth voices influencing local and regional change. Children, Youth and Environments, 21(1), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.21.1.0253
89.
*ParsonsE.ChalkleyB.JonesA. (2000). School catchments and pupil movements: A case study in parental choice. Educational Studies, 26(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690097727
90.
PeñaD. G. (1998). Los animalitos: Culture, ecology, and the politics of place in the Upper Rio Grande. In PeñaD. G. (Ed.), Chicano culture, ecology, politics: Subversive kin (pp. 25–57). University of Arizona.
91.
*PhillippoK. L.GriffinB. (2016). The social geography of choice: Neighborhoods’ role in students’ navigation of school choice policy in Chicago. The Urban Review, 48(5), 668–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-016-0373-x
92.
*PowerN. G.NormanM. E.DupréK. (2014). Rural youth and emotional geographies: how photovoice and words-alone methods tell different stories of place. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(8), 1114–1129. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2014.881983
93.
PowersA. L. (2004). An evaluation of four place-based education programs. Journal of Environmental Education, 35(4), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.35.4.17-32
*RiceL.HendersonM.HunterM. (2017). Neighborhood priority or desegregation plans? A spatial analysis of voting on San Francisco’s student assignment system. Population Research and Policy Review, 36(6), 805–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-017-9435-3
96.
*RodríguezC.AmadorA.TarangoB. A. (2016). Mapping educational equity and reform policy in the Borderlands: LatCrit spatial analysis of grade retention. Equity & Excellence in Education, 49(2), 228–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2016.1144834
97.
RubelL. H.LimV.Hall-WieckertM.KatzS. (2016). Cash across the city: Participatory mapping and teaching for spatial justice. Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research, 12, 4–14.
98.
SampsonR. J.MorenoffJ. D.Gannon-RowleyT. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 443–478. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141114
99.
*SaporitoS.SohoniD. (2007). Mapping educational inequality: Concentrations of poverty among poor and minority students in public schools. Social Forces, 85(3), 1227–1253. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2007.0055
100.
*SchlemperM. B.StewartV. C.ShettyS.CzajkowskiK. (2018). Including students’ geographies in geography education: Spatial narratives, citizen mapping, and social justice. Theory & Research in Social Education, 46(4), 603–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2018.1427164
101.
*SchlossbergM.PhillipsP. P.JohnsonB.ParkerB. (2005). How do they get there? A spatial analysis of a “sprawl school” in Oregon. Planning Practice & Research, 20(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450500414678
102.
SeawrightG. (2014). Settler traditions of place: Making explicit the epistemological legacy of white supremacy and settler colonialism for place-based education. Educational Studies, 50(6), 554–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2014.965938
SharkeyP.ElwertF. (2011). The legacy of disadvantage: Multigenerational neighborhood effects on cognitive ability. American Journal of Sociology, 116(6), 1934–1981. https://doi.org/10.1086/660009
105.
*SheddC. (2015). Unequal city: Race, schools, and perceptions of injustice. Russell Sage Foundation.
SmithG. A.SobelD. (2010). Place- and community-based education in schools. Routledge.
108.
SmithG. AWilliamsD. R (Eds.). (1999). Ecological education in action: On weaving education, culture, and the environment. State University of New York Press.
109.
SmithL. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). Zed Books
110.
*SmrekarC.HoneyN. (2015). The desegregation aims and demographic contexts of magnet schools: How parents choose and why siting policies matter. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(1), 128–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2015.988545
111.
SobelD. (2004). Place-based education: Connecting classroom and community. The Orion Society.
112.
*SohoniD.SaporitoS. (2009). Mapping school segregation: using GIS to explore racial segregation between schools and their corresponding attendance areas. American Journal of Education, 115(4), 569–600. https://doi.org/10.1086/599782
SolórzanoD. G.YossoT. J. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040200800103
StyresS.Haig-BrownC.BlimkieM. (2013). Towards a pedagogy of Land: The urban context. Canadian Journal of Education, 36(2), 34–67.
117.
TakanoT.HigginsP.McLaughlinP. (2009). Connecting with place: Implications of integrating cultural values into the school curriculum in Alaska. Environmental Education Research, 15(3), 343–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620902863298
118.
*TalenE. (2001). School, community, and spatial equity: An empirical investigation of access to elementary schools in West Virginia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(3), 465–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00254
119.
TateW. F. (2008). “Geography of opportunity”: Poverty, place, and educational outcomes. Educational Researcher, 37(7), 397–411.
120.
*TateW. F.HogrebeM. C. (2018). Show me: Diversity and Isolation indicators of spatial segregation within and across Missouri’s school districts. Peabody Journal of Education, 93(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2017.1403170
121.
*TaylorC. (2001). Hierarchies and “local” markets: The geography of the “lived” market place in secondary education provision. Journal of Education Policy, 16(3), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930110041024
122.
TaylorC. (2007). Geographical information systems (GIS) and school choice: The use of spatial research tools in studying educational policy. In GulsonK.N.SymesC. (Eds.), Spatial theories of education: Policy and geography matters (pp. 77–94). New York, NY: Routledge.
123.
*TaylorC. (2009a). Choice, competition, and segregation in a United Kingdom urban education market. American Journal of Education, 115(4), 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1086/599781
*TeixeiraS.GardnerR. (2017). Youth-led participatory photo mapping to understand urban environments. Children and Youth Services Review, 82, 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.09.033
126.
TheobaldP. (1997). Teaching the commons: Place, pride, and the renewal of community. Routledge.
127.
TiekenM. C.Auldridge-RevelesT. R. (2019). Rethinking the school closure research: School closure as spatial injustice. Review of Educational Research, 89(6), 917–953. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319877151
128.
TrinidadA. (2011). Sociopolitical development through critical indigenous pedagogy of place: Preparing Native Hawaiian young adults to become change agents. Hulili: Multidisciplinary Research on Hawaiian Well-Being, 7, 185–221.
129.
TuanY. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press.
TuckE.McKenzieM.McCoyK. (2014). Land education: Indigenous, post-colonial, and decolonizing perspectives on place and environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 20(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.877708
VelezV.SolórzanoD. (2017). Critical race spatial analysis: Conceptualizing GIS as a tool for critical race research in education. In MorrisonD.AnnammaS. A.JacksonD. D. (Eds.), Critical race spatial analysis: Mapping to understand and address educational inequity (pp. 8–31). Stylus.
136.
ViterittiJ. (1999). A way out: School choice and educational opportunity. Brookings Instituition. https://doi.org/10.2307/20080877
*WridtP. (2010). A qualitative GIS approach to mapping urban neighborhoods with children to promote physical activity and child-friendly community planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(1), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1068/b35002
139.
YoonE. S.GulsonK.LubienskiC. (2018). A brief history of the geography of education policy: Ongoing conversations and generative tensions. AERA Open, 4(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418820940
140.
*YoonS. Y.DoudnikoffM.GouliasK. G. (2011). Spatial analysis of propensity to escort children to school in southern California. Transportation Research Record, 2230(1), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.3141/2230-15
141.
ZimmermanH. T.WeibleJ. L. (2017). Learning in and about rural places: Connections and tensions between students’ everyday experiences and environmental quality issues in their community. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12(1), 7–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9757-1
