BovedaM.AnnammaS. A. (2023). Beyond making a statement: An intersectional framing of the power and possibilities of positioning. Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X231167149
6.
Council for Exceptional Children (CEC). (2020). Project 20/20: Creating a vision of diversity, equity, and inclusion in all of CEC. https://exceptionalchildren.org/project2020
7.
EspelandW.YungV. (2019). Ethical dimensions of quantification. Social Science Information, 58(2), 238–260.
8.
FordK. S.PattersonA. N. (2019). “Cosmetic diversity”: University websites and the transformation of race categories. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 12(2), 99–114.
9.
FrankenbergE. (2009). Splintering school districts: Understanding the link between segregation and fragmentation. Law and Social Inquiry, 34(4), 869–909.
10.
GarciaN. M.MayorgaO. J. (2018). The threat of unexamined secondary data: A critical race transformative convergent mixed methods. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 231–252.
11.
GillbornD.WarmingtonP.DemackS. (2018). QuantCrit: education, policy, “Big Data” and principles for a critical race theory of statistics. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 158–179.
12.
GliedS. (2022). Presidential Address: Connecting the dots: Turning research evidence into evidence for policymaking. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 41, 676–682. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22394
13.
GordonE.W.RajagopalanK. (2016). The Gordon Commission and a vision for the future of assessment in education. In GordonE. W.RajagopalanK. (Eds.), The testing and learning revolution: The future of assessment in education (pp. 1–8). Springer.
14.
IvanovićL.HoY. S. (2019). Highly cited articles in the education and educational research category in the social science citation index: A bibliometric analysis. Educational Review, 71(3), 277–286.
15.
KirklandD. E. (2019). No small matters: Reimagining the use of research evidence from a racial justice perspective. William T. Grant Foundation.
16.
LópezF. (2022). Can educational psychology be harnessed to make changes for the greater good?Educational Psychologist, 57(2), 114–130.
17.
MasonS.MergaM. K.CanchéM. S. G.RoniS. M. (2021). The internationality of published higher education scholarship: How do the “top” journals compare?Journal of Informetrics, 15(2), 101155.
18.
MurphyP. K.DowdA. C.LloydG. M.ListA. (2020). Transparency in literature syntheses and editorial review: Introducing the Methodological Guidance Paper Series. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 3–5.
19.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2022). The future of education research at IES: Advancing an equity-oriented science. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26428
20.
PadillaA. M. (2003). The origins of the Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences: A personal memoir. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 25, 3–12.
21.
PigottT. D.PolaninJ. R. (2020). Methodological guidance paper: High-quality meta-analysis in a systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 24–46.
22.
RobertsS. O.Bareket-ShavitC.DollinsF. A.GoldieP. D.MortensonE. (2020). Racial inequality in psychological research: Trends of the past and recommendations for the future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(6), 1295–1309.
23.
StageF. K. (Ed.). (2007). Using quantitative data to answer critical questions. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2007(133).
24.
WilsonS. M.AnagnostopoulosD. (2021). Methodological guidance paper: The craft of conducting a qualitative review. Review of Educational Research, 00346543211012755.