Adaptations and Access to Assessment of Common Core Content

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.

Arizona Department of Education (2008). Arizona’s Instrument to Measure Standards. Retrieved from http://www.azed.gov/assessment/aims/

Beddow P. A. Kettler R. J. Elliott S. N. (2008). Test Accessibility and Modification Inventory. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University. Retrieved from http://peabody.vanderbilt.edu/research/pro/about_peabody_research/funded_projects/caaves_project_home/tami_project.php

Brown J. I. Fishco V. V. Hanna G. (1993). Nelson-Denny Reading Test: Technical report forms G & H. Chicago, IL: Riverside.

Carrizales D. Tindal G. (2009). Test design and validation of inferences for the Oregon alternate assessment In Lissitz R. Schafer W. (Eds.), Assessments in educational reform (pp. 240–275). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

Center for Universal Design. (1997). The principles of universal design. Retrieved from http://www.ncsu.edu/ncsu/design/cud/about_ud/udprinciples.htm

Chandler P. Sweller J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293–332.

College Board. (2005). The Scholastic Aptitude Test. New York, NY: Author.

Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2013). Grade 4: Number & operations in base 10. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Content/4/NBT

Cook L. Eignor D. Sawaki Y. Steinberg J. Cline F. (2010). Using factor analysis to investigate accommodations used by students with disabilities on an English-language arts assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 23, 187–208.

Cormier D. C. Altman J. R. Shyyan V. Thurlow M. L. (2010). A summary of the research on the effects of test accommodations: 2007-2008 (Technical Report No. 56). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.

Cronbach L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.

CTB/McGraw-Hill (2000). Guidelines for using the results of standardized tests administered under nonstandard conditions. Monterey, CA: Author.

CTB McGraw-Hill. (2008). North Dakota State Assessments: Fall 2008 administration final technical report. Monterey, CA: Author.

Data Recognition Corporation & WestEd. (2008). LAA 2: 2008 Operational technical report. Washington, DC: Author.

Data Recognition Corporation & Pacific Metric Corporation. (2008a). iLEAP 2008: Operational technical report. Washington, DC: Author.

Data Recognition Corporation & Pacific Metric Corporation. (2008b). LEAP 2008: Operational technical report. Washington, DC: Author.

DiPerna J. C. Elliott S. N. (1999). Development and validation of the Academic Competence Evaluation Scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 17, 207–255.

DiPerna J. C. Elliott S. N. (2000). Academic Competence Evaluation Scales manual K-12. Washington, DC: Psychological Corporation.

DiPerna J. C. Volpe R. J. Elliott S. N. (2002). A model of academic enablers and elementary reading/language arts achievement. School Psychology Review, 31, 298–312.

DiPerna J. C. Volpe R. J. Elliott S. N. (2005). A model of academic enablers and mathematics achievement in the elementary grades. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 379–392.

Elliott S. N. Kettler R. J. Beddow P. A. Kurz A. Compton E. McGrath D. . . . Roach A. T. (2010). Effects of using modified items to test students with persistent academic difficulties. Exceptional Children, 76, 475–495.

Elliott S. N. Kratochwill T. R. Schulte A. (1999). The Assessment Accommodation Checklist. Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw-Hill.

Elliott S. N. Rodriguez M. C. Roach A. T. Kettler R. J. Beddow P. A. Kurz A. (2009). AIMS EA 2009 pilot study. Nashville, TN: Learning Sciences Institute, Vanderbilt University.

Fuchs L. S. Fuchs D. (2001). Helping teachers formulate sound test accommodation decisions for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 174–181.

Fuchs L. S. Fuchs D. Eaton S. B. Hamlett C. Karns K. (2000). Supplementing teacher judgments of test accommodations with objective data sources. School Psychology Review, 29, 65–85.

Fuchs L. S. Fuchs D. Capizzi A. M. (2005). Identifying appropriate test accommodations for students with learning disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 37(6), 1–8.

Haladyna T. M. Downing S. M. Rodriguez M. C. (2002). A review of multiple-choice item-writing guidelines for classroom assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 15, 309–344.

Herman J. L. Klein D. C. Abedi J. (2000). Assessing students’ opportunity to learn: Teacher and student perspectives. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 19(4), 16–24.

Improving America’s Schools Act of 1994. Pub. L. 103-382, 108 Stat. 3518.

Individuals With Disabilities Education Act of 1997. Pub. L. 101-476, 104 Stat. 1142.

Ketterlin-Geller L. R. Jamgochian E. M. (2011). Instructional adaptations: Accommodations and modifications that support accessible instruction. In Elliott S. N. Kettler R. J. Beddow P. A. Kurz A. (Eds.), Handbook of accessible achievement tests for all students: Bridging the gaps between research, practice, and policy (pp. 131–146). New York, NY: Springer.

Kettler R. J. (2011a). Effects of packages of modifications to improve test and item accessibility: Less is more. In Elliott S. N. Kettler R. J. Beddow P. A. Kurz A. (Eds.), Handbook of accessible achievement tests for all students: Bridging the gaps between research, practice, and policy (pp. 231–242). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9356-4_13

Kettler R. J. (2011b). Holding modified assessments accountable: Applying a unified reliability and validity framework to the development and evaluation of AA-MASs. In Russell M. (Ed.), Assessing students in the margins: Challenges, strategies, and techniques (pp. 311–334). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Kettler R. J. (2012). Testing accommodations: Theory and research to inform practice. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 5, 53–66. doi:10.1080/1034912X.2012.654952

Kettler R. J. Dickenson T. S. Bennett H. L. Morgan G. B. Gilmore J. A. Beddow P. A. . . . Palmer P. W. (2012). Enhancing the accessibility of high school science tests: A multi-state experiment. Exceptional Children, 79, 91–106.

Kettler R. J. Elliott S. N. Beddow P. A. (2009). Modifying achievement test items: A theory-guided and data-based approach for better measurement of what students with disabilities know. Peabody Journal of Education, 84, 529–551. doi:10.1080/01619560903240996

Kettler R. J. Rodriguez M. R. Bolt D. M. Elliott S. N. Beddow P. A. Kurz A. (2011). Modified multiple-choice items for alternate assessments: Reliability, difficulty, and differential boost. Applied Measurement in Education, 24, 210–234. doi:10.1080/08957347.2011.580620

Koretz D. M. Hamilton L. S. (2006). Testing for accountability in K-12. In Brennan R. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 531–578). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

Kurz A. (2011). Access to what should be taught and will be tested: Students’ opportunity to learn the intended curriculum. In Elliott S. N. Kettler R. J. Beddow P. A. Kurz A. (Eds.), Handbook of accessible achievement tests for all students: Bridging the gaps between research, practice, and policy (pp. 99–129). New York, NY: Springer.

Kurz A. Elliott S. N. Shrago J. S. (2009). MyiLOGS: My instructional learning opportunities guidance system. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.

Lindstrom J. H. Gregg N. (2007). The role of extended time on the SAT for students with learning disabilities and/or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 85–95.

Louisiana Department of Education. (2008a). 2008 LAA 2 technical summary. Baton Rouge, LA: Author.

Louisiana Department of Education. (2008b). LEAP GEE 2008 technical summary. Baton Rouge, LA: Author.

Louisiana Department of Education. (2009). iLEAP 2009 technical summary. Baton Rouge, LA: Author.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, § 115, Stat. 1425 (2002).

North Dakota Department of Public Instruction. (2009). North Dakota Alternate Assessment-2: Technical manual final report. Bismarck, ND: Author.

Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers. (2013, July 25). PARCC Accessibility features and accommodations manual, guidance for districts and decision-making teams to ensure that PARCC mid-year, performance-based, and end-of-year assessments produce valid results for all students. Author.

Phillips S. (2011). U.S. legal issues in educational testing of special populations. In Elliott S. N. Kettler R. J. Beddow P. A. Kurz A. (Eds.), Handbook of accessible achievement tests for all students: Bridging the gaps between research, practice, and policy (pp. 231–242). New York, NY: Springer.

Phillips S. E. Camara W. J. (2006). Legal and ethical issues. In Brennan R. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., 733–757). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

Poggio A. J. Yang X. Irwin P. M. Glasnapp D. R. Poggio J. P. (2006). Kansas Assessments in Reading and Mathematics: Technical manual. Lawrence: University of Kansas, Center for Educational Testing and Evaluation. Retrieved from https://cete.ku.edu/sites/cete.drupal.ku.edu/files/docs/Technical_Reports/2007/irwin2007_KAMM.pdf

Randall J. Engelhard G. (2010). Using confirmatory factor analysis and the Rasch model to assess measurement invariance in a high stakes reading assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 23, 286–306.

Roach A. T. Beddow P. A. Kurz A. Kettler R. J. Elliott S. N. (2010). Incorporating student input in developing alternate assessments based on modified academic achievement standards. Exceptional Children, 77, 61–80.

Rodriguez M. C. (2005). Three options are optimal for multiple-choice items: A meta-analysis of 80 years of research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 24(2), 3–13.

Rogers C. M. Christian E. M. Thurlow M. L. (2012). A summary of the research on the effects of test accommodations: 2009-2010 (Technical Report No. 65). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.

Russell M. Famularo L. (2009). Testing what students in the gap can do. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 9(4), 1–28.

Sireci S. G. Scarpati S. E. Li S. (2005). Test accommodations for students with disabilities: An analysis of the interaction hypothesis. Review of Educational Research, 75, 457–490.

Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium. (2013). Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium: Usability, accessibility, and accommodations guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.smarterbalanced.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/SmarterBalanced_Guidelines_091113.pdf

Smith R. L. Chard L. (2007). A study of item format and delivery mode from the California Modified Assessment (CMA) pilot test. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Texas Education Agency. (2009, May 7). Technical digest 2007-2008. Austin, TX: Author. Retrieved from http://www.tea.state.tx.us

Texas Student Assessment Program. (2007). Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills-Modified: Technical report. Austin, TX: Author. Retrieved from http://www.tea.state.tx.us

Thurlow A. House C. Boys D. Scott J. Ysseldyke J. E. (2000). State participation and accommodation policies for students with disabilities: 1999 Update (Synthesis Report No. 33). Minneapolis: National Center on Educational Outcomes.

U.S. Department of Education. (2007a). Modified academic achievement standards: Non-regulatory guidance. Washington, DC: Author.

U.S. Department of Education. (2007b). Standards and assessments peer review guidance. Washington, DC: Author.

U.S. Department of Education. (2012). Teacher Incentive Fund. Retrieved from www2.ed.gov/programs/teacherincentive

Wechsler D. (2009). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test: 3rd edition (WIAT-III). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

Zenisky A. L. Sireci S. G. (2007). A summary of the research on the effects of test accommodations: 2005-2006 (Technical Report No. 47). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.