BaleJ. (2008). When Arabic is the “target” language: National security, Title VI and Arabic language programs, 1958-1991 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Arizona State University, Tempe.
3.
BaleJ. (2011a). The campaign for Spanish language education in the “Colossus of the North,” 1914-1945. Language Policy, 10, 137–157.
4.
BaleJ. (2011b). Language and imperialism: The case of Title VI and Arabic, 1958-1991. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 9, 376–409.
5.
BaleJ. (2011c). Tongue-tied: Imperialism and second language education in the United States. Critical Education, 2(8), 1–25.
6.
BaleJ. (2013). Patriotic duties: The campaign for Spanish language education in the Americanization era. Manuscript submitted for publication.
7.
BrechtR. D. (2007). National language educational policy in the nation’s interests: Why? How? Who is responsible?Modern Language Journal, 91, 264–265.
8.
BrechtR. D.IngoldC. W. (2002). Tapping a national resource: Heritage languages in the United States. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/resources/Digest/0202brecht.html
9.
BrechtR. D.RiversW. P. (2000). Language and national security for the 21st century: The role of Title VI and Fulbright-Hays in supporting national language capacity. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
10.
BrintonD. M.KaganO.BauckusS. (2007). Heritage language education: A new field emerging. New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
CallinicosA. (2009). Imperialism and global political economy. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
EdwardsJ. D. (2004). The role of languages in a post-9/11 United States. Modern Language Journal, 88, 268–271.
17.
EdwardsJ. D.LenkerA. L.KahnD. (2008). National language policies: Pragmatism, process, and products. NECTFL Review, 63, 2–42.
18.
GarcíaO. (1992). Societal multilingualism in a multicultural world in transition. In ByrnesH. (Ed.), Languages for a multicultural world in transition (pp. 1–27). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.
19.
GarcíaO. (2005). Positioning heritage languages in the United States. Modern Language Journal, 89, 601–605.
20.
GumperzE. M. (1970). Internationalizing American higher education: Innovation and structural change.Berkeley: University of California, Center for Research and Development in Higher Education.
21.
HaugenE. I. (1972). The ecology of language. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
22.
HebelS. (2002, March15). National-security concerns spur Congressional interest in language programs. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A26.
23.
HermanD. M. (2002). “Our patriotic duty”: Insights from professional history, 1890-1920. In OsbornT. (Ed.), The future of foreign language education in the United States (pp. 1–29). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
24.
HinesR. (2001). An overview of Title VI. In O’MearaP.MehlingerH. D.NewmanR. M. (Eds.), Changing perspectives on international education (pp. 6–10). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
25.
IngoldC. W.WangS. C. (2010). The teachers we need: Transforming world language education in the United States. College Park: National Foreign Language Center at the University of Maryland. Retrieved from http://www.nflc.org/publications/the_teachers_we_need.pdf
KarierC. J. (1975). Shaping the American educational state, 1900 to the present. New York, NY: Free Press.
28.
KramschC. (2005). Post 9/11: Foreign languages between knowledge and power. Applied Linguistics, 26, 545–567.
29.
LambertR. D. (with BarberE. G.JordenE.MerrillM. B.TwarogL. I.). (1984). Beyond growth: The next stage in language and area studies. Washington, DC: Association of American Universities.
30.
LambertR. D. (1986). Points of leverage: An agenda for a national foundation for international studies. New York, NY: Social Science Research Council.
31.
LomawaimaK. T.McCartyT. L. (2006). To remain an Indian: Lessons in democracy from a century of Native American education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
32.
LuquiensF. B. (1915). The national need for Spanish. Yale Review, 4, 699–711.
33.
McCartyT. L. (Ed.). (2011). Ethnography and language policy. New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
McClymerJ. F. (1980). War and welfare: Social engineering in America, 1890-1925. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
35.
McGroartyM. (2006). Neoliberal collusion or strategic simultaneity? On multiple rationales for language-in-education policies. Language Policy, 5, 3–13.
36.
MirelJ. E. (2010). Patriotic pluralism: Americanization education and European immigrants. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
NavarroA. (1995). Mexican American Youth Organization: Avant-garde of the Chicano movement in Texas. Austin: University of Texas Press.
38.
O’ConnellM. E.NorwoodJ. L. (Eds.) (2007). International education and foreign languages: Keys to securing America's future. Washington, DC:National Academies Press.
39.
Office of Education Appropriations, FY71: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Departments of Labor and Health, Education and Welfare, of the Senate Committee on Appropriations, 91st Cong. 301(1970d) (Insertion of article by William H. Jones).
40.
OlneckM. R. (1989). Americanization and the education of immigrants, 1900-1925: An analysis of symbolic action. American Journal of Education, 97, 402–405.
41.
O’MearaP.MehlingerH. D.NewmanR. M. (Eds.). (2001). Changing perspectives on international education. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
42.
ParkerW. R. (1961). The national interest and foreign languages: A discussion guide prepared for the U.S. National Commission for UNESCO, Department of State (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
43.
PetrovicJ. E. (2005). The conservative restoration and neoliberal defenses of bilingual education. Language Policy, 4, 395–416.
44.
RamseyP. J. (2010). Bilingual public schooling in the United States: A history of America’s “polyglot boardinghouse.”New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
45.
RamseyP. J. (2011). A review of “Patriotic pluralism: Americanization education and European immigrants.”Educational Studies, 47, 490–494.
46.
ReaganT. (2002). Language, education, and ideology: Mapping the linguistic landscape of U.S. schools. Westport, CT: Praeger.
47.
RicentoT. (2003). The discursive construction of Americanism. Discourse & Society, 14, 611–637.
48.
RicentoT. (2005). Problems with the “language-as-resource” discourse in the promotion of heritage languages in the U.S.A. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9, 348–368.
49.
RuizR. (1984). Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal, 8, 15–34.
50.
RuizR. (2010). Reorienting language-as-resource. In PetrovicJ. E.(Ed.), International perspectives on bilingual education: Policy, practice and controversy (pp. 155–172). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
51.
RutherN. L. (1994). The role of federal programs in internationalizing the U.S. higher education system from1958-1988 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
52.
San MiguelG.Jr.(2001). Brown, not white: School integration and the Chicano movement in Houston. Houston, TX: The University of Houston.
53.
ScarfoR. D. (1997). The history of Title VI and Fulbright-Hays. In HawkinsJ. N.HaroC. M.KazanjianM. A.MerkxG. W.WileyD. (Eds.), International education in the new global era: Proceedings on a national policy conference on the Higher Education Act, Title VI and Fulbright-Hays Programs (pp. 23–25). Los Angeles: UCLA International Studies and Overseas Programs.
54.
Scholarship and loan program, Part 3: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Special Education and the Subcommittee on General Education, of the House Committee on Education and Labor, 85th Cong. 1814 (1958) (Testimony of MildenbergerKenneth W.).
55.
ScollonR. (2004). Teaching language and culture as hegemonic practice. Modern Language Journal, 88, 271–274.
56.
SimonP. (1992). The tongue-tied American: Confronting the foreign language crisis. New York, NY: Continuum.
57.
SpackR. (2002). America’s second tongue: American Indian education and the ownership of English, 1860-1900. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
58.
SpolskyB. (2002). Heritage language and national security: An ecological view. In BakerS. J. (Ed.), Language policy: Lessons from global models (pp. 103–114). Monterrey, CA: Monterrey Institute for International Studies.
59.
SpolskyB. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
60.
SpringJ. (1989). The sorting machine revisited: National educational policy since 1945. New York, NY: Longman.
61.
ten BrinkT. (in press). Geopolitics and global political economy (BaleJ., Trans.). Leiden, Netherlands: Brill. (Original work published 2008)
62.
TrujilloA. (1998). Chicano empowerment and bilingual education: Movimiento politics in Crystal City, TX. New York, NY: Garland.
63.
UrbanW. J. (2010). More than science and Sputnik: The National Defense Education Act of 1958. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.
64.
ValdésG. (2001). Heritage language students: Profiles and possibilities. In PeytonJ. K.RanardD. A.McGinnisS. (Eds.), Heritage languages in America: Preserving a national resource (pp. 37–80). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
65.
ValentiJ. J. (1959). The recent debate on federal aid to education legislation in the United States. International Review of Education/Internationale Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft/Revue Internationale de l’Education, 5, 189–202.
66.
VargasZ. (2005). Labor rights are civil rights: Mexican American workers in twentieth-century America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
67.
VestalT. M. (1994). International education: Its history and promise for today. Westport, CT: Praeger.
68.
WalkerC. R. (1943). Language teaching goes to war. School & Society, 57, 369–373.
69.
WangS. (2009). Preparing and supporting teachers of less commonly taught languages. Modern Language Journal, 93, 282–287.
70.
WatzkeJ. L. (2003). Lasting change in foreign language education: A historical case for change in national policy. Westport, CT: Praeger.
71.
WeissB. J. (Ed.) (1982). American education and the European immigrant: 1840-1940. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
72.
WileyT. G. (1998). The imposition of World War I-era English-only policies and the fate of German in North America. In RicentoT.BurnabyB. (Eds.), Language policies in the United States and Canada: Myths and realities (pp. 211–241). Philadelphia, PA: Lawrence Erlbaum.
73.
WileyT. G. (1999). Comparative historical analysis of U.S. language policy and language planning: Extending the foundations. In HuebnerT.DavisK. A. (Eds.), Sociopolitical perspectives on language policy and language planning in the U.S.A (pp. 17–37). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
74.
WileyT. G. (2002). Accessing language rights in education: A brief history of the U.S. context. In TollefsonJ. W. (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (pp. 39–64). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
75.
WileyT. G. (2006). The lessons of historical investigation: Implications for the study of language planning and policy. In RicentoT. (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 135–152). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
76.
WileyT. G. (2007). The foreign language “crisis” in the U.S.: Are heritage and community languages the remedy?Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 4, 179–205.
77.
WilhelmI. (2011, April13). Language and international-studies programs face devastating cuts under budget deal. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Language-and/127122/
78.
ZimmermanJ. (2002). Ethnics against ethnicity: European immigrants and foreign-language instruction, 1890-1940. Journal of American History, 88, 1383–1404.