AriasM. B.FaltisC. (2012). Implementing educational language policy in Arizona: Legal, historical and current practices in SEI. Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.
Arizona State Senate Research Staff. (2008, August27). Arizona State Senate issue paper:Flores v. Arizona. Phoenix: Author.
6.
ArriolaC. (1995). Knocking on the schoolhouse door: Mendez v. Westminster—Equal protection, public education and Mexican Americans in the 1940s. La Raza Law Journal, 8, 166–207.
7.
AugustD.ShanahanT. (Eds.). (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on language-minority children and youth. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
BehnkenB. (2011). Fighting their own battles: Mexican Americans, African Americans, and the struggle for civil rights. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
9.
Bilingual Education Act of 1968, Pub. L. No. 90-247, 81 Stat. 783 (1968).
10.
Bilingual Education Act of 1974, Pub. L. No. 93-380, 88 Stat. 503 (1974–1975).
11.
Bilingual Education Act of 1978, Pub. L. No. 95-561, 92 Stat. 2268 (1978).
12.
BlantonC. K. (2006). George I. Sanchez, ideology and whiteness in the making of the Mexican American Movement 1930-1960. Journal of Southern History, 72, 569–604.
13.
BosworthM. H. (2001). Courts as catalysts: State supreme courts and public school finance equity. Albany: State University of New York Press.
14.
BowmanK. L. (2010). Pursuing educational opportunities for Latino/a students. North Carolina Law Review, 88, 911–992.
15.
Brief for the National School Boards Association, the American Association of School Board Administrators, the National Education Association, and the Arizona Education Association in Support of Respondent, Horne v. Flores, 129 S. Ct. 2579 (2009).
16.
Brief for the Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project, DC Language Access Coalition, and the Latin American Youth Center in Support of Respondent, Horne v. Flores, 129 S. Ct. 2579 (2009).
17.
Brown v. Board of Educ., 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
18.
Casteñeda v. Pickard, 648 F.2d 989 (5th Cir. 1981).
19.
Cisneros v. Corpus Christi ISD, 324 F. Supp. 599 (S.D. Tex. 1970).
20.
Civil Rights Act of 1964 § 7, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1964).
21.
CrawfordJ. (1992). Hold your tongue: Bilingualism and the politics of English-only. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
22.
Delgado v. Bastrop, No. 338 Civil (W.D. Tex 1948).
23.
Del ValleS. (2003). Language rights and the law in the United States: Finding our voices. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
24.
DonatoR.HansonJ. S. (2012). Legally white, socially “Mexican”: The politics of de jure and de facto segregation in the American Southwest. Harvard Educational Review, 82, 202–225.
Evans v. Buchanan, 416 F. Supp. 328 (3rd Cir. 1974).
27.
Flores v. Arizona, 48 F. Supp 2d 937 (D. Ariz. 1999).
28.
Flores v. Arizona, 172 F. Supp. 2d 1225 (D. Ariz. 2000).
29.
Flores v. Arizona, 480 F. Supp. 2d 1157 (D. Ariz. 2007).
30.
Flores v. Arizona, 516 F.3d 1140 (9th Cir. 2008).
31.
Flores v. Arizona, No. 92-CV-596-TUC-RCC (D. Ariz. 2013).
32.
FoleyN. (1998). Becoming Hispanic: Mexican Americans and the Faustian pact with whiteness. In FoleyN. (Ed.), Reflexiones 1997: New directions in Mexican American studies. Austin: University of Texas Press.
33.
FoleyN. (2010). Quest for equality: The failed promise of black-brown solidarity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
GándaraP.GómezM. C. (2009). Language policy in education. In SykesG.SchneiderB.PlankD. J. (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 581–595). New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
GándaraP.MoranR.GarciaE. (2004). Legacy of Brown: Lau and language policy in the United States. Review of Research in Education, 28, 27–46.
36.
GándaraP.OrfieldG. (2012). Why Arizona matters: The historical, legal, and political contexts of Arizona’s instructional policies and U.S. linguistic hegemony. Language Policy, 11(1), 7–19.
37.
Gonzales v. Sheely, 96 F. Supp. 1004 (D. Ariz. 1951).
38.
Green v. County School Board of New Kent County, 391 U.S. 430 (1968).
39.
GrossA. J. (2007). “The Caucasian cloak”: Mexican Americans and the politics of whiteness in the Twentieth century Southwest. Georgetown Law Journal, 95, 337–392.
40.
Guadalupe Organization v. Tempe Elementary School District No. 3, 87 F.2d 1022 (9th Cir. 1978).
41.
Haney LópezI. F. (1997). Race, ethnicity, erasure: The salience of race to LatCrit theory. California Law Review, 85, 1143–1211.
42.
Hernandez v. Driscoll, 1957 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4784 (S.D. Tex. 1957).
43.
Horne v. Flores, 129 S. Ct. 2579 (2009).
44.
HorowitzD. L. (1977). The courts and social policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
45.
Hull v. Albrecht, 950 P. 2d 1141 (Ariz. 1997).
46.
Independent School District v. Salvatierra, 33 S.W.2d 790 (Tex. Ct. App. 1930).
47.
Johnson v. San Francisco Unified School District, 339 F. Supp. 1315 (Dist. Ct. N.D. Cal. 1971).
48.
Keyes v. Denver School District No 1, 413 U.S. 189 (1973).
49.
Keyes v. Denver School District No 1, 521 F.2d 465 (10th Cir. 1975).
50.
KlossH. (1971). Language rights of immigrant groups. International Migration Review, 5, 250–268.
51.
KoskiW. S.ReichR. (2006). When adequate isn’t: The retreat from equity in educational law and policy and why it matters. Emory Law Journal, 56, 545–618.
52.
Lau v. Nichols, 414 U.S. 563 (1974).
53.
LevinB. (1983). An analysis of the federal attempt to regulate bilingual education: Protecting civil rights or controlling curriculum?Journal of Law & Education, 12, 29–60.
54.
Lippi-GreenR. (2011). English with an accent: Language ideology and discrimination in the United States. New York, NY: Routledge.
55.
LiuG. (2006). The parted paths of school desegregation and school finance litigation. Law and Inequality, 24, 81–106.
56.
MartinezG. A. (1994). Legal indeterminacy, judicial discretion and the Mexican-American litigation experience: 1930-1980. UC Davis Law Review, 27, 555–618.
57.
MartinezT. (2010). English as a second language, middle school education, education policy, Hispanic American studies. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 1483411)
58.
McInnis v. Shapiro, 293 F. Supp. 327 (N.D. Il. 1968).
59.
Mendez v. Westminster, 64 F. Supp. 544 (Dist. Ct. S.D. Cal. Central Division, 1946).
60.
Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923).
61.
MinoriniP. A.SugarmanS. D. (1999). School finance litigation in the name of educational equity: Its evolution, impact, and future. In LaddH. F.ChalkR.HansenJ. S. (Eds.), Equity and adequacy in education finance: Issues and perspectives (pp. 34–71). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
62.
MoranR. F. (1988). The politics of discretion: Federal intervention in bilingual education. California Law Review, 76, 1249–1352.
63.
MoranR. F. (2005). Undone by law: The uncertain legacy of Lau v. Nichols. Berkeley La Raza Law Journal, 16, 1–10.
64.
MoranR. F. (2007). The story of Lau v. Nichols: Breaking the silence in Chinatown. In OlivasM. A.SchneiderR. G. (Eds.), Education law stories (pp 111–157). New York, NY: Thomson West.
65.
Morgan v. Kerrigan, 401 F. Supp. 216 (1st Cir. 1975).
66.
National Education Association. (1966). The invisible minority: Report of the NEA-Tucson survey on the teaching of Spanish to the Spanish-speaking. Washington, DC: Author.
67.
OddenA.CluneW. H. (1998). School finance systems: Aging structures in need of renovation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20, 157–177.
68.
Office of the Auditor General. (2007). Financing Arizona’s English language learner programs: Fiscal years 2002 through 2006. Phoenix, AZ: Author.
69.
Office for Civil Rights. (1970). Identification of discrimination and denial of services on the basis of national origin. 35 Fed. Reg. 11595 (1970). (Reprinted from The encyclopedia of bilingual education, pp. 929–930, by J. M.Gonzáles, Ed., 2008, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
70.
Office for Civil Rights. (1975). Task force findings specifying remedies available for eliminating past educational practices ruled unlawful under Lau v. Nichols. (1975). (Reprinted from The encyclopedia of bilingual education, pp. 935–940, by J. M.Gonzáles, Ed., 2008, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
71.
Otero v. Mesa County School Dist., 408 F. Supp. 162 (D. Colo. 1975).
72.
PereaJ. F. (1992). Demography and distrust: An essay on American languages, cultural pluralism, and Official English. Minnesota Law Review, 77, 269–373.
73.
PereaJ. F. (1997). The black/white binary paradigm of race: The “normal science” of American racial thought. California Law Review, 85, 1213–1258.
74.
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896).
75.
PowersJ. M. (2008). Forgotten history: Mexican American school segregation in Arizona from 1900–1951. Equity & Excellence in Education, 41, 467–481.
76.
PowersJ. M. (2012, November). Parallel tracks with points of intersection. Paper presented at the History of Education Society annual meeting, Seattle, WA.
77.
PowersJ. M.PattonL. (2008). Between Mendez and Brown: Gonzales v. Sheely (1951) and the legal campaign against segregation. Law & Social Inquiry, 33, 127–171.
78.
Rios v. Reed, 480 F. Supp. 14 (E.D. N.Y. 1978).
79.
Rios-AguilarC.GándaraP. (2012). Horne v. Flores and the future of language policy. Teachers College Record, 114(9), 1–13.
80.
RodriguezC. M. (2006). Language and participation. California Law Review, 94, 687–757.
81.
RomeroM. (2005). Brown is beautiful. Law & Society Review, 39, 211–234.
82.
Romo v. Laird, No. 21617 (Ariz. Super. 1925).
83.
Roosevelt v. Bishop, 877 P. 2d 806 (Ariz. 1994).
84.
RuizR. (1984). Orientations in language planning. Journal for the National Association for Bilingual Education, 8(2), 15–34.
85.
San Antonio School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1 (1973).
86.
San MiguelG. (1987). “Let them all take heed”: Mexican Americans and the campaign for educational equality in Texas. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
87.
San MiguelG. (2004). Contested policy: The rise and fall of federal bilingual education in the United States, 1960-2001. Denton: University of North Texas Press.
88.
SchottR. L. (1982). School desegregation in Texas: The implementation of United States v. Texas (Policy Research Report No. 51). Austin: Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, University of Texas at Austin.
89.
Serna v. Portales, 499 F.2d 1147 (10th Cir. 1974).
90.
Serrano v. Priest 487 P.2d 1241 (Ariz. 1971).
91.
SheridanC. (2003). “Another white race”: Mexican Americans and the paradox of whiteness in jury selection. Law and History Review, 21, 109–144.
92.
SkrentnyJ. D. (2002). The minority rights revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
93.
StoneG. R.SeidmanL. M.SunsteinC. R.TushnetM. V.KarlanP. S. (2005). Constitutional law (5th ed.). New York, NY: Aspen.
94.
StrumP. (2010). Mendez v. Westminster: School desegregation and Mexican-American rights. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
95.
United States v. Jefferson County Board of Education, 372 F.2d 836 (5th Cir. 1966).
96.
United States v. State of Texas, 342 F. Supp. 24 (E.D. Tex. 1971)
97.
United States v. Texas Education Agency, 431 F. 2d 1313 (5th Cir. 1970).
98.
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (1971). Ethnic isolation of Mexican Americans in the public schools in the Southwest. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
99.
ValenciaR. (2005). The Mexican American struggle for equal educational opportunity in Mendez v. Westminster: Helping to pave the way for Brown v. Board of Education. Teachers College Record, 107, 389–423.
100.
ValenciaR. R. (2008). Chicano students and the courts: The Mexican American legal struggle for educational equality. New York: New York University Press.
101.
ValenciaR. R. (2010). Dismantling contemporary deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
102.
WieseA. M.GarciaE. (2001). The Bilingual Education Act: Language minority students and US federal educational policy. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 4, 229–248.
103.
WileyT. G. (2002). Accessing language rights in education: A brief history. In TollefsonJ. W. (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (pp. 39–64). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
104.
WilsonS. H. (2003). Brown over “other white”: Mexican Americans’ legal arguments and litigation strategy in school desegregation lawsuits. Law and History Review, 21, 145–194.
105.
WilsonS. H. (2005). Some are born white, some achieve whiteness, and some have whiteness thrust upon them: Mexican Americans and the politics of racial classification in the federal judicial bureaucracy, twenty-five years after Hernandez v. Texas. Chicano-Latino Law Review, 25, 201–225.
106.
WollenbergC. (1976). All deliberate speed: Segregation and exclusion in California schools, 1855-1975. Berkeley: University of California Press.