AbediJ. (2004). The No Child Left Behind Act and English language learners: Assessment and accountability issues. Educational Researcher, 33(1), 4–14.
2.
AbediJ.HermanJ. (2010). Assessing English language learners’ opportunity to learn mathematics: Issues and limitations. Teachers College Record, 112, 723–746.
3.
AbediJ.LordC. (2001). The language factor in mathematics tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 219–234.
4.
AlexanderD.HeavisideS.FarrisE.BurnsS. (1998). Status of education reform in public elementary and secondary schools: Teachers’ perspectives (NCES No. 1999-045). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
5.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6.
AndersonL. W. (2000). Time, learning, and school reform: A conceptual framework. In GandaraP. C. (Ed.), The dimensions of time and the challenge of school reform (pp. 13–29). Albany: SUNY Press.
7.
AngristJ. D.DynarskiS. M.KaneT. J.PathakP. A.WaltersC. R. (2010). Inputs and impacts in charter schools: KIPP Lynn. American Economic Review, 100, 239–243.
8.
ArtilesA. J.BarretoR. M.PenaL.McClaffertyK. (1998). Pathways to teacher learning in multicultural contexts: A longitudinal case study of two novice bilingual teachers in urban schools. Remedial and Special Education, 19, 70–90.
9.
ArtilesA. J.KlingnerJ. K. (2006). Forging a knowledge base on English language learners with special needs: Theoretical, population, and technical issues. Teachers College Record, 108, 2187–2194.
10.
ArtilesA. J.OrtizA. (Eds.). (2002). English language learners with special needs: Identification, placement, and instruction. Washington. DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
11.
ArtilesA. J.RuedaR.SalazarJ. J.HigaredaI. (2005). Within-group diversity in minority disproportionate representation: English language learners in urban school districts. Exceptional Children, 71, 283–300.
12.
AyalaC. C.ShavelsonR. J.Ruiz-PrimoM. A.BrandonP. R.YinY.FurtakE. M.YoungD. B. (2008). From formal embedded assessments to reflective lessons: The development of formative assessment studies. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 315–334.
13.
BachmanL. F. (2000). Modern language testing at the turn of the century: Assuring that what we count counts. Language Testing, 17, 1–42.
14.
BartolomeL. I. (2004). Critical pedagogy and teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 31, 97–122.
15.
BlackP.HarrisonC.LeeC.MarshallB.WiliamD. (2004). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
16.
BlankM.FrankS. M. (1971). Story recall in kindergarten children: Effect of method of presentation on psycholinguistic performance. Child Development, 42, 299–312.
17.
BreedloveL. (2007). Identifying linguistically diverse students as gifted and talented: A qualitative study of adding a new measure (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University, College Station.
BunchG. C. (2013). Pedagogical language knowledge: Preparing mainstream teachers for English learners in the new standards era. Review of Research in Education, 37, 298–341. doi:10.3102/0091732X12461772
20.
BunchG. C.AbramP. L.LotanR. A.ValdesG. (2001). Beyond sheltered instruction: Rethinking conditions for academic language development. TESOL Journal, 10(2), 2–3.
21.
BunchG. C.AguirreJ. M.TéllezK. (2009). Beyond the scores: Using candidate responses on a high stakes performance assessment to inform teacher preparation for English learners. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(1), 26.
CallahanR. M. (2005). Tracking and high school English learners: Limiting opportunity to learn. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 305–328.
25.
CampbellC.EvansJ. A. (2000). Investigation of preservice teachers’ classroom assessment practices during student teaching. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 350–355.
26.
Celedón-PattichisS. (2004). Rethinking policies and procedures for placing English language learners in mathematics. NABE Journal of Research and Practice, 2, 176–192.
27.
Celedón-PattichisS.MusantiS. (2013). “Let’s suppose that . . .”: Developing base-ten thinking. In GottliebM.Ernst-SlavitG. (Eds.), Academic language demands for language learners: From text to context (pp. 87–128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
28.
ChomskyN. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York, NY: Praeger.
29.
CizekG. J. (2000). Pockets of resistance in the assessment revolution. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 19(2), 16–23.
30.
CizekG. J. (2010). An introduction to formative assessment: History, characteristics, and challenges. In AndradeH.CizekG. (Eds.). Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 3–18). New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
CizekG. J.FitzgeraldS. M.RachorR. A. (1995). Teachers’ assessment practices: Preparation, isolation, and the kitchen sink. Educational Assessment, 3, 159–179.
32.
ClineZ.NecocheaJ.RiosF. (2004). The tyranny of democracy: Deconstructing the passage of racist propositions. Journal of Latinos and Education, 3(2), 67–85.
33.
Cochran-SmithM. (2001). The outcomes question in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 527–546.
34.
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: CCSSO & National Governors Association.
35.
CumminsJ. (1982). Tests, achievement, and bilingual students. Focus, 9, 1–8.
36.
DanielL. G.KingD. A. (1998). Knowledge and use of testing and measurement literacy of elementary and secondary teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 91, 331–344.
37.
Darling-HammondL. (1999). Reshaping teaching policy, preparation, and practice. Influences of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
Darling-HammondL.McLaughlinM. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 597–604.
40.
DattaL.-E. (1981). Damn the experts and full speed ahead: An examination of the study of Federal programs supporting educational change as evidence against directed development and for local problem-solving. Evaluation Review, 5, 5–32.
41.
Diaz-RicoL. T.WeedK. Z. (2009). The crosscultural, language, and academic development handbook: A complete K-12 reference guide. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
42.
DuranR. P. (2008). Assessing English-Language Learners’ achievement. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 292–327.
43.
FaltisC. (1990). Spanish for native speakers: Freirian and Vygotskian perspectives. Foreign Language Annals, 23, 117–125.
44.
FloresA. (2007). Examining disparities in mathematics education: Achievement gap or opportunity gap?High School Journal, 91, 29–42.
45.
FrederiksenJ. R.WhiteB. J. (1997). Reflective assessment of students’ research within an inquiry-based middle school science curriculum. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AERA, Chicago, IL.
46.
FreemanD. (1991). To make the tacit explicit: Teacher education, emerging discourse, and conceptions of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7, 439–454.
47.
FreemanD.JohnsonK. E. (1998). Reconceptualizing the knowledge base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 397–417.
48.
GándaraP. C. (2000). The dimensions of time and the challenge of school reform. Albany: SUNY Press.
49.
GándaraP. C.Maxwell-JollyJ. (2006). Critical issues in developing a teacher corps for English learners. In TéllezK.WaxmanH. C. (Eds.). Preparing quality educators for English language learners: Research, policies, and practices (pp. 99–120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50.
GándaraP.RumbergerR. (2009). Immigration, language, and education: How does language policy structure opportunity?Teachers College Record, 111, 750–782.
GarcíaE. (1990). Educating teachers for language minority students. In HoustonW. R. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 717–729). New York, NY: Macmillan.
53.
GarcíaO.KleifgenJ. A.FalchiL. (2008). From English language learners to emergent bilinguals. New York, NY: Teachers College.
54.
GarzaC. L. (1990). Family pictures/Cuadros de familia. San Francisco, CA: Children’s Book Press.
55.
GouldS. J. (1996). The mismeasure of man (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
56.
GrosjeanF. (1989). Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain & Language, 36, 3–15.
57.
HaagN.HepptB.StanatP.KuhlP.PantH. A. (2013). Second language learners’ performance in mathematics: Disentangling the effects of academic language features. Learning and Instruction, 28, 24–34.
58.
HallidayM. A. (1969). Relevant models of language. Educational Review, 22(1), 26–37.
59.
HalterC. P. (2006). The reflective lens: The effects of video analysis on preservice teacher development (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California at San Diego.
60.
HarperC. A.de JongE. J.PlattE. J. (2008). Marginalizing English as a second language teacher expertise: The exclusionary consequence of No Child Left Behind. Language Policy, 7, 267–284.
61.
HarrisD. P. (1969). Testing English as a second language. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
62.
HeritageM. (2007). What do teachers need to know and do?Phi Delta Kappan, 89, 140–145.
63.
HeritageM. (2010). Formative assessment and next-generation assessment systems: Are we losing an opportunity?Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
64.
HeritageM. K.KimJ.VendlinskiT. P.HermanJ. L. (2009). From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment?Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 24–31.
65.
HeubertJ. P.HauserR. M. (Eds.). (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
66.
HilliardA. G. (2000). Excellence in education versus high-stakes standardized testing. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 293–304.
67.
Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow’s teachers: A report of the Holmes Group. New York, NY: Author.
68.
HuG. (2003). English language teaching in China: Regional differences and contributing factors. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 24, 290–318.
69.
JohnstonB. (2002). Values in English language teaching: Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
70.
Jones-MackenzieC. (2005). Knowledge about language and testing. In BartelsN. (Ed.), Applied linguistics and language teacher education (Vol. 4, pp. 313–324). New York, NY: Springer.
71.
KlingnerJ. K.Solano-FloresG. (2007). Cultural responsiveness in response-to-intervention models. In LaitusisC. C.CookL. L. (Eds.), Large-scale assessment and accommodations: What works? (pp. 229–241). Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
72.
KnightS. L.WisemanD. L. (2006). Lessons learned from a research synthesis on the effects of teachers’ professional development on culturally diverse students. In TéllezK.WaxmanH. C. (Eds.), Preparing quality educators for English language learners: Research, policy, and practice (pp. 71–98. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
73.
KrashenS. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London, England: Longman.
74.
KumaravadiveluB. (2005). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. New York, NY: Routledge.
75.
LaplanteB. (2000). Learning science is learning to “speak science”: Students in immersion classes talk to us about chemical reactions. Canadian Modern Language Review-Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes, 57, 245–271.
76.
LeeO.QuinnH.ValdésG. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to next generation Science Standards and with implications for Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42, 223–233.
77.
LlosaL. (2011). Standards-based classroom assessments of English proficiency: A review of issues, current developments, and future directions for research. Language Testing, 28, 367–382.
78.
LucasT.VillegasA. M. (2010). The missing piece in teacher education: The preparation of linguistically responsive teachers. National Society for the Study of Education, 109, 297–318.
79.
MaclellanE. (2004). Initial knowledge states about assessment: Novice teachers’ conceptualisations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 523–535.
80.
MahoneyK. S.MacSwanJ. (2005). Reexamining identification and reclassification of English language learners: A critical discussion of select state practices. Bilingual Research Journal, 29, 31–42.
81.
MartinielloM. (2008). Language and the performance of English-language learners in math word problems. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 333–368.
82.
MartinielloM. (2009). Linguistic complexity, schematic representations, and differential item functioning for English language learners in math tests. Educational Assessment, 14, 160–179.
83.
McCartyT. L. (2009). The impact of high-stakes accountability policies on Native American learners: Evidence from research. Teaching Education, 20, 7–29.
84.
McMillanJ. H. (2000). Fundamental assessment principles for teachers and school administrators. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(8). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=8
85.
McMillanJ. H. (2003). Understanding and improving teachers’ classroom assessment decision making: Implications for theory and practice. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 34–43.
86.
MenkenK. (2008). English learners left behind: Standardized testing as language policy (Vol. 65). Bristol, England: Multilingual matters.
87.
MertlerC. A. (2009). Teachers’ assessment knowledge and their perceptions of the impact of classroom assessment professional development. Improving Schools, 12, 101–113.
88.
MertlerC. A.CampbellC. (2005, April). Measuring teachers’ knowledge and application of classroom assessment concepts: Development of the Assessment Literacy Inventory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
89.
MinicucciC. (2000). Effective use of time in the education of English language learners. In GandaraP. C. (Ed.). The dimensions of time and the challenge of school reform (pp. 49–58). Albany: SUNY Press.
90.
MosquedaE. (2010). Compounding inequalities: English proficiency and tracking and their relation to mathematics performance among Latina/o secondary school youth. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 3, 57–81.
91.
MosquedaE.MaldonadoS. I. (2013). The effects of English language proficiency and curricular pathways: Latina/os’ mathematics achievement in secondary schools. Equity & Excellence in Education, 46, 202–219.
National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2012a). Early and middle childhood/English as a new language: Portfolio instructions. Retrieved from http://www.nbpts.org/art-emc
94.
National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2012b). Early adolescence through young adulthood/English as a new language: Portfolio instructions. Retrieved from http://www.nbpts.org/art-eaya
95.
NewmanM.HanauerD. (2005). The NCATE/TESOL teacher education standards: A critical review. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 753–764.
96.
OrtizA. A.RobertsonP. M.WilkinsonC. Y.LiuY.-J.McGheeB. D.KushnerM. I. (2011). The role of bilingual education teachers in preventing inappropriate referrals of ELLs to special education: Implications for response to intervention. Bilingual Research Journal, 34, 316–333.
97.
PáezM. M. (2008). English language proficiency and bilingual verbal ability among Chinese, Dominican, and Haitian immigrant students. Equity & Excellence in Education, 41, 311–324.
98.
PandyaJ. Z. (2011). Overtested: How high-stakes accountability fails English language learners. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
PlakeB. S.ImparaJ. C.FagerJ. J. (1993). Assessment competencies of teachers: A national survey. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(4), 10–12.
102.
PophamW. J. (2003). Seeking redemption for our psychometric sins. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(1), 45–48.
103.
PophamW. J. (2006). Needed: A dose of assessment literacy. Educational Leadership, 63(6), 84–85.
104.
PophamW. J. (2011). Assessment literacy overlooked: A teacher educator’s confession. The Teacher Educator, 46, 265–273.
105.
PorterJ. M. (2010). Performance Assessment for California Teachers (PACT): An evaluation of inter-rater reliability (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Davis.
106.
RandallJ.EngelhardG. (2010). Examining the grading practices of teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1372–1380.
107.
RivkinS. G.HanushekE. A.KainJ. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73, 417–458.
108.
RodriguezD. (2009). Meeting the needs of English language learners with disabilities in urban settings. Urban Education, 44, 452–464.
109.
RothR. A. (1996). Standards for certification, licensure, and accreditation. In SikulaJ. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 242–278). New York, NY: Macmillan.
110.
Ruiz-de-VelascoJ.FixM. (2000). Overlooked and underserved: Immigrant students in U.S. secondary schools. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
111.
Ruiz-PrimoM. A.FurtakE. M.AyalaC.YinY.ShavelsonR. J. (2010). Formative assessment, motivation, and science learning. In AndradeH.CizekG. (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 139–158). New York, NY: Routledge.
112.
RumbergerR.GándaraP. (2004). Seeking equity in the education of California’s English learners. Teachers College Record, 106, 2031–2055.
113.
SadlerD. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.
114.
SalvatoriM. R. (2003). Pedagogy: Disturbing history, 1819-1929. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
115.
SandholtzJ. H.SheaL. M. (2012). Predicting performance: A comparison of university supervisors’ predictions and teacher candidates’ scores on a Teaching Performance Assessment. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 39–50.
116.
San MiguelG. (2004). Contested policy: The rise and fall of federal bilingual education in the United States, 1960-2001. Denton: University of North Texas Press.
117.
SantosM.Darling-HammondL.CheukT. (2012). Teacher development to support English language learners in the context of common core state standards. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
118.
SarupM. (1993). An introductory guide to post-structuralism and postmodernism. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
119.
ScrivenM. (1991). Beyond formative and summative evaluation. In McLaughlinM. W.PhillipsD. C. (Eds.), Evaluation and education: At quarter century, 90th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 18–64). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
120.
ShawJ. M.BunchG. C.GeaneyE. R. (2010). Analyzing language demands facing English learners on science performance assessments: The SALD framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 909–928.
121.
ShepardL. A. (2006). Classroom assessment. In BrenanR. (Ed.), Educational Measurement (4th ed., pp. 624–646). Westport, CT: Praeger.
122.
SherinM. G.HanS. Y. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 163–183.
123.
ShulmanL. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.
124.
Solano-FloresG. (2006). Language, dialect, and register: Sociolinguistics and the estimation of measurement error in the testing of English language learners. The Teachers College Record, 108, 2354–2379.
125.
Solano-FloresG. (2011). Language issues in mathematics and the assessment of English language learners. In TéllezK.MoschkovichJ.CivilM. (Eds.), Latinos/as and mathematics education: Research on learning and teaching in classrooms and communities (pp. 283–314). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
126.
Solano-FloresG.TrumbullE. (2003). Examining language in context: The need for new research and practice paradigms in the testing of English-language learners. Educational Researcher, 32(2), 3–13.
127.
Solano-FloresG.TrumbullE.Nelson-BarberS. (2002). Concurrent development of dual language assessments: An alternative to translating tests for linguistic minorities. International Journal of Testing, 2, 107–129.
128.
SolórzanoR. W. (2008). High stakes testing: Issues, implications, and remedies for English language learners. Review of Educational Research, 78, 260–329.
129.
Stanton-SalazarR. D. (2001). Empowering relations of support between students and school personnel. In Manufacturing hope and despair: The school and kin support networks of U.S.-Mexican youth. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
130.
StigginsR. J. (1991). Assessment Literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 72, 534–539.
131.
StigginsR. J. (2001). The unfulfilled promise of classroom assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(3), 5–15.
132.
TangG. (1992). The effect of graphic representation of knowledge structures on ESL reading comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 177–195.
133.
TaubmanP. M. (2009). Teaching by numbers: Deconstructing the discourse of standards and accountability in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
134.
TéllezK. (1998). Class placement of elementary school emerging bilingual students. Bilingual Research Journal, 22, 279–295.
135.
TéllezK. (2003). Three themes on standards in teacher education: Legislative expediency, the role of external review, and test bias in the assessment of pedagogical knowledge. Teacher Education Quarterly, 30, 9–18.
136.
TéllezK. (2010). Teaching English language learners: Fostering language and the democratic experience. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
137.
TéllezK. (in press). An analysis of the structure and assessment of standards for teacher candidates and programs. In WaxmanH. C.AlfordB. L.BrownD.RollinsK. (Eds.), Preparing teachers to implement college and career readiness standards: Integrating research, policy, and practice. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
138.
TéllezK.MantheyG. (in press). Teachers’ perceptions of collective efficacy of school-wide programs and strategies for English language learners. Learning Environments Research.
139.
TéllezK.MoschkovichJ.CivilM. (Eds.). (2011). Latinos/as and mathematics education: Research on learning and teaching in classrooms and communities. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
140.
TéllezK.VargheseM. (2013). Teachers as intellectuals and advocates: Professional development for bilingual education teachers. Theory Into Practice, 52, 128–135.
TheoharisG.O’TooleJ. (2011). Leading inclusive ELL social justice leadership for English Language learners. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 646–688.
143.
ThompsonA. (2008, December). Using video technology to provide a professional development forum for reflection on the use of academic language for mathematics in elementary school teachers. Paper presented at conference of the California Mathematics Council North, Asilomar, CA.
144.
TrujilloA. L. (1998). Chicano empowerment and bilingual education: Movimiento politics in Crystal City, Texas. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
145.
TrujilloA. L. (2005). Politics, school philosophy, and language policy: The case of Crystal City schools. Educational Policy, 19, 621–654.
146.
TuttleC. C.TehB.-R.Nichols-BarrerI.GillB. P.GleasonP. (2010). Student characteristics and achievement in 22 KIPP middle schools. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
147.
ValdesG.FigueroaR. A. (1994). Bilingualism and testing: A special issue of bias. Norwood, NJ: Abex.
148.
ValenciaR. R.SuzukiL. A. (2000). Intelligence testing and minority students: Foundations, performance factors, and assessment issues (Vol. 3). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
149.
ValenzuelaA. (2000). Chicano empowerment and bilingual education: Movimiento politics in Crystal City, Texas by A. Trujillo. Bilingual Research Journal, 24, 207–212.
150.
ValenzuelaA. (2010). Subtractive schooling: US-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: SUNY Press.
151.
VeenmanS. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54, 143–178.
152.
VolanteL.FazioX. (2007). Exploring teacher candidates’ assessment literary: Implications for teacher education reform and professional development. Canadian Journal of Education, 30, 749–770.
153.
WeinsteinC. S. (1989). Teacher education students’ preconceptions of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2), 53–60.
154.
WolfM. K.LeonS. (2009). An investigation of the language demands in content assessments for English language learners. Educational Assessment, 14, 139–159.
155.
WoodcockR. W.McGrewK.MatherN. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson tests of achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
156.
XuY.LiuY. (2009). Teacher assessment knowledge and practice: A narrative inquiry of a Chinese college EFL teacher’s experience. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 492–513.
157.
ZepedaM.CastroD. C.CroninS. (2011). Preparing early childhood teachers to work with young dual language learners. Child Development Perspectives, 5, 10–14.