Love is recognized as a fundamental pillar in education, yet empirical research on this topic remains limited. Given this gap, the present study conducts a systematic review by analyzing studies from Web of Science and Scopus. The review focuses exclusively on formal educational settings and includes 24 empirical studies employing both quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Five key themes emerged: the conceptualization of love in education, its influence on teachers’ professional success and well-being, its impact on students’ social and emotional development, the role of love in fostering positive teacher-student relationships, and the ethical and practical challenges of integrating love into educational practice. The findings highlight love’s benefits, including enhanced well-being, professional satisfaction, and academic success, while also noting the need for clear definitions, ethical guidelines, and training for educators. Overall, the review suggests that love in education is a powerful yet context-dependent phenomenon. It supports the integration of love into educational policies and practices and serves as a foundation for future research, providing valuable insights for policymakers, teacher educators, and practitioners.
AldridgeD.LewinD. (2019). Introduction: Love and desire in education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 53(3), 457–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12384
2.
AlqassabM.LeonJ. (2024). Motivational messages from teachers before exams: Links to intrinsic motivation, engagement, and academic performance. Teaching and Teacher Education, 151, 104750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104750
3.
Álvarez-ÁlvarezC.FalconS. (2023). Students’ preferences with university teaching practices: Analysis of testimonials with artificial intelligence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71, 1709–1724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10239-8
4.
ArchambaultI.JanoszM.FalluJ. S.PaganiL. S. (2009). Student engagement and its relationship with early high school dropout. Journal of Adolescence, 32(3), 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.007
5.
AromatarisE.MunnZ. (2020). JBI manual for evidence synthesis. https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL
6.
ASReview LAB Developers. (2024). ASReview LAB - A tool for AI-assisted systematic reviews (v1.6.3). Zenodo.
7.
BarcelosA. M. F.CoelhoH. S. H. (2016). Language learning and teaching: What’s Love got to do with it? In MacIntyreP. D.GregersenT.MercerS. (Eds.), Positive psychology in SLA (pp. 130–144). Channel View Publications. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783095360-006
8.
*Campbell-BarrV.GeorgesonJ.VargaA. N. (2015). Developing professional early childhood educators in England and Hungary: Where has all the love gone?European Education, 47(4), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10564934.2015.1100451
*ChenS. (2023). Modeling the effect of loving pedagogy dispositions and teacher self-efficacy on teacher burnout. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1157324
11.
*CousinsS. B. (2017). Practitioners’ constructions of love in early childhood education and care. International Journal of Early Years Education, 25(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2016.1263939
12.
DavisM. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.44.1.113
DemszkyD.YangD.YeagerD. S.BryanC. J.ClapperM.ChandhokS.EichstaedtJ. C.HechtC. A.JamiesonJ.JohnsonM.JonesM.Krettek-CobbD.LaiL.Jones MitchellN.OngD. C.DweckC. S.GrossJ. J.PennebakerJ. W. (2023). Using large language models in psychology. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(11), 688–701. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00241-5
15.
*DerakhshanA.GreenierV.FathiJ. (2023). Exploring the interplay between a loving pedagogy, creativity, and work engagement among EFL/ESL teachers: A multinational study. Current Psychology, 42(26), 22803–22822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03371-w
16.
DowlingM. (2014). Young children’s personal, social and emotional development (4th ed.). Sage.
17.
DurlakJ. A.WeissbergR. P.DymnickiA. B.TaylorR. D.SchellingerK. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
18.
DurualpE.KaytezN. (2016). Evaluation of pre-school teachers’ job satisfaction from the point of their children love and other variables. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 6(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2016.006
19.
EgertF.FukkinkR. G.EckhardtA. G. (2018). Impact of in-service professional development programs for early childhood teachers on quality ratings and child outcomes: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 88(3), 401–433. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317751918
20.
FehrB.RussellJ. A. (1991). The concept of love viewed from a prototype perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(3), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.60.3.425
21.
FengB. (2007). A study of teacher job satisfaction and factors that influence it. Chinese Education & Society, 5, 47–64. https://doi.org/10.2753/CED1061-1932400506
22.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
23.
GagnéM.ForestJ.GilbertM.-H.AubéC.MorinE.MalorniA. (2010). The motivation at work scale: Validation evidence in two languages. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(4), 628–646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355698
GinwrightS. A. (2010). Black youth rising: Activism and radical healing in urban America. NY: Teachers College Press.
26.
GoldsteinL. S.LakeV. E. (2000). ‘Love, love, and more love for children’: Exploring preservice teachers’ understandings of caring. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 861–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00031-7
27.
Gouveia-PereiraM.ValaJ.PalmonariA.RubiniM. (2003). School experience, relational justice and legitimation of institutional. In European Journal of Psychology of Education, 18, 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173251
28.
HarackiewiczJ. M.SmithJ. L.PriniskiS. J. (2016). Interest matters: The importance of promoting interest in education. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(2), 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732216655542
29.
HardyK. V. (2013). Healing the hidden wounds of racial trauma. Reclaiming Children & Youth, 22(1), 24–28. www.reclaimingjournal.com
30.
*HaslipM. J.Allen-HandyA.DonaldsonL. (2019). How do children and teachers demonstrate love, kindness and forgiveness? Findings from an early childhood strength-spotting intervention. Early Childhood Education Journal, 47(5), 531–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-00951-7
31.
*HeffernanA.MillsM. (2023). Love, care, and solidarity: Understanding the emotional and affective labour of school leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 53(3), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2022.2103099
32.
HerránA. (2019). ¿Qué hacemos jugando mal con las cartas de la educación, mientras vamos en un camarote del Titanic? [What are we doing playing badly with the education cards, while we are in a cabin on the Titanic?]. In HerránA.ValleJ. M.VillenaJ. L. (Eds.), ¿Qué estamos haciendo mal en la educación? Reflexiones pedagógicas para la investigación, la enseñanza y la formación (pp. 331–391). Octaedro.
33.
HoffmanD. M. (2009). Reflecting on social emotional learning: A critical perspective on trends in the United States. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 533–556. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325184
34.
HooksB. (2000). All about love: New vision. William Morrow and Company, Inc.
35.
HooksB. (2001). Salvation: Black people and love. Morrow.
36.
HuangY.ProcházkováM.LuJ.RiadA.MacekP. (2022). Family related variables’ influences on adolescents’ health based on health behaviour in school-aged children database, an AI-assisted scoping review, and narrative synthesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 871795. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.871795
37.
JanoszM.BouthillierC. (2007). Rapport de validation du questionnaire sur l’environnement socioéducatif des écoles secondaires (QES-secondaire). Université de Montréal.
*JohnsonF. M.ArduizN. O. (2020). Apreciaciones del profesorado chileno sobre una educación basada en el amor: estudio de casos. Revista Humanidades, 10(1), e39215. https://doi.org/10.15517/h.v10i1.39215
40.
JohnsonL. L.BryanN.BoutteG. (2019). Show us the love: Revolutionary teaching in (un)critical times. Urban Review, 51(1), 46–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-018-0488-3
41.
JonesD. E.GreenbergM.CrowleyM. (2015). Early social-emotional functioning and public health: The relationship between kindergarten social competence and future wellness. American Journal of Public Health, 105(11), 2283–2290. www.ajph.org
42.
JuradoA. (2022). Pedagogía del amor [Pedagogy of love]. Revista Complutense de Educacion, 33(1), 179–180. https://doi.org/10.5209/RCED.78829
43.
KarasekR.BrissonC.KawakamiN.HoutmanI.BongersP.AmickB. (1998). The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): An instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3(4), 322–355. https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-8998.3.4.322
44.
*Karkar EsperatT. M. (2022). Compassionate love: Improving international student online learning through new literacies. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 35(6), 630–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2021.1982056
45.
*KaukkoM.WilkinsonJ.KohliR. K. (2021). Pedagogical love in Finland and Australia: A study of refugee children and their teachers. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 30(5), 731–747. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1868555
46.
Kayaİ. (2015). Etik Değerlere Yatkınlık Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. The Journal of International Social Research, 8(41), 968–974. https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.20185537186
47.
KressT. M.Krueger-HenneyP. (2016). Radically listening to radical love: Toward enactivism in education and educational research. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 7(3), 5–11. https://digitalcommons.molloy.edu/edu_fac
LanasM.ZembylasM. (2015b). Towards a transformational political concept of love in critical education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 34(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-014-9424-5
50.
LeoniV.Przygodzki-LionetN.ViratM. (2018). French validation of a justice perception scale in a judicial context. Pratiques Psychologiques, 24(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prps.2017.07.002
51.
*LiB.MiaoG. (2022). On the role of Chinese English as a foreign language: Teachers’ well-being and loving pedagogy in their academic engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 941226. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.941226
52.
*LiW.RawalH. (2018). Waning and waxing of love: Unpacking layers of teacher emotion. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 41(4), 552–570. https://doi.org/10.1515/cjal-2018-0038
53.
*LiY.WangX. (2022). Chinese ideological and political teachers’ job satisfaction, loving pedagogy, and their professional success. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 976397. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.976397
54.
ListonD. P. (2004). The lure of learning in teaching. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 106, 459–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810410600303
55.
ListonD. P.GarrisonJ. W. (2003). Teaching, learning, and loving: Reclaiming passion in educational practice. Routledge Press.
56.
*LokN.UzunG.Selçuk TosunA. (2023). Determinants of nursing students’ inclination to ethical values: Compassionate love and perceived social support from the family. Nurse Education in Practice, 67, 103556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103556
57.
LoremanT. (2011). Love as pedagogy. Sense.
58.
*LuguettiC.KirkD.OliverK. L. (2019). Towards a pedagogy of love: Exploring pre-service teachers’ and youth’s experiences of an activist sport pedagogical model. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(6), 629–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2019.1663499
59.
LyubomirskyS.LepperH. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006824100041
60.
MäättäK.UusiauttiS. (2012). How to raise children to be good people?Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis, 33(1), 83–91.
MaturanaH.Verden-ZöllerG. (2009). The origin of humanness in the biology of love. Imprint Academic.
63.
MoafianF.StovarS.GriffithsM. D.HashemiM. (2009). The construct validity and reliability of the ‘Characteristics of Successful EFL Teachers Questionnaire (CoSEFLT-Q)’ revisited. Porta Linguarum, 31, 53–73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287389807
64.
O’QuinnE. J.GarrisonJ. W. (2003). Creating loving relations in the classroom. In GarrisonJ. W.ListonD. (Eds.), Teaching, learning, and loving: Reclaiming passion in educational practice (pp. 49–64). Routledge Press.
65.
*PageJ. (2017). Reframing infant-toddler pedagogy through a lens of professional love: Exploring narratives of professional practice in early childhood settings in England. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 18(4), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949117742780
66.
PenmanJ.EllisB. (2009). Regional academics’ perceptions of the love of learning and its importance for their students. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 49(1), 148–168.
ProcidanoM. E.HellerK. (1983). Measures of perceived social support from friends and from family: Three validation studies. American Journal of Community Psychology, 11(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00898416
69.
ReeveJ. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903028990
70.
Rio PoncelaA. M.Romero GutierrezL.BermúdezD. D.EstellésM. (2021). A labour of love? The invisible work of caring teachers during Covid-19. Pastoral Care in Education, 39(3), 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2021.1938646
71.
Rodriguez MüllerA. P.FloresC. C.AlbrechtV.SteenT.CrompvoetsJ. (2021). A scoping review of empirical evidence on (Digital) public services co-creation. Administrative Sciences, 11(4), 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11040130
72.
RubensteinL. D. V.McCoachD. B.SiegleD. (2013). Teaching for creativity scales: An instrument to examine teachers’ perceptions of factors that allow for the teaching of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25(3), 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.813807
ŞahinŞ.ÖkmenB.KılıçA. (2019). The views of students related to compassionate love and compassionate love education course after taking compassionate love education course. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 7(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.7c1s.8m
75.
SammonsP.LindorffA. M.OrtegaL.KingtonA. (2016). Inspiring teaching: Learning from exemplary practitioners. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 1(2), 124–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-09-2015-0005
76.
Santana-MonagasE.da Costa FerreiraP.Veiga SimãoA. M.NúñezJ. L. (2024). How (de)motivating teaching styles shape message framing outcomes on students’ self-efficacy, emotions, and grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 110, 102420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102420
77.
SchaufeliW. B.BakkerA. B.SalanovaM. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
78.
SimpsonJ. A. (1990). Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 971–980. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.59.5.971
79.
SprecherS.FehrB. (2005). Compassionate love for close others and humanity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(5), 629–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505056439
UnderwoodL. G.TeresiJ. A. (2002). The daily spiritual experience scale: Development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health-related data. Annals of Behavioral Medicine: A Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 24(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2401_04
83.
VallieresE. F.VallerandR. J. (1990). Traduction et validation canadienne-Française de L’échelle de L’estime de Soi de Rosenberg. International Journal of Psychology, 25(2), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207599008247865
84.
Van de SchootR.De BruinJ.SchramR.ZahediP.De BoerJ.WeijdemaF.KramerB.HuijtsM.HoogerwerfM.FerdinandsG.HarkemaA.WillemsenJ.MaY.FangQ.HindriksS.TummersL.OberskiD. L. (2021). An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3, 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-00287-7
85.
Van HaastrechtM.OzkanB. Y.BrinkhuisM.SpruitM. (2021). Respite for SMEs: A systematic review of socio-technical cybersecurity metrics. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11, 6909. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156909
86.
*ViratM. (2022). Teachers’ compassionate love for students: A possible determinant of teacher-student relationships with adolescents and a mediator between teachers’ perceived support from coworkers and teacher-student relationships. Educational Studies, 48(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1751083
87.
*ViratM.LeoniV.ArchambaultI. (2023). Teachers’ compassionate love, teachers’ esteem and students’ attitudes towards the justice system: The mediating role of school belonging. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(2), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2022.2087627
88.
*ViratM.TrouilletR.FavreD. (2020). A French adaptation of the Compassionate Love Scale for teachers: Validation on a sample of teachers and correlation with teacher autonomous motivation. Psychologie Francaise, 65(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2018.03.003
89.
WangW.ZhouZ. (2019). Research on the characteristics of outstanding ideological and political theory teachers in colleges and universities. Leading Journal of Ideological & Theoretical Education., 10, 86–92. http://doi.org/10.16580/j.sxlljydk.2019.10.018
90.
WangY.DerakhshanA.PanZ. (2022). Positioning an agenda on a loving pedagogy in second language acquisition: Conceptualization, practice, and research. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 894190. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894190
91.
*WarrenA. (2021). Love in early childhood teaching: Reading data diffractively with Deleuzo-Guattarian concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 34(7), 565–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2020.1771462
92.
WarrenS. L.MoustafaA. A. (2023). Functional magnetic resonance imaging, deep learning, and Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review. Journal of Neuroimaging, 33, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/jon.13063
93.
WhiteE. J.GradovskiM. (2018). Untangling (some) philosophical knots concerning love and care in early childhood education. International Journal of Early Years Education, 26(2), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2018.1458602
94.
YinL. C.LoremanT.MajidR. A.AliasA. (2019). The Dispositions towards Loving Pedagogy (DTLP) scale: Instrument development and demographic analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102884
95.
*ZaidiR.StrongT.OliverC.AlwarraqH.NaqviA. (2022). The understated role of pedagogical love and human emotion in refugee education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 35(6), 678–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2021.1991029
96.
*ZhangJ.ClarkM. R.HsuehY. (2022). Free play and “Loving Care”: A qualitative inquiry of Chinese kindergarten teachers’ professional ethics. ECNU Review of Education, 5(4), 664–682. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311221121677
97.
*ZhangQ. (2019). Ruminating on love and care in early childhood teaching. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 40(3), 256–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2018.1561561
98.
ZhangZ. (2022). Toward the role of teacher empathy in students’ engagement in English language classes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 880935. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.880935
99.
*ZhiR.WangY. (2023). English as a foreign language teachers’ professional success, loving pedagogy and creativity: A structural equation modeling approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101370
