Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Universal behavior screening is used in schools worldwide to detect students with and at risk for behavioral challenges. A plethora of instruments is available for this purpose, though little metascience has been conducted to review and synthesize methods used to study these instruments in educational settings, nor is there a comprehensive list of instruments to support educators in selecting an appropriate tool. We conducted this review to provide a rigorous—and accessible—overview of the research base for universal behavior screening instruments to facilitate educators’ decision-making process when selecting a systematic screening tool for the students they serve and identify areas of further refinement for the research community. This scoping review includes an extensive list of behavior screening instruments, an examination of how these tools have been studied, and areas for future research. We identified 56 behavior screening instruments. The most common psychometric analyses included coefficient alpha for internal consistency, correlations between theoretically related variables, and confirmatory factor analysis. We discuss other methods currently employed as well as methods and complexities for consideration in future research.

Keywords

at-risk students behavior screening decision making instrument validation psychometrics research methodology scoping review special education student behavior/attitude validity/reliability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

*Aanondsen

C. M.

Jozefiak

Heiling

Rimehaug

(2020). Validation of the strengths and difficulties self-report in Norwegian sign language. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 25(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enz026

Achenbach

T. M.

(1991). Manual for the child behavior checklist/4-18 and 1991 profile. University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.

Achenbach

T. M.

McConaughy

S. H.

Howell

C. T.

(1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/bqcsgb

Achenbach

T. M.

McConaughy

S. H.

Ivanova

Rescorla

L. A.

(2011). Manual for the ASEBA Brief Problem Monitor. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.

Achenbach

T. M.

Rescorla

L. A.

(2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.

*Aitken

Martinussen

Wolfe

R. G.

Tannock

(2015). Factor structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a Canadian elementary school sample. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 40(3), 155–165. https://doi.org/mjk8

American Education Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council of Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. AERA. https://www.aera.net/Publications/Books/Standards-for-Educational-Psychological-Testing-2014-Edition

*Arslan

(2019). Development and validation of the Youth Externalizing Behavior Screener: A brief and effective measure of behavioral problems. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 7(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2018.1466747

*Arslan

(2021). Measuring emotional problems in Turkish adolescents: Development and initial validation of the Youth Internalizing Behavior Screener. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 9(2), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2019.1700860xs

10.

Bacanli

Erdoğan

(2003). Adaptation of the Matson evaluation of social skills with youngsters (MESSY) to Turkish. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 2, 368–379. https://doi.org/10.5172/jamh.1.3.235

11.

Barbarin

. (2004). ABLE: Screening for problems of attention, aggression, behavior, language and emotional self-regulation in young children. HPT1, LLC.

12.

*Barbarin

Hitti

Brown

(2020). Assessing the severity of concerns about preschool children’s self-regulation of attention, behavior, and emotions using The ABLE universal screener: A Rasch analysis. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 28(3), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426619864932

13.

Barrett

Eber

Weist

(2017). Advancing educational effectiveness: Interconnecting school mental health and school-wide positive behavior support. https://www.pbis.org/resource/advancing-education-effectiveness-interconnecting-school-mental-health-and-school-wide-positive-behavior-support

14.

Bauer

(2022). A primer to latent profile and latent class analysis. In Goller

Kyndt

Paloniemi

Damşa

(Eds.), Methods for researching professional learning and development: Challenges, applications and empirical illustrations (pp. 243–268). Springer.

15.

Behar

(1977). The Preschool Behavior Questionnaire. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 5(3), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00913697

16.

Berry

(2015). Differential validity and differential prediction of cognitive ability tests: Understanding test bias in the employment context. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 435–463. https://doi.org/gckfm4

17.

Birmaher

Khetarpal

Brent

Cully

Balach

Kaufman

Neer

S. M.

(1997). The Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED). Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36 (4), 545–553.

18.

*Black

Mansfield

Panayiotou

(2021). Age appropriateness of the self-report strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Assessment, 28(6), 1556–1569. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120903382

19.

*Bøe

Hysing

Skogen

J. C.

Breivik

(2016). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ): Factor structure and gender equivalence in Norwegian adolescents. PLoS One, 11(5), e0152202. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152202

20.

*Bosik

S. W.

Harris

Alibrahim

Donovan

(2022). Construct validity of the teacher version of the strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a sample of elementary-aged children in the United States. Contemporary School Psychology, 26(4), 518–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-021-00371-8

21.

Boveda

Ford

K. S.

Frankenberg

López

(2023). Editorial vision 2022–2025. Review of Educational Research, 93(5), 635–640. https://doi.org/gtgbqp

22.

Bradshaw

C. P.

Buckley

J. A.

Ialongo

N. S.

(2008). School-based service utilization among urban children with early onset educational and mental health problems: The squeaky wheel phenomenon. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/cvjwz2

23.

Buckman

M. M.

Lane

K. L.

Common

E. A.

Royer

D. J.

Oakes

W. P.

Allen

G. E.

Lane

K. S.

Brunsting

(2021). Treatment integrity of primary (tier 1) prevention efforts in tiered systems: Mapping the literature. Education and Treatment of Children, 44, 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-021-00044-4

24.

*Caldarella

Young

E. L.

Richardson

M. J.

Young

B. J.

Young

K. R.

(2008). Validation of the systematic screening for behavior disorders in middle and junior high school. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16(2), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426607313121

25.

Caselman

T. D.

Self

P. A.

(2008). Assessment instruments for measuring young children’s social-emotional behavioral development. Children & Schools, 30(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/30.2.103

26.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024). Youth risk behavior survey data summary & trends report: 2013–2023. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/yrbs/dstr/index.html

27.

Chafouleas

S. M.

Kilgus

S. P.

Jaffery

Riley-Tillman

T. C.

Welsh

Christ

T. J.

(2013). Direct behavior rating as a school-based behavior screener for Elementary and middle grades. Journal of School Psychology, 51(3), 367–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.04.002

28.

Chafouleas

Miller

Briesch

Neugebauer

Riley-Tillman

(2012). Usage rating profile–assessment. University of Connecticut.

29.

Chang

H. H.

(2004). Understanding computerized adaptive testing: From Robbins-Munro to Lord and beyond. In Kaplan

(Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 117–133). Sage.

30.

Cintron

D. W.

Loken

McCoach

D. B.

(2023). A cautionary note about having the right mixture model but classifying the wrong people. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 58(4), 675–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2022.2082913

31.

Cipriano

Naples

L. H.

Eveleigh

Cook

Funaro

Cassidy

McCarthy

M. F.

Rappolt-Schlichtmann

(2023). A systematic review of student disability and race representation in universal school-based social and emotional learning interventions for elementary school students. Review of Educational Research, 93(1), 73–102. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221094079

32.

Cohen

(1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104

33.

Cohen

K. A.

Ito

Ahuvia

I. L.

Yang

Zhang

Renshaw

T. L.

Larson

Cook

Hill

Liao

Rapoport

Smock

Yang

Schleider

J. L.

(2024). Brief school-based interventions targeting student mental health or well-being: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 27, 732–806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-024-00487-2

34.

Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1995). Teacher social competence scale technical report. Fast Track Project.

35.

*Cook

C. R.

Rasetshwane

K. B.

Truelson

Grant

Dart

E. H.

Collins

T. A.

Sprague

(2011). Development and validation of the Student Internalizing Behavior Screener: Examination of reliability, validity, and classification accuracy. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 36(2), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508410390486

36.

Cook

B. G.

Therrien

W. J.

(2017). Null effects and publication bias in special education research. Behavioral Disorders, 42(4), 149–158. https://doi.org/gc6zhx

37.

Cook

Volpe

Gresham

F. M.

(2012). Technical adequacy, classification accuracy, and social validity of the Student Externalizing Behavior Screener. Unpublished manuscript.

38.

Cronbach

L. J.

Shavelson

R. J.

(2004). My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(3), 391–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164404266386

39.

Cullinan

Epstein

M. H.

(2013). Emotional and Behavioral Screener. PRO-ED.

40.

*Daniels

Volpe

R. J.

Fabiano

G. A.

Briesch

A. M.

(2017). Classification accuracy and acceptability of the Integrated Screening and Intervention System Teacher Rating Form. School Psychology Quarterly, 32(2), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000147

41.

De Ayala

J. R

. (2022). The theory and practice of item response theory. Guilford Press.

42.

*Deighton

Tymms

Vostanis

Belsky

Fonagy

Brown

Martin

Patalay

Wolpert

(2013). The development of a school-based measure of child mental health. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31(3), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282912465570

43.

De Los Reyes

Epkins

C. C

. (2023). Introduction to the special issue. A dozen years of demonstrating that informant discrepancies are more than measurement error: Toward guidelines for integrating data from multi-informant assessments of youth mental health. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 52(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2022.2158843

44.

*Dever

B. V.

Gallagher

E. K.

Hochbein

C. D.

Loukas

Dai

(2017). Examining subtypes of behavioral/emotional risk using cluster analysis. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(6), 628–632. https://doi.org/gbsc82

45.

*Dowdy

Nylund-Gibson

Felix

E. D.

Morovati

Carnazzo

K. W.

Dever

B. V.

(2014). Long-term stability of screening for behavioral and emotional risk. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74(3), 453–472. https://doi.org/mjmc

46.

*Downs

Strand

P. S.

Heinrichs

Cerna

(2012). Use of the teacher version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire with German and American preschoolers. Early Education & Development, 23(4), 493–516. https://doi.org/mjmd

47.

Drummond

(1994). The Student Risk Screening Scale (SRSS). Josephine County Mental Health Program.

48.

Ebesutani

Reise

S. P.

Chorpita

B. F.

Ale

Regan

Young

Higa-McMillan

Weisz

J. R.

(2012). The revised child anxiety and depression scale-short version: Scale reduction via exploratory bifactor modeling of the broad anxiety factor. Psychological Assessment, 24(4), 833–845. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027283

49.

Eckert

T. L.

Hintze

J. M.

Shapiro

E. S.

(1999). Development and refinement of a measure for assessing the acceptability of assessment methods: The assessment rating profile-revised. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 15, 21–42. https://doi.org/dtbdpz

50.

*Eklund

Kilgus

von der Embse

Beardmore

Tanner

(2017). Use of universal screening scores to predict distal academic and behavioral outcomes: A multilevel approach. Psychological Assessment, 29(5), 486–499. https://doi.org/f96wtc

51.

*Elliott

S. N.

Davies

M. D.

Frey

J. R.

Gresham

Cooper

(2018). Development and initial validation of a social emotional learning assessment for universal screening. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 55, 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2017.06.002

52.

Embretson

S. E.

(1996). The new rules of measurement. Psychological Assessment, 8(4), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.341

53.

*Erdogan

Ozturk

(2011). Psychometric evaluation of the Turkish version of the pediatric symptom checklist-17 for detecting psychosocial problems in low-income children. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20(17–18), 2591–2599. https://doi.org/cc2csk

54.

Epstein

M. H.

(2004). Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: A strengths-based approach to assessment (2nd ed.). PRO-ED.

55.

Epstein

M. H.

Sharma

(1998). Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: A strength-based approach to assessment. PRO-ED.

56.

Epstein

M. H.

Synhorst

(2009). Preschool Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale. PRO-ED.

57.

*Español-Martín

Pagerols

Prat

Rivas

Sixto

Valero

Artigas

M. S.

Ribasés

Ramos-Quiroga

J. A.

Casas

Bosch

(2021). Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: Psychometric properties and normative data for Spanish 5- to 17-year-olds. Assessment, 28(5), 1445–1458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120918929

58.

*Feil

E. G.

Becker

W. C.

(1993). Investigation of a multiple-gated screening system for preschool behavior problems. Behavioral Disorders, 19(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874299301900101

59.

*Feil

E. G.

Walker

H. M.

Severson

H. H.

(1995). The Early Screening Project for young children with behavior problems. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 3(4), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/106342669500300401

60.

Flanagan

D. P.

Alfonso

V. C.

Primavera

L. H.

Povall

Higgins

(1996). Convergent validity of the BASC and SSRS: Implications for social skills assessment. Psychology in the Schools, 33(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/dfqn9h

61.

Forness

Freeman

Paperella

Kauffman

Walker

(2012). Special education implications of point and cumulative prevalence for children with emotional and behavioral disorder. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20, 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426611401624

62.

Gardner

Kelleher

(1999). Pediatric Symptom Checklist-17 (PSC-17). The Journal of Pediatrics, 109(2), 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3476(86)80408-5

63.

*Garrido

L. E.

Barrada

J. R.

Aguasvivas

J. A.

Martínez-Molina

Arias

V. B.

Golino

H. F.

Legaz

Ferrís

Rojo-Moreno

(2020). Is small still beautiful for the strengths and difficulties questionnaire? Novel findings using exploratory structural equation modeling. Assessment, 27(6), 1349–1367. https://doi.org/gdqbs4

64.

Geldhof

G. J.

Preacher

K. J.

Zyphur

M. J.

(2014). Multilevel reliability estimation within a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods, 19(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/e698612011-001

65.

*Gillé

Kerkhoff

Heim-Dreger

Kohlmann

C. W.

Lohaus

Eschenbeck

(2021). Stress-symptoms and well-being in children and adolescents: Factor structure, measurement invariance, and validity of English, French, German, Russian, Spanish, and Ukrainian language versions of the SSKJ scales. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 9(1), 875–894. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2021.1990062

66.

Glover

T. A.

Albers

C. A.

(2007). Considerations for evaluating universal screening assessments. Journal of School Psychology, 45(2), 117–135. https://doi.org/bj59gd

67.

*Gomez

Stavropoulos

(2020). Malaysian parent ratings of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: Factor structure and measurement invariance across language versions, gender, informants, and race. Assessment, 27(8), 1971–1984. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118787284

68.

Goodman

(1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 791–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x

69.

Goodman

Iervolino

A. C.

Collishaw

Pickles

Maughan

(2007). Seemingly minor changes to a questionnaire can make a big difference to mean scores: A cautionary tale. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 42(4), 322–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-007-0169-0

70.

Gresham

F. M.

Elliott

S. N.

(2008). Social skills improvement system (SSIS). Pearson Assessment.

71.

Gresham

F. M.

Elliott

S. N.

Cook

C. R.

Vance

M. J.

Kettler

(2010). Cross-informant agreement for ratings for social skill and problem behavior ratings: An investigation of the social skills improvement system—rating scales. Psychological Assessment, 22(1), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018124

72.

Gresham

F. M.

Hunter

K. K.

Corwin

E. P.

Fischer

A. J.

(2013). Screening, assessment, treatment, and outcome evaluation of behavioral difficulties in an RTI model. Exceptionality, 21(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2013.750115

73.

*Gustafsson

B. M.

Gustafsson

P. A.

Proczkowska-Björklund

(2016). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for preschool children—a Swedish validation. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 70(8), 567–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2016.1184309

74.

*Harrell-Williams

L. M.

Raines

T. C.

Kamphaus

R. W.

Dever

B. V.

(2015). Psychometric analysis of the BASC–2 Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (BESS) student form: Results from high school student samples. Psychological Assessment, 27(2), 738–743. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000079

75.

*Hartman

Gresham

F. M.

Byrd

(2017). Student internalizing and externalizing behavior screeners: Evidence for reliability, validity, and usability in elementary schools. Behavioral Disorders, 42(3), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742916688656

76.

Health Resources and Services Administration. (2020). National survey of children’s health mental and behavioral health, 2018-2019. [Issue Brief]. https://mchb.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/mchb/data-research/nsch-data-brief-mental-bh-2019.pdf

77.

Huang

F. L.

(2018). Multilevel modeling myths. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(3), 492–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000272

78.

*Huang

F. L.

Reinke

W. M.

Thompson

Herman

K. C.

(2019). An investigation of the psychometric properties of the early identification system–student report. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 37(4), 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282918758791

79.

Hysing

Elgen

Gillberg

Lie

S. A.

Lundervold

A. J.

(2007). Chronic physical illness and mental health in children. results from a large-scale population study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(8), 785–792. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01755.x

80.

*Iaccarino

von der Embse

Kilgus

(2019). Interpretation and use of the social, academic, and emotional behavior risk screener: A latent transition approach. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 37(4), 486–503. https://doi.org/gd32j9

81.

*Isolan

Salum

G. A.

Osowski

A. T.

Amaro

Manfro

G. G.

(2011). Psychometric properties of the screen for child anxiety related emotional disorders (scared) in Brazilian children and adolescents. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25(5), 741–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.03.015

82.

Jellinek

M. S.

Murphy

J. M.

Burns

B. J.

(1986). Brief psychosocial screening in outpatient pediatric practice. The Journal of Pediatrics, 109(2), 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3476(86)80408-5

83.

Jenkins

L. N.

Demaray

M. K.

Wren

N. S.

Secord

S. M.

Lyell

K. M.

Magers

A. M.

Setmeyer

A. J.

Rodelo

Newcomb-McNeal

Tennant

(2014). A critical review of five commonly used social-emotional and behavioral screeners for elementary or secondary schools. Contemporary School Psychology, 18(4), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-014-0026-6

84.

Kamphaus

R. W.

Reynolds

C. R.

(2007). BASC-2 Behavioral and Emotional Screening System Manual. Pearson.

85.

Kamphaus

R. W.

Reynolds

C. R.

(2015). Behavior assessment system for children – third edition (BASC-3): Behavioral and emotional screening system (BESS). Pearson.

86.

Kamps

D. M.

Wills

H. P.

Greenwood

C. R.

Thorne

Lazo

J. F.

Crockett

J. L.

McGonigle Akers

Swaggart

B. L.

(2003). Curriculum influences on growth in early reading fluency for students with academic and behavioral risks. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11(4), 211–224. https://doi.org/ctntr6

87.

Kane

M. T.

(2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(1), 1–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12000

88.

Kennedy

C. H.

(2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Pearson Education.

89.

Kersten

Czuba

McPherson

Dudley

Elder

Tauroa

Vandal

(2015). A systematic review of evidence for the psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(1), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025415570647

90.

Keyes

(2006). Mental health in adolescence: Is America’s youth flourishing? American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76(3), 395–402. doi:10.1037/0002-9432.76.3.395.

91.

Kilgus

S. P.

Chafouleas

S. M.

Riley-Tillman

T. C.

(2013). Development and initial validation of the Social and Academic Behavior Risk Screener for Elementary Grades. School Psychology Quarterly, 28(3), 210–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000024

92.

*Kilgus

S. P.

Izumi

J. T.

von der Embse

N. P.

Van Wie

M. P.

Eklund

Taylor

C. N.

Iaccarino

(2019). Co-occurrence of academic and behavioral risk within elementary schools: Implications for universal screening practices. School Psychology, 34(3), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000314

93.

*Kilgus

S. P.

Sims

W. A.

von der Embse

N. P.

Riley-Tillman

T. C.

(2015). Confirmation of models for interpretation and use of the Social and Academic Behavior Risk Screener (SABRS). School Psychology Quarterly, 30(3), 335–352. https://doi.org/f7qj78

94.

*Kilgus

S. P.

Sims

W. A.

von der Embse

N. P.

Taylor

C. N.

(2016). Technical adequacy of the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener in an elementary sample. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 42(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508415623269

95.

*Kilgus

S. P.

von der Embse

N. P.

Allen

A. N.

Taylor

C. N.

Eklund

(2018). Examining SAEBRS technical adequacy and the moderating influence of criterion type on cut score performance. Remedial and Special Education, 39(6), 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517748421

96.

*Kilpatrick

K. D.

Maras

M. A.

Brann

K. L.

Kilgus

S. P.

(2018). Universal screening for social, emotional, and behavioral risk in students: DESSA-mini risk stability over time and its implications for screening procedures. School Psychology Review, 47(3), 244–257. https://doi.org/10.17105/spr-2017-0069.v47-3

97.

*Kim

Kamphaus

R. W.

(2018). Investigation of factor structure and measurement invariance by gender for the behavioral and emotional screening system among high school students. Psychological Assessment, 30(2), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000469

98.

*King

K. R.

Lembke

E. S.

Reinke

W. M.

(2016). Using latent class analysis to identify academic and behavioral risk status in elementary students. School Psychology Quarterly, 31(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000111

99.

King

K. R.

Reschly

A. L.

(2014). A comparison of screening instruments: Predictive validity of the BESS and BSC. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32(8), 687–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282914531714

100.

Korpershoek

Harms

de Boer

van Kuijk

Doolaard

(2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of classroom management strategies and classroom management programs on students’ academic, behavioral, emotional, and motivational outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 643–680. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626799

101.

*Lambert

M. C.

Epstein

Ingram

Simpson

Bernstein

(2014). Psychometrics and measurement invariance of the emotional and behavioral screener. Behavioral Disorders, 39(2), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291303900205

102.

Lambert

M. C.

January

S.-A. A.

Epstein

M. H.

Spooner

Gebreselassie

Stephens

R. L.

(2015). Convergent validity of the behavioral and emotional rating scale for youth in Community Mental Health Settings. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(12), 3827–3832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0191-x

103.

*Lambert

M. C.

January

S. A. A.

Pierce

C. D.

(2018). Latent structure of scores from the Emotional and Behavioral Screener. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 36(3), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916676130

104.

Lambert

M. C.

Sointu

E. T.

Epstein

M. H.

(2018). A comprehensive review of international research using the behavioral and emotional rating scale. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 7(3), 215–226. https://doi.org/gqtwhw

105.

Landis

J. R.

Koch

G. G.

(1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

106.

Lane

K. L.

(2019). Systematic screening tools: Universal behavior screeners. Center on PBIS, University of Oregon. https://www.pbis.org/resource/systematic-screening-tools-universal-behavior-screeners

107.

*Lane

K. L.

Bruhn

A. L.

Eisner

S. L.

Robertson Kalberg

(2010). Score Reliability and Validity of the Student Risk Screening Scale: A psychometrically sound, feasible tool for use in urban middle schools. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 18(4), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426609349733

108.

Lane

K. L.

Kalberg

J. R.

Menzies

Bruhn

Eisner

Crnobori

(2011). Using systematic screening data to assess risk and identify students for targeted supports: Illustrations across the K-12 Continuum. Remedial and Special Education, 32(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510361263

109.

Lane

K. L.

Kalberg

J. R.

Menzies

H. M.

(2009). Developing schoolwide programs to prevent and manage problem behaviors: A step-by-step approach. Guilford Press.

110.

Lane

K. L.

Menzies

H. M.

(2009). Student Risk Screening Scale for Internalizing and Externalizing (SRSS-IE). https://www.ci3t.org/screening

111.

Lane

K. L.

Menzies

H. M.

(2010). Student Risk Screening Scale for Early Childhood (SRSS-EC). https://www.ci3t.org/screening

112.

Lane

K. L.

Menzies

H. M

Oakes

W. P.

Kalberg

J. R.

(2012). Systematic screenings of behavior to support instruction: From preschool to high school. Guilford Press.

113.

Lane

K. L.

Menzies

H. M.

Oakes

W. P.

Kalberg

J. R.

(2020). Developing a schoolwide framework to prevent and manage learning and behavior problems. Guilford Press.

114.

Lane

K. L.

Oakes

W. P.

(2010). Screening tool rating scale. ci3t.org.

115.

Lane

K. L.

Oakes

W. P.

Buckman

M. M.

Lane

N. A.

Lane

K. S

Fleming

Swinburne Romine

Sherod

Chang

Jones

Cantwell

Crittenden

(2024). Examination of the factor structure and measurement invariance of the SRSS-IE. Remedial and Special Education, 45(3), 152–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325231193147

116.

*Lane

K. L.

Oakes

W. P.

Ennis

R. P.

Royer

D. J.

(2015). Additional evidence of convergent validity between SRSS-IE and SSiS-PSG scores. Behavioral Disorders, 40(4), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.17988/0198-7429-40.4.213

117.

Lane

K. L.

Oakes

W. P.

Menzies

H. M.

Buckman

M. M.

Royer

D. J.

(2020). Systematic screening for behavior: Considerations and commitment to continued inquiry [research brief]. Ci3T Strategic Leadership Team. www.ci3t.org/screening

118.

Lane

K. L.

Oakes

W. P.

Menzies

H. M.

(2021). Considerations for systematic screening PK-12: Universal screening for internalizing and externalizing behaviors in the COVID-19 era. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 65(3), 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2021.1908216

119.

Lane

K. L.

Oakes

W. P.

Monahan

Smith

Lane

K. S.

Buckman

M. M.

Lane

N. A

Sherod

(2023). A comparison of DESSA-mini and SRSS-IE screening tools. Education and Treatment of Children, 46(4), 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-023-00106-9

120.

Lane

K. L.

Powers

Oakes

W. P.

Buckman

M. M.

Sherod

R. L.

Lane

K. S.

(2020). Universal screening – Systematic screening to shape instruction: Lessons learned & practicalities. Center on PBIS, University of Oregon. https://www.pbis.org/resource/universal-screening-systematic-screening-to-shape-instruction

121.

*Lane

K. L.

Richards-Tutor

Oakes

W. P.

Connor

(2014). Initial evidence for the reliability and validity of the student risk screening scale with elementary age English learners. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 39(4), 219–232. https://doi.org/gcmc7h

122.

Lebrun-Harris

L. A.

Ghandour

R. M.

Kogan

M. D.

Warren

M. D.

(2022). Five-year trends in US children’s health and well-being, 2016-2020. JAMA Pediatrics, 176(7), e220056–e220056. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.0056

123.

*Liau

A. K.

Chow

Teck Kiang Tan Senf

(2011). Development and validation of the Personal Strengths Inventory using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282910365648

124.

*Liau

A. K.

Tan

T. K.

Khoo

(2012). Factorial invariance of the Personal Strengths Inventory-2 for children and adolescents across school level and gender. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(4), 451–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0088-z

125.

*Liu

Burgess

DiStefano

Pan

Jiang

(2020). Validating the Pediatric Symptoms Checklist–17 in the preschool environment. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 38(4), 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282919828234

126.

Lohaus

Eschenbeck

Kohlmann

C. W.

Klein-Heßling

(2006). Fragebogen zur Erhebung von Stress und Stressbewältigung im Kindes-und Jugendalter (SSKJ 3–8).

127.

Sherod

R. L.

Lane

K. L.

Buckman

M. M.

Oakes

W. P.

(2022). Interpreting universal behavior screening data: Questions to consider. Center on PBIS, University of Oregon. https://www.pbis.org/resource/interpreting-universal-behavior-screening-data-questions-to-consider

128.

*Margherio

S. M.

Evans

S. W.

Owens

J. S.

(2019). Universal screening in middle and high schools: Who falls through the cracks? School Psychology, 34(6), 591–602. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000337

129.

Marzocchi

G. M.

Capron

Di Pietro

Duran Tauleria

Duyme

Frigerio

Gaspar

M. F.

Hamilton

Pithon

Simões

Thérond

(2004). The use of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in southern European countries. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 13(S2), ii40–ii46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-004-2007-1

130.

McCoach

D. B.

Cintron

(2022). Introduction to modern modelling methods. Sage Quantitative Research.

131.

McCoach

D. B.

Gable

R. K.

Madura

J. P.

(2013). Instrument development in the affective domain: School and corporate applications. Springer Science & Business Media.

132.

McDougal

Bardos

A. N.

Meir

(2011). Behavior Intervention Monitoring Assessment System. Edumetrisis.

133.

McDougal

Bardos

A. N.

Meir

(2016). Behavior Intervention Monitoring Assessment System 2. Edumetrisis.

134.

McIntosh

Goodman

(2016). Integrating multi-tiered systems of support: Blending RTI and PBIS. Guilford Press.

135.

McNeish

(2018). Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 412–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000144

136.

McNeish

Stapleton

L. M.

Silverman

R. D.

(2017). On the unnecessary ubiquity of hierarchical linear modeling. Psychological Methods, 22(1), 114–140. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000078

137.

Merrell

K. W.

(1993). Using behavior rating scales to assess social skills and antisocial behavior in school settings: Development of the school social behavior scales. School psychology review, 22(1), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1993.12085641

138.

Merrell

K. W.

(2002). School Social Behavior Scales second edition. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.

139.

*Merrell

K. W.

Felver-Gant

J. C.

Tom

K. M.

(2011). Development and validation of a parent report measure for assessing social-emotional competencies of children and adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20(4), 529–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-010-9425-0

140.

*Mieloo

C. L.

Bevaart

Donker

M. C. H.

van Oort

F. V. A.

Raat

Jansen

(2014). Validation of the SDQ in a multi-ethnic population of young children. European Journal of Public Health, 24(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckt100

141.

Moulton

S. E.

Young

E. L.

(2021). An item analysis of gender differences on the SRSS-IE in middle school. Psychology in the Schools, 58(5), 789–803. https://doi.org/mjmp

142.

Munn

Peters

M. D. J.

Stern

Tufanaru

McArthur

Aromataris

(2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x

143.

Murano

Sawyer

J. E.

Lipnevich

A. A.

(2020). A meta-analytic review of preschool social and emotional learning interventions. Review of Educational Research, 90(2), 227–263. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320914743

144.

Muyskens

Marston

Reschly

A.L.

(2007) The use of response to intervention practices for behavior: An examination of the validity of a screening instrument. The California School Psychologist 12, 31–45 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340930

145.

Naglieri

J. A.

LeBuffe

P. A.

Shapiro

V. B.

(2011). Devereux Student Strengths Assessment-mini (DESSA-mini). Aperture Education.

146.

*Naser

Brown

Verlenden

(2018). The utility of universal screening to guide school-based prevention initiatives: Comparison of office discipline referrals to standardized emotional and behavioral risk screening. Contemporary School Psychology, 22(4), 424–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-018-0173-2

147.

*Naser

Hitti

Overstreet

(2018). The behavioral and emotional screening system student form: Is there evidence of a global at-risk factor in a sample of predominantly African American youth? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 36(5), 446–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916686015

148.

National Center on Intensive Intervention (NCII). (2022). Behavior screening tools chart rating rubric. https://intensiveintervention.org/sites/default/files/call-tools/b-assessment/bs_rating_rubric_2022.pdf

149.

Oakes

W. P.

Buckman

M. M.

Lane

K. L.

Sherod

R. L.

(2021). Selecting a universal behavior screening tool: Questions to consider. Center on PBIS, University of Oregon. https://www.pbis.org/resource/selecting-a-universal-behavior-screening-tool-questions-to-consider

150.

Oakes

W. P.

Lane

K. L.

Cantwell

E. D.

Royer

D. J.

(2017). Systematic screening for behavior in K–12 settings as regular school practice: Practical considerations and recommendations. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 33(4), 369–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2017.1345813

151.

*Oakes

W. P.

Lane

K. L.

Ennis

R. P.

(2016). Systematic screening at the elementary level: Considerations for exploring and installing universal behavior screening. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 32(3), 214–233. https://doi.org/mjmq

152.

Oakes

W. P.

Lane

K. L.

Sherod

R. L.

Pérez-Clark

(2022). Installing a universal behavior screening tool: Questions to consider. Center on PBIS, University of Oregon. https://www.pbis.org/resource/installing-a-universal-behavior-screening-tool-questions-to-consider

153.

Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, U.S. Department of Education. (2022). 44th Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. U.S. Department of Education. https://sites.ed.gov/idea/files/44th-arc-for-idea.pdf

154.

*Pagano

M. E.

Cassidy

L. J.

Little

Murphy

J. M.

Jellinek

A. M.

(2000). Identifying psychosocial dysfunction in school-age children: The pediatric symptom checklist as a self-report measure. Psychology in the Schools, 37(2), 91–106. https://doi.org/b7ksps

155.

Page

M. J.

McKenzie

J. E.

Bossuyt

P. M.

Boutron

Hoffmann

T. C.

Mulrow

C. D.

Shamseer

Tetzlaff

J. M.

Akl

E. A.

Brennan

S. E.

Chou

Glanville

Grimshaw

J. M.

Hróbjartsson

Lalu

M. M.

Loder

E. W.

Mayo-Wilson

McDonald

McGuinness

L. A.

(2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4

156.

Pianta

R. C.

(1990) Social Competence Scale. University of Virginia.

157.

*Pierce

C. D.

Lambert

Alamer

(2016). Convergent, criterion and social validity of the emotional and behavioral screener. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(1), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0206-7

158.

Putnam

S. P.

Rothbart

M. K.

(2006). Children’s Behavior Questionnaire--Very Short Form (CBQ-Very Short). APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t07623-000

159.

*Reinke

W. M.

Herman

K. C.

Huang

McCall

Holmes

Thompson

Owens

(2022). Examining the validity of the Early Identification System–Student Version for screening in an elementary school sample. Journal of School Psychology, 90, 114–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2021.10.001

160.

Renshaw

T. L.

(2015). A replication of the technical adequacy of the Student Subjective Wellbeing Questionnaire. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33, 757–768.

161.

*Renshaw

T. L.

(2019). Screening using the SDQ total difficulties scale: An analog test of three cutoff values. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 37(8), 1030–1036. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282918809808

162.

*Renshaw

T. L.

Cook

C. R.

(2018). Initial Development and Validation of the Youth Internalizing Problems Screener. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 36(4), 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916679757

163.

*Renshaw

T. L.

Cook

C. R.

(2019). Preliminary psychometrics of responses to the Youth Externalizing Problems Screener. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 37(8), 1016–1022. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282918809814

164.

Revelle

Condon

D. M.

(2019). Reliability from alpha to omega: A tutorial. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1395–1411. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000754

165.

Reynolds

C. R.

Richmond

B. O.

(2008). Revised Children’s Manifest Anxiety Scale–Second Edition (RCMAS-2). Western Psychological Services.

166.

Sabey

C. V.

Charlton

C. T.

Pyle

Lignugaris-Kraft

Ross

S. W.

(2017). A review of classwide or universal social, emotional, behavioral programs for students in kindergarten. Review of Educational Research, 87(3), 512–543. https://doi.org/gfgtr3

167.

*Schatschneider

Lane

K. L.

Oakes

W. P.

Kalberg

J. R.

(2014). The student risk screening scale: Exploring dimensionality and differential item functioning. Educational Assessment, 19(3), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2014.934608

168.

Schmiege

S. J.

Masyn

K. E.

Bryan

A. D.

(2017). Confirmatory latent class analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 21(4), 983–1001. https://doi.org/gcwbhp

169.

Schonour

D. Lane

K. L.

Oakes

W. P.

Sherod

R. L.

Buckman

M. M

. (2022). The whys and hows of screening: Frequently asked questions for families. Center on PBIS, University of Oregon. https://www.pbis.org/resource/the-whys-and-hows-of-screening-frequently-asked-questions-for-families

170.

*Sharma

Chheda

Piramal

Bhatia

Frazier

Singh

N. C.

(2022). The social and emotional learning and orientation scale - Development and validation of a brief measure in Hindi. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 40(5), 571–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829221075517

171.

Shojaei

Wazana

Pitrou

Kovess

(2008). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: Validation study in French school-aged children and cross-cultural comparisons. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 44(9), 740–747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-008-0489-8

172.

Sijtsma

Pfadt

J. M.

(2021). Part II: On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha: Discussing lower bounds and correlated errors. Psychometrika, 86(4), 843–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-021-09789-8

173.

Sinclair

Del’homme

Gonzalez

(1993). Systematic screening for preschool behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 18(3), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874299301800307

174.

*Splett

J. W.

Raborn

Lane

K. L.

Binney

A. J.

Chafouleas

S. M.

(2017). Factor analytic replication and model comparison of the BASC-2 Behavioral and Emotional Screening System. Psychological Assessment, 29(12), 1543–1549. https://doi.org/mjmt

175.

*Splett

J. W.

Smith-Millman

Raborn

Brann

K. L.

Flaspohler

P. D.

Maras

M. A.

(2018). Student, teacher, and classroom predictors of between-teacher variance of students’ teacher-rated behavior. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(3), 460–468. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000241

176.

Sugai

Horner

(2002). The evolution of discipline practices: School-wide positive behavior supports. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 24(1–2), 23–50. https://doi.org/10.1300/J019v24n01_03

177.

Treyvaud

(2014). Best practice when using the strengths and difficulties questionnaire with extremely preterm children: Are two informants better than one? Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 56(5), 413–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12448

178.

Tricco

A. C.

Lillie

Zarin

O'Brien

K. K.

Colquhoun

Levac

Moher

Peters

M. D.

Horsley

Weeks

Hempel

(2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

179.

*Vancraeyveldt

Verschueren

Wouters

Van Craeyevelt

Colpin

(2014). A multidimensional screening tool for preschoolers with externalizing behavior: Factor structure and factorial invariance. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32(8), 699–709. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282914539898

180.

*Vander Stoep

Mccauley

Thompson

K. A.

Herting

J. R.

Kuo

E. S.

Stewart

D. G.

Anderson

C. A.

Kushner

. (2005). Universal emotional health screening at the middle school transition. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 13(4), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266050130040301

181.

Volpe

R. J.

Fabiano

G. A.

(2013). Daily behavior report cards: An evidence-based system of assessment and intervention. Guilford Press.

182.

*Volpe

R. J.

Yeung

T. S.

Casale

Krull

Briesch

A. M.

Henneman

(2021). Evaluation of a German language school-based universal screening for student social, emotional, and behavioral risk. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 9(1), S10–S20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2020.1717699

183.

*von der Embse

N. P.

Kilgus

S. P.

Iaccarino

Levi-Nielsen

. (2017). Screening for student mental health risk: Diagnostic accuracy, measurement invariance, and predictive validity of the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener-Student Rating Scale (SAEBRS-SRS). School Mental Health, 9(3), 273–283. https://doi.org/gbwd23

184.

*von der Embse

N. P.

Pendergast

L. L.

Kilgus

S. P.

Eklund

K. R

. (2016). Evaluating the applied use of a mental health screener: Structural validity of the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener. Psychological Assessment, 28(10), 1265–1275. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000253

185.

Walker

H. M.

Forness

S. R.

Lane

K. L.

(2014). Design and management of scientific research in applied school settings. In Cook

Tankersley

Landrum

(Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 27, pp. 141–169). Emerald.

186.

Walker

H. M.

Severson

H. H.

(1992). Systematic screening for behavior disorders (SSBD). Sopris West.

187.

Walker

H. M.

Severson

H. H.

Feil

E. G.

(1995). Early screening project: A proven child-find process. Sopris West.

188.

Walrath

C. M.

Mandell

D. S.

Holden

E. W.

Santiago

R. L.

(2004). Assessing the strengths of children referred for community-based mental health services. Mental Health Services Research, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:mhsr.0000011252.84719.f2

189.

*Warmbold-Brann

Maras

M. A.

Splett

J. W.

Smith-Millman

Dinnen

Flaspohler

(2017). Examining the long-term stability of a strengths-based screener over 2 years. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 36(8), 767–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282917720564

190.

Whalen

D. J.

Sylvester

C. M.

Luby

J. L.

(2017). Depression and anxiety in preschoolers: A review of the past 7 years. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 26(3), 503–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2017.02.006

191.

Weist

M. D.

Eber

Horner

Splett

Putnam

Barrett

Perales

Fairchild

A. J.

Hoover

(2018). Improving multitiered systems of support for students with “internalizing” emotional/behavioral problems. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20(3), 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300717753832

192.

Weist

M. D.

Garbacz

Schultz

Bradshaw

C. P.

Lane

K. L.

(2023). Revisiting the percentage of K-12 students in need of preventative interventions in schools in a “peri-COVID” era: Implications for implementing tiered programming. Prevention Science, (3), 481–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-023-01618-x

193.

*Wiesner

Schanding

G. T.

(2013). Exploratory structural equation modeling, bifactor models, and standard confirmatory factor analysis models: Application to the BASC-2 Behavioral and Emotional Screening System Teacher Form. Journal of School Psychology, 51(6), 751–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.09.001

194.

Wright

D. B.

Cook

C. R.

(2014). Brief Externalizing and Internalizing Screener for Youth. Unpublished Instrument.

195.

Wolf

M. M.

(1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 203–14. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203

196.

*Xu

Wang

M. C.

Zhang

Liu

(2021). The Brief Problem Monitor (BPM-Y/BPM-P) among Chinese youth: Psychometric properties and measurement invariance. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 44(2), 496–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-021-09927-7

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.07 MB

Mapping the Research Base for Universal Behavior Screeners

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material