AbellS. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In AbellS. K.LedermanN. G. (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 3–28). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
American Council on Education. (1940). Report of the first annual administration of the National Teacher Examinations and announcement of the 1941 examinations. New York, NY: Author.
3.
American Federation of Teachers. (2012). Raising the bar: Aligning and elevating teacher preparation and the teaching profession (A report of the American Federation of Teachers Teacher Preparation Task Force). Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.highered.nysed.gov/raisingthebar2012.pdf
4.
AndersonJ. R. (1976). Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
AngristJ. D.GuryanJ. (2007). Does teacher testing raise teacher quality? Evidence from state certification requirements. Economics of Education Review, 27, 483–503. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.03.002
6.
Association of Mexican American Educators v. State of Cal. (1996). 937 F. Supp. 1397, N.D. Cal.
7.
AugustD.HakutaK. (Eds.). (1997). Improving schooling for language-minority children: A research agenda. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309054974
8.
AugustD.ShanahanT. (Eds.). (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth (Executive summary). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Retrieved from http://www.bilingualeducation.org/pdfs/PROP2272.pdf
9.
BallD. L.ForzaniF. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 497–511. doi:10.1177/0022487109348479
10.
BallD. L.HillH. C.BassH. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide?American Educator, 29, 14–46. Retrieved from http://www.aft.org/pdfs/americaneducator/fall2005/BallF05.pdf
11.
BallD. L.SleepL.BoerstT.BassH. (2009). Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 109, 458–476. doi:10.1086/596996
12.
BallD. L.ThamesM. H.PhelpsG. C. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407. doi:10.1177/0022487108324554
13.
BaumertJ.KunterM.BlumW.BrunnerM.VossT.JordanA.. . . TsaiY.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 133–180. doi:10.3102/0002831209345157
14.
BaxterJ. A.LedermanN. G. (1999). Assessment and measurement of pedagogical content knowledge. In Gess-NewsomeJ.LedermanN. G. (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 147–161). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
15.
BennettC. I.McWhorterL. M.KuykendallJ. A. (2006). Will I ever teach? Latino and African American students’ perspectives on PRAXIS I. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 531–575. doi:10.3102/00028312043003531
16.
BiestaG. J. J.BurbulesN. C. (2003). Pragmatism and educational research. Latham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
17.
BiestaG. J. J.StengelB. (in press). Thinking philosophically about teaching: Illuminating issues and (re)framing research. In GitomerD. H.BellC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
BoydstonJ. A. (Ed.). (1984). John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953: Vol. 3. 1927–1928: Essays, reviews, miscellany, and “impressions of Soviet Russia.”Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.
BuschangR. E.ChungG. K. W. K.DelacruzG. C.BakerE. L. (2012). Validating measures of algebra teacher subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge (CRESST Report No. 820). Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, & Student Testing, UCLA.
24.
CarlisleJ. F.CorrentiR.PhelpsG.ZengJ. (2009). Exploration of the contribution of teachers’ knowledge about reading to their students’ improvement in reading. Reading and Writing, 22, 457–486. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9165-y
25.
Carnegie Task Force on Teaching as a Profession. (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century (The report of the Task Force on Teaching as a Profession). Hyattsville, MD: Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy.
ChaseW. G.SimonH. A. (1973). The mind’s eye in chess. In ChaseW. G. (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 215–281). New York, NY: Academic Press.
28.
ChiM. T. H. (1978). Knowledge structure and memory development. In SieglerR. S. (Ed.), Children’s thinking: What develops? (pp. 73–96). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
ChiM. T. H.OhlssonS. (2005). Complex declarative learning. In HolyoakK. J.MorrisonR. G. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 371–400). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://chilab.asu.edu/papers/Handbook_Chapter_with_Din.pdf
30.
ChomskyN. (1988). Language and problems of knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press.
31.
CizekG. J.BunchM. B. (2007). Standard setting: A guide to establishing and evaluating performance standards on tests. London, England: Sage.
32.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. L. (2007). How and why do teacher credentials matter for student achievement? (NBER Working Paper No. 12828). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:10.3386/w12828
33.
ColeM.ScribnerS. (1974). Culture and thought: A psychological introduction. New York, NY: John Wiley.
Council of Chief State School Officers. (2000). Key state education policies on K–12 education: 2000: Results from the 2000 policies and practices survey, state departments of education. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.personal.psu.edu/dgm122/epfp/KeyState2000.PDF
Darling-HammondL.BransfordJ. (Eds.). (2007). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
DöhrmannM.KaiserG.BlömekeS. (2012). The conceptualisation of mathematics competencies in the international teacher education study TEDS-M. ZDM: International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44, 325–340. doi:10.1007/s11858-012-0432-z
Educational Testing Service. (2014a). Frequently asked questions about the Praxis™ series tests. Princeton, NJ: Author. Retrieved from https://www.ets.org/praxis/faq_test_takers/
44.
Educational Testing Service. (2014b). Praxis® core academic skills for educators (core) test content and structure. Princeton, NJ: Author. Retrieved from https://www.ets.org/praxis/about/core/content/
45.
ElbazF. (1983). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. London, England: Croom Helm.
46.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
47.
FaltisC. J.ValdésG. (in press). Preparing teachers for teaching in and advocating for linguistically diverse classrooms: A vade mecum for teacher educators. In GitomerD. H.BellC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
FlanaganJ. C. (1941). An analysis of the results from the first annual edition of the National Teacher Examinations. Journal of Experimental Education, 9, 237–250. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20150668
50.
FogoB. (2014). Core practices for teaching history: The results of a Delphi panel survey. Theory & Research in Social Education, 42, 151–196. doi:10.1080/00933104.2014.902781
51.
ForzaniF. M. (2014). Understanding core practices and practice-based teacher education: Learning from the past. Journal of Teacher Education, 65, 357–368. doi:10.1177/0022487114533800
52.
FrankeM.WebbN.ChanA.IngM.FreundD.BatteyD. (2009). Teacher questioning to elicit students’ mathematical thinking in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 380–392. doi:10.1177/0022487109339906
53.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
54.
FullerS. C.LaddH. F. (2012). School based accountability and the distribution of teacher quality among grades in elementary school (CALDER Working Paper No. 75). Washington, DC: Center for the Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research, American Institutes for Research. Retrieved from http://www.caldercenter.org/publications/upload/wp75.pdf
55.
GayG. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
56.
Gess-NewsomeJ.LedermanN. G. (Eds.). (1999). Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
57.
GitomerD. H.BrownT. L.BonettJ. (2011). Useful signal or unnecessary obstacle? The role of basic skills tests in teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 62, 431–445. doi:10.1177/0022487111412785
58.
GitomerD. H.LathamA. S.ZiomekR. (1999). The academic quality of prospective teachers: The impact of admissions and licensure testing (ETS Teaching & Learning Report Series, ETS RR-03-25). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RR-03-35.pdf
59.
GitomerD. H.PhelpsG.WerenB.HowellH.CroftA. J. (2014). Evidence on the validity of content knowledge for teaching assessments. In KaneT. J.KerrK. A.PiantaR. C. (Eds.), Designing teacher evaluation systems: New guidance from the Measures of Effective Teaching project (pp. 493–528). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
60.
GitomerD. H.QiY. (2010). Score trends for Praxis II. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service.
61.
GoldhaberD. (2007). Everyone’s doing it, but what does teacher testing tell us about teacher effectiveness?Journal of Human Resources, 42(4), 765–794. doi:10.3368/jhr.XLII.4.765
62.
GoldhaberD.LaveryL.TheobaldR. (2014). Uneven playing field? Assessing the inequity of teacher characteristics and measured performance across students (CEDR Working Paper No. 2014-4). Seattle: Center for Education Data & Research, University of Washington. Retrieved from http://www.cedr.us/papers/working/CEDR%20WP%202014-4.pdf
63.
GoodladJ. I. (1984). A place called school. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
64.
GrimmettP. P.MacKinnonA. M. (1992). Craft knowledge and the education of teachers. Review of Research in Education, 18, 385–456. doi:10.3102/0091732X018001385
65.
GrossmanP. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
66.
GrossmanP. L. (1991). What are we talking about anyhow: Subject matter knowledge for secondary English teachers. In BrophyJ. (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Vol. 2: Subject matter knowledge (pp. 245–264). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
67.
GrossmanP.HammernessK.McDonaldM. (2009). Redefining teaching: Re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15, 273–290. doi:10.1080/13540600902875340
68.
GrossmanP.McDonaldM. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. Educational Research Journal, 45, 184–205. doi:10.3102/0002831207312906
69.
HambletonR. K.PitoniakM. J. (2006). Setting performance standards. In BrennanR. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 433–470). Westport, CT: Praeger.
70.
HaneyW.MadausG.KreitzerA. (1987). Charms talismanic: Testing teachers for the improvement of American education. Review of Research in Education, 14, 169–238. doi:10.3102/0091732X014001169
71.
HatchT.GrossmanP. (2009). Learning to look beyond the boundaries of representation: Using technology to examine teaching (Overview for a digital exhibition: Learning from the practice of teaching). Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 70–85. doi:10.1177/0022487108328533
72.
HillH. C.BallD. L.BlunkM.GoffneyI. M.RowanB. (2007). Validating the ecological assumption: The relationship of measure scores to classroom teaching and student learning. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 5, 107–117. doi:10.1080/15366360701487138
HillH. C.BlunkM. L.CharalambousC. Y.LewisJ. M.PhelpsG. C.SleepL.BallD. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 430–511. doi:10.1080/07370000802177235
75.
HillH. C.DeanC.GoffneyI. M. (2007). Assessing elemental and structural validity: Data from teachers, non-teachers, and mathematicians. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 5(2–3), 81–92. doi:10.1080/15366360701486999
76.
HillH. C.LubienskiS. T. (2007). Teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching and school context: A study of California teachers. Educational Policy, 21, 747–768. doi:10.1177/0895904807307061
77.
HillH. C.RowanB.BallD. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 371–406. doi:10.3102/00028312042002371
78.
HillH. C.SchillingS. G.BallD. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching. Elementary School Journal, 105, 11–30. doi:10.1086/428763
79.
HillH. C.UmlandK.LitkeE.KapitulaL. R. (2012). Teacher quality and quality teaching: Examining the relationship of a teacher assessment to practice. American Journal of Education, 118, 489–519. doi:10.1086/666380
80.
HirschE. D.Jr. (1988). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. New York, NY: Random House.
81.
HlasA. C.HlasC. S. (2012). A review of high-leverage teaching practices: Making connections between mathematics and foreign languages. Foreign Language Annals, 45(Suppl. 1), s76–s97. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2012.01180.x
82.
HoweyK. R.GrossmanP. L. (1989). A study in contrast: Sources of pedagogical content knowledge for secondary English. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(5), 24–31. doi:10.1177/002248718904000504
83.
HumphryB. J. (1966). Report concerning the National Teacher Examinations (ETS Confidential). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
84.
JanssenF.WestbroekH.DoyleW. (2014). The practical turn in teacher education: Designing a preparation sequence for core practice frames. Journal of Teacher Education, 65, 195–206. doi:10.1177/0022487113518584
85.
KafkaJ. (in press). In search of a grand narrative on the history of teaching. In GitomerD. H.BellC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
86.
KaneM. (2006). Validation. In BrennanR. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 17–64). New York, NY: Macmillan.
87.
KerstingN. (2008). Using video clips as item prompts to measure teachers’ knowledge of teaching mathematics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 845–861. doi:10.1177/0013164407313369
88.
KerstingN. B.GivvinK.SoteloF.StiglerJ. W. (2010). Teachers’ analyses of classroom video predict student learning of mathematics: Further explorations of a novel measure of teacher knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 172–181. doi:10.1177/0022487109347875
89.
KerstingN. B.GivvinK. B.ThompsonB.SantagataR.StiglerJ. (2012). Developing measures of usable knowledge: Teachers’ analyses of mathematics classroom videos predict teaching quality and student learning. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 568–590. doi:10.3102/0002831212437853
90.
KerstingN. B.SherinB. L.StiglerJ. W. (2014). Automated scoring of teachers’ open-ended responses to video prompts: Bringing the classroom-video-analysis assessment to scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0013164414521634
91.
KintschW. (1998). Comprehension. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
92.
KraussS.BaumertJ.BlumW. (2008). Secondary mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge: Validation of the COACTIV constructs. ZDM: International Journal of Mathematics Education, 40, 873–892. doi:10.1007/s11858-008-0141-9
93.
KraussS.BrunnerM.KunterM.BaumertJ.NeubrandM.BlumW.JordanA. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 716–725. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.716
94.
KucanL.HapgoodS.PalincsarA. S. (2011). Teachers’ specialized knowledge for supporting student comprehension in text-based discussions. Elementary School Journal, 112, 61–82. doi:10.1086/660689
95.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 465–491. doi:10.3102/00028312032003465
96.
LampertM. (2010). Learning teaching in, from, and for practice: What do we mean?Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 21–34. doi:10.1177/0022487109347321
97.
LampertM.FrankeM. L.KazemiE.GhousseiniH.TurrouA. C.BeasleyH.. . . CroweK. (2013). Keeping it complex using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 226–243. doi:10.1177/0022487112473837
98.
LaveJ. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
99.
LeinhardtG. (1993). Weaving instructional explanations in history. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 46–74. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01041.x
100.
LeinhardtG.GreenoJ. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 75–95. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.78.2.75
MaL. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
103.
MagnussonS.KrajcikJ.BorkoH. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In Gess-NewsomeJ.LedermanN. G. (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
104.
McDonaldM. A. (2010). Social justice teacher education and the case for enacting high-leverage practices. Teacher Education and Practice, 23, 452–455.
105.
McDonaldM.KazemiE.KavanaghS. S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 378–386. doi:10.1177/0022487113493807
106.
MessickS. (1989). Validity. In LinnR. (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–100). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
MislevyR. J.HaertelG. D. (2006). Implications of evidence-centered design for educational testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 25(4), 6–20. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2006.00075.x
109.
Monte-SanoC.BudanoC. (2013). Developing and enacting pedagogical content knowledge for teaching history: An exploration of two novice teachers’ growth over three years. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22, 171–211. doi:10.1080/10508406.2012.742016
110.
MossP. A. (1998). Rethinking validity in the assessment of teaching. In LyonsN.GrantG. (Eds.), With portfolio in hand: Portfolios in teaching and teacher education (pp. 202–219). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
111.
MossP. A. (2010). Thinking systemically about assessment practice. In KennedyM. (Ed.), Teacher assessment and the quest for teacher quality: A handbook (pp. 355–374). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
The National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform (A report to the nation and the Secretary of Education, U.S. Department of Education). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://datacenter.spps.org/uploads/sotw_a_nation_at_risk_1983.pdf
115.
National Council for the Social Studies. (1994). Expectations of excellence: Curriculum standards for social studies. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED378131.pdf
116.
National Council of Teachers of English & the International Reading Association. (1996). Standards for the English language arts. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
117.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
118.
National Council on Education Standards and Testing. (1992). Raising standards for American education: A report to Congress, the Secretary of Education, the National Education Goals Panel, and the American people. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED338721.pdf
119.
National Education Goals Panel. (1993). The National Education Goals Report: Building a nation of learners: Vol. 1. The national report. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED360394.pdf
120.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards. Washington, DC: Author.
National Research Council. (2001a). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment (PellegrinoJ.ChudowskyN.GlaserR. Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309072727
124.
National Research Council. (2001b). Testing teacher candidates: The role of licensure tests in improving teacher quality. (MitchellK. J.RobinsonD. Z.PlakeB. S.KnowlesK. T.Eds.). Committee on Assessment and Teacher Quality, Center for Education. Board on Testing and Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10090
125.
National Research Council. (2008). Assessing accomplished teaching: Advanced-level certification programs (HakelM. D.KoenigJ. A.ElliottS. W. Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
126.
National Research Council. (2010). Preparing teachers: Building evidence for sound policy. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12882
127.
NeissM. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509–523. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006
128.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
129.
NoddingsN. (2005). The challenge to care in schools (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
130.
NormanD. A.RumelhartD. E. (1975). Reference and comprehension. In NormanD. A.RumelhartD. E., & the LNR Research Group (Eds.), Explorations in cognition (pp. 65–87). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
131.
Pearson Education, Inc. (2014). California Educator Credentialing Examinations: California Basic Educational Skills Test™ (CBEST®). Amherst, MA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ctcexams.nesinc.com/about_CBEST.asp
132.
PhelpsG. (2009). Just knowing how to read isn’t enough! Assessing knowledge for teaching reading. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 137–154. doi:10.1007/s11092-009-9070-6
133.
PhelpsG.SchillingS. (2004). Developing measures of content knowledge for teaching reading. Elementary School Journal, 105, 31–48. doi:10.1086/428764
134.
PruchaF. P. (Ed.). (1973). Official report of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of Charities and Correction. In Americanizing the American Indians: Writings by the “friends of the Indian”: 1880–1900 (pp. 260–271). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/4929/ (Original work published 1892)
135.
PullinD. C. (2001). Key questions in implementing teacher testing and licensing. Journal of Law & Education, 30, 383–429.
136.
RavitchD.ViterittiJ. P. (Eds.). (2001). Making good citizens: Education and civil society. Binghamton, NY: Vail-Ballou Press.
RowlandT.HuckstepP.ThwaitesA. (2005). Elementary teachers’ mathematics subject knowledge: The knowledge quartet and the case of Naomi. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 255–281. doi:10.1007/s10857-005-0853-5
140.
RumelhartD. E.NormanD. A. (1978). Accretion, tuning and restructuring: Three modes of learning. In CottonJ. W.KlatzkyR. (Eds.), Semantic factors in cognition (pp. 37–53). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
141.
RyleG. (1946). Knowing how and knowing that: The presidential address. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 46, 1–16. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4544405
142.
SchankR. C.AbelsonR. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
143.
SchillingS. G.BlunkM.HillH. C. (2007). Test validation and the MKT measures: Generalizations and conclusions. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 5, 118–127. doi:10.1080/15366360701487146
144.
ShepardL. (1993). Evaluating test validity. Review of Research in Education, 19, 405–450. doi:10.3102/0091732X019001405
145.
ShulmanL. (1986). Paradigms and research programs for the study of teaching. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 3–36). New York, NY: Macmillan.
146.
ShulmanL. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.
147.
SinharayS. (2010). How often do subscores have added value? Results from operational and simulated data. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47, 150–174. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2010.00106.x
TattoM.SchwilleJ.SenkS.IngvarsonL.PeckR.RowleyG. (2008). Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M): Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics. Conceptual framework. East Lansing: College of Education, Michigan State University.
TroyanF. J.DavinK. J.DonatoR. (2013). Exploring a practice-based approach to foreign language teacher preparation: A work in progress. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69, 154–180. doi:10.3138/cmlr.1523
153.
TurkanS.de OliveiraL.LeeO.PhelpsG. (2014). Proposing a knowledge base for teaching academic content to English language learners: Disciplinary linguistic knowledge. Teachers College Record, 116(4). Retrieved from https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=17361
154.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education. (2011). Preparing and credentialing the nation’s teachers: The Secretary’s eighth report on teacher quality based on data provided for 2008, 2009 and 2010. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://title2.ed.gov/Public/TitleIIReport11.pdf
155.
van DrielJ. H.VerloopN.de VosW. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 673–695. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<673::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-J
156.
VossT.KunterM.BaumertJ. (2011). Assessing teacher candidates’ general pedagogical/psychological knowledge: Test construction and validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 952–969. doi:10.1037/a0025125
157.
WaddellL. R. (2014). Using culturally ambitious teaching practices to support urban mathematics teaching and learning. Journal of Praxis in Multicultural Education, 8(2). doi:10.9741/2161-2978.1069
158.
WellmanH. M.GelmanS. A. (1997). Knowledge acquisition in foundational domains. In KuhnD.SieglerR. S. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 523–573). New York, NY: John Wiley. doi:10.1002/9780470147658
159.
WilsonA. J. (1985, April). Knowledge for teachers: The origin of the National Teachers Examinations Program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED262049.pdf
160.
WilsonS. M.FlodenR. E.Ferrini-MundyJ. (2002). Teacher preparation research: An insider’s view from the outside. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 190–204. doi:10.1177/0022487102053003002
161.
WilsonS. M.WineburgS. S. (1988). Peering at history through different lenses: The role of disciplinary perspectives in teaching history. Teachers College Record, 89, 525–539. Retrieved from https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=540
162.
WilsonS. M.WineburgS. S. (1993). Wrinkles in time and place: Using performance-based exercises to assess the knowledge of history teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 30(4), 729–769. doi:10.3102/00028312030004729
163.
WilsonS. M.YoungsP. (2005). Research on accountability processes in teacher education. In Cochran-SmithM.ZeichnerK. M. (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 591–644). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
164.
WindschitlM.ThompsonJ.BraatenM.StroupeD. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96, 878–903. doi:10.1002/sce.21027
165.
ZeichnerK. (2012). The turn once again toward practice-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 376–382. doi:10.1177/0022487112445789