According to the internal/external frame of reference model, academic achievement has a strong impact on people’s self-concept, both within and between subjects. We conducted a series of meta-analyses of k = 505 data sets containing the six bivariate correlations between achievement and self-concept in two subjects. Negative paths from achievement to noncorresponding self-concept, indicating dimensional comparison effects, were strongest when the subjects were dissimilar with regard to the math-verbal continuum, reduced but still significantly negative when both subjects belonged to the verbal domain, and near-zero when both subjects belonged to the math/science domain. Additionally, we found stronger positive paths from achievements to corresponding self-concepts, indicating social comparison effects, and stronger dimensional comparison effects for grades than for standardized test scores, and for older rather than younger students. We extend dimensional comparison theory by discussing these results with particular regard to the nonexistence of assimilation effects, the effects of subject similarity on dimensional comparison effects, and other moderators of dimensional comparison effects.
ArensA. K.BeckerM.MöllerJ. (2017). Social and dimensional comparisons in math and verbal test anxiety: Within- and cross-domain relations with achievement and the mediating role of academic self-concept. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.08.005
3.
ArensA. K.HelmF.WolffF.MöllerJ. (2020). Social and dimensional comparisons in the formation of German students’ language self-concepts. Journal of Experimental Education, 88(2), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2019.1635069
ArensA. K.MöllerJ.WatermannR. (2016). Extending the internal/external frame of reference model to social studies: Self-concept and achievement in history and politics. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.044
6.
BeckerB. J.WuM. J. (2007). The synthesis of regression slopes in meta-analysis. Statistical Science, 22(3), 414–429. https://doi.org/10.1214/07-STS243
7.
BokerS. M.NealeM. C.MaesH. H.WildeM. J.SpiegelM.BrickT. R.EstabrookR.BatesT. C.MehtaP.von OertzenT.GoreR. J.HunterM. D.HackettD. C.KarchJ.BrandmaierA.PritikinJ. N.ZaheryM.KirkpatrickR. M. (2017). OpenMx 2.8.3 user guide. https://openmx.ssri.psu.edu/docs/OpenMx/2.8.3/OpenMxUserGuide.pdf
8.
BrunnerM.KellerU.DierendonckC.ReichertM.UgenS.FischbachA.MartinR. (2010). The structure of academic self-concepts revisited: The nested Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 964–981. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019644
9.
ChanalJ. P.SarrazinP. G.GuayF.BoichéJ. (2009). Verbal, mathematics, and physical education self-concepts and achievements: An extension and test of the Internal/External Frame of Reference Model. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(1), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.06.008
CheungM. W.-L. (2019a). A guide to conducting a meta-analysis with non-independent effect sizes. Neuropsychology Review, 29(4), 387–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-019-09415-6
ChiuM.-S. (2008). Achievements and self-concepts in a comparison of math and science: Exploring the internal/external frame of reference model across 28 countries. Educational Research and Evaluation, 14(3), 135–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610802048858
14.
ChiuM.-S. (2012). The internal/external frame of reference model, big-fish-little-pond effect, and combined model for mathematics and science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025734
DaiD. Y. (2002). Incorporating parent perceptions: A replication and extension study of the internal-external frame of reference model of self-concept development. Journal of Adolescent Research, 17(6), 617–645. https://doi.org/10.1177/074355802237467
17.
DickhäuserO. (2003). Überprüfung des erweiterten Modells des internal/external frame of reference [Test of the extension of the internal/external frame of reference model]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 35(4), 200–207. https://doi.org/10.1026//0049-8637.35.4.200
18.
EcclesJ. S.O’NeillS. A.WigfieldA. (2005). Ability self-perceptions and subjective task values in adolescents and children. In MooreK. A.LippmanL. H. (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? (pp. 237–249). Springer.
19.
EhmJ.-H.LindbergS.HasselhornM. (2014). Reading, writing, and math self-concept in elementary school children: Influence of dimensional comparison processes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29(2), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-013-0198-x
GaspardH.WigfieldA.JiangY.NagengastB.TrautweinU.MarshH. W. (2018). Dimensional comparisons: How academic track students’ achievements are related to their expectancy and value beliefs across multiple domains. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 52, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.10.003
22.
GasparriniA.ArmstrongB.KenwardM. G. (2012). Multivariate meta-analysis for non-linear and other multi-parameter associations. Statistics in Medicine, 31(29), 3821–3839. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5471
23.
GebauerS. K.ZaunbauerA. C.MöllerJ. (2013). Cross-language transfer in English immersion programs in Germany: Reading comprehension and reading fluency. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.09.002
24.
GerberJ. P.WheelerL.SulsJ. (2018). A social comparison theory meta-analysis 60+ years on. Psychological Bulletin, 144(2), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000127
25.
GötzT.FrenzelC. A.HallN. C.PekrunR. (2008). Antecedents of academic emotions: Testing the internal/external frame of reference model for academic enjoyment. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(1), 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.12.002
26.
HaagL.GötzT. (2012). Mathe ist schwierig und Deutsch aktuell: Vergleichende Studie zur Charakterisierung von Schulfächern aus Schülersicht [Math is difficult and German up to date: A study on the characterization of subject domains from the student’s perspective]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 59(1), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.2378/peu2012.art03d
27.
HansfordB. C.HattieJ. A. (1982). The relationship between self and achievement/performance measures. Review of Educational Research, 52(1), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543052001123
28.
HelmF.AbeleA. E.Müller-KalthoffH.MöllerJ. (2017). Applying dimensional comparison theory to the fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Agency and communion. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.01.011
29.
HelmF.MöllerJ. (2017). Der Einfluss von Erhebungsbedingungen auf Kontrasteffekte dimensionaler Vergleiche [The influence of manner of assessment on contrastive effects of dimensional comparisons]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 64(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.2378/peu2017.art03d
30.
HelmF.Müller-KalthoffH.MukowskiR.MöllerJ. (2018). Teacher judgment accuracy regarding students’ self-concepts: Affected by social and dimensional comparisons?Learning and Instruction, 55, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.02.002
HigginsJ. P. T.ThompsonS. G.DeeksJ. J.AltmanD. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysis. British Medical Journal, 327(7414), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
33.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Sage.
34.
JansenM.SchroedersU.LüdtkeO.MarshH. W. (2015). Contrast and assimilation effects of dimensional comparisons in five subjects: An extension of the I/E model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4), 1086–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000021
35.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Sage.
36.
LohbeckA.MöllerJ. (2017). Social and dimensional comparison effects on math and reading self-concepts of elementary school children. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.01.013
37.
LüdtkeO.KöllerO.ArteltP.StanatC.BaumertJ. (2002). Eine Überprüfung von Modellen zur Genese akademischer Selbstkonzepte: Ergebnisse aus der PISAStudie [Testing models on the genesis of academic self-concepts: Findings of the PISA Study]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 16(3/4), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1024//1010-0652.16.34.151
38.
MarshH. W. (1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23(1), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312023001129
39.
MarshH. W. (1990a). Influences of internal and external frames of reference on the formation of math and English self-concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.107
40.
MarshH. W. (1990b). A multidimensional, hierarchical model of self-concept: Theoretical and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review, 2(2), 77–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01322177
41.
MarshH. W.AbduljabbarA. S.ParkerP. D.MorinA. J.AbdelfattahF.NagengastB.MöllerJ.Abu-HilalM. M. (2015). The internal/external frame of reference model of self-concept and achievement relations: Age-cohort and cross-cultural differences. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 168–202. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214549453
42.
MarshH. W.AyotteV. (2003). Do multiple dimensions of self-concept become more differentiated with age? The differential distinctiveness hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 687–706. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.687
43.
MarshH. W.HauK.-T. (2004). Explaining paradoxical relations between academic self-concepts and achievements: Cross-cultural generalizability of the internal/external frame of reference predictions across 26 countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.56
44.
MarshH. W.KöllerO. (2004). Unification of theoretical models of academic self-concept/achievement relations: Reunification of East and West German schools after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(3), 264–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(03)00034-1
45.
MarshH. W.KuyperH.SeatonM.ParkerP. D.MorinA. J. S.MöllerJ.AbduljabbarA. S. (2014). Dimensional comparison theory: An extension of the internal/external frame of reference effect on academic self-concept formation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(4), 326–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.08.003
46.
MarshH. W.LüdtkeO.NagengastB.TrautweinU.AbduljabbarA. S.AbdelfattahF.JansenM. (2015). Dimensional comparison theory: Paradoxical relations between self-beliefs and achievements in multiple domains. Learning and Instruction, 35, 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.08.005
47.
MarshH. W.YeungA. S. (2001). An extension of the internal/external frame of reference model: A response to Bong (1998). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(3), 389–420. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906389-420
48.
MöllerJ.HelmF.Müller-KalthoffH.NagyN.MarshH. W. (2015). Dimensional comparisons and their consequences for self-concept, motivation, and emotion. In WrightJ. D. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 430–436). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26092-3
MöllerJ.KöllerO. (2001a). Dimensional comparisons: An experimental approach to the internal/external frame of reference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(4), 826–835. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.4.826
51.
MöllerJ.KöllerO. (2001b). Frame of reference effects following the announcement of exam results. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(2), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2000.1055
52.
MöllerJ.KuskaS. K.ZaunbauerA. C. M. (2011). Internale und externale Bezugsrahmen in der Grundschule. [Internal and external frames of reference in primary school]. In HellmichF. (Ed.), Selbstkonzepte im Grundschulalter – Modelle, empirische Ergebnisse, pädagogische Konsequenzen. Kohlhammer.
MöllerJ.Müller-KalthoffH.HelmF.NagyN.MarshH. W. (2016). The generalized internal/external frame of reference model: An extension to dimensional comparison theory. Frontline Learning Research, 49(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v4i2.169
55.
MöllerJ.PohlmannB.KöllerO.MarshH. W. (2009). A meta-analytic path analysis of the internal/external frame of reference model of academic achievement and academic self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1129–1167. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309337522
56.
MöllerJ.RetelsdorfJ.KöllerO.MarshH. W. (2011). The reciprocal internal/external frame of reference model: An integration of models of relations between academic achievement and self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 48(6), 1315–1346. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211419649
57.
MöllerJ.SavyonK. (2003). Not very smart thus moral: Dimensional comparisons between academic self-concept and honesty. Social Psychology of Education, 6(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023247910033
58.
MöllerJ.StreblowL.PohlmannB. (2006). The belief in a negative interdependence of math and verbal abilities as determinant of academic self-concepts. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X37451
59.
MöllerJ.StreblowL.PohlmannB. (2009). Achievement and self-concept of students with learning disabilities. Social Psychology of Education, 12(1), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-008-9065-z
60.
MöllerJ.StreblowL.PohlmannB.KöllerO. (2006). An extension to the internal/external frame of reference model to two verbal and numerical domains. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21(4), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173515
61.
MöllerJ.ZimmermannF.KöllerO. (2014). The reciprocal internal/external frame of reference model using grades and test scores. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12047
62.
MuiF. L.YeungA. S.LowR.JinP. (2000). Academic self-concept of talented students: Factor structure and applicability of the internal/external frame of reference model. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23(3), 343–367.
63.
Müller-KalthoffH.HelmF.MöllerJ. (2017). The big three of comparative judgment: On the effects of social, temporal, and dimensional comparisons on academic self-concept. Social Psychology of Education, 20(4), 849–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9395-9
64.
Müller-KalthoffH.JansenM.SchieferI. M.HelmF.NagyN.MöllerJ. (2017). A double-edged sword? On the benefit, detriment, and net effect of dimensional comparison on self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(7), 1029–1047. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000171
65.
NagyG.TrautweinU.BaumertJ.KöllerO.GarrettJ. (2006). Gender and course selection in upper secondary education: Effects of academic self-concept and intrinsic value. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610600765687
66.
NiepelC.BrunnerM.PreckelF. (2014). The longitudinal interplay of students’ academic self-concepts and achievements within and across domains: Replicating and extending the reciprocal internal/external frame of reference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 1170–1191. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036307
67.
O’MaraA. J.MarshH. W.CravenR. G.DebusR. (2006). Do self-concept interventions make a difference? A synergetic blend of construct validation and meta-analysis. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 181–206. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4103_4
68.
OvertonR. C. (1998). A comparison of fixed-effects and mixed (random-effects) models for meta-analysis tests of moderator variable effects. Psychological Methods, 3(3), 354–379. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.3.354
69.
PaulickI.GroßschedlJ.HarmsU.MöllerJ. (2017). How teachers perceive their expertise: The role of dimensional and social comparisons. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.06.007
70.
PinxtenM.WoutersS.PreckelF.NiepelC.De FraineB.VerschuerenK. (2015). The formation of academic self-concept in elementary education: A unifying model for external and internal comparisons. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.12.003
71.
PluckerJ. A.StockingV. B. (2001). Looking outside and inside: Self-concept development of gifted adolescents. Exceptional Children, 67(4), 535–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290106700407
72.
PohlmannB.MöllerJ. (2009). On the benefits of dimensional comparisons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013151
73.
PohlmannB.MöllerJ.StreblowL. (2004). Zur Fremdeinschätzung von Schülerselbstkonzepten durch Lehrer und Mitschüler [On students’ self-concepts inferred by teachers and classmates]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 18(3/4), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652.18.34.157
74.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Sage.
75.
R Development Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org
76.
SchurtzI. M.PfostM.NagengastB.ArteltC. (2014). Impact of social and dimensional comparisons on student’s mathematical and English subject-interest at the beginning of secondary school. Learning and Instruction, 34, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.08.001
77.
SkaalvikE. M.ValasH. (1999). Relations among achievement, self-concept and motivation in mathematics and language arts: A longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Education, 67(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220979909598349
78.
SorgeS.KellerM.NeumannK.MöllerJ. (2019). Investigating the relationship between pre-service physics teachers’ professional knowledge, self-concept, and interest. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(7), 937–955. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21534
79.
StrickhouserJ. E.ZellE. (2015). Self-evaluative effects of dimensional and social comparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.03.001
80.
TrautweinU.MöllerJ. (2016). Self-concept: Determinants and consequences of academic self-concept in school contexts. In LipnevichA. A.PreckelF.RobertsR. D. (Eds.), Psychosocial skills and school systems in the 21st century: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 187–214). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28606-8_8
81.
Van ZandenB.MarshH. W.SeatonM.ParkerP. D.GuoJ.DuineveldJ. J. (2017). How well do parents know their adolescent children? Parent inferences of student self-concepts reflect dimensional comparison processes. Learning and Instruction, 47, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.09.002
82.
WigfieldA.EccesJ. S.MöllerJ. (in press). How dimensional comparisons help to understand linkages between expectancies, values, performance and choice. Educational Psychology Review.
83.
WilsonA. E.RossM. (2000). The frequency of temporal-self and social comparisons in people’s personal appraisals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 928–942. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.928
84.
WolffF.HelmF.JungeF.MöllerJ. (2020). Are dimensional comparisons performed unconsciously? An investigation of the internal/external frame of reference model using implicit self-concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(2), 397–415. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000375
85.
WolffF.HelmF.MöllerJ. (2018). Testing the dimensional comparison theory: When do students prefer dimensional comparisons to social and temporal comparisons?Social Psychology of Education, 21(4), 875–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-9441-2
86.
WolffF.HelmF.MöllerJ. (2019). Integrating the 2I/E model into dimensional comparison theory: Towards a comprehensive comparison theory of academic self-concept formation. Learning and Instruction, 62, 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.05.007
87.
WolffF.HelmF.PreckelF.MöllerJ. (2018). Dimensionale Vergleiche im Studium? Ein generalisiertes I/E-Modell zur Ausbildung fachbezogener Selbstkonzepte im Studium der Psychologie [Dimensional comparisons at university? A generalized I/E model for the formation of subject-specific self-concepts in the study of psychology]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 32(4), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000227
88.
WolffF.HelmF.ZimmermannF.NagyG.MöllerJ. (2018). On the effects of social, temporal, and dimensional comparisons on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(7), 1005–1025. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000248
89.
WolffF.NagyG.RetelsdorfJ.HelmF.KöllerO.MöllerJ. (2019). The 2I/E model: Integrating temporal comparisons into the internal/external frame of reference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(7), 1131–1161. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000319
90.
WolffF.NagyN.HelmF.MöllerJ. (2018). Testing the internal/external frame of reference model of academic achievement and academic self-concept with open self-concept reports. Learning and Instruction, 55, 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.006
91.
XuM. K.MarshH. W.HauK.-T.HoI. T.MorinA. J. S.AbduljabbarA. S. (2013). The internal/external frame of reference of academic self-concept: Extension to a foreign language and the role of language of instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031333
92.
YuanK.-H.ChanW. (2008). Structural equation modeling with near singular covariance matrices. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 52(10), 4842–4858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2008.03.030
93.
YuanK.-H.ChanW. (2016). Structural equation modeling with unknown population distributions: Ridge generalized least squares. Structural Equation Modeling, 23(2), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2015.1077335
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
