In this review of research, we explore intersectionality in the literature on K–12 educational leadership. We seek to understand how researchers have used intersectionality and what their findings or arguments reveal about the work of leading to reduce inequities in education. We ask, What traditions and trends associated with intersectionality have been brought into educational leadership research to inform the development of transformative leadership? The sample includes 15 articles published in peer-reviewed journals between 2005 and 2017. We identify the themes individualism and knowledge relations, which leads us to three interrelated findings concerning conceptions of leadership and intersectionality. We find that intersectionality primarily (1) is used to support micro-level analysis rather than both micro-level and macro-level analysis of the inequities being confronted by leadership practice, (2) is used to focus on individuals’ experiences as “leaders” and “leadership” capacity rather than “leading” practices, and (3) serves as an emergent knowledge project in its support of agendas related to transformative educational leadership. We discuss how the use of intersectionality, conceptions of leadership, and leadership and research practices coincide, pointing to the implications for the continued use of intersectionality in educational leadership, and provide recommendations to support the use of intersectionality in future research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgostoV.RolleR. A. (2014). An intersectoral policy framework: Technology and obesity intersecting on schoolchildren. In GrantC. A.ZwierE. (Eds.), Intersectionality and urban education: Identities, policies, spaces & power (pp. 293–310). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
2.
*AlstonJ. A. (2005). Tempered radicals and servant leaders: Black females persevering in the superintendency. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 675–688.
3.
AndrewsA. R. (1993). Balancing the personal and professional. In JamesJ.FarmerR. (Eds.), Spirit, space, and survival: African American women in (White) academe (pp. 179–195). New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
AnzaldúaG. (1987). Borderlands/La Frontera: The new Mestiza. San Francisco, CA: Spinsters/Aunt Lute.
5.
*BassL. (2009). Fostering an ethics of care in leadership: A conversation with five African American women. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 619–632.
6.
BlackmoreJ. (2013). A feminist critical perspective on educational leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 16, 139–154.
7.
BloomC. M.ErlandsonD. A. (2003). African American women principals in urban schools: Realities, (re)constructions, and resolutions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 339–369.
8.
BlountJ. M. (1998). Destined to rule the schools: Women and the superintendency, 1873–1995. New York: State University of New York Press.
9.
BrooksJ. S.Jean-MarieG. (2007). Black leadership, White leadership: Race and race relations in an urban high school. Journal of Educational Administration, 45, 756–768.
10.
BurnsJ. M. (1978). Leadership: Transformational leadership, transactional leadership. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
11.
ByrdM. Y. (2009). Telling our stories of leadership: If we don’t tell them they won’t be told. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 582–606.
12.
CapperC. A. (1989). Transformative leadership: Embracing student diversity in democratic schooling (ED 305 714). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
13.
*CapperC. A. (2015). The 20th-year anniversary of critical race theory in education: Implications for leading to eliminate racism. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51, 791–833.
14.
CapperC. A.GreenT. L. (2013). Organizational theories and the development of leadership capacity for integrated, socially just schools. In TillmanL.ScheurichJ. J. (Eds.), Handbook of educational leadership for equity and diversity (pp. 62–82). New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
CapperC. A.YoungM. D. (2014). Ironies and limitations of educational leadership for social justice: A call to social justice educators. Theory Into Practice, 53, 158–164.
16.
CarbadoD. W.CrenshawK. W.MaysV. M.TomlinsonB. (2013). Intersectionality. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 10, 303–312.
17.
ChoS.CrenshawK. W.McCallL. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38, 785–810.
18.
CleggS. (2005). Evidence-based practice in educational research: A critical realist critique of systematic review. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26, 415–428.
19.
CollinsP. H. (1998). It’s all in the family: Intersections of gender, race, and nation. Hypatia, 13(3), 62–82.
20.
CollinsP. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
CollinsP. H. (2009). Piecing together a genealogical puzzle: Intersectionality and American pragmatism. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 3, 88–112.
22.
CollinsP. H. (2016). Black feminist thought as oppositional knowledge. Departures in Critical Qualitative Research, 5, 133–144.
23.
CollinsP. H.BilgeS. (2016). Intersectionality. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
24.
Combahee River Collective. (1981). A Black feminist statement. In MorágaC.AnzaldúaG. (Eds.), This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color (pp. 210–218). Watertown, MA: Persephone Press.
25.
CrenshawK. W. (1988). Race, reform, and retrenchment: Transformation and legitimation in antidiscrimination law. Harvard Law Review, 101, 1331–1387.
26.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989, 8. Retrieved from https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8/
27.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.
28.
CrenshawK.OcenP.NandaJ. (2015). Black girls matter: Pushed out, overpoliced, and underprotected. New York, NY: Center for Intersectionality and Social Policy Studies, Columbia University.
29.
CrevaniL.LindgrenM.PackendorffJ. (2010). Leadership, not leaders: On the study of leadership as practices and interactions. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26, 77–86.
30.
DantleyM. E. (2010). Successful leadership in urban schools: Principals and critical spirituality, a new approach to reform. Journal of Negro Education, 79, 214–219.
31.
DavisB. W.GoodenM. A.BowersA. J. (2017). Pathways to the principalship: An event history analysis of the careers of teachers with principal certification. American Educational Research Journal, 54, 207–240.
32.
Delgado BernalD. (2002). Critical race theory, LatCrit theory and critical raced-gendered epistemologies: Recognizing students of color as holders and creators of knowledge. Qualitative Inquiry, 8, 105–126.
33.
EversC. W.LakomskiG. (2013). Methodological individualism, educational administration, and leadership. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 45, 159–173.
34.
FosterW. (1989). Toward a critical practice of leadership. In SmithJ. (Ed.), Critical perspectives on educational leadership (pp. 39–62). New York, NY: Routledge, Falmer.
35.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
36.
*GarcíaW.Byrne-JiménezM. (2016). Out of the sombra: One Afro-Latino making his way in educational leadership. National Forum of Educational Administration & Supervision Journal, 33(2–3), 121–143.
37.
GibsonC. A.TarrantM. (2010). A “conceptual models” approach to organisational resilience. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 25(2), 6–12.
38.
GirouxH. A. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
39.
GrosfoguelR. (2016). What is racism?Journal of World-Systems Research, 22(1), 9–15.
40.
GrossC.GottburgsenA.PhoenixA. (2016). Education systems and intersectionality. In HadjarA.GrossC. (Eds.). Education systems and inequalities: International comparisons (pp. 51–72). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
41.
HallS. (1996). Race: The floating signifier. Northampton, MA: Media Education Foundation.
42.
HancockA. M. (2013). Empirical intersectionality: A tale of two approaches. UC Irvine Law Review, 3, 259–296.
43.
HansotE.TyackD. (1981). The dream deferred: A golden age for women school administrators (Policy Paper No. 81-C2). Stanford, CA: Stanford University School of Education, Institute for Research on Educational Finance and Governance.
44.
HarlanL. R. (1957). The Southern Education Board and the race issue in public education. Journal of Southern History, 23, 189–202.
45.
hooksb. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston, MA: South End Press.
46.
*HorsfordS. D. (2012). This bridge called my leadership: An essay on Black women as bridge leaders in education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 25(1), 11–22.
47.
*Jean-MarieG. (2013). The subtlety of age, gender, and race barriers: A case study of early career African American female principals. Journal of School Leadership, 23, 615–639.
48.
JonesK. P.SabatI. E.KingE. B.AhmadA.McCauslandT. C.ChenT. (2017). Isms and schisms: A meta-analysis of the prejudice-discrimination relationship across racism, sexism, and ageism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38, 1076–1110.
49.
KingD. K. (1995). Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a Black feminist ideology. In Guy-SheftallB. (Ed.), Words of fire: An anthology of African American feminist thought (pp. 294–317). New York, NY: New Press.
50.
LarsonC. L.MurtadhaK. (2003). Leadership for social justice. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 101, 134–161.
51.
*LiangJ. G.Peters-HawkinsA. L. (2017). “I am more than what I look alike”: Asian American women in public school administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53, 40–69.
52.
*LiangJ. G.SottileJ.PetersA. L. (2016). Understanding Asian American women’s pathways to school leadership. Gender and Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/09540253.2016.1265645
53.
LoderT. L. (2005). Women administrators negotiate work-family conflicts in changing times: An intergenerational perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 741–776.
54.
*LópezP. D. (2016). Leadership for Chicano/Latino education and the politics of change. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal, 10(3), 129–140.
55.
LumbyJ. (2014, March). Intersectionality theory and educational leadership: Help or hindrance?Paper presentation at the British Educational Leadership, Management and Administration Special Interest Group, Gender and Leadership, Birmingham, England.
56.
LumbyJ.MorrisonM. (2010). Leadership and diversity: Theory and research. School Leadership and Management, 30(1), 3–17.
57.
MayV. M. (2014). “Speaking into the void”? Intersectionality critiques and epistemic backlash. Hypatia, 29, 94–112.
58.
McCallL. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 1771–1800.
59.
MeyersC. V.Hambrick HittD. (2017). School turnaround principals: What does initial research literature suggest they are doing to be successful?Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 22(1), 38–56.
60.
MeyersonD. (2001). Tempered radicals: How people use difference to inspire change at work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
61.
MezirowJ. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
62.
MontuoriA.DonnellyG. (2017). Transformative leadership. In NealJ. (Ed.), Handbook of personal and organizational transformation (pp. 1–33). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
63.
NatapoffA. (1995). Anatomy of a debate: Intersectionality and equality for deaf children from non-English speaking homes. Journal of Law & Education, 24, 271–278.
64.
*NicholsonJ.ManiatesH. (2015). Recognizing postmodern intersectional identities in leadership for early childhood. Early Years, 36(1), 66–80.
65.
NúñezA. (2014). Employing multilevel intersectionality in educational research: Latino identifies, contexts, and college access. Educational Researcher, 43(2), 85–92.
66.
*PetersA. L. (2012). Leading through the challenge of change: African-American women principals on small school reform. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 25(1), 23–38.
67.
QuantzR.Cambron-McCabeN.DantleyM.HachemA. H. (2017). Culture-based leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20, 376–392.
68.
QuantzR. A.RogersJ.DantleyM. (1991). Rethinking transformative leadership: Toward democratic reform of schools. Journal of Education, 173, 96–118.
69.
*ReedL. C. (2012). The intersection of race and gender in school leadership for three Black female principals. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 25, 39–58.
70.
ReedL.EvansA. E. (2008). What you see is [not always] what you get! Dispelling race and gender leadership assumptions. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 21, 487–499.
71.
RitzerG. (2007). Contemporary sociological theory and its classical roots: The basics. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
72.
RolandE. (2016, November). Understanding intersectionality to promote social justice in education leadership. Paper presentation at the University Council for Educational Administration Annual Convention, Detroit, MI.
73.
RousmaniereK. (2007). Presidential address: Go to the principal’s office: Toward a social history of the school principal in North America. History of Education Quarterly, 47(1), 1–22.
74.
SantamaríaL. J.SantamaríaA. P. (2013). Applied critical leadership in education: Choosing change. New York, NY: Routledge.
75.
ScanlanM.TheoharisG. (2016). Introduction to special issue—Intersectionality: Promoting social justice while navigating multiple dimensions of diversity. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 19(1), 3–5.
76.
ShieldsC. M. (2010). Transformative leadership: Working for equity in diverse contexts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46, 558–589.
77.
ShieldsC. M. (2011). Transformative leadership: An introduction. Counterpoints, 409, 1–17.
78.
ShieldsC. M. (2012). Transformative leadership in education: Equitable change in an uncertain and complex world. New York: NY: Routledge.
79.
ShobenE. W. (1980). Compound discrimination: The interaction of race and sex in employment discrimination. New York University Law Review, 55, 793–837.
80.
TateW. F.IV. (2005). Ethics, engineering and the challenge of racial reform in education. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 121–127.
81.
TerriquezV. (2015). Intersectional mobilization, social movement spillover, and queer youth leadership in the immigrant rights movement. Social Problems, 62, 343–362.
82.
TyackD. B.HansotE. (1982). Managers of virtue: Public school leadership in America, 1820–1980. New York, NY: Basic Books.
83.
WattJ. H.Van Den BergS. (2002). Elements of scientific theories: Concepts and definitions. Research methods for communication science. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
84.
*WeltonA. D.MansfieldK. C.LeeP. L.YoungM. D. (2015). Mentoring educational leadership doctoral students: Using methodological diversification to examine gender and identity intersections. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 10(2), 53–81.
85.
*WitherspoonN.ArnoldB. M. (2010). Pastoral care: Notions of caring and the Black female principal. Journal of Negro Education, 79, 220–232.
86.
*WitherspoonN.TaylorD. L. (2010). Spiritual weapons: Black female principals and religio-spirituality. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 42, 133–158.
87.
WolfswinkelJ. F.FurtmuellerE.WilderomC. P. M. (2011). Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(1), 1–11.
88.
ZaneN. (2002). The glass ceiling is the floor my boss walks on: Leadership challenges in managing diversity. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 38, 334–353.
